Does Atlantis really exist?

[BADecker]

Some food for thought

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcPgIphDWGY&index=1&list=LL2SUmeAzu4qXRc5uQe4eZCw

There is now mounting evidence that there existed a lost civilisation/s that was were submerged after the last ice age.

that's really crazy though and the fact they could survive is bonkers.

Why is it bonkers? After all, we are the descendants of the people of Atlantis which was a worldwide trade organization. So why might it be bonkers that some lost civilization survived in some other way?

Actually, there is a reason why this "lost civilization" doesn't exist. But it is not what you think.

[BitMos]

Actually, there is a reason why this "lost civilization" doesn't exist. But it is not what you think.

if there was a civilization before it or self-destruct (with a few remaining survivants, in 100's ww) or it faced the "contact" and wasn't ready, ie didn't made peace with life it self. Maybe someone at the time tried to ban a plant?

p.s. we lack a tinfoilgearedsmiley :  

[BADecker]

Actually, there is a reason why this "lost civilization" doesn't exist. But it is not what you think.

if there was a civilization before it or self-destruct (with a few remaining survivants, in 100's ww) or it faced the "contact" and wasn't ready, ie didn't made peace with life it self. Maybe someone at the time tried to ban a plant?

p.s. we lack a tinfoilgearedsmiley :  

No. The reason that there isn't any lost civilization anywhere, and the reason that there never was, is that Noah and his family were the only survivors of the Great Flood of his day - about 4,500 years ago.

All people are descendants of the sons of Noah, even though many of us have the mingling of inferior DNA in our bodies, DNA from the angels that God translated into our mega universe from their own mega universes, to have the pleasure of helping Him with making our universe be what He wanted it to be. My guess is that God didn't want this mingling, but that the angels did it on their own. Some of these angels have remained obstinate in their ways (evil angels, like Satan). Others have repented of their deeds and gone back to God in friendship. Some never turned from God at all. Long story.



EDIT: Man's DNA is stronger and is overcoming the weaker angel(alien) DNA within us. This is because God made the angel DNA only sufficient for them to keep them in bodily form while they were working on our universe with God. Their DNA wasn't meant to be strong for this universe like ours is. Perhaps they were going to be sent "home" sometime, after people had spread out and populated the stars. Many of the angels wouldn't have been needed after that.

The populating of the stars by man will never take place because Satan, a very powerful angel, turned evil, and brought evil(imperfection) into this universe, and God doesn't go for even a smidgen of imperfection. So, He is going to destroy this universe and remake it for us, long before we would have the ability to populate even any of the near stars.

[spazzdla]

Perhaps it was antartica and some massive disaster hit earth.  There is no real evidence proving just how old humanity is.  Not too long ago relative to the existance of earth antartica would of had a very nice climate.

Weapons to move the plates of the earth thus annihilating humanity?  If Merica or Russia had this tech and one started to get invaded only a fool would beleive they wouldn't take the samson option.

[spazzdla]

Actually, there is a reason why this "lost civilization" doesn't exist. But it is not what you think.

if there was a civilization before it or self-destruct (with a few remaining survivants, in 100's ww) or it faced the "contact" and wasn't ready, ie didn't made peace with life it self. Maybe someone at the time tried to ban a plant?

p.s. we lack a tinfoilgearedsmiley :  

No. The reason that there isn't any lost civilization anywhere, and the reason that there never was, is that Noah and his family were the only survivors of the Great Flood of his day - about 4,500 years ago.

All people are descendants of the sons of Noah, even though many of us have the mingling of inferior DNA in our bodies, DNA from the angels that God translated into our mega universe from their own mega universes, to have the pleasure of helping Him with making our universe be what He wanted it to be. My guess is that God didn't want this mingling, but that the angels did it on their own. Some of these angels have remained obstinate in their ways (evil angels, like Satan). Others have repented of their deeds and gone back to God in friendship. Some never turned from God at all. Long story.



EDIT: Man's DNA is stronger and is overcoming the weaker angel(alien) DNA within us. This is because God made the angel DNA only sufficient for them to keep them in bodily form while they were working on our universe with God. Their DNA wasn't meant to be strong for this universe like ours is. Perhaps they were going to be sent "home" sometime, after people had spread out and populated the stars. Many of the angels wouldn't have been needed after that.

The populating of the stars by man will never take place because Satan, a very powerful angel, turned evil, and brought evil(imperfection) into this universe, and God doesn't go for even a smidgen of imperfection. So, He is going to destroy this universe and remake it for us, long before we would have the ability to populate even any of the near stars.

