RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 11, 2014, 09:00:48 PM |
|
So I do not open this thread to talk about the profitability of gpu mining, I just want to compare and try to improve settings for mining neoscrypt coins (feathercoins) So far this is what ive been able to get on a R9 280X VaporX TriX Im on Windows 8.1 Pro x64 and using Catalyst 14.4, a FX6300 and 16GB ram. Im pretty sure I should be able to squeeze some extra hashes, considering in the beginning people was getting no more than 100kh per one of this cards, and I was able to get almost 275 without playing a lot! This is my sgminer.conf { "pools" : [ { "url" : "stratum+tcp://ftc-neo.give-me-coins.com:3336", "user" : ".1", "pass" : "x" } ] , "intensity" : "13", "worksize" : "64", "kernel" : "neoscrypt", "lookup-gap" : "2", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "shaders" : "2048", "gpu-threads" : "2", "gpu-engine" : "1100", "gpu-fan" : "0-75", "auto-fan" : true, "gpu-memclock" : "1500", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "temp-cutoff" : "90", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-target" : "70", "no-pool-disable" : true, "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" }
Please guys I need some help on this
|
|
|
|
RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 12, 2014, 07:39:09 PM |
|
BUMP! Im suddenly down to 90kh with the same settings
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
December 13, 2014, 05:27:36 AM |
|
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.
|
|
|
|
cisahasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 13, 2014, 09:53:34 AM Last edit: December 13, 2014, 10:04:10 AM by cisahasa |
|
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.
yeh, sure.. not even breaking even with new x11 +50% kernel only x11 near to neo profit is dark when diff is low, but it will not last long so u may say x11 vs neo 75% of profit
|
|
|
|
RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 13, 2014, 10:36:30 AM |
|
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.
As far as I know neoscrypt is more profitable
|
|
|
|
RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 14, 2014, 01:01:21 PM |
|
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.
As far as I know neoscrypt is more profitable It's way more profitable. Man my card is not Elpida and using your kernel and tweaking dont get anything stable apart from 265kh!
|
|
|
|
RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 14, 2014, 02:14:34 PM |
|
Honestly just mine X11. It makes the same amount of profit.
As far as I know neoscrypt is more profitable It's way more profitable. Man my card is not Elpida and using your kernel and tweaking dont get anything stable apart from 265kh! It can get a bit higher, to maybe 300, but that's about it. Well thats extra 25khash so would be nice! Since in the beginning ppl where mining with 90kh per card
|
|
|
|
RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 16, 2014, 02:38:38 PM |
|
Weirdly, if I permute the state ONCE, it slows down, but if I do it and reverse it dozens of times, it's faster. This is stupid.
What you mean?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 16, 2014, 03:50:58 PM |
|
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 16, 2014, 04:58:12 PM Last edit: December 16, 2014, 08:29:10 PM by Amph |
|
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt. i was doing 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version
|
|
|
|
RD965 (OP)
|
|
December 16, 2014, 05:04:58 PM |
|
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
My card does 820KH in scrypt so quite not accurate.... 265 its definitely not half of it
|
|
|
|
BitmoreCoin
|
|
December 16, 2014, 07:25:45 PM |
|
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt. i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version Would you like to share your setting or the source? Edit: I mean Amph.
|
|
|
|
BitmoreCoin
|
|
December 16, 2014, 07:32:09 PM |
|
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt. i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version Would you like to share your setting or the source? You mean me? Or him, for Scrypt-N? Sorry, I mean Amph. I know you will share it when you want.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 16, 2014, 08:29:53 PM |
|
it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt. i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version Would you like to share your setting or the source? Edit: I mean Amph. it was long time ago, with my old 290(not x) on scrypt-n algo it seems like a n-scrypt, 1/2 of regular scrypt
I don't know, just broke 560kh/s on 290X, and 290X cards usually don't do 1120kh/s scrypt. i was doin 450 on n-scrypt but not with your optimized version 450 is close to my 280X hashrate, so yeah, not quite like scrypt-N. mine was regular 290(not x), with your version i could have done better for sure, i was using an old cgminer
|
|
|
|
cisahasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 16, 2014, 11:59:09 PM |
|
hate the N some much heat and too much memory for rigs
|
|
|
|
|