Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 03:14:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: GTX 970 or AMD R9 290x ?  (Read 3677 times)
malekbaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 06:29:53 PM
 #1

What card do you prefer to mine ?
GTX 970 or AMD R9 290x ?
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070



View Profile
January 29, 2015, 08:12:50 PM
 #2

gtx 970, better performance and less consumption
ol92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 445
Merit: 255


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 09:49:09 PM
 #3

gtx 970, better performance and less consumption
depends what you are mining ...
But in general GTX970 will be less power hungry and less noisy.
The cuda mining dev seems more active than amd opencl miners dev now,  and open source their code.

For instance for XMR a R9 290x has better performance than GTX970 whereas for spreadcoin GTX 970 is better (with open source miners).
MaxDZ8
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 30, 2015, 03:33:48 PM
 #4

Even though I have great preference for AMD architecture I would never buy a 290x. The price premium (over 280x) is insane and goes beyond any benefit in density I could have. Of course that's according to my e-tailer of choice. And they are too hot, too noisy... unless you buy the premium models which are easily 50 bucks more.

Maybe... I wouldn't buy either.
Equate
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 05:18:49 PM
 #5

Go with GTX 970 , lower power consumption , less heat , active cuda mining app development.....AMD 290x heats up too much.
DES_MX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 13


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 07:48:43 PM
 #6

GTX980 is king in Spreadcoin. 5500-5600Khash easily (open tsiv miner b2)
GTX970 is around 4200khash max

This makes $$/ hash the GTX970 around 30% more efficient to use for a build.

R9 280X / R9 290X will generally use 50-60% more WATTS for around same hash depending on the coin.
Also, its hard to find a good double ball bearings equipped AMD except for ref design, which is 60-70dBA

malekbaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 08:06:40 PM
 #7

GTX980 is king in Spreadcoin. 5500-5600Khash easily (open tsiv miner b2)
GTX970 is around 4200khash max

This makes $$/ hash the GTX970 around 30% more efficient to use for a build.

R9 280X / R9 290X will generally use 50-60% more WATTS for around same hash depending on the coin.
Also, its hard to find a good double ball bearings equipped AMD except for ref design, which is 60-70dBA




I am pretty convinced to buy a GTX 970. Will not start witk multiple GPU but will be mining as it seems funny
leowonderful
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1130


Bitcoin FTW!


View Profile
January 31, 2015, 11:02:30 PM
 #8

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.
grendel25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031



View Profile
February 01, 2015, 01:26:42 AM
 #9

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.

Make a few cents if power is free.  GPU mining is just a hobby these days unless you can overcome power costs.

..EPICENTRAL .....
..EPIC: Epic Private Internet Cash..
.
.
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████████████████▀▀█████▄
▄████████████▀▀▀    ██████▄
████████▀▀▀   ▄▀   ████████
█████▄     ▄█▀     ████████
████████▄ █▀      █████████
▀████████▌▐       ████████▀
▀████████ ▄██▄  ████████▀
▀█████████████▄███████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
.
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████████▀█████▀████████▄
▄██████▀  ▀     ▀  ▀██████▄
██████▌             ▐██████
██████    ██   ██    ██████
█████▌    ▀▀   ▀▀    ▐█████
▀█████▄  ▄▄     ▄▄  ▄█████▀
▀██████▄▄███████▄▄██████▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
.
.
[/center]
malekbaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026


View Profile
February 04, 2015, 12:23:47 PM
 #10

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.

Make a few cents if power is free.  GPU mining is just a hobby these days unless you can overcome power costs.


2x GTX 960 will produce more hash than GTX 970 Huh
ol92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 445
Merit: 255


View Profile
February 04, 2015, 02:07:18 PM
 #11

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.

Make a few cents if power is free.  GPU mining is just a hobby these days unless you can overcome power costs.


2x GTX 960 will produce more hash than GTX 970 Huh
But more expensive. I would take 2 GTX 970

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070



View Profile
February 04, 2015, 04:36:34 PM
 #12

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.

Make a few cents if power is free.  GPU mining is just a hobby these days unless you can overcome power costs.