Are we seriously talking about DNA and have sex with angles..................... I.. wow.

[BADecker]

Actually, there is a reason why this "lost civilization" doesn't exist. But it is not what you think.

if there was a civilization before it or self-destruct (with a few remaining survivants, in 100's ww) or it faced the "contact" and wasn't ready, ie didn't made peace with life it self. Maybe someone at the time tried to ban a plant?

p.s. we lack a tinfoilgearedsmiley :  

No. The reason that there isn't any lost civilization anywhere, and the reason that there never was, is that Noah and his family were the only survivors of the Great Flood of his day - about 4,500 years ago.

All people are descendants of the sons of Noah, even though many of us have the mingling of inferior DNA in our bodies, DNA from the angels that God translated into our mega universe from their own mega universes, to have the pleasure of helping Him with making our universe be what He wanted it to be. My guess is that God didn't want this mingling, but that the angels did it on their own. Some of these angels have remained obstinate in their ways (evil angels, like Satan). Others have repented of their deeds and gone back to God in friendship. Some never turned from God at all. Long story.



EDIT: Man's DNA is stronger and is overcoming the weaker angel(alien) DNA within us. This is because God made the angel DNA only sufficient for them to keep them in bodily form while they were working on our universe with God. Their DNA wasn't meant to be strong for this universe like ours is. Perhaps they were going to be sent "home" sometime, after people had spread out and populated the stars. Many of the angels wouldn't have been needed after that.

The populating of the stars by man will never take place because Satan, a very powerful angel, turned evil, and brought evil(imperfection) into this universe, and God doesn't go for even a smidgen of imperfection. So, He is going to destroy this universe and remake it for us, long before we would have the ability to populate even any of the near stars.

Are we seriously talking about DNA and have sex with angles..................... I.. wow.

Yes. That's where some of the varieties and abilities of human beings come from. That's part of the reason why some people have more muscle, others are smarter, others are prettier, others are great thinkers, others are weaker in various ways. It comes from the introduction of alien (angel) DNA into our systems back at times both before and after the Flood. Personally, I don't think it is happening at present, but how could I really know?

Human DNA is made for Earth. Angel DNA in us is being gradually overcome, through the generations, by our human DNA bodily systems. But it still exerts some influence in most if not all of us.

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

Hi OP, just a friendly tip regarding spelling / grammer

Does atlantis really exist

Do you think Atlantis exists?
Does he think Atlantis exists?
Do they think Atlantis exists?
Does Google think Atlantis exists?
Do I think Atlantis exists?

Hope this helps!

[Aggressor66]

If it did exist, it was most likely a post-Flood island somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean, leaving only much smaller islands still sitting above the Atlantic Ocean’s surface.

[poisenrang]

If it did exist, it was most likely a post-Flood island somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean, leaving only much smaller islands still sitting above the Atlantic Ocean’s surface.

truely a loner island.

[BADecker]

When you look at the video "‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress," by Graham Hancock, you see that, even though the times of the events may not be correct, that there was a worldwide trade collaboration, far in the distant past. The thing known as "Atlantis" may or may not have been a separate island location. It may have been the capitol of the worldwide trade organization. It may have been a pattern, something like flags proclaim what nation or grouping we exist with. Only the "flag" called "Atlantis" may have been something far greater than a simple flag like we have. It may have been the symbol of the various relationships to the ancient worldwide trade organization, built in a shape, right in the ground of certain lands, built to resemble the capitol city of Atlantis.

The point is, whatever the timelines, whatever the archaeological finds, whatever ancient technology existed, there was a time in the distant past, for sure beyond 4,500 years ago, where worldwide civilization existed. And this civilization was far greater in some ways than ours is today, both scientifically (different kind of science), and maybe in population, as well.

The term "Atlantis" may certainly have its base in a single "place." But there is a good chance that the word "Atlantis" was a term devised to encompass the whole worldwide trade organization of the distant past.

[notbatman]

When you look at the video "‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress," by Graham Hancock, you see that, even though the times of the events may not be correct, that there was a worldwide trade collaboration, far in the distant past. The thing known as "Atlantis" may or may not have been a separate island location. It may have been the capitol of the worldwide trade organization. It may have been a pattern, something like flags proclaim what nation or grouping we exist with. Only the "flag" called "Atlantis" may have been something far greater than a simple flag like we have. It may have been the symbol of the various relationships to the ancient worldwide trade organization, built in a shape, right in the ground of certain lands, built to resemble the capitol city of Atlantis.

