Pilotseye
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 06:58:33 PM |
|
Hackers may have taken down their site, but they did not take down their ability to pay out, they just don't do it anymore.
|
|
|
|
stevetrac
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 07:06:27 PM |
|
Hackers may have taken down their site, but they did not take down their ability to pay out, they just don't do it anymore.
i did actually get 2 payments minutes before the site went down ,just lucky as others had been pending hours
|
|
|
|
MakingMoneyHoney
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 07:07:53 PM |
|
I dont know who interstellar is, but find him and kill him!!! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) He did not rob you, but he stopped the Scammer from robbing other people, so he cant pay you out anymore! That would be very ironic if people now start a hunt for interstellar instead of the real scammer. But it would show how selfish people are and just proof the following: Everyone who invested in this, or is investing in other ponzies, is making only one bet: That he will get paid before it crashes, so that the others will get robbed. Everyone of you who invested, is the same scammer as the one who was running the site. There is only one difference, he is smart enough to run his own site! Now stop cry for help and justice! You deserved to be scammed!!!! Thousands of warnings were said, not only in this thread but everywhere in the internet! You did not listen! I posted this on another forum "Personally, I would never give them money, especially since they're just using it to cheat someone in the future." People complaining about not getting money because the site was shut down, were hoping new people would get scammed. And the longer the ponzi went on, the newer people were coming on to the site and believing it would pay out, instead of being a ponzi or scam. The people using it from the beginning were those who knew what it was. By participating they doomed people who were new to this type of scam/site. I saw tons of twitter posts and forum posts of people just referring others saying you will get double your money back, without explanation of what it really was. I'm ashamed by the community of people who referred others to this site over and over without explaining that it was a ponzi and it's not guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
stevetrac
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 07:16:26 PM |
|
I dont know who interstellar is, but find him and kill him!!! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) He did not rob you, but he stopped the Scammer from robbing other people, so he cant pay you out anymore! That would be very ironic if people now start a hunt for interstellar instead of the real scammer. But it would show how selfish people are and just proof the following: Everyone who invested in this, or is investing in other ponzies, is making only one bet: That he will get paid before it crashes, so that the others will get robbed. Everyone of you who invested, is the same scammer as the one who was running the site. There is only one difference, he is smart enough to run his own site! Now stop cry for help and justice! You deserved to be scammed!!!! Thousands of warnings were said, not only in this thread but everywhere in the internet! You did not listen! I posted this on another forum "Personally, I would never give them money, especially since they're just using it to cheat someone in the future." People complaining about not getting money because the site was shut down, were hoping new people would get scammed. And the longer the ponzi went on, the newer people were coming on to the site and believing it would pay out, instead of being a ponzi or scam. The people using it from the beginning were those who knew what it was. By participating they doomed people who were new to this type of scam/site. I saw tons of twitter posts and forum posts of people just referring others saying you will get double your money back, without explanation of what it really was. I'm ashamed by the community of people who referred others to this site over and over without explaining that it was a ponzi and it's not guaranteed. really , the fault lies with every individual who took part .the fact that greed clouded their judgement is their fault no one else , but there you go thats the blame everyone else but myself society we live in. one thing though i didnt do the referal bit as they are parasites .
|
|
|
|
Enochian
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 07:31:32 PM |
|
The people using it from the beginning were those who knew what it was. By participating they doomed people who were new to this type of scam/site. I saw tons of twitter posts and forum posts of people just referring others saying you will get double your money back, without explanation of what it really was.
The people who were playing this game with full knowledge that earlier investors were being paid out of the revenues from later ones, were keeping careful track of deposits versus payouts, and had a good idea of when the site would fold. The person who got the site shut down prematurely cheated these people out of their returns. It's like you're playing Blackjack, and just as you have a really good hand, some idiot tips over the table, and causes the casino to void the game. When you complain, he says "Well, you deserved it for playing Blackjack." And then goes on and on about all the naive people he saved from losing money, who didn't know what the game "really was." The Internet is full of busybodies who stick their noses into things that are none of their concern.
|
|
|
|
MakingMoneyHoney
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 07:47:55 PM |
|
The people using it from the beginning were those who knew what it was. By participating they doomed people who were new to this type of scam/site. I saw tons of twitter posts and forum posts of people just referring others saying you will get double your money back, without explanation of what it really was.
