Intermatic (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2014, 12:20:03 PM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
|
|
|
|
botany
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
|
|
December 06, 2014, 12:23:59 PM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
You would have to issue physical bitcoins backed by a reserve. This is the only way to have bitcoins used for day to day transactions. I think only a country with large surplus and substantial assets would be able to do this. They can protect their citizens from volatility to a certain extent.
|
|
|
|
toleng
|
|
December 06, 2014, 07:52:57 PM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
You would have to issue physical bitcoins backed by a reserve. This is the only way to have bitcoins used for day to day transactions. With respect, I'd have to decree this statement to be nothing other than Hogwash. Jking.. Just wanted to use the word hogwash Why would they need to use physical coins? And why would the coins need to be backed by a reserve? wouldn't that turn a decentralized currency into one that is bastardized just like the USD? digital is the way forward friend. lets not take 10 steps backwards into the darkages here I think only a country with large surplus and substantial assets would be able to do this. They can protect their citizens from volatility to a certain extent.
If an entire nation were to adopt bitcoin, then so much money would flow into bitcoin that you wouldn't know what to do. This alone will stabilize the currency. With respect, the citizens don't need to be "protected" by anyone. That is some defect that has been implanted into your mind by your western government. We don't need protection sir
|
|
|
|
hua_hui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 07, 2014, 12:31:37 AM |
|
When the cryptocurrency system is robust and extensive, ppl recognize the benefits by adopting it and the merchants tend to price their provided goods and service in bitcoin, it is the time the price of bitcoin will stable without consideration the inflation factor of fiat.
|
|
|
|
lihuajkl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 12:44:16 AM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
You would have to issue physical bitcoins backed by a reserve. This is the only way to have bitcoins used for day to day transactions. I think only a country with large surplus and substantial assets would be able to do this. They can protect their citizens from volatility to a certain extent. I don't think any country would do this by dumping their own fiat currency, which means they lose the authority of issuing cash and a method to adjusting the economy(print as many cash as they like to get rid of debt or enrich themselves). The reason is that the production of bitcoin is scheduled and the issued number of it is fixed, no any third party can control it.
|
|
|
|
RedhatCAT
|
|
December 07, 2014, 04:38:14 AM |
|
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
Cryptocurrencies will not replace fiat until they are no longer unstable. This kind of volatility is not able to be addressed economically
|
|
|
|
bornil267645
|
|
December 07, 2014, 05:24:23 AM |
|
It has to be Bitcoin. The world would have been so much better.
|
|
|
|
Q7
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:47:52 AM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
Technically I don't how that could be made possible. currency of a nation is tied up to the state of economy, natural resources, political stability and things like that. if based on crypto concept where everyone could mine and own a portion or a share of a country, what would that mean? If a country is at civil war or experiencing trade deficit or in a state whereby the natural resources have completely depleted, would that value get reflected in the crypto coin??? Certain concept of distribution has to be worked out but definitely not POW
|
|
|
|
HeroCat
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:06:29 AM |
|
I do not think that cryptocurrency can replace national currency, because many people like to buy with cash, and they will not accept any other more developed way, like crypto. Look what is going with credit cards - not all people are using them.
|
|
|
|
ikydesu
|
|
December 07, 2014, 10:08:56 AM |
|
I do not think that cryptocurrency can replace national currency, because many people like to buy with cash, and they will not accept any other more developed way, like crypto. Look what is going with credit cards - not all people are using them.
Yes you're right, and not all people understand about digital money/ crypto currency , especially when their money is stolen or scammed, sure they are very panic
|
|
|
|
shawshankinmate37927
|
|
December 07, 2014, 11:18:03 PM |
|
I do not think that cryptocurrency can replace national currency, because many people like to buy with cash, and they will not accept any other more developed way, like crypto. Look what is going with credit cards - not all people are using them.
Bank notes used to be "backed" by (redeemable for) gold or silver. Technically speaking, there's no reason why bank notes can't be "backed" by BTC.
|
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
|
|
|
worle1bm
|
|
December 08, 2014, 04:06:13 AM |
|
It would have to be physical, and fiat. So it really makes no sense to do so.
|
|
|
|
grappa_barricata
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
|
|
December 08, 2014, 04:32:18 AM |
|
nation-states uses their currency as a tool for economic engineering, why even consider relinquish this? they'll never do it voluntarily
|
Fortune cannot take away what she has not given.
|
|
|
botany
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
|
|
December 08, 2014, 08:35:26 AM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
You would have to issue physical bitcoins backed by a reserve. This is the only way to have bitcoins used for day to day transactions. With respect, I'd have to decree this statement to be nothing other than Hogwash. Jking.. Just wanted to use the word hogwash Why would they need to use physical coins? And why would the coins need to be backed by a reserve? wouldn't that turn a decentralized currency into one that is bastardized just like the USD? digital is the way forward friend. lets not take 10 steps backwards into the darkages here I think only a country with large surplus and substantial assets would be able to do this. They can protect their citizens from volatility to a certain extent.
Well, you should try buying a hotdog off a vendor of the street without physical coins and see. Then you would get an idea. If it is backed by a reserve of bitcoins, then you know that all the government can't issue physical coins at will and that there is some control on inflation.
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
December 08, 2014, 08:50:39 AM |
|
It would likely be incremental.
A city in Australia is starting to accept Bitcoin as payment for city services.
It would likely happen like that. The city starts accepting it. Then set a phase in time of when they would fully use bitcoins.
They would need to use multi-sig keys for spending in the way that their bank account might require city officials to approve something before the treasurer goes ahead with the transaction.
|
First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders Of course we accept bitcoin.
|
|
|
sandykho47
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Knowledge its everything
|
|
December 08, 2014, 09:01:28 AM |
|
I think it's too soon cryptocurrency to replace fiat national currency.
There are very very long ways before that happen. The government have a very much reason to decline bitcoin as national currency.
|
Kemampuanku Tidak semua orang memiliki dan dapat melakukannya . Tidak memakan kaum sendiri . dan mempunyai kode etik yang tidak masuk akal.
|
|
|
master5
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2014, 06:01:14 PM |
|
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed?
I don't agree. BTC price is stable enough last few months.
|
|
|
|
Sefton
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
December 08, 2014, 06:29:53 PM |
|
...what changes would need to be made?
Cryptocurrencies are terribly unstable and volatile, how would this be addressed? What other barriers may need addressing?
You would have to issue physical bitcoins backed by a reserve. This is the only way to have bitcoins used for day to day transactions. Why would you? You can make physical bitcoins or paper wallets ie notes yourself.
|
|
|
|
rogerdonkey
|
|
December 09, 2014, 05:16:58 AM |
|
i think it's hard cryptocurrency replace a fiat national currency...
|
|
|
|
NUFCrichard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 09, 2014, 04:32:56 PM |
|
BBC suggested that Zimbabwe could use their awful currency situation to try out crypto. Apparently they now use the USD, but as it is only physical money, it is getting so heavily used that it is literally falling to bits..
I would love if somewhere decided to 'go for it' and use bitcoin, but I think it would be a difficult thing to do.
|
|
|
|
|