The point is, whatever the timelines, whatever the archaeological finds, whatever ancient technology existed, there was a time in the distant past, for sure beyond 4,500 years ago, where worldwide civilization existed. And this civilization was far greater in some ways than ours is today, both scientifically (different kind of science), and maybe in population, as well.

The term "Atlantis" may certainly have its base in a single "place." But there is a good chance that the word "Atlantis" was a term devised to encompass the whole worldwide trade organization of the distant past.

Is it a big step to suppose that this is what they're working on in area 52; that space aliens while probably out there are not the source of the technological inspiration?

I only ask because the grammatical errors in the title of this thread have a direct correlation the "IS UFO or ALIENS are real ?" thread and it's a simple case of putting a + b together for me.

[BADecker]

When you look at the video "‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress," by Graham Hancock, you see that, even though the times of the events may not be correct, that there was a worldwide trade collaboration, far in the distant past. The thing known as "Atlantis" may or may not have been a separate island location. It may have been the capitol of the worldwide trade organization. It may have been a pattern, something like flags proclaim what nation or grouping we exist with. Only the "flag" called "Atlantis" may have been something far greater than a simple flag like we have. It may have been the symbol of the various relationships to the ancient worldwide trade organization, built in a shape, right in the ground of certain lands, built to resemble the capitol city of Atlantis.

The point is, whatever the timelines, whatever the archaeological finds, whatever ancient technology existed, there was a time in the distant past, for sure beyond 4,500 years ago, where worldwide civilization existed. And this civilization was far greater in some ways than ours is today, both scientifically (different kind of science), and maybe in population, as well.

The term "Atlantis" may certainly have its base in a single "place." But there is a good chance that the word "Atlantis" was a term devised to encompass the whole worldwide trade organization of the distant past.

Is it a big step to suppose that this is what they're working on in area 52; that space aliens while probably out there are not the source of the technological inspiration?

I only ask because the grammatical errors in the title of this thread have a direct correlation the "IS UFO or ALIENS are real ?" thread and it's a simple case of putting a + b together for me.

It is not a big step, but...

Even though scientists and archaeologists seem to have figured out that there was this great big cataclysm around 12,000 years ago, there is still one problem. That problem is this. They use carbon dating as a basis for dating everything before about 2,500 BC. The reason that they do this is, we don't have any "pottery" and such that can be accurately dated from before about 4,500 years ago.

Sure, there are scientists who date pottery from earlier dates. But there are also those who have good reasons to suggest that dates beyond 4,500 years ago are unrealistic.

Carbon dating is based on the dates of that old "pottery" and such. It is extrapolated for earlier times. But, C-14 dating may be giving us the wrong dates for times before 4,500 years ago. Why? Because before 4,500 years ago is a time for which we don't have any "pottery" from, pottery that can be conclusively dated.

Why isn't there any pottery from before that time? Because the cataclysm that has been arbitrarily dated to a much earlier time, actually happened at that time - 4,500 years ago. Before the cataclysm happened, there was a difference in the way C-14 worked and the amounts of C-14 that were everywhere on earth.

The speed of light is not the constant that people have thought. Even now it varies a little bit all the time. All kinds of things were different back before 4,500 years ago, before the Great Flood of Noah's day. The Flood itself was probably caused by the gigantic comet (an ice comet) that is depicted in the video. It brought not only an excessive amount of water to the earth, but it also might have changed the way C-14 acted, so that we are getting a skewed picture of how old the Earth is from C-14 extrapolated dating.

These things that I am stating are not things that we know for certain. However, if you search for the idea that many of the physics constants that we trust in now, may not have been the same constants in the past, but may have been variables in the ancient past, you will find that we really don't know. Even core samples that are dated by methods other than C-14, may be wrong because of our inability in determining exactly what we are looking at age-wise.

In other words, much of the time-line of Earth history may really overlap so that all kinds of things in the ancient past might have happened much closer together, or even overlapped. The only way we could tell for sure is to build a time viewer and watch people as they are actually doing things back then. Graham Hancock suggests that there might be a big scientific coverup, because it would disrupt the way we understand physics, making us have to go back and start over in our thinking.

Beyond about 4,500 years ago, NOTHING is certain in the age of the earth or the timeline of what happened.

