|
canary (OP)
|
 |
January 07, 2015, 04:31:41 PM
Last edit: January 11, 2015, 08:41:28 PM by canary |
|
I don't have much time to earn money from signature campaigns. If you have time, it's possible to earn 0.12BTC/month or more. Posts: 340+++ Activity: 294 Position: Sr. Member Trust: Neutral Price: 0.33 BTC Escrowed by monbux. I want a fast&safe sale, just post it if you're serious  |
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 09, 2015, 10:44:28 PM
Last edit: January 11, 2015, 08:43:07 PM by canary |
|
C'mon guys it's not much for an account like this...
|
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
January 09, 2015, 11:02:41 PM |
|
how much do you want for it?
I assume you can prove ownership.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 11, 2015, 08:42:48 PM |
|
how much do you want for it?
I assume you can prove ownership.....
The price is 0.33 BTC and I use escrow nothing to worry about... |
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
January 11, 2015, 08:45:03 PM |
|
how much do you want for it?
I assume you can prove ownership.....
The price is 0.33 BTC and I use escrow nothing to worry about... Well when you created the thread you were asking .3 (as you pointed out in the previous post that you deleted and as is evidenced by the title of the thread when I replied). Are you able to provide a signed message from an address posted in an old post that would prove ownership of the account. |
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 11, 2015, 08:49:50 PM |
|
how much do you want for it?
I assume you can prove ownership.....
The price is 0.33 BTC and I use escrow nothing to worry about... Well when you created the thread you were asking .3 (as you pointed out in the previous post that you deleted and as is evidenced by the title of the thread when I replied). Are you able to provide a signed message from an address posted in an old post that would prove ownership of the account. I revised the price, cause I realised that is really low for the market average  |
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
January 11, 2015, 08:50:28 PM |
|
how much do you want for it?
I assume you can prove ownership.....
The price is 0.33 BTC and I use escrow nothing to worry about... Well when you created the thread you were asking .3 (as you pointed out in the previous post that you deleted and as is evidenced by the title of the thread when I replied). Are you able to provide a signed message from an address posted in an old post that would prove ownership of the account. I revised the price, cause I realised that is really low for the market average Are you able to provide a signed message from an address posted in an old post that would prove ownership of the account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 11, 2015, 09:11:24 PM |
|
how much do you want for it?
I assume you can prove ownership.....
The price is 0.33 BTC and I use escrow nothing to worry about... Well when you created the thread you were asking .3 (as you pointed out in the previous post that you deleted and as is evidenced by the title of the thread when I replied). Are you able to provide a signed message from an address posted in an old post that would prove ownership of the account. I'm not able to provide a signed message; because I used Bittrex wallet with that account. |
|
|
|
|
NewDeal2014
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 12, 2015, 03:22:24 AM |
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
|
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
January 12, 2015, 03:25:45 AM |
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
He doesn't need to post it now. If escrow is used then he can provide it to escrow prior to him receiving funds for the transaction. The escrow will not release funds until a signed message can be verified. By agreeing that he can sign a message now he can give more legitimacy to the account he is trying to sell. |
|
|
|
|
NewDeal2014
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 12, 2015, 04:28:27 AM |
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
He doesn't need to post it now. If escrow is used then he can provide it to escrow prior to him receiving funds for the transaction. The escrow will not release funds until a signed message can be verified. By agreeing that he can sign a message now he can give more legitimacy to the account he is trying to sell. Understood. That makes more sense. Thank you for clearing that up. |
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 12, 2015, 05:45:59 AM |
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
He doesn't need to post it now. If escrow is used then he can provide it to escrow prior to him receiving funds for the transaction. The escrow will not release funds until a signed message can be verified. By agreeing that he can sign a message now he can give more legitimacy to the account he is trying to sell. I believe Bitcoin message is not the only way to do that, I can provide transaction information which are gained from signature campaigns and you can check if it's the same Bitcoin adress or not in Blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339
|
|
January 12, 2015, 05:51:48 AM |
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
He doesn't need to post it now. If escrow is used then he can provide it to escrow prior to him receiving funds for the transaction. The escrow will not release funds until a signed message can be verified. By agreeing that he can sign a message now he can give more legitimacy to the account he is trying to sell. I believe Bitcoin message is not the only way to do that, I can provide transaction information which are gained from signature campaigns and you can check if it's the same Bitcoin adress or not in Blockchain. That would be something that is between you and a potential buyer, but I would disagree. |
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
|
January 12, 2015, 06:07:33 AM |
|
sr member accs go for 0.18
|
yolo
|
|
|
|
doggieTattoo
|
|
January 12, 2015, 06:09:57 AM |
|
sr member accs go for 0.18
I don't think this is true. I have sen them go for over .4 BTC when the seller is reputable. |
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 12, 2015, 10:11:57 PM |
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
He doesn't need to post it now. If escrow is used then he can provide it to escrow prior to him receiving funds for the transaction. The escrow will not release funds until a signed message can be verified. By agreeing that he can sign a message now he can give more legitimacy to the account he is trying to sell. I believe Bitcoin message is not the only way to do that, I can provide transaction information which are gained from signature campaigns and you can check if it's the same Bitcoin adress or not in Blockchain. That would be something that is between you and a potential buyer, but I would disagree. Yeah you're right, thanks for the information about Bitcoin message. Everyday I'm learning new things in this forum |
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 14, 2015, 09:40:56 PM
Last edit: January 14, 2015, 09:57:33 PM by canary |
|
sr member accs go for 0.18
I don't think this is true. I have sen them go for over .4 BTC when the seller is reputable. That's right, market average is 0.40 BTC for Sr. Account. |
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2015, 10:36:18 PM |
|
Sale is still open, the price is not too much for a Sr. Member account...
Posts: 340+++
Activity: 294
Position: Sr. Member
Trust: 0: -0 / +0(0)
Price: 0.33 BTC
Escrowed by monbux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
canary (OP)
|
|
January 30, 2015, 07:58:14 PM |
|
Bump
|
|
|
|
|
|
