Stop by our pool give us feed back

[jonnybravo0311]

So I got home and checked my miners, looking at "best share" and sure enough both S5's had shares larger than the share difficulty. It was strange that both shares came within mins of each other. I also wonder about the "Payout when block found:   0.00869571" ? Right now I have all miners mining with different wallet address. I guess this is what to do? Also wondering if you have 1 or 2 miners here and what equipment you are using?  And who is the miner mining 200+ GH what equipment they are running?

mine are:

wallets starting with:
 1M..  is a S3
 1H..  is a S3
 1D..  is a S5
 1K..  is a S5

Payout when block found - that's the node's address and what will be paid when a block is found.  When you start up a p2pool node it connects to the local bitcoind.  If you do not provide an address on startup, one will be created for you.  In this case, the miner with about 1TH/s wallet starting 18G6 is the node owner, and that's the node wallet address - hence why you're seeing that.

Miners with different addresses?  This is a question that has been debated for quite some time in the p2pool thread.  There are pros and cons.  For example, with your setup, you can clearly see that your 2 S5s have found shares, but neither of your S3s have yet.  The downside is that if a block was found now, you're going to get two small transactions (0.00295419BTC and 0.00300707BTC).  If your miners were all configured to the same address you'd get a single payment of 0.00596126BTC.

[1715546015]

1715546015

[1715546015]

1715546015

[ChicagoCryptocurrency]

i see so when he connected his 1th to the pool it became the address makes sense i thought he was hogging up all the shares LOL

[ChicagoCryptocurrency]

So is it safe to say its working as intended and we can move to next stage.
attaching DNS to server and going full on with the rest of development?
or too premature?

[ChicagoCryptocurrency]

I removed the Payout when block found so it wont cause further confusion!

[aurel57]

So I got home and checked my miners, looking at "best share" and sure enough both S5's had shares larger than the share difficulty. It was strange that both shares came within mins of each other. I also wonder about the "Payout when block found:   0.00869571" ? Right now I have all miners mining with different wallet address. I guess this is what to do? Also wondering if you have 1 or 2 miners here and what equipment you are using?  And who is the miner mining 200+ GH what equipment they are running?

mine are:

wallets starting with:
 1M..  is a S3
 1H..  is a S3
 1D..  is a S5
 1K..  is a S5

Payout when block found - that's the node's address and what will be paid when a block is found.  When you start up a p2pool node it connects to the local bitcoind.  If you do not provide an address on startup, one will be created for you.  In this case, the miner with about 1TH/s wallet starting 18G6 is the node owner, and that's the node wallet address - hence why you're seeing that.

Miners with different addresses?  This is a question that has been debated for quite some time in the p2pool thread.  There are pros and cons.  For example, with your setup, you can clearly see that your 2 S5s have found shares, but neither of your S3s have yet.  The downside is that if a block was found now, you're going to get two small transactions (0.00295419BTC and 0.00300707BTC).  If your miners were all configured to the same address you'd get a single payment of 0.00596126BTC.

Well I guess I can just redo the wallet to the same for all miners. If I do it now it really will not hurt anything the way I understand it then as if a block is found the payment will still be split on the shares already found but any new shares found will be combined then?

Moved my last S3 miner here and am now using the same wallet for all 3 S3 miners. I combined the S3's with one of the S5

[ChicagoCryptocurrency]

I think that is correct aurel.