The people who were playing this game with full knowledge that earlier investors were being paid out of the revenues from later ones, were keeping careful track of deposits versus payouts, and had a good idea of when the site would fold. The person who got the site shut down prematurely cheated these people out of their returns. It's like you're playing Blackjack, and just as you have a really good hand, some idiot tips over the table, and causes the casino to void the game. When you complain, he says "Well, you deserved it for playing Blackjack." And then goes on and on about all the naive people he saved from losing money, who didn't know what the game "really was." The Internet is full of busybodies who stick their noses into things that are none of their concern. Not really. Everyone knows Blackjack is gambling. All over the internet people were telling others via referrals that this company paid out 2 times what you "invested". It was being advertised by users as a sure thing. An example from twitter: "#CryptoDouble lets you double the number of #BTC you have in just 100 hrs. Invest your coins here: (ref link) " So you can't compare people trying to get others (who don't know it's not 100%) to not "invest" in a ponzi to knocking over a table of blackjack that everyone is fully aware is gambling. And trying to discuss those who know better, then they knew it was always a risk (and they shouldn't have risked more than they could) as you said they "had a good idea of when the site would fold" not 100% sure on when though. Those calculations of when it would fold should have counted when social pressure might make it fold too. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
theskillzdatklls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 08:57:44 PM |
|
how in the fucking hell did anything think this site was for real? wtf? could some "investor" please shed some light on this? I would loooooove to hear what went on in your head.
|
|
|
|
Enochian
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:02:25 PM |
|
Not really. Everyone knows Blackjack is gambling. All over the internet people were telling others via referrals that this company paid out 2 times what you "invested". It was being advertised by users as a sure thing. An example from twitter: "#CryptoDouble lets you double the number of #BTC you have in just 100 hrs. Invest your coins here: (ref link) " So you can't compare people trying to get others (who don't know it's not 100%) to not "invest" in a ponzi to knocking over a table of blackjack that everyone is fully aware is gambling. And trying to discuss those who know better, then they knew it was always a risk (and they shouldn't have risked more than they could) as you said they "had a good idea of when the site would fold" not 100% sure on when though. Those calculations of when it would fold should have counted when social pressure might make it fold too. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only the retarded didn't know this was gambling. I stuck in $25 worth of BTC, and would have taken the $25 back after the first double. Had the site stayed up for another month and a half, I could have been pulling $100 a day out of it, playing entirely with their money. The "social pressure" caused the site to go offline about 5 hours before I would have been paid. Since I only invested lunch money, against a mathematical expectation that was much higher, I don't have a big loss, but it is certainly annoying that a non-participant whining to Cloudflare and the ISP perturbed the mathematics of the thing, and gave them an excuse to stop paying long before they would have, based on the numbers. I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones. Contrast this with your typical HYIP where you don't know if you've been screwed for several hundred days. There are certainly a lot of games on the Internet where a small number of people get something of value paid for by many people making a small investment, like Penny Auctions, and chains of people doing offers for prizes. I think the merger of such entertainment with Bitcoin is an interesting market niche, and I expect to see far more polished and better managed sites than CryptoDouble spring up around this notion in the near future. As for "interstellar", I'd strap him to a waterboard, and send him to visit Dick Cheney for an hour, just to cure him of the notion that he has been somehow appointed to censor other peoples fun.
