kpitti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 12:29:34 PM |
|
It`s a good step in the overall adoption. I am not thinking on "huge" and "mass" now.
Negative signs as Mt Gox and Bitstamp are bed signs and they are in the memory for a long time. This is nature.
|
|
|
|
Netnox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 12:29:55 PM |
|
Ofcourse good for bitcoin, more recognition, more adoption, more fresh money coming in. With Gemini and the ETF it gets better.
|
|
|
|
pawel7777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1618
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 12:43:17 PM |
|
... People are devided into different groups, when this is discussed :
1. People who says, it's a huge move for Mass adoption. 2. People who says, it's a blow for Bitcoin/crypto currency privacy. 3. People who says, "Bring it on, it will open up new legitimate channels for new buyers" 4. People who says, "They bring nothing new, we need a decentralized exchange" ...
As for 2 and 4: How is it a blow to privacy? It's not as long as no one forces you to use such exchange. Similarly, it doesn't stop anyone from creating/using decentralised exchange. Don't know how could this be bad for bitcoin. I'm pretty happy that there are people trying to create a legit, safe and regulated businesses (Coinbase, Winklevoss) and that there are people (Amir Taaki, Cody Wilson) working on decentralised/anonymous solutions.
|
|
|
|
Armis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 01:33:33 PM |
|
What you see that occurred with Coinbase was the first time that BTC experienced TOP down market flow, up to now it has all been about grassroots organizations and building a system up, well this time the big guys got together decided to adopt a favorite son of the CC world (coinbase) and give it their blessings. The problem is they came far too late in the game, they came right on time to save Coinbase but not earlier enough to save the industry in the short term (1 year). If they did this a year ago, when gox died, it would have saved the industry in the short term. I've read a couple threads about coinbase and I'd like to clear up a couple reasonable misconceptions: Coinbase and coinbase exchange are two different things, I don't know how the two are legally related as of yet but they are treating them as two separate entities. Coinbase is not an exchange, however 'coinbase exchange' is an exchange, they use essentially the same name in order to build on the branding. One of the things I've been advocating for a year now is the need for INSURANCE, to my pleasant surprise the exchange has some insurance. And the coverage appears to guard against some of the things that occurred with Mt Gox and Moolah/mintpal -- internal thief. Thereby raising the quality bar for the industry. The more secure we make BTC (and the whole CC industry) the higher the value will go. SAFETY AND SECURITY are the ONLY things keeping BTC value down. On a totally separate note: http://www.crowdfundingpr.org/10-cryptocurrency-communities-unite-form-powerful-crowdfunding-platform/
|
|
|
|
BitCoinNutJob
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 01:57:19 PM |
|
Ofcourse good for bitcoin, more recognition, more adoption, more fresh money coming in. With Gemini and the ETF it gets better.
Some people are want the government out of it completely but theres not much chance when they have fingers in all pies.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 01:59:59 PM |
|
What is up with people? Why would one not be okay/happy about this? What needs to happen to satisfy your needs? This is very tiring sometimes. So having a regulated and licensed exchange which won't be shut down by the US government is a bad thing now? Sigh..
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
slushee
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
Legendary
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 02:23:40 PM |
|
Very good! One million dollars soon.
Is trollbox available on Coinbase?
|
|
|
|
Xapo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 03:56:15 PM |
|
Ofcourse good for bitcoin, more recognition, more adoption, more fresh money coming in. With Gemini and the ETF it gets better.
Some people are want the government out of it completely but theres not much chance when they have fingers in all pies. Agreed. There is room for decentralized exchanges/anonymous users, as well as licensed exchanges/government oversight/users who sacrifice anonymity for insurance. The two are not mutually exclusive, and I think Bitcoin can only grow with contributions from both sides, so this is one of many great breakthroughs to happen to bitcoin.
|
Twitter: @xapo
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 04:37:51 PM |
|
good.
|
|
|
|
coinpr0n
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 04:47:15 PM |
|
I think it was a smart move on their part. Good for them seeing where Bitcoin is moving.
|
|
|
|
JBits
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 04:57:17 PM |
|
4. People who says, "They bring nothing new, we need a decentralized exchange"
We need a decentralised exchange and one that does not give in to government regulation.
|
|
|
|
Come-In-Behind
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 05:04:52 PM |
|
... People are devided into different groups, when this is discussed :
1. People who says, it's a huge move for Mass adoption. 2. People who says, it's a blow for Bitcoin/crypto currency privacy. 3. People who says, "Bring it on, it will open up new legitimate channels for new buyers" 4. People who says, "They bring nothing new, we need a decentralized exchange" ...
