Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 04:28:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Time?  (Read 1062 times)
benjamindees (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 19, 2011, 01:19:29 AM
 #1

How important is it that the time on my mining rig be accurate?  If it's off by a few minutes, would that affect anything like number of rejected blocks for instance?

Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
1bitc0inplz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 19, 2011, 01:22:09 AM
 #2

How important is it that the time on my mining rig be accurate?  If it's off by a few minutes, would that affect anything like number of rejected blocks for instance?

nope. you should be good.

Mine @ http://pool.bitp.it - No fees, virtually 0 stales, what's not to love!
Chat with us @ #bitp.it on irc.freenode.net
Learn more about our pool @ http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026



View Profile
May 19, 2011, 01:42:08 AM
 #3

The spec says that a node should refuse a block if the timestamp is more than 2 hours into the future.  If the timestamp is too far into the past, I'm guessing that most nodes will also reject it (since it would appear to be older than a block already accepted as valid).

Which brings me to an interesting question.  Why the hell isn't accurate NTP timekeeping required of nodes?  If your clock is even 5 minutes into the future, you don't belong on the internet, much less participating in a distributed cryptocurrency.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
1bitc0inplz
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 19, 2011, 01:47:44 AM
 #4

The spec says that a node should refuse a block if the timestamp is more than 2 hours into the future.  If the timestamp is too far into the past, I'm guessing that most nodes will also reject it (since it would appear to be older than a block already accepted as valid).

That would be true if he is mining solo.

If he is part of a pool, I do not believe it is required as the pool is generating the timestamps he would be hashing.

Mine @ http://pool.bitp.it - No fees, virtually 0 stales, what's not to love!
Chat with us @ #bitp.it on irc.freenode.net
Learn more about our pool @ http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.0
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026



View Profile
May 19, 2011, 02:01:51 AM
 #5

That would be true if he is mining solo.

If he is part of a pool, I do not believe it is required as the pool is generating the timestamps he would be hashing.

Ahh, good point.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!