|
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:16:41 PM |
|
Not really. Everyone knows Blackjack is gambling. All over the internet people were telling others via referrals that this company paid out 2 times what you "invested". It was being advertised by users as a sure thing. An example from twitter: "#CryptoDouble lets you double the number of #BTC you have in just 100 hrs. Invest your coins here: (ref link) " So you can't compare people trying to get others (who don't know it's not 100%) to not "invest" in a ponzi to knocking over a table of blackjack that everyone is fully aware is gambling. And trying to discuss those who know better, then they knew it was always a risk (and they shouldn't have risked more than they could) as you said they "had a good idea of when the site would fold" not 100% sure on when though. Those calculations of when it would fold should have counted when social pressure might make it fold too. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only the retarded didn't know this was gambling. I stuck in $25 worth of BTC, and would have taken the $25 back after the first double. Had the site stayed up for another month and a half, I could have been pulling $100 a day out of it, playing entirely with their money. The "social pressure" caused the site to go offline about 5 hours before I would have been paid. Since I only invested lunch money, against a mathematical expectation that was much higher, I don't have a big loss, but it is certainly annoying that a non-participant whining to Cloudflare and the ISP perturbed the mathematics of the thing, and gave them an excuse to stop paying long before they would have, based on the numbers. I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones. Contrast this with your typical HYIP where you don't know if you've been screwed for several hundred days. There are certainly a lot of games on the Internet where a small number of people get something of value paid for by many people making a small investment, like Penny Auctions, and chains of people doing offers for prizes. I think the merger of such entertainment with Bitcoin is an interesting market niche, and I expect to see far more polished and better managed sites than CryptoDouble spring up around this notion in the near future. As for "interstellar", I'd strap him to a waterboard, and send him to visit Dick Cheney for an hour, just to cure him of the notion that he has been somehow appointed to censor other peoples fun. Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations.
|
|
|
|
Enochian
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:25:13 PM |
|
Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations.
Future variations on the CryptoDouble theme will no doubt be perfectly legal, and engage in full disclosure of how they work. Should you engage in tortious interference with their business, they will sue you until you are living under a bridge, where you will have little protection from the large numbers of people wishing to use an electric drill on your kneecaps. I'm not one of those people, but I would definitely watch the video on YouTube. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
HYPster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:28:20 PM |
|
Not really. Everyone knows Blackjack is gambling. All over the internet people were telling others via referrals that this company paid out 2 times what you "invested". It was being advertised by users as a sure thing. An example from twitter: "#CryptoDouble lets you double the number of #BTC you have in just 100 hrs. Invest your coins here: (ref link) " So you can't compare people trying to get others (who don't know it's not 100%) to not "invest" in a ponzi to knocking over a table of blackjack that everyone is fully aware is gambling. And trying to discuss those who know better, then they knew it was always a risk (and they shouldn't have risked more than they could) as you said they "had a good idea of when the site would fold" not 100% sure on when though. Those calculations of when it would fold should have counted when social pressure might make it fold too. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only the retarded didn't know this was gambling. I stuck in $25 worth of BTC, and would have taken the $25 back after the first double. Had the site stayed up for another month and a half, I could have been pulling $100 a day out of it, playing entirely with their money. The "social pressure" caused the site to go offline about 5 hours before I would have been paid. Since I only invested lunch money, against a mathematical expectation that was much higher, I don't have a big loss, but it is certainly annoying that a non-participant whining to Cloudflare and the ISP perturbed the mathematics of the thing, and gave them an excuse to stop paying long before they would have, based on the numbers. I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones. Contrast this with your typical HYIP where you don't know if you've been screwed for several hundred days. There are certainly a lot of games on the Internet where a small number of people get something of value paid for by many people making a small investment, like Penny Auctions, and chains of people doing offers for prizes. I think the merger of such entertainment with Bitcoin is an interesting market niche, and I expect to see far more polished and better managed sites than CryptoDouble spring up around this notion in the near future. As for "interstellar", I'd strap him to a waterboard, and send him to visit Dick Cheney for an hour, just to cure him of the notion that he has been somehow appointed to censor other peoples fun. Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations. Sounds like to me that you were in on the Ponzi scheme and are covering it up by saying you had it taken down in order to do everyone a favor. Everyone knows it was a Ponzi scheme. I don't take away your toys fuckface so don't take away mine. Go get bent!
|
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:30:10 PM |
|
Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations.
