Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 09:50:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Deleted posts in the Hardware BFL Thread, Double Standards, and Hypocrisy  (Read 8314 times)
Leeroy Jenkins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.


View Profile
April 16, 2015, 06:39:26 PM
 #161

Yep, I call bullshit to the naysayers, mods and non-mods. Think very carefully before you assume something is just "garbage". The topic is BFL and its lies, manipulations, etc. The upper management (many times the subject of mockery) played a not-less-than-99% role in what still struggles to survive off the backs of those fooled by empty promises. (Blaming those fooled is no different from blaming the victim of a crime, so be mindful of that as well.)

The discussion needs to be had, and preventing it helps no one but BFL. Knock it off with the holier than thou bullshit and let people discuss freely.

Bick, who are you to tell us we're all just the average person anyway? Get real. Roll Eyes

.























Federal Trade Commission vs Butterfly Labs













Made ya look. ; )



























brush242 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199652 ) aka TheBitcoinimist aka Rush Reid aka Ken Hunlenton aka Steve Reid aka perfectlycromulentword aka Stephen Mark Reid says: "BFL is fucked" READ THE EARTH-SHATTERING COMMENTARY AT >>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9614841#msg9614841 <<<<
1715377814
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715377814

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715377814
Reply with quote  #2

1715377814
Report to moderator
1715377814
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715377814

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715377814
Reply with quote  #2

1715377814
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715377814
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715377814

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715377814
Reply with quote  #2

1715377814
Report to moderator
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1183


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2015, 07:46:57 PM
 #162

The discussion needs to be had

The discussion needs to be had, but that was not a discussion.

Leeroy Jenkins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.


View Profile
April 16, 2015, 08:27:05 PM
 #163

The discussion needs to be had

The discussion needs to be had, but that was not a discussion.

Reality and 800+ pages prove you're flatout wrong. The thread should've been moved, not locked. Roll Eyes

.























Federal Trade Commission vs Butterfly Labs













Made ya look. ; )



























brush242 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199652 ) aka TheBitcoinimist aka Rush Reid aka Ken Hunlenton aka Steve Reid aka perfectlycromulentword aka Stephen Mark Reid says: "BFL is fucked" READ THE EARTH-SHATTERING COMMENTARY AT >>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9614841#msg9614841 <<<<
ABitNut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 764
Merit: 500


I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 01:13:09 AM
 #164

The discussion needs to be had

The discussion needs to be had, but that was not a discussion.

Reality and 800+ pages prove you're flatout wrong. The thread should've been moved, not locked. Roll Eyes

800+ pages containing a low percentage of useful post and a tonne of useless posts. Quite a few different topics being argued (since BFL fucked people over in quite a few different ways). That thread is a mess. I would have personally kept it open until BFL has to close up shop, but it was bound to be locked sooner or later.

The thread has definitively served a purpose though. And it still is there for reference.


Now where's the thread on Josh vs. Bruno again?
Leeroy Jenkins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 02:45:08 AM
 #165

800+ pages containing a low percentage of useful post and a tonne of useless posts.

Sorry, but unless you can go through the thread, post by post, and explain in each case, according to explicit criteria, that such and such post is "useless" to give us a real percentage rather than uselessly gesturing that that is the case, you really are talking a lot of nonsense.

I'm pretty sure the mods are having loads of fun deleting posts in the new thread. Gotta make those bitcoins BFL paid regularly count for something, huh?

Quote
Now where's the thread on Josh vs. Bruno again?

Very useless comment, but thanks for sharing! It would be a shame if someone reported useless banter sentence by sentence to protect the delicate sensibilities of those who have no reading comprehension. Censorship never had such powerful champions until now...

.























Federal Trade Commission vs Butterfly Labs













Made ya look. ; )



























brush242 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199652 ) aka TheBitcoinimist aka Rush Reid aka Ken Hunlenton aka Steve Reid aka perfectlycromulentword aka Stephen Mark Reid says: "BFL is fucked" READ THE EARTH-SHATTERING COMMENTARY AT >>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9614841#msg9614841 <<<<
ABitNut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 764
Merit: 500


I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 03:42:00 AM
 #166

800+ pages containing a low percentage of useful post and a tonne of useless posts.

Sorry, but unless you can go through the thread, post by post, and explain in each case, according to explicit criteria, that such and such post is "useless" to give us a real percentage rather than uselessly gesturing that that is the case, you really are talking a lot of nonsense.

My statement is my opinion. I have read every post in that thread as it unfolded. You're asking me to back up my opinion. That would be fair enough if you had provided the same for your opinion that the vast majority (please correct me if I'm paraphrasing you wrong here) of posts in that thread are meaningful.

