This is one of the most idiotic statements I've read lately:
But the policy remains controversial and some politicians, regulators and bankers have called for it to end, so banks don't try to squeeze profits from customers elsewhere. They say ending it would make charges more transparent and improve competition and levels of service.
Steve Davies, retail banking leader at PwC, said current accounts were not as free as they seemed.
"UK current accounts are not free at all and are paid for through overdraft charges, penalty fees and uncompetitive or zero rates of interest," said Davies.
Why treat customers as a bunch of retards, instead of letting them choose whether they prefer free account with less interest, or more interest + monthly charge? Let everyone decide what's best for them.
Maybe better idea would be to enforce banks to be more transparent with their fees, or even force them to suggest better deals, prevent them from mis-selling and closing/freezing accounts without giving any reasons etc?
If you force bankers to charge a fee, what would prevent them from 'trying to squeeze profits from customers elsewhere' anyway?
There will be no direct impact on Bitcoin. People won't be able to switch to bitcoin instead of using banks. Bitcoin is not there yet and you pretty much have to have a bank account (practically impossible to live without one for any adult, working person).
The only impact I can see is that things like that add up to the general disappointment with financial institutions, which pushes people to explore the alternatives, such as Bitcoin.