Future variations on the CryptoDouble theme will no doubt be perfectly legal, and engage in full disclosure of how they work. Should you engage in tortious interference with their business, they will sue you until you are living under a bridge, where you will have little protection from the large numbers of people wishing to use an electric drill on your kneecaps. I'm not one of those people, but I would definitely watch the video on YouTube. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) As long as they disclose they are a ponzi, like weeklyponzi for example, it's just a distasteful form of gambling and I don't give a shit so we are on the same page. But please don't bring tort law bs into this for your own dignity's sake.
|
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:31:49 PM |
|
Not really. Everyone knows Blackjack is gambling. All over the internet people were telling others via referrals that this company paid out 2 times what you "invested". It was being advertised by users as a sure thing. An example from twitter: "#CryptoDouble lets you double the number of #BTC you have in just 100 hrs. Invest your coins here: (ref link) " So you can't compare people trying to get others (who don't know it's not 100%) to not "invest" in a ponzi to knocking over a table of blackjack that everyone is fully aware is gambling. And trying to discuss those who know better, then they knew it was always a risk (and they shouldn't have risked more than they could) as you said they "had a good idea of when the site would fold" not 100% sure on when though. Those calculations of when it would fold should have counted when social pressure might make it fold too. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only the retarded didn't know this was gambling. I stuck in $25 worth of BTC, and would have taken the $25 back after the first double. Had the site stayed up for another month and a half, I could have been pulling $100 a day out of it, playing entirely with their money. The "social pressure" caused the site to go offline about 5 hours before I would have been paid. Since I only invested lunch money, against a mathematical expectation that was much higher, I don't have a big loss, but it is certainly annoying that a non-participant whining to Cloudflare and the ISP perturbed the mathematics of the thing, and gave them an excuse to stop paying long before they would have, based on the numbers. I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones. Contrast this with your typical HYIP where you don't know if you've been screwed for several hundred days. There are certainly a lot of games on the Internet where a small number of people get something of value paid for by many people making a small investment, like Penny Auctions, and chains of people doing offers for prizes. I think the merger of such entertainment with Bitcoin is an interesting market niche, and I expect to see far more polished and better managed sites than CryptoDouble spring up around this notion in the near future. As for "interstellar", I'd strap him to a waterboard, and send him to visit Dick Cheney for an hour, just to cure him of the notion that he has been somehow appointed to censor other peoples fun. Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations. Sounds like to me that you were in on the Ponzi scheme and are covering it up by saying you had it taken down in order to do everyone a favor. Everyone knows it was a Ponzi scheme. I don't take away your toys fuckface so don't take away mine. Go get bent! Yes, that is it Sherlock.