As for 2 and 4: How is it a blow to privacy? It's not as long as no one forces you to use such exchange. Similarly, it doesn't stop anyone from creating/using decentralised exchange. Don't know how could this be bad for bitcoin. I'm pretty happy that there are people trying to create a legit, safe and regulated businesses (Coinbase, Winklevoss) and that there are people (Amir Taaki, Cody Wilson) working on decentralised/anonymous solutions. Anyone agreeing with #4 is an idiot simply because Coinbase is not an exchange in the way Cryptsy is an exchange. Coinbase lets you wire $ in and buy Bitcoin directly from your bank account, Cryptsy is where you can trade Bitcoins for other Cryptocurrencies. With that being so, how the hell would a decentralized exchange allow you to wire $ from your bank account onto the exchange. Obviously banks wouldn't permit that, so it would never work, which means that exchanges like Coinbase are the ones likely to be the leading Cryptocurrency exchanges.
|
|
|
|
Nagle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 08:05:56 PM |
|
The Wall Street Journal and Time have picked up on the fact that Coinbase doesn't have all the money transmitter licenses they claim to have. Time: "Correction: A previous version of this article reported the Wall Street Journal’s claim that Coinbase had achieved regulatory approval in 24 states, including New York and California. That article has been updated to reflect that Coinbase is working to receive regulatory approval and this article has been updated to reflect that change."
|
|
|
|
b-stock
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 08:13:13 PM |
|
anything that creates demand is positive though...
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 08:24:32 PM |
|
It's really good........for weeding out the people who should never of been involved in Bitcoin and those who understand regulation is why Bitcoin exists....ie to avoid it. Regulation simply mean the governmnt can take your currency that you simply wanted to use as an exchange of value between private individuals away or what most people understand as Tax. Some people will beg their masters to beat them more...it's a perverse psychology but it's true.
|
|
|
|
HarryPotHead
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
You are what you eat. PIZZA!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 08:33:21 PM |
|
4. People who says, "They bring nothing new, we need a decentralized exchange"
We need a decentralised exchange and one that does not give in to government regulation. I agree with our noobie friend decentralized exchange is needed to prevent the greedy stealing as they please
|
|
|
|
tss
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 08:56:13 PM |
|
you can still trade on unregulated offshore exchanges and receive the same exact bitcoins. a move for a united states based exchange is only an addition to the growing infrastructure, so a good thing in my book.
|
|
|
|
Nagle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 09:14:29 PM |
|
The Wall Street Journal and Time have picked up on the fact that Coinbase doesn't have all the money transmitter licenses they claim to have. Today, the California Department of Business Oversight issued a warning on Coinbase: “Numerous press accounts about Coinbase’s Jan. 26 launch of Coinbase Exchange erroneously reported the Exchange has received regulatory approval from the State of California. The California Department of Business Oversight has not decided whether to regulate virtual currency transactions, or the businesses that arrange such transactions, under the state’s Money Transmission Act. California consumers should be aware Coinbase Exchange is not regulated or licensed by the State.”So Coinbase is not a regulated exchange.
|
|
|
|
mayax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2015, 11:07:24 PM |
|
I am wondering how they operate. They are outlaw... Unlicensed Money Trasmitter
|
|
|
|
Armis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2015, 03:05:07 PM |
|
It's really good........for weeding out the people who should never of been involved in Bitcoin and those who understand regulation is why Bitcoin exists....ie to avoid it. Regulation simply mean the governmnt can take your currency that you simply wanted to use as an exchange of value between private individuals away or what most people understand as Tax. Some people will beg their masters to beat them more...it's a perverse psychology but it's true.
Currently thievery is the biggest tax in the CC industry, and that is followed by scams, and schemes. Given that taxes are only charged on gains, and that losses are decuctible from the gains, seems to me most people would have no taxes owed anywhy. For the whole year of 2014 BTC was one downward sloping line. Based on that part in red, no one should put any money in any exchange that isn't licensed, insured, community certified, owner verified, and otherwise regulated. On a totally separate note: http://www.articlesbase.com/sleep-articles/the-einsteinium-foundation-awards-prize-to-science-researcher-7185107.html
|
|
|
|
|