2x GTX 960 will produce more hash than GTX 970 Huh
But more expensive. I would take 2 GTX 970



lol what advise is this, 2 970 are even more expensive

1 970 to start mining is enough imho, 980 is also bad in compariso as it cost to much for a little gain over a 970, and in gaming also , not worth it at all
ol92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 445
Merit: 255


View Profile
February 04, 2015, 09:04:17 PM
 #13

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.

Make a few cents if power is free.  GPU mining is just a hobby these days unless you can overcome power costs.


2x GTX 960 will produce more hash than GTX 970 Huh
But more expensive. I would take 2 GTX 970



lol what advise is this, 2 970 are even more expensive

1 970 to start mining is enough imho, 980 is also bad in compariso as it cost to much for a little gain over a 970, and in gaming also , not worth it at all

What I meant : two 960 have not a better perf/price than GTX 970 (especially in europe where GTX 960 > 200 euros, and we can find some GTX 970 at 300 euros (but price is increasing due to $/euro fx rate).
Yes begining with a GTX 970 is probably the most reasonable idea. You can add once later on.
Bananana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 481
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 05, 2015, 06:53:43 AM
 #14

GTX 980 if possible.
Either way, you ain't going to make much with one GPU, go with four or five and make a few cents.

Make a few cents if power is free.  GPU mining is just a hobby these days unless you can overcome power costs.


2x GTX 960 will produce more hash than GTX 970 Huh
But more expensive. I would take 2 GTX 970



lol what advise is this, 2 970 are even more expensive

1 970 to start mining is enough imho, 980 is also bad in compariso as it cost to much for a little gain over a 970, and in gaming also , not worth it at all

What I meant : two 960 have not a better perf/price than GTX 970 (especially in europe where GTX 960 > 200 euros, and we can find some GTX 970 at 300 euros (but price is increasing due to $/euro fx rate).
Yes begining with a GTX 970 is probably the most reasonable idea. You can add once later on.

If you add in the cost of motherboard, CPU, HDD and memory card. You will find out that GTX 970 is a better deal as motherboard slot is fixed to 4 or 6 depending on your motherboard.

malekbaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026


View Profile
February 05, 2015, 07:53:19 AM
 #15

yah, I also have measured that, GTX 970 will be a good idea to start with
malekbaba (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1026


View Profile
February 05, 2015, 01:02:16 PM
 #16

Now in my place, price of both (GTX 970) and ( Sapphire AMD radeon TRI-x R9 290x ), almost same....
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
February 05, 2015, 01:31:10 PM
 #17

The 290x is faster than the 970 with the wolf0 miner, on some algos.

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW EVRPROGPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070



View Profile
February 05, 2015, 06:41:38 PM
 #18

The 290x is faster than the 970 with the wolf0 miner, on some algos.


isn't wolfo miner private? you need to pay for it, therefore is useless to talk about it
grendel25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031



View Profile
February 06, 2015, 04:05:31 AM
 #19

Neither because I'm waiting for more power efficient gpus to come.  But if I had to choose right now, probably the 970 because of overall efficiency and growing miner support

..EPICENTRAL .....
..EPIC: Epic Private Internet Cash..
.
.
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████████████████▀▀█████▄
▄████████████▀▀▀    ██████▄
████████▀▀▀   ▄▀   ████████
█████▄     ▄█▀     ████████
████████▄ █▀      █████████
▀████████▌▐       ████████▀
▀████████ ▄██▄  ████████▀
▀█████████████▄███████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
.
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████████▀█████▀████████▄
▄██████▀  ▀     ▀  ▀██████▄
██████▌             ▐██████
██████    ██   ██    ██████
█████▌    ▀▀   ▀▀    ▐█████
▀█████▄  ▄▄     ▄▄  ▄█████▀
▀██████▄▄███████▄▄██████▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
.
.
[/center]
Equate
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 04:49:37 PM
 #20

Neither because I'm waiting for more power efficient gpus to come.  But if I had to choose right now, probably the 970 because of overall efficiency and growing miner support

AMD 300 Series will be launched soon and claims to have lower power consumption and better performance.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!