Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 06:40:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: .  (Read 2912 times)
BurtW (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
⇾ .
June 19, 2012, 01:31:02 PM
Last edit: November 08, 2012, 01:55:28 AM by BurtW
 #1

.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
brendio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 19, 2012, 01:46:27 PM
 #2

Plus it seems 100 share lots have been distributed to random accounts. I'm not sure if there are from the issuer. I think it's the first example of asset spam, that is, GLBSE being spammed with worthless assets.

Nefario
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 513


GLBSE Support support@glbse.com


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2012, 02:05:24 PM
 #3

These ARE from the issuers account, I'm not sure why they've been transfered, they were sent to a number accounts that were asset issuers.

PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C

To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
PsychoticBoy
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1010


Parental Advisory Explicit Content


View Profile
June 19, 2012, 02:21:33 PM
 #4

They are.
You can see the issuer by "Mail Security Issuer"

Greetz
Nefario
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 513


GLBSE Support support@glbse.com


View Profile WWW
June 19, 2012, 02:37:16 PM
 #5

How are they getting the usernames in order to transfer the assets?  I did not think usernames were public anywhere.

If you have created an asset it lists your username on the asset page, but all the username can be used for is to transfer assets to their account.

PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C

To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
June 19, 2012, 03:09:34 PM
 #6

Christmas came early this year.

+1
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227


Away on an extended break


View Profile
June 19, 2012, 03:24:57 PM
 #7

Christmas came early this year.

+1
Noo, where's my Christmas gift!  Wink
bitfoo
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 289
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 19, 2012, 10:14:17 PM
 #8

He clearly made an IMPACT on people.

Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2012, 01:40:27 AM
 #9

Expensive spam....

sunnankar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 20, 2012, 04:37:40 AM
 #10

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

cytokine
Donator
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 20, 2012, 04:42:01 AM
 #11

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4914
Merit: 4849


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2012, 04:43:41 AM
 #12

I only got 100.  This is an outrage!   Angry

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 20, 2012, 04:44:52 AM
 #13

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
cytokine
Donator
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 20, 2012, 04:46:59 AM
 #14

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

How did the hacker get in to the account?
Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 20, 2012, 04:49:04 AM
 #15

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

How did the hacker get in to the account?

He hasn't shared or found out yet :/

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
cytokine
Donator
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 20, 2012, 04:52:07 AM
 #16

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

How did the hacker get in to the account?

He hasn't shared or found out yet :/

Hmm... methinks I should set up Two Factor Auth ASAP...
stochastic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 20, 2012, 04:57:45 AM
 #17

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

I just sent mine back.  I also got an email from some guy asking how to use GLBSE that seemed suspicious.  I just forwarded that to GLBSE support.

Introducing constraints to the economy only serves to limit what can be economical.
Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 20, 2012, 05:05:30 AM
 #18

Hmm... methinks I should set up Two Factor Auth ASAP...

Indeed. And thanks for sending those back to him, stochastic.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
GeoRW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 257


Trust No One


View Profile
June 20, 2012, 05:14:57 AM
 #19

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

How did the hacker get in to the account?

He hasn't shared or found out yet :/

Hmm... methinks I should set up Two Factor Auth ASAP...

2-factor auth is a must, set at least for withdrawals and password change
Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 20, 2012, 05:17:58 AM
 #20

Expensive spam....

Until issuer accounts get hacked. Usernames should not be public. Should be an alias.

I agree. The GLBSE would be a gold-mine for a hacker. They'd have to liquidate shares quickly though and withdraw BTC, so a hack event would probably appear as a market crash.

That already happened with TheSeven's account which had a good number of Cognitive shares. It was traded down to something like 0.0000002. I can't believe the hacker didn't even have the heart to save him a few shares... but then again, if you're stealing in the first place...

How did the hacker get in to the account?

He hasn't shared or found out yet :/

Hmm... methinks I should set up Two Factor Auth ASAP...

2-factor auth is a must, set at least for withdrawals and password change

I'd set it up for everything, so they can't even get in and sell everything only to realize they can't withdraw.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!