I'll humor you anyway, since it's so easy. Starting from the most recent post, working my way back up the page:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069694#msg11069694 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069615#msg11069615 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069563#msg11069563 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069544#msg11069544 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069226#msg11069226 -> androturdusphilia

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11067652#msg11067652 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11067360#msg11067360 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066861#msg11066861 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not (Bruno actually tries to stop this derailment, instead derailing the thread onto androturdusphilia)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066289#msg11066289 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066201#msg11066201 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066146#msg11066146 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11065967#msg11065967 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11065783#msg11065783 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not

13 out of 17 posts...  Say roughly 75% is crap. There you go.

Side note: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066175#msg11066175 -> Mentioning the argument is off topic. See, I'm not the only one that thinks the thread is cluttered. Quelle suprise!


I'm pretty sure the mods are having loads of fun deleting posts in the new thread. Gotta make those bitcoins BFL paid regularly count for something, huh?
Unfounded allegation. Do you see the irony?

Quote
Now where's the thread on Josh vs. Bruno again?

Very useless comment, but thanks for sharing! It would be a shame if someone reported useless banter sentence by sentence to protect the delicate sensibilities of those who have no reading comprehension. Censorship never had such powerful champions until now...
Excuse me for trying to end my post on a lighter note. I don't like being sour. You can have all the sour grapes for yourself if you like them.
Leeroy Jenkins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 04:03:53 AM
 #167

Lol, cherrypicking doesn't substantiate your claim, pal. You should also realize that you aren't in good company since my claims are backed up by this thread. Talk about losing before the battle even started. LMAO!  Cheesy

.























Federal Trade Commission vs Butterfly Labs













Made ya look. ; )



























brush242 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199652 ) aka TheBitcoinimist aka Rush Reid aka Ken Hunlenton aka Steve Reid aka perfectlycromulentword aka Stephen Mark Reid says: "BFL is fucked" READ THE EARTH-SHATTERING COMMENTARY AT >>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9614841#msg9614841 <<<<
VenusFlyTrap
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


Are you OCD?


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 04:15:34 AM
 #168

800+ pages containing a low percentage of useful post and a tonne of useless posts.

Sorry, but unless you can go through the thread, post by post, and explain in each case, according to explicit criteria, that such and such post is "useless" to give us a real percentage rather than uselessly gesturing that that is the case, you really are talking a lot of nonsense.

My statement is my opinion. I have read every post in that thread as it unfolded. You're asking me to back up my opinion. That would be fair enough if you had provided the same for your opinion that the vast majority (please correct me if I'm paraphrasing you wrong here) of posts in that thread are meaningful.

I'll humor you anyway, since it's so easy. Starting from the most recent post, working my way back up the page:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069694#msg11069694 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069615#msg11069615 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069563#msg11069563 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069544#msg11069544 -> androturdusphilia
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11069226#msg11069226 -> androturdusphilia

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11067652#msg11067652 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11067360#msg11067360 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066861#msg11066861 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not (Bruno actually tries to stop this derailment, instead derailing the thread onto androturdusphilia)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066289#msg11066289 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066201#msg11066201 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066146#msg11066146 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11065967#msg11065967 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11065783#msg11065783 -> Arguing if Bruno is a racist or not

13 out of 17 posts...  Say roughly 75% is crap. There you go.

Side note: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg11066175#msg11066175 -> Mentioning the argument is off topic. See, I'm not the only one that thinks the thread is cluttered. Quelle suprise!


I'm pretty sure the mods are having loads of fun deleting posts in the new thread. Gotta make those bitcoins BFL paid regularly count for something, huh?
Unfounded allegation. Do you see the irony?

Quote
Now where's the thread on Josh vs. Bruno again?

Very useless comment, but thanks for sharing! It would be a shame if someone reported useless banter sentence by sentence to protect the delicate sensibilities of those who have no reading comprehension. Censorship never had such powerful champions until now...
Excuse me for trying to end my post on a lighter note. I don't like being sour. You can have all the sour grapes for yourself if you like them.

You could have used all this energy to investigate BFL. You know that there is a lot to do. Keep up the good work and keep wasting your time fighting the people who you don't like.

WARNING! SLok is a known user of SilkRoad and SilkRoad 2.0 who used to moderate BFL's forums. Can't get your refund? Email FTC attorney Helen Wong at: hwong [at] ftc.gov Follow the FTC vs. BF Labs court docs: http://tinyurl.com/ftcvsbfl
ABitNut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 764
Merit: 500


I'm a cynic, I'm a quaint


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 04:22:13 AM
 #169

Lol, cherrypicking doesn't substantiate your claim, pal. You should also realize that you aren't in good company since my claims are backed up by this thread. Talk about losing before the battle even started. LMAO!  Cheesy

How is taking the most recent posts cherry picking? For what it is worth I found the thread entertaining and I've certainly contributed to those triple digits daily views. But I also found it mostly off-topic and fairly useless in stopping / warning newbies about BFL's evil ways.

