Keep lying buddy, I ignored him, and he knows why I ignored him, for he has no respect for privacy and not only leaked my information but then also leaked a private conversation, he is a garbage person that has respect from fools.
How much of your $30,000 did you get back?
50$
Now I am serious when I say that I really have no sympathy for you losing $30,000 in the betking ICO scam because of your conduct here but I am shocked all you got back $50 and you still find it hard to blame serial scammer Dean Nolan?
Please consider going to a doctor to checked for "Stockholm syndrome", you can search online for it. Maybe you suffer from it.
If he pays back peoples on site funds, and leaves then I will have to blame you amigo, however if he runs off I got what I deserve I suppose.
So effectively what SillyBilly (betking mouthpiece) is saying is that if serial scammer Dean Nolan runs off with the remaining funds, I am to blame for serial scammer Dean Nolan scamming him out of his $30,000 investment.
Likewise, SillyBilly also says that I am to blame because serial scammer Dean Nolan scammed ICO investors out of a minimum of
$2.74 million using the stolen 30 million BKB (out of the 100 million BKB tokens).
SillyBilly received back just
$50 from betking for the
$30,000 he invested during the ICO.
Usually I would sympathise with someone in that predicament but since SillyBilly has unnecessarily attacked anybody who exposed betking or asked questions that showed Dean Nolan as a serial scammers - he deserves no sympathy from me, especially after volunteering to be a moderator on the now defunct betking website chat.
"if today is the day I receive legal papers and face a painful Court action for the money I stole from innocent ICO investors and those that purchased BKB/BKT tokens"
Anyone stupid enough to lose money to Dean is far too stupid to file legal papers.
It is a well known fact within the now deleted betking Telegram channel that a group of investors were on the verge of taking joint legal action against serial scammer Dean Nolan but pulled out at the last minute as he made promises to work on the website to turn things around and make a success of it. He obviously failed therefore I hope legal action will begin.
We just burned 1.3 million BKT tokens from last weeks buyback.
So serial scammer Dean Nolan has increased his ownership of betking to around 80% ?
If you actually knew what you were talking about and were able to read you would be able to work out (by going on the betking website) that I technically only have 17.8% of the site but actually only make 10% of the total profit.
30% goes to BKB token holders, 10% to BKT holders and the rest to bankroll providers.
Regardless of how much stake serial scammer Dean Nolan owns, he does not own 100% of betking so shareholders and tokens holders are now around at least 10 days later still without news about why betking is down.