Which is your strategy on dice sites?

[rayhan]

How crazy you are ?
I heard they rigged their game

But, i'm sure you will lose your money soon

many people say like that. but it still one of my favorites site when I was playing dice
as your guess... already lost all my bitcoin in local exchange .. lol i sold them

[1715284506]

1715284506

[freeyourmind]

i'm sure you will lose your money soon

already lost all my bitcoin

That was hilarious.  Did you have a certain goal of winnings before quitting?

[shulio]

I think all method we use is the same, whatever chance of winning that we use will ended in lost if we can not stop playing when we win a lot

We very hardly ever win a lot to begin with so when we do it is essential we leave with the profit but so many can't leave because they don't know how much they can possibly win so they keep going thinking they will keep on winning, then they lose and lose then they chase it is a horrible cycle if you have no self control over what you are doing, the majority don't.

In all gamble, the main issue will be self control and greed, because people will always want to gain more and more, actually if people bet 1 btc at the chance of 98 % and gain 0.01+ in 1 bet  and cash them out immediately, repeat the this process daily for profit, that will be a good selfcontrol, although there are still chance to lose in 1 bet of 98% chance

[rayhan]

i'm sure you will lose your money soon

already lost all my bitcoin

That was hilarious.  Did you have a certain goal of winnings before quitting?

there should be .. but for now I'm doing the best that I can do ..
yeah about that much that I get and I sell 

[vennali]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

[Twipple]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

I don't think casinos allow you to make 0 value bets, and even if they do they slow down the betting speed, specially for that purpose. So if you say you get one streak like in a million then you might just consume that much in electricity to make a million bets.

Unless you can bet like 1000 BTC to cover it up. But even then you might just lose it all.

[zcxvbs]

I have no strategy, I would rather say it's about luck, so I always bet at 50% with a small amount, lose or win, simple.

[shanem]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

This method takes too long and they would be instances when you would lose more than 15 times in a row.
Your capital would still be wiped out.

[98problems]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

in my opinion its better to use martingale in such situation than betting all in after a few lossess

[Enzyme]

A strategy that seems to work for me is:

1% Odds
0.5% of Inventory per Roll

100 rolls without win = x2
Recalculate and revert to 0.5% afterwards.

[adaseb]

A strategy that seems to work for me is:

1% Odds
0.5% of Inventory per Roll

100 rolls without win = x2
Recalculate and revert to 0.5% afterwards.

But according to this if you roll 200 times without a win, which is pretty possible you end up with a 0% bankroll if you bet 0.5%. You can bet less but it would take forever and a lot of luck to actually win something.

[Shogen]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

in my opinion its better to use martingale in such situation than betting all in after a few lossess

The rolls are independent to each other, so the previous rolls should not affect the future rolls. Given the fact that you have 7 losses now, the chance of having another loss is the same as ever.

[sherbyspark]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

This method takes too long and they would be instances when you would lose more than 15 times in a row.
Your capital would still be wiped out.

I doubt I have ever heard of 15 losses at 90%. Max I have heard is 7. But casinos won't allow him to make bets fast like Twipple said, and it would be a very slow thing.

[deisik]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

Forgive me my nitpicking, but how is this strategy similar to martingale but very different at the same time? That beats me, it seems that it has nothing to do with martingale. Though never mind. So you are risking 1 BTC with a 93% chance to win how much exactly?

[shorena]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

Forgive me my nitpicking, but how is this strategy similar to martingale but very different at the same time? That beats me, it seems that it has nothing to do with martingale. Though never mind. So you are risking 1 BTC with a 93% chance to win how much exactly?

93% would typically be ~*1.02 or ~0.02 BTC with 1 BTC bets.

[vennali]

Forgive me my nitpicking, but how is this strategy similar to martingale but very different at the same time? That beats me, it seems that it has nothing to do with martingale. Though never mind. So you are risking 1 BTC with a 93% chance to win how much exactly?

Well in martingale I would usually double or multiply my bets after loss, and heavily rely on gambler's fallacy. its the same here, except for that I am not making the middle bets. But am betting exponentially higher.

The rolls are independent to each other, so the previous rolls should not affect the future rolls. Given the fact that you have 7 losses now, the chance of having another loss is the same as ever.

Yes they are. But in the simulation I have never got more than 8 rolls ever. Even though it has the same probability but to satisfy the trend or statistics, it hopefully should never happen. THe probability of 7 losses is already very low. 9 in a row is almost 0. But anyways, I have never had a loss, so I am not sure of it , I might be wrong, but it has worked till now.

[rayhan]

I have been using a different strategy lately. Its sort of similar to martingale but very different. I did a simulation of dice by betting at 93%, and the maximum losses I have ever got in a row at 8, with 8 being only once and mostly 7. So I have been running a bot by betting 0 satoshi or lowest amount, and wait for such a streak. And after 7 losses, I bet around 1 BTC at the odds.

I know it sounds like gamblers fallacy, but since the maximum losses in a row have been 7 or 8, I don't mind risking it on the stats I have got before. I started about a week back and have made the bet of 1 BTC 3 times till now. So its been going good till now.

huh, you sure? I just wonder how long it took till eventually you find that 8x lose in a row

[ubitcoin]

Wow i fine the new strategy
Màrtingale in 33%chances and from small base bet

[sed]

I'm thinking that nowadays my strategy is to stay away from dice sites.  I've lost too much money gambling and now I'm embarrassed. Well not so much that I'm in trouble but I'm starting to think harder about how and where I spend my BTC.

[ABS-CBN2]

Wow i fine the new strategy
Màrtingale in 33%chances and from small base bet

try martingale on 75% chance