DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
 |
December 07, 2014, 01:10:33 AM |
|
How would you prefer to log in at your mining pool's website?
Please take part in the poll above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023
Mine at Jonny's Pool
|
|
December 07, 2014, 01:27:04 AM |
|
I run my own p2pool node, so there is no need for a login. However, if I were to run a more conventional pool, I would certainly want to have a username/password in conjunction with 2fa.
|
Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow! Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets! No SPV cheats. No empty blocks.
|
|
|
aurel57
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 01:57:29 AM |
|
ID/Password with Second factor with a text code sent to my cell phone.
|
|
|
|
|
o_solo_miner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2440
Merit: 1474
-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-
|
|
December 07, 2014, 10:58:16 AM |
|
Payoutadress as Name & Password, i think. I don't get Facebook (never!) just for login. NB: Gummibären für immer ;-), und Schnecken natürlich.  |
from the creator of CGMiner http://solo.ckpool.org for Solominers paused: passthrough for solo.ckpool.org => stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334 |
|
|
marklyon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:16:28 PM |
|
Either two factor or Google auth.
I have a strong dislike of "just use your wallet address" pools - I trust it a bit more when I have an actual account.
|
|
|
|
|
swhity8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2014, 10:01:39 PM |
|
Google open id is the quickest. It saves me time logging in...I log-in multiple times per day. Email log-in would also be ok. I do use authy. Have you considered sqrl login technology? see below: https://www.grc.com/sqrl/sqrl.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
daddyfatsax
|
|
December 07, 2014, 11:06:24 PM |
|
I prefer using my payout address. 2FA with UN and PW is not a bad way, payout address just seems easier for everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Vantar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2014, 01:29:20 AM |
|
I like the open ID for most things due to it being fast and easy, however a password/txt msg code/ or some other thing would be good for the changing of settings/sending payments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
daddyfatsax
|
|
December 08, 2014, 02:47:34 AM |
|
How would you prefer to log in at your mining pool's website?
Please take part in the poll above.
Better question. As someone who runs a pool, and has done a damn good job doing so, which do you prefer? |
|
|
|
|
|
no141
|
|
December 08, 2014, 03:17:31 AM |
|
The OpenID Connect, just seems to be Google+, I still don't like Google+.
|
|
|
|
|
yenzae0215
|
|
December 08, 2014, 03:57:03 AM |
|
i prefer my payout address + phone authentication  |
Banned**
|
|
|
|
avw1982
|
|
December 08, 2014, 11:36:51 AM |
|
Username+Password+2 way factor google authenticator
|
|
|
|
|
|
PatMan
|
|
December 08, 2014, 05:57:29 PM |
|
Can't believe FB is listed as an option.....that's a joke right?  |
|
|
|
bcm2013
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2014, 04:06:50 AM |
|
I prefer OpenID with Google. I have Google set up to provide an SMS 2FA, if I am logging in from s new device. This is quite convenient as I log in on multiple devices (iPhone, iPad and desktop) multiple times per day. All of my devices are heavily secured as well.
|
|
|
|
|
HerbPean
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 09, 2014, 06:20:22 PM |
|
Voted for the OPENID, but i'm all good with login/pass + second factor (SMS) Thanks Doc !  |
|
|
|
|
|
Flashman
|
|
December 10, 2014, 01:21:10 PM |
|
user/pass and CHOICE of second factor, google auth, SMS etc.
Google authentication is an algorithm btw and has been independently implemented, no need to trust google. You can pick up an old windows mobile device for $10 or less, put auth software on it, use it as entirely offline hardware key, etc.
|
TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6
Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins. |
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
December 10, 2014, 05:00:18 PM |
|
I had forgotten about this. It looks very interesting and much more secure than other 2FA solutions. But are there mobile apps implementing this? Are any sites using it? Are people willing to scan a QR code every time they need to log in? The problem with many other 2FA solutions: Most 2FA solutions give you a one-time password on a separate device that you then type into your computer. There is a belief by a lot of users that this makes hacking impossible. Let's review this. In many cases if you get hacked it's because someone (through a trojan or other malware) took over control of your computer. They are now looking at you through your camera, listening to you through your microphone, taking screenshots of your desktop to see what you are doing.. and they are recording every keystroke you make. When you type your one-time passwords into a compromised computer like this, you are essentially giving them to the hacker. I wish more people would accept that.. - A one-time password/code typed into a compromised computer won't save you
- A compromised computer can become yours again, but you need to reformat your drive and reinstall the operating system from a clean source
Although if the hacker installed malware on the firmware of your laptop battery then you may wish to just burn the computer. |
|
|
|
|
mavericklm
|
|
December 10, 2014, 05:59:48 PM |
|
bitcoin wallet! facebook? google? are u grazy!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
TomVelvetPaws
|
|
December 12, 2014, 02:35:31 AM |
|
user name + password
|
◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ ☠ CRAVE ☠ Embrace the privacy movement ☠ ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ Your Market. Your Blockchain Business. Your Profit. ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ |
|
|
AaronS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2014, 07:41:21 AM |
|
I prefer the convenience of Google login. I set the payout threshold such that it wouldn't be that big a deal even if it was hacked so it's sufficiently secure for me as is.
I do not like the payout address as user method as without an actual account it doesn't feel like I belong to anything. It would also make perks very difficult to implement.
Aaron
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
