VOD is a Fool.

[takagari]

Just to get some more help on this. as I feel like some Higher than God MOFO with a hard on to be the hero is "Fuc*ing me"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=913889

Any advice or help would be nice. I'm now sitting at a -2 for no f*cking reason. ARG!

[suchmoon]

Just to get some more help on this. as I feel like some Higher than God MOFO with a hard on to be the hero is "Fuc*ing me"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=913889

Any advice or help would be nice. I'm now sitting at a -2 for no f*cking reason. ARG!

Bitcoin Discussion? Really?

[takagari]

This system is fucked
I just got denied a transaction and deal due to my rating.

Because the Admins and Mod's are allowing this guy to run around with a God complex.

So it's effecting my bitcoin life.

So Yes. This is a serious issue that really needs to be looked into.
Stop letting fuck whits with no life, control others like this.

[suchmoon]

This system is fucked
I just got denied a transaction and deal due to my rating.

Because the Admins and Mod's are allowing this guy to run around with a God complex.

So it's effecting my bitcoin life.

So Yes. This is a serious issue that really needs to be looked into.
Stop letting fuck whits with no life, control others like this.

Have you PMed VOD? Have you given him/her a reasonable timeframe to reply?

Seems you haven't because the neg trust was posted just today.

I can't see anything good coming out of this off topic rant. You might want to step back and calmly re-evaluate the situation. Personal attacks on someone who you presumably would like to make amends with might not be the best course of action.

[takagari]

This system is fucked
I just got denied a transaction and deal due to my rating.

Because the Admins and Mod's are allowing this guy to run around with a God complex.

So it's effecting my bitcoin life.

So Yes. This is a serious issue that really needs to be looked into.
Stop letting fuck whits with no life, control others like this.

Have you PMed VOD? Have you given him/her a reasonable timeframe to reply?

Seems you haven't because the neg trust was posted just today.

I can't see anything good coming out of this off topic rant. You might want to step back and calmly re-evaluate the situation. Personal attacks on someone who you presumably would like to make amends with might not be the best course of action.

I saw the feedback moments after it happened
I pm'd him
That was over 12 hours ago
He was just online a few moments ago.

He randomly slandered my reputation for absolutely ZERO reason. and the system on these forum's allow it.

So yes, time was given, he's been online, and frankly this never should have taken place in the first place.

[redhawk979]

Well clearly you're a scammer because 1 person made an accusation. The free market works.

[jonald_fyookball]

Vod, do you have any proof he is lying about his zipcode?

If not, I suggest you remove the neg feedback, as it
seems unwarranted.

[bitcoin_bagholder]

Correct me if I'm wrong but all postal codes in Canada begin with a letter, followed by a number, then a letter, then a number, then a letter, then a number. Example K2G 2M4. (I'm Canadian)

Maybe Vod thought you were saying yours contained three consecutive zeros (000).

[takagari]

Vod, do you have any proof he is lying about his zipcode?

If not, I suggest you remove the neg feedback, as it
seems unwarranted.

I've started the other thread 12 hours ago, he has ignored it
Ignored three pm's and he has been online since (only 15 mins ago actually)
So it would seem Sir VOD, need not answer to no one.

The trust system really is a good idea, but a system without some sort of checks is a flawed system.

[DannyHamilton]

Belongs in "Meta", or "Scam Accusations", not Bitcoin Discussion.

Reported.

[takagari]

Correct me if I'm wrong but all postal codes in Canada begin with a letter, followed by a number, then a letter, then a number, then a letter, then a number. Example K2G 2M4. (I'm Canadian)

Maybe Vod thought you were saying yours contained three consecutive zeros (000).

Maybe, but I explained in PM why I said 000, as well as sent him the link to unblickus
and included said link within the thread if you look (sorry on phone so copy/paste isnt easy).

My postal code is r0e0k0
to trick hulu you remove the letter's and add 2 zero's, than verify it's good.

That makes my zip 00000... which doenst work. I mean, not overly clearly posted to the topic at original cause. BUT had nothing to do with me scamming/lieing/cheating/ or trying to fake who I was.
I've also made other threads since than with my info/email on them.
He had no actual reason to leave a damn thing.

Let alone go ALLTHE WAY back to March to find a thread to slander me over?

[takagari]

Belongs in "Meta", or "Scam Accusations", not Bitcoin Discussion.

Reported.

True, please move this to SCAM, as I think VOD is scamming users. Clearly it need's help.

But thanks for reading, original thread is in meta

[jonald_fyookball]

Vod, do you have any proof he is lying about his zipcode?

If not, I suggest you remove the neg feedback, as it
seems unwarranted.

I've started the other thread 12 hours ago, he has ignored it
Ignored three pm's and he has been online since (only 15 mins ago actually)
So it would seem Sir VOD, need not answer to no one.

The trust system really is a good idea, but a system without some sort of checks is a flawed system.

Give him some time, maybe he is busy at the moment.
I'm sure we all want to hear Vod's side of the story.

