|
fabiola! (OP)
|
 |
December 05, 2014, 08:41:39 PM |
|
I just realised I have "minus 6 trust rating" on here yet I've done nothing wrong, never asked for a loan or scammed anyone, never been involved in business transactions etc etc.
I don't intend on asking for loans in the future or anything so I guess my trust rating on here shouldn't matter to me, but it still bothers me that I have a low one when I've done nothing wrong. Moderators should be able to allow/disallow people to rate based on real facts, real scams, etc, otherwise what's the point of a trust rating that's not accurate and cannot be trusted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Brewins
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2014, 09:30:31 PM |
|
Mods don't moderate the trust system.
Search the meta forum to see some criticism about the truth system and about people complaining about the Vod's trust rates.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabiola! (OP)
|
|
December 05, 2014, 10:00:00 PM |
|
Mods don't moderate the trust system.
Search the meta forum to see some criticism about the truth system and about people complaining about the Vod's trust rates.
Cheers
Thanks, but Meta forum? Where? |
|
|
|
|
Arrogantx
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
“What can’t kill Bitcoin, makes it (us) stronger.”
|
|
December 05, 2014, 10:04:23 PM |
|
It clearly states next to your negative trust that you apparently lied about your ability to send pictures.
|
“It will be everywhere, and the world will have to readjust. World governments will have to readjust.”
1KbCRTGQc7oma5NN4taw9ELVhp5PhB149r |
|
|
sumantso
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2014, 10:56:12 PM |
|
Mods don't moderate the trust system.
Search the meta forum to see some criticism about the truth system and about people complaining about the Vod's trust rates.
Cheers
Thanks, but Meta forum? Where? Here only https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0Come over there, you will get a good laugh  |
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4653
|
|
December 05, 2014, 11:23:55 PM |
|
what's the point of a trust rating that's not accurate and cannot be trusted?
When used properly, the trust system works perfectly well and accomplishes its intended task. The fact that you haven't bothered learning how to properly use the trust system is not an indication that there is anything wrong with the trust system. It's just an indication that you (along with a significant number of users on this forum) are lazy, and unmotivated. |
|
|
|
|
|
fabiola! (OP)
|
|
December 05, 2014, 11:56:16 PM |
|
It clearly states next to your negative trust that you apparently lied about your ability to send pictures.
Because it was a misunderstanding, i said "sent pics" as a figure of speech. I sent links to pics, which is pretty much the same. I cleared that up later yet Vod still went and gave me a bad rating. Whatever. doesn't matter, I'm mainly here to read news about BFL refunds and a few more interesting things that pop up. I couldn't care less if a couple of idiots decide I'm untrustworthy based on nothing. |
|
|
|
|
Arrogantx
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
“What can’t kill Bitcoin, makes it (us) stronger.”
|
|
December 06, 2014, 12:48:22 AM |
|
Then good for you  |
“It will be everywhere, and the world will have to readjust. World governments will have to readjust.”
1KbCRTGQc7oma5NN4taw9ELVhp5PhB149r |
|
|
sl@ppy
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2014, 01:52:16 AM |
|
Any 'trust' system among strangers is beyond lame. But I doubt most see it that way since Linkedin is built on lying about people and it is fully accepted as a 'system that works'
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabiola! (OP)
|
|
December 06, 2014, 01:53:57 AM |
|
Any 'trust' system among strangers is beyond lame. But I doubt most see it that way since Linkedin is built on lying about people and it is fully accepted as a 'system that works'
That's a good point. |
|
|
|
|
kotwica666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1035
|
|
December 06, 2014, 03:14:55 AM |
|
example: you can trust me - Sr. Member. -$ 400 tomorrow someone will rob you.. conclusion: don't trust anyone!
|
|
|
|
Babba D
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
yes my email is 49kasimk@gmail.com
|
|
December 06, 2014, 11:10:51 AM |
|
people dont even think once before giving -ve trust and people like Vod must be found and beaten up brutally !!!
|
|
|
|
|
LOBSTER
|
|
December 06, 2014, 11:19:14 AM |
|
My advice is to use Escrow (preferred Multi-Sig-Escrow; so that the Escrow can't steal your funds).
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabiola! (OP)
|
|
December 06, 2014, 03:27:37 PM |
|
people dont even think once before giving -ve trust and people like Vod must be found and beaten up brutally !!!
Violence doesn't solve anything though, never has never will. |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:37:47 PM |
|
there are some trust abuse, but remember that the trust system isn't used only for trading
|
|
|
|
|
notlist3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:50:59 PM |
|
there are some trust abuse, but remember that the trust system isn't used only for trading
I would agree if used right the trust is a good indicator. No it should not be only thing used for verifying a "good" trade. The system is not perfect but does have some positives. |
|
|
|
|
Candystripes
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
***THIS ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE***
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:27:14 PM |
|
I've also been given negative trust, and I've never scammed. Although I did do something wrong, it has nothing to do with my profile or my trust. Oh well, it's just a profile on a forum if you think about it.
|
---------------------------------
No longer under the possession of Candystripes.
Account is currently dormant.
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4653
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:38:11 PM |
|
I've also been given negative trust, and I've never scammed. Although I did do something wrong
- snip -
Trust has nothing to do with scamming, or transactions, or theft, or lying. Trust has to do with whether others believe that the person using that ID on this forum has acted in an ethical, moral, reliable, and otherwise "trustworthy" manner. If people believe that the things you have said or done are an indication that you are unethical, immoral, unreliable, or otherwise untrustworthy, then they will leave you negative trust with an explanation of why so that others can decide for themselves if they want to risk trusting you in any manner. |
|
|
|
|
jaberwock
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1073
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:28:54 PM |
|
I've also been given negative trust, and I've never scammed. Although I did do something wrong
- snip -
Trust has nothing to do with scamming, or transactions, or theft, or lying. Trust has to do with whether others believe that the person using that ID on this forum has acted in an ethical, moral, reliable, and otherwise "trustworthy" manner. If people believe that the things you have said or done are an indication that you are unethical, immoral, unreliable, or otherwise untrustworthy, then they will leave you negative trust with an explanation of why so that others can decide for themselves if they want to risk trusting you in any manner. The trust stuff says: Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer. Negative trust is for scammers or potential scammers. Not about how good or bad people is. Seems there are different interpretations about what the trust is |
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4653
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:57:09 PM |
|
Seems there are different interpretations about what the trust is
Correct. Fortunately, the trust system has a method to deal with this. You get to choose whose feedback matters to you. If you don't like the way that I assign trust values, then don't include me in your trust network. If you like the way that jaberwock assigns trust values, then include him in your trust network. When used properly, you choose the people whose feedback you value and trust. Then the "score" that you see is based on the value assigned by the people whose feedback you value. |
|
|
|
|
|
