Riemann hypothesis - Proof

[Tusk]

Here is a link to the shared document any feedback welcome

Riemann hypothesis - Proof
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-OElBSEtYZjZTLUk/view?usp=sharing

As some of the images were difficult to show in the document here are links to larger ones
Main Diagram
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-X0EyV3pXM0dsN0E/view?usp=sharing

Critical Strip
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-WDYtMDd5UDdCMVE/view?usp=sharing

Sine Wave Diagram
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-TkZJU2c4ZVlXVkE/view?usp=sharing

Prime Numbers
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-ZHVOcHV1TjFpSTQ/view?usp=sharing


Thanks

[findftp]

Here is a link to the shared document any feedback welcome

Riemann hypothesis - Proof
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-OElBSEtYZjZTLUk/view?usp=sharing

As some of the images were difficult to show in the document here are links to larger ones
Main Diagram
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-X0EyV3pXM0dsN0E/view?usp=sharing

Critical Strip
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-WDYtMDd5UDdCMVE/view?usp=sharing

Sine Wave Diagram
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-TkZJU2c4ZVlXVkE/view?usp=sharing

Prime Numbers
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz5xt1KEGIi-ZHVOcHV1TjFpSTQ/view?usp=sharing


Thanks

So what's your point?
Just dump some random off topic data in this forum?

[iamback]

I don't have time to study this in detail, and it seems to be off topic of Economics and perhaps belongs in the Technical discussion thread.

But if there is breakthrough on the dimensionality of primes, this could potentially have major implications on cracking public-key cryptography.

[criptix]

didnt read yet, but if its correct the author will get atleast a million $ from the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI)

[findftp]

didnt read yet, but if its correct the author will get atleast a million $ for it

Wow, expect the bitcoin price to jump!
I would exchange all fiat for BTC right now

[username18333]

The problem here is that conventional mathematics uses a flawed (i.e., partially anti-symmetric [i.e., one divided by infinity is equal to zero and one divided by zero is undefined]) numerical system. The Riemann hypothesis should be provable when using Earth’s numerical system with the system’s zero approached from the positive direction (which is of greater magnitude than its positive infinity) in the place of the traditional infinity of the conventional Riemann zeta function.

Code:

ℝ = {*0⁺, …, −*1, …, −1, …, 0⁻, 0⁺, …, 1, …, *1, …, *0⁻}

[bitcoin_purist]

The problem here is that conventional mathematics uses a flawed (i.e., partially anti-symmetric [i.e., one divided by infinity is equal to zero and one divided by zero is undefined]) numerical system. The Riemann hypothesis should be provable when using Earth’s numerical system with the system’s zero approached from the positive direction (which is of greater magnitude than its positive infinity) in the place of the traditional infinity of the conventional Riemann zeta function.

Code:

ℝ = {0⁻, −∞, …, −1, …, −⅟∞, −0⁻, −0⁺, ⅟∞, …, 1, …, ∞, 0⁺}

I don't understand sh*t of what you just said, but it looks important
However, what does this have to do on the economics forum? Isn't it a more appropriate place to put it in the development board if this has technical implications for the functionality of bitcoin or crypto in general?

[cr1776]

The problem here is that conventional mathematics uses a flawed (i.e., partially anti-symmetric [i.e., one divided by infinity is equal to zero and one divided by zero is undefined]) numerical system. The Riemann hypothesis should be provable when using Earth’s numerical system with the system’s zero approached from the positive direction (which is of greater magnitude than its positive infinity) in the place of the traditional infinity of the conventional Riemann zeta function.

Code:

ℝ = {0⁻, −∞, …, −1, …, −⅟∞, −0⁻, −0⁺, ⅟∞, …, 1, …, ∞, 0⁺}

Why is the link through Tor?

[cynicSOB]

I don't understand sh*t of what you just said, but it looks important

it's not... full of baloney

[Reynaldo]

I don't have time to study this in detail, and it seems to be off topic of Economics and perhaps belongs in the Technical discussion thread.

But if there is breakthrough on the dimensionality of primes, this could potentially have major implications on cracking public-key cryptography.

Please define dimensionality of primes.

if people actually found a formula to determine every prime then we couldnt use them for cryptography since it would be easy to determine any given primer number on the sequence and then it would break most of the cryptography that relies on the factorization problem, it was proven by Euclid that there are infinte prime numbers.

https://primes.utm.edu/notes/proofs/infinite/euclids.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer_factorization

[coric]

So, you're trying to reinvent limits? Nice, but you're some centuries late in that.

