Stunna
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
|
|
April 15, 2013, 07:23:11 AM |
|
Very interesting, makes me wish I had a fun/rare address
|
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 15, 2013, 10:21:49 AM |
|
Very interesting, makes me wish I had a fun/rare address Makes me wish having the time to look at all my addresses 1 by 1 to try and find these kind of patterns lol
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
April 15, 2013, 03:23:35 PM |
|
Very interesting, makes me wish I had a fun/rare address Makes me wish having the time to look at all my addresses 1 by 1 to try and find these kind of patterns lol lol, I don't look at them one by one to find cool ones, I use vanity gen and specifically search for these patterns.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
CasinoBit
|
|
April 15, 2013, 04:01:04 PM |
|
1 LucKPedBpbKF1QR5JPskSEeowm6LapNu9 or black 10 on our website
|
|
|
|
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 15, 2013, 04:04:22 PM |
|
1 LucKPedBpbKF1QR5JPskSEeowm6LapNu9 or black 10 on our website Fuck dude, I initially read that as Lucky Pedo
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
April 15, 2013, 04:27:45 PM |
|
is this cool?
1ABCDEFGhSGyyACty7gXC4PvKwjjMEsdVq
You didn't even put that in the block chain. and someone already has this one https://blockchain.info/address/1ABCDEFGHTs4DtPSNch45cmp3BsDdQP8SVAll upper case, and a-h, and that is the one that has first bits. If you want to beat that, go a-i and get it in the block chain.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
|
|
wingding
|
|
April 15, 2013, 08:15:57 PM |
|
The bitcoin address is hash, right? Is it possible to create a legal address without doing the hash? (not using a seed number) And if I send coins to this address - will the transaction be confirmed. And will I ever be able to get those coins?
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
April 15, 2013, 09:20:26 PM |
|
The bitcoin address is hash, right? Is it possible to create a legal address without doing the hash? (not using a seed number) And if I send coins to this address - will the transaction be confirmed. And will I ever be able to get those coins?
Way off topic. But yes, you can create a valid address without knowing the private key. You can send coins to it, and it will be confirmed if it is a real transaction. And no, you will never be able to retrieve those coins. They are lost forever. Two examples of those are mentioned in the first post. 1111111111111111111114oLvT2 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE Those are valid addresses. You can see people have destroyed bitcoins by sending them to those addresses.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
veteranBtc
|
|
April 15, 2013, 09:23:49 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a nice one
|
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1138
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
April 16, 2013, 12:49:41 PM |
|
1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE (real address)
This is a nice one Yes, nice, except it burned the firstbits for 1Bitcoin which is kind of a shame. But it is a very honest address, warning you that your BTC will be lost forever
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
zebedee
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 668
Merit: 500
|
|
April 29, 2013, 07:30:04 AM |
|
7 char vanity address. The "goog" is almost certainly just a coincidence. I can see someone wanting an address starting with 12345678, but why would they go for 12345678goog? There's no way it was deliberate.
Probability says it's very definitely deliberate. To get "goog" there, assuming any case would do (which is a little generous to your position) the chances of "goog" appearing after 12345678 are 1 in 29*58*58*29 which is 1 in 2.8 million. I really doubt that's a fluke on a 12345678 address.
|
|
|
|
gadman2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 978
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 10, 2013, 06:43:20 AM Last edit: May 10, 2013, 08:29:26 AM by gadman2 |
|
Surprised that only 9 letters is the current max. I compiled a list of 9 and 10 letter words. Oclvanitygen says I should find a 9 letter word in about 2-4 hours, and a 10 letter word in about 5 days with my 660ti pumping out about 20mkeys/s. I'll let it run for a few hours while I do my laundry and post what I get Edit: didn't get anything, I'll just let it run, added in -k and -o for a results file... Will post in the morning, should defiantly get some by then.
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
May 10, 2013, 01:34:50 PM |
|
Surprised that only 9 letters is the current max. I compiled a list of 9 and 10 letter words. Oclvanitygen says I should find a 9 letter word in about 2-4 hours, and a 10 letter word in about 5 days with my 660ti pumping out about 20mkeys/s. I'll let it run for a few hours while I do my laundry and post what I get Edit: didn't get anything, I'll just let it run, added in -k and -o for a results file... Will post in the morning, should defiantly get some by then. Does your list have just a dictionary of words? The record is 9, so you would want just 10 or greater if you plan to beat it. I'm sure that would change the probability a lot. There is a huge difference between searching for any 9 letter word vs 1dictionary. Are you looking for case sensitive as well? Toss an -i on there and it should go even faster.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
gadman2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 978
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 10, 2013, 02:01:56 PM |
|
