Would you? One Commercial field, one for you family - 101 farming.

[BitMos]

Some farmers are now using dual fields, one field is for family (&friends) usage (greenhouse, organic, clean) and the others is for commercial use (gmo seeds, round up, unclean). I think that it's a crime against the Market itself. When I go to a shoe shop I can buy the exact same shoe than the ceo of the corporation, same for anything. So why the farmers have the rights to produce a toxic food that they will not consume, and sell it to me. When I can't sell them toxic shoes for example. I think it's unfair. Or the farmer association is wiped out (jail time, executions) or the shoe industry can too dualize it's production... next baby soap, food, diapers . we are going to have fun... thank you gmo association producer of America for creating dual markets... I hope you can check everything you are going to buy . My question would you do that? And how do you know that you aren't going to kill the future wife of your son with your toxic food? War is Raw.

[Snail2]

Do what?

Do you mean farming with double standards? Depends on the profitability of producing organic food only. Anyway I'd do everuthying I could to keep all traces of that GMO crap far far away from my own stuff.
If you mean checking every food for organic and  "Non GMO" signs and excuding stuff because of the country of origin, then yes, we are already doing that.

[BitMos]

Not exactly, I was more trying to say that once you can legislate toxic threshold for any product higher than their reality is, the producers is doing harm. I take this :

from: http://naturalsociety.com/gmos-monsantos-roundup-found-kelloggs-froot-loops/

Independent DNA lab testing has verified that 100% of the corn in Kellogg’s Froot Loops is genetically modified corn, containing DNA sequences known to be present in insecticide producing Bt and Roundup Ready corn. The soy also contained DNA sequences known to be present in Roundup Ready GMO soy. What’s more, tests documented the presence of glyphosate at 0.12 mg/kg, the main chemical ingredient of Monsanto’s best-selling Roundup weedkiller.

So to comeback to my shoes producers, I would buy some connections with the MIIC, get some lawmakers on board, then make a law that would allow shoe producers to put something toxic inside the shoes that after ten years force the removal of your toes.

My question is would you (as a producer, merchant) still make the shoes the old way, or follow the new guideline and make more $ because the toxic shoes are indirectly receiving financial aids?

I am not an expert but if it's found that some of those nasty innovations specifically target the liver, those having supported/paid and co in this field may have in a close future to meet their maker, ina unfashionable way oc. uwc. For those who can't being "given" to a foreign nation for further processing in the spirit of peace, harmony, growth and love, evidently.

Mercylesser than you have been, and then you will understand. once and for all, some things are unimportant to you, your leaders or your nations, but don't tread where you don't belong, i.e. on EARTH. What happen when a usmiic program is closed and the corporations behind become rebellious to the point of creating real&serious strategic threats to the American Empire? The more this reality will appear, the closer this answer will be revealed... interesting times indeed.

[Possum577]

I'd make the shoes the right way, the ethical way, because I'd value the long term relationship with my customers.

Some business folks don't give a shit about the 'ethical way' (Monsanto for example) so they are willing to pay the "cost" of the bad publicity and turn over in customers.

As long as the buyer has the information available to make an informed purchase either way is acceptable. The market is free because sellers are allowed to sell almost anything they want and buyers have the information to make their purchases. The best products will survive and the rest will fail.

[BitMos]

I agree with you, until cross pollination enter the arena. X-pollination is the fact that dna from Monsanto and others destructors of humanity will infect natural product of the evolution... Meaning that it becomes of a form of Pollution for those wanting to practice the art of growing. This pollution trough legal lies is actually in many country allowed. it's part of the strategical conquest solution, at the dna lvl. Are you familiar with the reactivity of live, and how dna-mesh can be the forthcoming of a genetic apocalypse, at the speed of life? And frankly the problem is that most people still are unable to appreciate and evaluate and value what a once in a life time product of the earth for a true producer taste.... of course at this level it's an Art. About your free adjective their is still many thing that you need to learn, it's not only the what, but the how much, to tip you...

Core pb low tech/skill/live people of the illusion of war are trying to destroy the Earth, aka spread their dna on the plants I eat... of course their ignorances don't remove what's coming their ways...

[MaxDZ8]

I see nothing wrong with the farmers going for dual-production. Their work habits don't shift in a day. Perhaps they will go completely hi-quality in the future but as long as the race-to-bottom continues I guess that's not foreseeable future. Vote with your wallets.

In the meanwhile, if they feel their family requires hi-quality food, I really won't blame them.

[BitMos]

it just sad to know that as a famer you produce a product that is under what you could do in all aspect, but your buyers are too uneducated to appreciate what you could achieve, and prefer it cheap... if only they took care of their health themselves... (outside of Xpol). Like everything too high is a scam, too low too.

[MaxDZ8]

100% agreed.

[Ingatqhvq]

Some farmers are now using dual fields, one field is for family (&friends) usage (greenhouse, organic, clean) and the others is for commercial use (gmo seeds, round up, unclean). I think that it's a crime against the Market itself. When I go to a shoe shop I can buy the exact same shoe than the ceo of the corporation, same for anything. So why the farmers have the rights to produce a toxic food that they will not consume, and sell it to me. When I can't sell them toxic shoes for example. I think it's unfair. Or the farmer association is wiped out (jail time, executions) or the shoe industry can too dualize it's production... next baby soap, food, diapers . we are going to have fun... thank you gmo association producer of America for creating dual markets... I hope you can check everything you are going to buy . My question would you do that? And how do you know that you aren't going to kill the future wife of your son with your toxic food? War is Raw.

You can choose don't buy it. That's simple.