Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 03:41:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Strange Bitcoin Wallet IDs (?)  (Read 655 times)
OROBTC (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1852



View Profile
January 04, 2015, 10:20:07 PM
 #1

...

I do not have any kind of formal (or even informal) training in Bitcoin, but I have used it in various ways.  I have an observation on which I would appreciate comments.  I have seen three "kinds" of wallet IDs:

-- 1(next: Capital Letter) followed by 32 alphanumerics (34 total)   <-- Lots & Lots of them!
-- 1(next: a single digit number) followed by 32 alphanumerics (34 total)   <-- Lots & Lots of these too!
-- 1(next: small letter) followed by 31 alphanumerics (33 total)  <-- Very few

The third case above has worked OK for several transactions.

Why are some wallet ID numbers one "alphanumeric "short"?

Why are there so few wallet IDs that have a small letter (vs. a CAPITAL) as the second alphanumeric?
1714707687
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714707687

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714707687
Reply with quote  #2

1714707687
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714707687
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714707687

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714707687
Reply with quote  #2

1714707687
Report to moderator
1714707687
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714707687

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714707687
Reply with quote  #2

1714707687
Report to moderator
1714707687
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714707687

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714707687
Reply with quote  #2

1714707687
Report to moderator
hexafraction
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 259

Tips welcomed: 1CF4GhXX1RhCaGzWztgE1YZZUcSpoqTbsJ


View Profile
January 04, 2015, 10:37:07 PM
 #2

This is because a wallet ID is a base58 representation of a number (with some cruft at the end for typo verification/checksumming). A similar thing can happen with base 10 numbers. For example, choose a bunch of random numbers from 1 to 1,000,000. Most will be of the form ###,###. Some will be of the form ##,###. Even fewer will be #,###; and so on (less probable) with ###; ##; #.

Due to the range in which these numbers can fall, few will get a lowercase leading letter. Imagine again that we're picking numbers between 1 and 627,500. The leading digit is more likely to be one of 0,1,2,3,4 than it is to be one of 5,6,7,8,9. A similar thing happens with base58check (since the actual address "number" doesn't perfectly "align" to base 58 as in this example).

I have recently become active again after a long period of inactivity. Cryptographic proof that my account has not been compromised is available.
OROBTC (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1852



View Profile
January 04, 2015, 10:48:42 PM
 #3

...

Thanks for the nice explanation!

Now I know who to ask re other technical questions...

j/k   Smiley
mnemonick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0



View Profile
January 04, 2015, 11:46:24 PM
 #4

...

Thanks for the nice explanation!

Now I know who to ask re other technical questions...

j/k   Smiley

sweet mother jesus...!
hexafraction
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 259

Tips welcomed: 1CF4GhXX1RhCaGzWztgE1YZZUcSpoqTbsJ


View Profile
January 04, 2015, 11:51:33 PM
 #5

...

Thanks for the nice explanation!

Now I know who to ask re other technical questions...

j/k   Smiley

It's fine, I'm happy to answer questions that I am qualified and able to.

I have recently become active again after a long period of inactivity. Cryptographic proof that my account has not been compromised is available.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!