[DannyHamilton]

But thanks for reading, original thread is in meta

I'm aware, and yet this one is not.



Note,

As far as I can tell, Vod left his feedback because you created a thread stating that you are Canadian but requesting a Pre-Paid Credit Card registered to a U.S. zip code so that you can use Hulu against their terms of service.

This is dishonest behavior and is a reflection of your morals and character.  Therefore, Vod has chosen to warn others about your lack of trustworthiness.

[takagari]

Vod, do you have any proof he is lying about his zipcode?

If not, I suggest you remove the neg feedback, as it
seems unwarranted.

I've started the other thread 12 hours ago, he has ignored it
Ignored three pm's and he has been online since (only 15 mins ago actually)
So it would seem Sir VOD, need not answer to no one.

The trust system really is a good idea, but a system without some sort of checks is a flawed system.

Give him some time, maybe he is busy at the moment.
I'm sure we all want to hear Vod's side of the story.

Danny, Thats a stretch... as he said "some reason lied about postal code.. beware" not really "some reason"   pretty obvious.

Time isn't really a factor.
He has no reason.
Look at the guy's trader rating. he posts multiples per day.

He has been online since the first issue.
And in Bitcoins hours are weeks. It's already affected me

[suchmoon]

Belongs in "Meta", or "Scam Accusations", not Bitcoin Discussion.

Reported.

True, please move this to SCAM, as I think VOD is scamming users. Clearly it need's help.

But thanks for reading, original thread is in meta

You're digging your own grave buddy. How is he scamming?

Assuming VOD is wrong about your zip code (I have no clue, nor do I care), do you really think continuing to swear here and make wild accusations is helping to prove otherwise? Also leaving VOD an inflammatory trust rating...

I get you're agitated but this is getting ridiculous. If your PM was sent in a similar tone I'm afraid you might be stuck with your neg for good.

[jonald_fyookball]

But thanks for reading, original thread is in meta

I'm aware, and yet this one is not.



Note,

As far as I can tell, Vod left his feedback because you created a thread stating that you are Canadian but requesting a Pre-Paid Credit Card registered to a U.S. zip code so that you can use Hulu against their terms of service.

This is dishonest behavior and is a reflection of your morals and character.  Therefore, Vod has chosen to warn others about your lack of trustworthiness.

I don't think that was it -- it was the triple zero that doesn't match Canadian
zipdcodes, so it was a misunderstanding.   Perhaps Vod will clarify.

Regarding your point, Danny, with all due respect, I disagree.

Faulting someone for wanting to access Hulu
and getting around their terms of service is
overly scrupulous, IMO... and not
deserving of negative trust.

[takagari]

Belongs in "Meta", or "Scam Accusations", not Bitcoin Discussion.

Reported.

True, please move this to SCAM, as I think VOD is scamming users. Clearly it need's help.

But thanks for reading, original thread is in meta

You're digging your own grave buddy. How is he scamming?

Assuming VOD is wrong about your zip code (I have no clue, nor do I care), do you really think continuing to swear here and make wild accusations is helping to prove otherwise? Also leaving VOD an inflammatory trust rating...

I get you're agitated but this is getting ridiculous. If your PM was sent in a similar tone I'm afraid you might be stuck with your neg for good.

I'm unsure you really see this?

If you were at a huge convention.
Looking to sell/buy
And some random dude walked up to you and screamed "HEY! This guy RIGHT HERE, he might be a scammer! BEWARE!"
Than walked away. No reason, no questions. No response.

You'd just take it and walk away.
people in the building now, maybe won't buy your product, ignore you, or think you are infact a scammer.

But that's fine right? The guy who did it. He's fine right. It's withing his right to do what he did?

Give it time. Who care's what sort of damage is done

[DannyHamilton]

Regarding your point, Danny, with all due respect, I disagree.

Faulting someone for wanting to access Hulu
and getting around their terms of service is
overly scrupulous, IMO... and not
deserving of negative trust.

That's the great thing about the trust system.

We each get to choose whose feedback we trust.  If you disagree with the requirements that I place on giving positive or negative feedback, you can take me out of your list.  If there is someone whose feedback you value whom is not in your trust list, you can add them.

The rating we see is based on the individuals whose feedback we find valuable.

[jonald_fyookball]

Regarding your point, Danny, with all due respect, I disagree.

Faulting someone for wanting to access Hulu
and getting around their terms of service is
overly scrupulous, IMO... and not
deserving of negative trust.

That's the great thing about the trust system.

We each get to choose whose feedback we trust.  If you disagree with the requirements that I place on giving positive or negative feedback, you can take me out of your list.  If there is someone whose feedback you value whom is not in your trust list, you can add them.

The rating we see is based on the individuals whose feedback we find valuable.

Yes, but let us not ignore the fact that there is a default trust list,
which most people do not modify...And the fact that Vod
is on the default trust means that he should take extra care
not to falsely neg someone. 

I do agree with Vod most of the time.
But I think there was a misunderstanding
and the OP doesn't deserve the neg.