Yankee (BitInstant)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
Charlie 'Van Bitcoin' Shrem
|
|
November 05, 2012, 07:19:34 PM |
|
My Casascius Coins website issued a payment address starting with"1Fake" and the customer did not know if he got a real or a test address. Suspicious, he redid his order and paid the new (non-1Fake) address he was issued, then wrote to tell me about it. The 1Fake address was a real address and a genuine coincidence.
Can I buy this address off of you?
|
Bitcoin pioneer. An apostle of Satoshi Nakamoto. A crusader for a new, better, tech-driven society. A dreamer. More about me: http://CharlieShrem.com
|
|
|
bitcoinbear
|
|
November 05, 2012, 07:31:01 PM |
|
My Casascius Coins website issued a payment address starting with"1Fake" and the customer did not know if he got a real or a test address. Suspicious, he redid his order and paid the new (non-1Fake) address he was issued, then wrote to tell me about it. The 1Fake address was a real address and a genuine coincidence.
Can I buy this address off of you? Why would you want his Fake address, when you could just use a vanitygen to get your own Fake address?
|
|
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
|
November 05, 2012, 08:23:30 PM |
|
My Casascius Coins website issued a payment address starting with"1Fake" and the customer did not know if he got a real or a test address. Suspicious, he redid his order and paid the new (non-1Fake) address he was issued, then wrote to tell me about it. The 1Fake address was a real address and a genuine coincidence.
Can I buy this address off of you? Why would you want his Fake address, when you could just use a vanitygen to get your own Fake address? Maybe his Fake address was the first one, so has a "firstbits" of 1fake? That's the only reason I could think of.
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
mskwik
|
|
November 05, 2012, 08:58:28 PM |
|
mskwik@mskwik ~ $ ./vanitygen 1Fake Difficulty: 4476342 Pattern: 1Fake Address: 1FakerW3HiFf8Fz5bYPKApGeguoaY6F1xh Privkey: 5JxThis1sAReaLPrivateKey111111111111111112zcbiLwEsU
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:09:56 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
|
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:15:20 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a valid address in that the checksum is correct but I would not call it "real" in the sense that those BTC will ever be recovered - they will never be recovered.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
kokojie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:17:49 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a valid address in that the checksum is correct but I would not call it "real" in the sense that those BTC will ever be recovered - they will never be recovered. Incorrect, they are unlikely be recovered, but not never. THERE IS A CHANCE.
|
btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:24:56 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a valid address in that the checksum is correct but I would not call it "real" in the sense that those BTC will ever be recovered - they will never be recovered. Incorrect, they are unlikely be recovered, but not never. THERE IS A CHANCE. No, there is not.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:34:31 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a valid address in that the checksum is correct but I would not call it "real" in the sense that those BTC will ever be recovered - they will never be recovered. Incorrect, they are unlikely be recovered, but not never. THERE IS A CHANCE. No, there is not. Didn't I just get done reading that funds can't be sent to a fake address? That's why I stated that it was real. I wasn't trying to spread FUD. What am I missing? ~Bruno K~
|
|
|
|
Yuhfhrh
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:41:53 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a valid address in that the checksum is correct but I would not call it "real" in the sense that those BTC will ever be recovered - they will never be recovered. Incorrect, they are unlikely be recovered, but not never. THERE IS A CHANCE. No, there is not. Didn't I just get done reading that funds can't be sent to a fake address? That's why I stated that it was real. I wasn't trying to spread FUD. What am I missing? ~Bruno K~ So wait, does this mean this address has the possibility be generated, even though it isn't as long as a bitcoin address should be? 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 (It has received funds)
|
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 05, 2012, 11:51:58 PM |
|
My Casascius Coins website issued a payment address starting with"1Fake" and the customer did not know if he got a real or a test address. Suspicious, he redid his order and paid the new (non-1Fake) address he was issued, then wrote to tell me about it. The 1Fake address was a real address and a genuine coincidence.
Can I buy this address off of you? Why would you want his Fake address, when you could just use a vanitygen to get your own Fake address? Maybe his Fake address was the first one, so has a "firstbits" of 1fake? That's the only reason I could think of. It doesn't have the firstbits if it wasn't used... The 1fake firstbits, at least according to blockchain.info, is http://blockchain.info/address/1FAkERLT43VNTSX4XYfrSdW547VzjJ8Q3a
|
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
November 06, 2012, 12:06:41 AM |
|
Didn't I just get done reading that funds can't be sent to a fake address? That's why I stated that it was real. I wasn't trying to spread FUD. What am I missing?