[notbatman]

When you look at the video "‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress," by Graham Hancock, you see that, even though the times of the events may not be correct, that there was a worldwide trade collaboration, far in the distant past. The thing known as "Atlantis" may or may not have been a separate island location. It may have been the capitol of the worldwide trade organization. It may have been a pattern, something like flags proclaim what nation or grouping we exist with. Only the "flag" called "Atlantis" may have been something far greater than a simple flag like we have. It may have been the symbol of the various relationships to the ancient worldwide trade organization, built in a shape, right in the ground of certain lands, built to resemble the capitol city of Atlantis.

The point is, whatever the timelines, whatever the archaeological finds, whatever ancient technology existed, there was a time in the distant past, for sure beyond 4,500 years ago, where worldwide civilization existed. And this civilization was far greater in some ways than ours is today, both scientifically (different kind of science), and maybe in population, as well.

The term "Atlantis" may certainly have its base in a single "place." But there is a good chance that the word "Atlantis" was a term devised to encompass the whole worldwide trade organization of the distant past.

Is it a big step to suppose that this is what they're working on in area 52; that space aliens while probably out there are not the source of the technological inspiration?

I only ask because the grammatical errors in the title of this thread have a direct correlation the "IS UFO or ALIENS are real ?" thread and it's a simple case of putting a + b together for me.

It is not a big step, but...

Even though scientists and archaeologists seem to have figured out that there was this great big cataclysm around 12,000 years ago, there is still one problem. That problem is this. They use carbon dating as a basis for dating everything before about 2,500 BC. The reason that they do this is, we don't have any "pottery" and such that can be accurately dated from before about 4,500 years ago.

Sure, there are scientists who date pottery from earlier dates. But there are also those who have good reasons to suggest that dates beyond 4,500 years ago are unrealistic.

Carbon dating is based on the dates of that old "pottery" and such. It is extrapolated for earlier times. But, C-14 dating may be giving us the wrong dates for times before 4,500 years ago. Why? Because before 4,500 years ago is a time for which we don't have any "pottery" from, pottery that can be conclusively dated.

Why isn't there any pottery from before that time? Because the cataclysm that has been arbitrarily dated to a much earlier time, actually happened at that time - 4,500 years ago. Before the cataclysm happened, there was a difference in the way C-14 worked and the amounts of C-14 that were everywhere on earth.

The speed of light is not the constant that people have thought. Even now it varies a little bit all the time. All kinds of things were different back before 4,500 years ago, before the Great Flood of Noah's day. The Flood itself was probably caused by the gigantic comet (an ice comet) that is depicted in the video. It brought not only an excessive amount of water to the earth, but it also might have changed the way C-14 acted, so that we are getting a skewed picture of how old the Earth is from C-14 extrapolated dating.

These things that I am stating are not things that we know for certain. However, if you search for the idea that many of the physics constants that we trust in now, may not have been the same constants in the past, but may have been variables in the ancient past, you will find that we really don't know. Even core samples that are dated by methods other than C-14, may be wrong because of our inability in determining exactly what we are looking at age-wise.

In other words, much of the time-line of Earth history may really overlap so that all kinds of things in the ancient past might have happened much closer together, or even overlapped. The only way we could tell for sure is to build a time viewer and watch people as they are actually doing things back then. Graham Hancock suggests that there might be a big scientific coverup, because it would disrupt the way we understand physics, making us have to go back and start over in our thinking.

Beyond about 4,500 years ago, NOTHING is certain in the age of the earth or the timeline of what happened.

[Aggressor66]

Until Atlantis is actually discovered it is only a myth and a theory.

[justinetime]

Hi OP, just a friendly tip regarding spelling / grammer

Does atlantis really exist

Do you think Atlantis exists?
Does he think Atlantis exists?
Do they think Atlantis exists?
Does Google think Atlantis exists?
Do I think Atlantis exists?

Hope this helps!

Thank you for your kind words TF.
Changed the tittle.

[BADecker]

Until Atlantis is actually discovered it is only a myth and a theory.

That's the point. WE and the people of the world are the descendants of Atlantis.

[notbatman]

Until Atlantis is actually discovered it is only a myth and a theory.

Are the Easter Island stone heads just a "myth"?

[Tusk]

Graham Hancock Breaks the Set on TED Censorship, Lost Civilizations & War on Consciousness

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BrDF5WLyQs

His website is also a great reference for archaeology and other scientific news

http://www.grahamhancock.com/news/

[Ingatqhvq]

Is it real or just some kind of a myth?

There is no evidence show it really exist.

[grendel25]

The point is that no one really knows for sure and this is why underwater exploration is so important.  There have already been evidence of submerged villages and some have been excavated just not on the scale of any legendary Atlantis.  But give it time, I would imagine explorers will continue to find amazing things in our oceans.