Surprised that only 9 letters is the current max. I compiled a list of 9 and 10 letter words. Oclvanitygen says I should find a 9 letter word in about 2-4 hours, and a 10 letter word in about 5 days with my 660ti pumping out about 20mkeys/s. I'll let it run for a few hours while I do my laundry and post what I get Edit: didn't get anything, I'll just let it run, added in -k and -o for a results file... Will post in the morning, should defiantly get some by then. Does your list have just a dictionary of words? The record is 9, so you would want just 10 or greater if you plan to beat it. I'm sure that would change the probability a lot. There is a huge difference between searching for any 9 letter word vs 1dictionary. Are you looking for case sensitive as well? Toss an -i on there and it should go even faster. No, wasn't looking for case sens lol, oops. Ether way, I found these overnight. Record tied : Pattern: 1CoRNCRiBS Address: 1CoRNCRiBS7Jg1KmRf5r1N7N3LeLg6cMua Pattern: 1HiCCUPPED Address: 1HiCCUPPEDPNaLUGVvvC9USMvon1YyHzFq Pattern: 1ALooFNESS Address: 1ALooFNESSm1bZbS61DLc6rq4KRZSg61he Furthermore when I add the -i, it seems it makes way too many words and errors me out:
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
May 10, 2013, 03:01:43 PM |
|
Surprised that only 9 letters is the current max. I compiled a list of 9 and 10 letter words. Oclvanitygen says I should find a 9 letter word in about 2-4 hours, and a 10 letter word in about 5 days with my 660ti pumping out about 20mkeys/s. I'll let it run for a few hours while I do my laundry and post what I get Edit: didn't get anything, I'll just let it run, added in -k and -o for a results file... Will post in the morning, should defiantly get some by then. Does your list have just a dictionary of words? The record is 9, so you would want just 10 or greater if you plan to beat it. I'm sure that would change the probability a lot. There is a huge difference between searching for any 9 letter word vs 1dictionary. Are you looking for case sensitive as well? Toss an -i on there and it should go even faster. No, wasn't looking for case sens lol, oops. Ether way, I found these overnight. Record tied : Pattern: 1CoRNCRiBS Address: 1CoRNCRiBS7Jg1KmRf5r1N7N3LeLg6cMua Pattern: 1HiCCUPPED Address: 1HiCCUPPEDPNaLUGVvvC9USMvon1YyHzFq Pattern: 1ALooFNESS Address: 1ALooFNESSm1bZbS61DLc6rq4KRZSg61he Furthermore when I add the -i, it seems it makes way too many words and errors me out: Okay, you've got it tied... no one cares, you weren't the first and not in the block chain. Now do a 10 digit, get it in the chain and sign something proving you had it. If you take all the 9's out, what is your ETA for finding a word? The style that it is finding makes it look like it is already not looking for case sensitive.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
gadman2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 978
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 10, 2013, 03:35:28 PM Last edit: May 10, 2013, 04:08:30 PM by gadman2 |
|
Okay, you've got it tied... no one cares, you weren't the first and not in the block chain. Now do a 10 digit, get it in the chain and sign something proving you had it. If you take all the 9's out, what is your ETA for finding a word? The style that it is finding makes it look like it is already not looking for case sensitive. I have no bitcoins to send sadly, one of my friends is trying to show me a way to prove it without sending bitcoins. He's mentioning something about signatures and bla bla. By the way, I'm not trying to be a dick (never was), so you can cut your prick attitude. I have two lists of 9 letter words, and 10 letter words. That's an ETA on case sens 10 letter words. I can't do non case sens because my video card doesn't have enough memory to support a non case search. Here's a signature proof? I think? Pattern: 1ALooFNESS Address: 1ALooFNESSm1bZbS61DLc6rq4KRZSg61he G6Mm6YwfX77DpPl7aDihZu/pV942vMTG+kVgVQbiRWf2UsX8UePV5AjKoJEn4HKs/i+BaX+0IR6ip+UifpJ51/U= Sig text= Gadman2 owns this signature Pattern: 1CoRNCRiBS Address: 1CoRNCRiBS7Jg1KmRf5r1N7N3LeLg6cMua HHw5SSUsCT/SxREgrhdUN10j6PaaQHI1c+/7n+X3ehXpY0yDM4wPlRV+K8nweB3THqCBmHko+DU3eRpcXb9AOPI= Sig text= Gadman2 owns this signature Pattern: 1HiCCUPPED Address: 1HiCCUPPEDPNaLUGVvvC9USMvon1YyHzFq Gyqwh9sBtplWwipejhJVhxbsw9mJRySYl3GXo8JnGCcnSgyODkWT2vK8uz7iERTrw3u9mPZ5mVdBNjy z/QfiyeU= Sig text= Gadman2 owns this signature Looks like deepceleron won
|
|
|
|
SgtSpike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 10, 2013, 03:38:40 PM |
|
*looks at sig*
I have a lot of cool firstbits...
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
May 10, 2013, 03:59:27 PM |
|
Sorry, but record not tied by a factor of 100x. I did a 10 character dictionary for a while, the file date is 1/24/2012: Pattern: 1MoDERNiSMS Address: 1MoDerniSMsch3tsTEQG69P3toqUvVCTR1 Privkey: Pattern: 1EXECUTABLE Address: 1EXEcutaBLEbJEV8BYX4CPbzvb5131zXnQ Privkey: Pattern: 1CARETAKERS Address: 1CArETakERSX8rHjCMyVfQNzTnEBCv7278 Privkey: Pattern: 1ASPHALTUMS Address: 1AsPhALtuMs9Ahcvo8bcTdUFUpnAfheZt2 Privkey: Pattern: 1DARKNESSES Address: 1DaRKnesseSiSCFDAUS9aP2vaEB6nJVFYo Privkey: http://blockexplorer.com/address/1EXEcutaBLEbJEV8BYX4CPbzvb5131zXnQFor reference: >\vanitygen-0.22-win>vanitygen.exe 1MoDERNiSMS Difficulty: 170408517192794400 [373.81 Kkey/s][total 3059456][Prob 0.0%][50% in 10019.9y]By the way, I'm not trying to be a dick (never was), so you can cut your prick attitude.
Yeah, deep celeron has you salughtered with his 10 characters and his are in he block chain. No one is being a prick, you just haven't followed everything in the first post for the hall of fame addresses. You need it in a block chain and you need to sign something proving it is yours. Signature proof will provide the address, text that you are signing, and then the signature. If those are signatures below, I need to know what text you signed to verify it. But first you need the first bits in the block chain, can be a single satoshi. Deep celeron, sign your earliest address so OP can put it in there for longest vanity so far.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
|