Weeklyponzi made ~60 BTC from fees?

[ndnh]

Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC

[ABitNut]

Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC

The obvious answer is yes.

But did you consider how much they earned in addition to that by depositing into their own scheme?

[james.lent]

Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC

5% from the payout , so you could say its about 6.5% ? i think

[traxx187]

and they cant even pay out 

[dyask]

Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC

5% from the payout , so you could say its about 6.5% ? i think

It is 6.5% of the deposits.  Also they keep whatever is left over that didn't payout.   The operator did put 20 BTC back into the second weekly game because his script overpaid early players.  The script sent out double and triple payments cost the game over 60 BTC.   

I think it is very unlikely the site is playing their own games, it is just to risky when you are pulling in good returns.   There is some chance on a weekly game as the risk at the beginning is probably lower but probably zero chance on the daily games. 

[yahoo62278]

all the ponzis are trash lately. seems a bunch of noob accts also

[fox19891989]

Current addresses on website:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk
https://blockchain.info/address/124hrKamS1ZQpEXQ3bPkrjp6KDKxspMfXp

Respective fees address:
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeespcqD5HpJ38HzsmDqwxaTxpZBs57P4  Total Received   59.21465542 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1FeesQ8Nfii6SmXrkvBXP5iqUm5T6dztz  Total Received   19.65123202 BTC

Total = ~80BTC

Or

5% * 915.185 = 45.75925
5% * 303.827 = 15.19135

Total = ~60BTC

It seems fucking crazy, ppl can be rich if they are scammers, oh this is a shit world

[wp.comtemp]

It seems fucking crazy, ppl can be rich if they are scammers, oh this is a shit world

Yes, people can be rich if they're scammers. However, that's not the case with WeeklyPonzi as I am not rich, nor am I a scammer.

[Dilemma]

60 btc ?? 
and only with fees ?
it's incredible ..

[ABitNut]

It seems fucking crazy, ppl can be rich if they are scammers, oh this is a shit world

Yes, people can be rich if they're scammers. However, that's not the case with WeeklyPonzi as I am not rich, nor am I a scammer.

You are ban evading. Now, I'm ok with you wanting to refute the scam accusation in your own thread (mods may not be!) but you should really limit it to that, if at all.

[erwin45hacked]

this is what i call smart ponzi operator

basically other ponzi operator scam a small amount of btc

this one dont do that and instead keep running his game , stating risk for people, and only take fees, and boom 60~ btc to his wallet - 20 btc = 40~ btc so far

[Snail2]

this is what i call smart ponzi operator

basically other ponzi operator scam a small amount of btc

this one dont do that and instead keep running his game , stating risk for people, and only take fees, and boom 60~ btc to his wallet - 20 btc = 40~ btc so far

Well, smart guy indeed. This is why I think a transparent ponzi game would have some chance for long(er) term survival.

[finnile]

Yeah, looks like they had incredible luck with their ponzis. Most of the ponzis happened in the past haven't exceeded 50 BTC.
700 BTC was a crazy big amount for a ponzi.

[james.lent]

Yeah, looks like they had incredible luck with their ponzis. Most of the ponzis happened in the past haven't exceeded 50 BTC.
700 BTC was a crazy big amount for a ponzi.

That's because the others only intended to scam.

[marcotheminer]

60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

[finnile]

Yeah, looks like they had incredible luck with their ponzis. Most of the ponzis happened in the past haven't exceeded 50 BTC.
700 BTC was a crazy big amount for a ponzi.

That's because the others only intended to scam.

Well, thats not always true. Some ponzis, just payout in the start then scam later. Seems there is a ponzi season every year on btctalk. They were the first ones to start in this season, probably why they had so much interest.

[dyask]

60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

 

Do you have any proof of that?   There seems to be a lot of proof that he isn't doing that.  The blockchain clearly shows deposits coming in from many different locations, that would be hard for the operator to fake.   Besides if he invested that much he would have most certainly also lost a bunch.   

[finnile]

60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

It might not always be true. All deposits have a risk. Its hard to know when do you get paid, as that completely depends on deposits coming in the future.
Once you deposit , then you have to wait for more people to deposit. Depositing a big amount in the start also might not help, as people investing after that, will not tend to invest due to the already high amount invested.
However, if a lot of activity happens during a time frame, then that might be a time he might have invested.

[dyask]

60 btc of his own money yes. He (most certainly) invested several hundred BTC to earn from others' deposits, and also took fees from this.

It might not always be true. All deposits have a risk. Its hard to know when do you get paid, as that completely depends on deposits coming in the future.
Once you deposit , then you have to wait for more people to deposit. Depositing a big amount in the start also might not help, as people investing after that, will not tend to invest due to the already high amount invested.
However, if a lot of activity happens during a time frame, then that might be a time he might have invested.

So if the game isn't salted at the start and later the operator feeds the Ponzi, I bet most players would like that.    However that would be very high risk and just collecting the fat fees is low risk.