Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 12:46:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The death of banks – and the future of money  (Read 630 times)
nevafuse (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 26, 2012, 06:51:29 PM
 #1

Really good article about money with specific mention of bitcoin.

http://www.goldmadesimplenews.com/gold/the-death-of-banks-%E2%80%93-and-the-future-of-money-7177/

The only reason to limit the block size is to subsidize non-Bitcoin currencies
1715561171
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715561171

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715561171
Reply with quote  #2

1715561171
Report to moderator
1715561171
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715561171

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715561171
Reply with quote  #2

1715561171
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Paul Troon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 08:23:26 PM
 #2

Really good article about money with specific mention of bitcoin.

http://www.goldmadesimplenews.com/gold/the-death-of-banks-%E2%80%93-and-the-future-of-money-7177/

Yes - excellent article.  However the link you gave should have given credit to the author, Detlev Schlichter.  See the original post here:
  2012-06-20 Detlev Schlichter: The Death of Banks and the Future of Money

Bitrated user: paultroon.
nevafuse (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 26, 2012, 08:35:09 PM
 #3

Ah, didn't realize it wasn't the source.  Figured it was too good to be true that I beat everyone to the punch on a 6 day old article.

The only reason to limit the block size is to subsidize non-Bitcoin currencies
loshia
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 12:21:22 PM
 #4

10X!
The article worth it:)

Please help the Led Boy aka Bicknellski to make us a nice Christmas led tree and pay WASP membership fee here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=643999.msg7191563#msg7191563
And remember Bicknellski is not collecting money from community;D
Handler
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 12:38:26 PM
 #5

Good article, but I get the feeling he's glorifying bitcoin a tad... Not that I disagree, but if people think he has an agenda they will be very sceptic to what he's saying.
nevafuse (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 02:58:00 PM
 #6

I don't think bitcoins were really the point of the article.  Bitcoins just happen to be the most popular solution.  His only agenda is that he wants to remove governments from money.  Other options prior to bitcoin have just been too risky & expensive.  And there aren't exactly many real, popular competitors to bitcoin right now (think cocacola & pepsi).

The only reason to limit the block size is to subsidize non-Bitcoin currencies
SheldonCooper
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0



View Profile
June 27, 2012, 10:56:29 PM
 #7

Great article. The main problem is the dollar monopoly and the dollar have no gold standard.
bighecks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 28, 2012, 12:17:00 AM
 #8

I would be using monopoly money in  the future and money out of candy.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!