Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2024, 06:49:18 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Video:BitCrane T-720 of 7.2 TH/S  (Read 1989 times)
BitCrane-Tech (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 09:50:06 AM
Last edit: January 16, 2015, 07:19:09 AM by BitCrane-Tech
 #1

http://www.bitcrane.com/images/T-720-n1.jpg

Check it out here :http://youtu.be/9gjUl7X2K8Y

With a massive hashrate of 7.2 Th/s and in a form that can slide into a standard 19-inch server rack, the T-720 is designed amidst the current high bitcoin difficulty level for scaled mining from mid-sized mining operations to large data center deployments.


 

 
mazedk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 14, 2015, 11:12:41 AM
 #2

not being good at chinese.

Whats the w/ghs | ghs/j of these boxes?

Edit: Seems its 4600w for - X - Is this in green mode, or in turbo mode?

Edit2: found an English button on the website. 7800w in turbo mode :/
Tupsu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 14, 2015, 11:55:14 AM
 #3


This miner is  outdated, like a half a year ago was
Butterfly Labs BFL BitForce 500 GH/s Mini Rig

http://www.coindesk.com/inside-butterfly-labs-the-asic-bitcoin-mining-arms-race/
Also, lots of USB cables and USB hubs, like this T-720


Powerful miner ?
My KNC Neptune is produced in October. Requires 2,55kW (only 2 PSU) and mined 4TH/s (6 modules)
It takes several times less space , and is still outdated.

You need to build a time machine to sell this T-720 "Powerful miner"
wpgdeez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 02:27:50 PM
 #4

Too bad about the efficiency, it does look like an excellent design.
xstr8guy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1004


Glow Stick Dance!


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 03:07:44 PM
 #5

Well the timing of this couldn't have been worse!

What chip is this using that has such terrible efficiency?
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2015, 03:57:05 PM
 #6

Well the timing of this couldn't have been worse!

What chip is this using that has such terrible efficiency?

Its been out for months and months and months already, this is just a video post.

IYFTech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 04:24:18 PM
 #7

These contraptions were bulky, inefficient & expensive when they came out ages ago - so now they're old, bulky, inefficient & expensive contraptions........

-- Smiley  Thank you for smoking  Smiley --  If you paid VAT to dogie for items you should read this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018906.0
Mabsark
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 06:33:18 PM
 #8

 Shocked It's a mine of the beholder.
aclass
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 251


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 06:41:49 PM
 #9

it's pretty ... but just on the front. the design itself s*** with all those cables hanging around. with only a small portion taken on the front, it is also a space waster
why would you post this video? willing to sell some or?
thomas_s
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 14, 2015, 09:03:03 PM
 #10

it's pretty ... but just on the front. the design itself s*** with all those cables hanging around. with only a small portion taken on the front, it is also a space waster
why would you post this video? willing to sell some or?
I believe its meant to be placed in DC racks / rack mountable, there would be no need for it to look good on the back / sides while in a rack.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!