Yes, the singularity of 1/x can be "removed", even on the complex plane if you add an infinity point to make it a sphere, it becomes a simple reflection
Now Riemann's function is a wee bit more difficult

[coric]

And if you had a proof, you'd be at least a million dollar richer. Why are you posting that here?

[username18333]

So, you're trying to reinvent limits? Nice, but you're some centuries late in that.

Yes, the singularity of 1/x can be "removed", even on the complex plane if you add an infinity point to make it a sphere, it becomes a simple reflection
Now Riemann's function is a wee bit more difficult

Code:

( ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (0⁺, *0⁻) )  ⇒  [( 0 ± 𝑥 = {0⁻ − 𝑥, 0⁺ + 𝑥} = {−𝑥, 𝑥} ) ∧ ( *0 ± 𝑥 = {*0⁺ + 𝑥, *0⁻ − 𝑥} = {−*𝑥, *𝑥} )]

It is not “an infinity point” (coric), for such a point would not accomodate conventional mathematics’ “hyperreal numbers.” Instead, it is an origin—one that has been missed sorely.

[coric]

Code:

( ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (−0, 0) )  ⇒  ( −0 ± 𝑥 = {−𝑥, 𝑥} ) ∧ ( 0 ± 𝑥 = {0⁻ + 𝑥, 0⁺ − 𝑥} )

It is not “an infinity point” (coric), for such a point would not accomodate conventional mathematics’ “hyperreal numbers.” Instead, it is an origin—one that has been missed sorely.

The "point" is the one which you add to the complex plane to make the sphere ^C (can't post correct symbol on my phone). Guess after whom it is named
And hyperteal numbers? The Riemann zeta function is defined on the complex plane! You can't even formulaze the hypothesis in some set where you add some funny infinitesimals to the real numbers in order to make 1/x somehow more pleasing. In complex analysis that's already as simple as it can get.

[R2D221]

The Riemann hypothesis has nothing to do with Bitcoin, at all.

This should go in Off-Topic.

[username18333]

Code:

( ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (0⁺, *0⁻) )  ⇒  [( 0 ± 𝑥 = {0⁻ − 𝑥, 0⁺ + 𝑥} = {−𝑥, 𝑥} ) ∧ ( *0 ± 𝑥 = {*0⁺ + 𝑥, *0⁻ − 𝑥} = {−*𝑥, *𝑥} )]

It is not “an infinity point” (coric), for such a point would not accomodate conventional mathematics’ “hyperreal numbers.” Instead, it is an origin—one that has been missed sorely.

The "point" is the one which you add to the complex plane to make the sphere ^C (can't post correct symbol on my phone). Guess after whom it is named
And hyperteal numbers? The Riemann zeta function is defined on the complex plane! You can't even formulaze the hypothesis in some set where you add some funny infinitesimals to the real numbers in order to make 1/x somehow more pleasing. In complex analysis that's already as simple as it can get.

Code:

( ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (0⁺, *0⁻) )  ⇒  ( 𝜉(*0 ± 𝑥) = ½[½ + 𝑖(*0 ± 𝑥)]([½ + 𝑖(*0 ± 𝑥)] − 1)𝜋^(−[½ + 𝑖(*0 ± 𝑥)] ÷ 2)Γ([½ + 𝑖(*0 ± 𝑥)] ÷ 2)𝜁(½ + 𝑖(*0 ± 𝑥)) ≟ 0 )

You were saying?

[Possum577]

IF the OP doesn't have time to summarize the articles and share his opinion on them then I don't think we have the time to do the same.

[Possum577]

How does this mathematical theory serve as a predictor for the human action of supply and demand, which directly impacts the price?

[username18333]

How does this mathematical theory serve as a predictor for the human action of supply and demand, which directly impacts the price?

If earthly humanity could reach the point of proving that hypothesis, it would transcend “supply and demand” (Possum577).

[R2D221]

How does this mathematical theory serve as a predictor for the human action of supply and demand, which directly impacts the price?

If earthly humanity could reach the point of proving that hypothesis, it would transcend “supply and demand” (Possum577).

But, would it explain it?