~Bruno K~
There are two ways to create a valid Bitcoin address, that is, an address that will be accepted by the client and allow you to send BTC to it. The first way creates a valid address and since the private and public keys are known, the BTC can be recovered and spent: 1) Create a random private key 2) Calculate the corresponding public key from the random private key 3) Calculate the valid corresponding Bitcoin address from the public key The second way creates a valid address but since the private and public keys not known (and for all practical purposes will never be known in the lifetime of this universe), the BTC can not be recovered and spent: 1) Create a random bunch of crap, for example: 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSend 2) Calculate the correct checksum for the address and put the two together: 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE Wala! You have a valid Bitcoin address but any coins sent to it can never be spent and are forever lost because the address was not created from a valid key pair. Now, in fact, there are many private/public keypairs that will produce the address 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE But your chances of guessing any one of them is so remote that for all practical purposes it is impossible.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
November 06, 2012, 12:25:58 AM |
|
So wait, does this mean this address has the possibility be generated, even though it isn't as long as a bitcoin address should be? 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 (It has received funds)
If BTC have been sent to it then this is a valid Bitcoin address. This is a special case, the hash of the public key is 0. I would have to check, or someone may know, is this a valid hash of a public key? If not then there are no keypairs that hash to this address. If it is a valid hash output then there are many key pairs that will hash to this address.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
helloworld
|
|
November 06, 2012, 01:10:21 AM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a valid address in that the checksum is correct but I would not call it "real" in the sense that those BTC will ever be recovered - they will never be recovered. Incorrect, they are unlikely be recovered, but not never. THERE IS A CHANCE. No, there is not. Yes, there is. You just said so yourself in the above posts!
|
|
|
|
mskwik
|
|
November 06, 2012, 01:18:10 AM |
|
So wait, does this mean this address has the possibility be generated, even though it isn't as long as a bitcoin address should be? 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 (It has received funds)
If BTC have been sent to it then this is a valid Bitcoin address. This is a special case, the hash of the public key is 0. I would have to check, or someone may know, is this a valid hash of a public key? If not then there are no keypairs that hash to this address. If it is a valid hash output then there are many key pairs that will hash to this address. Like the other data+checksum addresses it is theoretically possible but very unlikely to find a valid private/public keypair that matches it. One of those small transactions is mine from a bug in subvertx that apparently messed up the output address, wouldn't surprise me if at least some of the others came about the same way.
|
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
November 06, 2012, 01:21:58 AM |
|
Yes, there is. You just said so yourself in the above posts!
Homework: How many public/private key pairs will hash to a given Bitcoin address? How many possible public/private key pairs are there? What is the probability of finding any one of the keypairs for a given Bitcoin address by random chance? My point is that the chance is so small it is not worth mentioning. For all practical purposes it is impossible. Of course, if you wish, you can hold on to the small possibility that you may find one of the key pairs for an address. I suggest you look for keypairs to the Bitcoin addresses on this list, to make it worth your time: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92423.0;topicseen
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
Yuhfhrh
|
|
November 06, 2012, 06:31:26 AM Last edit: November 06, 2012, 06:56:50 AM by Yuhfhrh |
|
Yes, there is. You just said so yourself in the above posts!
Homework: How many public/private key pairs will hash to a given Bitcoin address? How many possible public/private key pairs are there? What is the probability of finding any one of the keypairs for a given Bitcoin address by random chance? My point is that the chance is so small it is not worth mentioning. For all practical purposes it is impossible. Of course, if you wish, you can hold on to the small possibility that you may find one of the key pairs for an address. I suggest you look for keypairs to the Bitcoin addresses on this list, to make it worth your time: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=92423.0;topicseenYou're not suggesting we try to steal right?
|
|
|
|
J-Norm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2012, 04:30:34 PM |
|
You can create any arbitrary address by just putting the right checksum on the end. You will of course not know the private key so anything sent there is unlikely to ever be retrieved.
|
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
November 06, 2012, 04:48:06 PM |
|
You're not suggesting we try to steal right? Yes, I am. The entire premise of Bitcoin is that you cannot do it so it is OK to test that premise. If you do manage to do it then I would suggest giving the BTC back to the rightful owner.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
|