Now tell me again how giving my opinion equals losing a battle and how you've substantiated your claim "Hey, this thread backs me up!". At least you find my posts entertaining, I guess. So enjoy it!

You could have used all this energy to investigate BFL. You know that there is a lot to do. Keep up the good work and keep wasting your time fighting the people who you don't like.

All this energy was 5 minutes. I'm sorry that I don't know (yet?) of a way to put another nail into BFL's coffin in about 5 minutes. If I did, I'd hammer it in slowly just to make it more painful to them. They're scum and they seem so deluded that they don't even seem to realise it. Which leads me to believe they'll be back with a new scam soon.
Bicknellski
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 17, 2015, 05:13:07 AM
 #170

The discussion needs to be had

The discussion needs to be had, but that was not a discussion.

Reality and 800+ pages prove you're flatout wrong. The thread should've been moved, not locked. Roll Eyes

800+ pages containing a low percentage of useful post and a tonne of useless posts. Quite a few different topics being argued (since BFL fucked people over in quite a few different ways). That thread is a mess. I would have personally kept it open until BFL has to close up shop, but it was bound to be locked sooner or later.

The thread has definitively served a purpose though. And it still is there for reference.


Now where's the thread on Josh vs. Bruno again?

Agreed. Too much noise little signal especially in the last year.

Dogie trust abuse, spam, bullying, conspiracy posts & insults to forum members. Ask the mods or admins to move Dogie's spam or off topic stalking posts to the link above.
VenusFlyTrap
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


Are you OCD?


View Profile
April 17, 2015, 05:58:16 AM
 #171

Lol, cherrypicking doesn't substantiate your claim, pal. You should also realize that you aren't in good company since my claims are backed up by this thread. Talk about losing before the battle even started. LMAO!  Cheesy

How is taking the most recent posts cherry picking? For what it is worth I found the thread entertaining and I've certainly contributed to those triple digits daily views. But I also found it mostly off-topic and fairly useless in stopping / warning newbies about BFL's evil ways.

Now tell me again how giving my opinion equals losing a battle and how you've substantiated your claim "Hey, this thread backs me up!". At least you find my posts entertaining, I guess. So enjoy it!

You could have used all this energy to investigate BFL. You know that there is a lot to do. Keep up the good work and keep wasting your time fighting the people who you don't like.

All this energy was 5 minutes. I'm sorry that I don't know (yet?) of a way to put another nail into BFL's coffin in about 5 minutes. If I did, I'd hammer it in slowly just to make it more painful to them. They're scum and they seem so deluded that they don't even seem to realise it. Which leads me to believe they'll be back with a new scam soon.

You say so? But wait. You will be busy searching for useless posts, so you will miss the scam. Eh... you seem to have other priorities.

WARNING! SLok is a known user of SilkRoad and SilkRoad 2.0 who used to moderate BFL's forums. Can't get your refund? Email FTC attorney Helen Wong at: hwong [at] ftc.gov Follow the FTC vs. BF Labs court docs: http://tinyurl.com/ftcvsbfl
Muhammed Zakir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 506


I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!


View Profile WWW
April 17, 2015, 06:07:19 AM
 #172

Happy posting! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1027518.0

P.S. Can you please lock this thread for now?

H1N1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 17, 2015, 06:17:14 AM
 #173

Happy posting! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1027518.0

P.S. Can you please lock this thread for now?

What does that thread have to do with this? Why do you insist on spamming every thread with useless replies?

Muhammed Zakir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 506


I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!


View Profile WWW
April 17, 2015, 10:18:47 AM
 #174

What does that thread have to do with this? Why do you insist on spamming every thread with useless replies?

This thread is about BFL deleting posts. As these postsare being send by theymos, I thought that might end this thread. So I thought to post here.

However, I was wrong. This thread is discussing more about BFL than about forum-BFL issue. This thread should be in Service Discussion IMHO.

Leeroy Jenkins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.


View Profile
April 18, 2015, 05:03:30 AM
 #175

However, I was wrong. This thread is discussing more about BFL than about forum-BFL issue. This thread should be in Service Discussion IMHO.

No, Muhammed, this thread is exactly where it belongs...

.























Federal Trade Commission vs Butterfly Labs













Made ya look. ; )



























brush242 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199652 ) aka TheBitcoinimist aka Rush Reid aka Ken Hunlenton aka Steve Reid aka perfectlycromulentword aka Stephen Mark Reid says: "BFL is fucked" READ THE EARTH-SHATTERING COMMENTARY AT >>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9614841#msg9614841 <<<<
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!