|
|
|
|
HYPster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:35:35 PM |
|
Not really. Everyone knows Blackjack is gambling. All over the internet people were telling others via referrals that this company paid out 2 times what you "invested". It was being advertised by users as a sure thing. An example from twitter: "#CryptoDouble lets you double the number of #BTC you have in just 100 hrs. Invest your coins here: (ref link) " So you can't compare people trying to get others (who don't know it's not 100%) to not "invest" in a ponzi to knocking over a table of blackjack that everyone is fully aware is gambling. And trying to discuss those who know better, then they knew it was always a risk (and they shouldn't have risked more than they could) as you said they "had a good idea of when the site would fold" not 100% sure on when though. Those calculations of when it would fold should have counted when social pressure might make it fold too. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only the retarded didn't know this was gambling. I stuck in $25 worth of BTC, and would have taken the $25 back after the first double. Had the site stayed up for another month and a half, I could have been pulling $100 a day out of it, playing entirely with their money. The "social pressure" caused the site to go offline about 5 hours before I would have been paid. Since I only invested lunch money, against a mathematical expectation that was much higher, I don't have a big loss, but it is certainly annoying that a non-participant whining to Cloudflare and the ISP perturbed the mathematics of the thing, and gave them an excuse to stop paying long before they would have, based on the numbers. I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones. Contrast this with your typical HYIP where you don't know if you've been screwed for several hundred days. There are certainly a lot of games on the Internet where a small number of people get something of value paid for by many people making a small investment, like Penny Auctions, and chains of people doing offers for prizes. I think the merger of such entertainment with Bitcoin is an interesting market niche, and I expect to see far more polished and better managed sites than CryptoDouble spring up around this notion in the near future. As for "interstellar", I'd strap him to a waterboard, and send him to visit Dick Cheney for an hour, just to cure him of the notion that he has been somehow appointed to censor other peoples fun. Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations. Sounds like to me that you were in on the Ponzi scheme and are covering it up by saying you had it taken down in order to do everyone a favor. Everyone knows it was a Ponzi scheme. I don't take away your toys fuckface so don't take away mine. Go get bent! Yes, that is it Sherlock. Good, now that is cleared up, I will be expecting my 0.00000010 btc investment to be paid in full. LOL Just messin with ya. Anyone on here complaining about losing money is actually Retarded. Do the math, it went on for like 3 weeks. I mean damn, the fact it even lasted that long is truly amazing. Better yet, I found a new site here: www.GiveMeYourMoneyAndIRun.com. It works really well and guaranteed to piss you off. All of you so ready to give your money away never ceases to amaze me. I mean gambling is one thing, but then to complain about it once it happens??? SUCKERS!
|
|
|
|
LiteBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1050
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:41:28 PM |
|
I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones.
Saving this for prosperity. I can't believe it.
|
|
|
|
Enochian
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:49:09 PM |
|
I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones.
Saving this for prosperity. I can't believe it. Which part is unclear?
|
|
|
|
LiteBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1050
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 09:59:07 PM |
|
I think CryptoDouble was one of the more interesting things to happen to Bitcoin in the past 12 months. It demonstrated a sweet spot in terms of return and payback time where people were willing, in large numbers, to play a Ponzi for entertainment. Note that almost all of the copycat sites that have sprung up spin it as a game, and openly announce that earlier investors are paid out of the funds from later ones.
Saving this for prosperity. I can't believe it. Which part is unclear? It's clear. Crystal clear. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
Sejuani
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 10:01:10 PM |
|
i only did give them some btc, because its something I can afford to lose $10. so yeah, its more of a entertainment thing if they were legit.
|
|
|
|
Sejuani
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 10:16:20 PM |
|
What the heck is frostcoins? another alt coin? Also the sites closed down.. so it wouldnt be available to any members.
|
|
|
|
crocko
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2015, 10:26:26 PM |
|
Sorry to rain on your ponzi parade bud. Will do it again every time. Better put that in your calculations.
Future variations on the CryptoDouble theme will no doubt be perfectly legal, and engage in full disclosure of how they work. Should you engage in tortious interference with their business, they will sue you until you are living under a bridge, where you will have little protection from the large numbers of people wishing to use an electric drill on your kneecaps. I'm not one of those people, but I would definitely watch the video on YouTube. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) As long as they disclose they are a ponzi, like weeklyponzi for example, it's just a distasteful form of gambling and I don't give a shit so we are on the same page. But please don't bring tort law bs into this for your own dignity's sake. Can you give me back my coins from CD ? Do you have any idea how many people lost their coins or how much ? You piece of crap ! One day we will have your ass ! It is just of matter of time.. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
Find my posts helpful? Click my Trust link and rep me!
BTC: 1MqUxoDQE8Q88sDvoaLMbBJSMToSfPgKSy | | DOGE: D61Na9wjuneAn9GFLRNrHgWHHFwVfd1T7y | | LTC: 3Luo136zrqkCi53jT72FEY52GbwW1ZYi6X |
|
|
|
|