|
Madness
|
 |
December 31, 2014, 07:01:09 AM |
|
If it needs to reindex you'll have to wait for it. But it should go faster with the RC build...
It was reindexing as you said .. but suddenly and when It reached the "2 years xx weeks" It start synchronizing with the network again and now I should wait a lot ... why It didn't continue reindexing fast till 13 weeks left where it stopped exactly ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
January 01, 2015, 08:54:36 PM |
|
when the "delete address" will be added? it's not that important i know, but it's always a plus to have
You mean the option of deleting an address from a wallet? Interesting, request, it would definitely be very useful. yeah, right now you need to re-create a new wallet to do this, it could be doing easily with a send to other folder that hide them anyway this version is not signed yet, it is because of the rc1 state? |
|
|
|
|
|
Parazyd (OP)
|
|
January 01, 2015, 09:47:47 PM |
|
when the "delete address" will be added? it's not that important i know, but it's always a plus to have
You mean the option of deleting an address from a wallet? Interesting, request, it would definitely be very useful. yeah, right now you need to re-create a new wallet to do this, it could be doing easily with a send to other folder that hide them anyway this version is not signed yet, it is because of the rc1 state? It is. Grab the SHA256SUMS.asc file from the directory. |
|
|
|
|
philiveyjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 01, 2015, 10:26:08 PM |
|
Downloaded it.!!! Takes forever to sync.! :/
|
|
|
|
ulatec
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2015, 06:48:59 AM |
|
Digging the new fee interface  |
|
|
|
|
|
Blazr
|
|
January 02, 2015, 06:51:21 AM |
|
Initial sync is faster than it used to be, but it's still faster to torrent bootstrap.dat and sync that way.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
January 02, 2015, 01:09:25 PM |
|
when the "delete address" will be added? it's not that important i know, but it's always a plus to have
You mean the option of deleting an address from a wallet? Interesting, request, it would definitely be very useful. yeah, right now you need to re-create a new wallet to do this, it could be doing easily with a send to other folder that hide them anyway this version is not signed yet, it is because of the rc1 state? It is. Grab the SHA256SUMS.asc file from the directory. windows it say the typical caution message when i run the installer |
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
|
|
January 16, 2015, 02:21:36 PM
Last edit: January 16, 2015, 02:55:40 PM by Meuh6879 |
|
 Perfect, the RC3 of 0.10.0 work with WinXP 32 bits + all KBs installed ... and a solo-mining server or P2Pool mining client.  
|
|
|
|
|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1015
|
|
January 16, 2015, 05:43:44 PM |
|
I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
|
|
January 16, 2015, 06:03:32 PM |
|
what is internet for you ? for me, it's an updated software connected at internet. |
|
|
|
|
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
|
|
January 16, 2015, 06:03:33 PM |
|
I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet anything made by Microsoft to the Internet?
FTFY |
|
|
|
|
|
IIOII
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1153
Merit: 1012
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:02:10 PM |
|
I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?
What makes you think that newer versions of Windows are safer? Maybe these versions even have more intentional backdoors than the previous ones. Using XP is unsafe only if you use Internet Explorer and allow scripts. |
|
|
|
|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1015
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:26:10 PM |
|
I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?
What makes you think that newer versions of Windows are safer? Bit of a strawman reply here. I never mentioned anything about newer versions of Windows being safer. |
|
|
|
IIOII
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1153
Merit: 1012
|
|
January 17, 2015, 01:06:29 PM |
|
I thought Windows XP was obsolete. Is it still safe to connect one of those machines to the internet?
What makes you think that newer versions of Windows are safer? Bit of a strawman reply here. I never mentioned anything about newer versions of Windows being safer. Not intended. I really thought you were advocating an update to a newer Windows version. From my point of view both Windows and Linux systems will never be 100% secure. I know that Linux users tend to think that their system is more secure, but an open source code does not help if people don't review the code and identify all attack vectors before others exploit them. From my point of view what's most important is to be aware that no system is 100% secure and adjust behavior accordingly. Edit: On topic: I'm really looking forward to the final release of 0.10.0. There are a lot of great improvements. |
|
|
|
|
|
