Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 08:09:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: A proposal: Bitcoin address directory  (Read 2442 times)
anfedorov (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 08:31:21 PM
 #1

Say you want to send bitcoins to someone on a forum like reddit, Hacker News, Facebook, or by e-mail, and they don't have a bitcoin address. I propose a public service which will accept bitcoins on behalf of someone, reaches out to verify their ownership of the recipient account, and allows them to clam the bitcoins and set up an address to forward their bitcoins to in the future.

Would this be useful? What are the downsides?
1715242169
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715242169

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715242169
Reply with quote  #2

1715242169
Report to moderator
1715242169
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715242169

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715242169
Reply with quote  #2

1715242169
Report to moderator
Activity + Trust + Earned Merit == The Most Recognized Users on Bitcointalk
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 08:59:38 PM
 #2

Downside #1:  It compromises the anonymity concept of Bitcoin.  You provide a great nexus for tracking who sent coins to where.

Downside #2: It compromises the "no trusted third party" concept of Bitcoin.  You simply walk away with all the coins.
shtylman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 21, 2012, 09:16:23 PM
 #3

A similar idea was hatched for the following service: https://thewalletlist.com

Instead of actually receiving the coins, the service would email the user asking them to input an address for an email. Not sure how I feel about a service that just holds funds for a particular user without them first creating the account.
grantbdev
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 21, 2012, 10:17:05 PM
 #4

Yeah, I would not trust it.

Don't use BIPS!
unclemantis
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


(:firstbits => "1mantis")


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 10:43:00 PM
 #5

either get involved with bitcoin or don't receive bitcoin.

PHP, Ruby, Rails, ASP, JavaScript, SQL
20+ years experience w/ Internet Technologies
Bitcoin OTC | GPG Public Key                                                                               thoughts?
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 10:49:23 PM
 #6

Say you want to send bitcoins to someone on a forum like reddit, Hacker News, Facebook, or by e-mail, and they don't have a bitcoin address. I propose a public service which will accept bitcoins on behalf of someone, reaches out to verify their ownership of the recipient account, and allows them to clam the bitcoins and set up an address to forward their bitcoins to in the future.

Would this be useful? What are the downsides?
If you have their email address, use http://coinapult.com/

There is also some Facebook apps, but I haven't tried any of them.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
unclemantis
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


(:firstbits => "1mantis")


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 10:53:40 PM
 #7

I need to reply again and stress just how stupid this idea is.

"Say you want to send bitcoins to someone ... and they don't have a bitcoin address."

The person you want to send bitcoin to probably already knows about bitcoin through you telling them. So why they haven't set up a wallet yet is beyond me.

And if you want to send a stranger bitcoin and you don't know if they even know what bitcoin is just asking for trouble.

PHP, Ruby, Rails, ASP, JavaScript, SQL
20+ years experience w/ Internet Technologies
Bitcoin OTC | GPG Public Key                                                                               thoughts?
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
July 21, 2012, 10:58:03 PM
 #8

I need to reply again and stress just how stupid this idea is.

"Say you want to send bitcoins to someone ... and they don't have a bitcoin address."

The person you want to send bitcoin to probably already knows about bitcoin through you telling them. So why they haven't set up a wallet yet is beyond me.

And if you want to send a stranger bitcoin and you don't know if they even know what bitcoin is just asking for trouble.
Take a look at coinapult, it does an awesome job of making bitcoin-to-noob-via-email transactions work really well.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 22, 2012, 12:22:34 AM
 #9

Coinapult.com

Stephen Gornick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010


View Profile
July 22, 2012, 08:14:02 PM
 #10

Coinapult.com

Coinapult sends to any e-mail address or mobile (U.S. and Canada):
 - http://www.Coinapult.com

Blockchain.info also does this, to e-mail as well as to nearly any mobile anywhere:
 - https://blockchain.info/wallet/send-via

They even will send to a friend on Facebook:
 - https://blockchain.info/wallet/send-via

If you only have a Twitter account:  
 - http://www.BTCTip.com

With BTCTip and Coinapult, if the recipient never claims the coin, they are returned to the sender after a period of time (like 30 days).  With Blockchain.info, the sender can redeem the private key, essentially to cancel the transfer if the recipient never claims the funds or any other reason.

You can also share the private key for an address so that the recipient can redeem the bitcoins.  Here's an easy way to create a paper bitcoin wallet:
 - http://www.BitAddress.org

Physical bitcoins can be sent to a party that doesn't know what a bitcoin is yet.   Casascius is one provider of a physical bitcoins:
 - http://www.Casascius.com

There are also redeemable codes from exchanges.  These too can be passed to somebody who can redeem the code to obtain the value stored against it.
 - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Redeemable_code

Now any bearer codes, like the paper wallet's private key or the redeemable codes need to be transferred securely.  You wouldn't want to send a Mt. Gox redeemable code through e-mail where anyone sniffing the network between you and the recipient can spend the funds.  But used properly, these function just fine for transferring bitcoins (or USDs, EURs, GBPs, etc., etc.  as well, from the exchanges and wallets that offer them) from one person to the next without knowing the recipient's bitcoin address or account number, e-mail, or anything else.

Low security, instant wallets like Instawallet and Easywallet.org require no username and password -- you just need the URL.
 - http://www.Instawallet.org
 - http://www.Easywallet.org

For your specific use cases, you could send the URL as a private message (PM) to the party you wish to send funds to.   Hacker News is the only one that you listed that has no PM method, but most everyone on HN using their own identity also uses some other social media which you could send the funds through.


Unichange.me

            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █


Stephen Gornick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010


View Profile
July 22, 2012, 08:22:58 PM
 #11

For your specific use cases, you could send the URL as a private message (PM) to the party you wish to send funds to.

And I almost forgot ... Propster, probably would work well for many of the scenarios where unsolicited "props" can be given.

 - https://propster.me/content/howto.html


Unichange.me

            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █


Stephen Gornick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010


View Profile
July 22, 2012, 09:10:25 PM
 #12

Say you want to send bitcoins to someone on a forum like reddit, Hacker News, Facebook, or by e-mail, and they don't have a bitcoin address.

Also, there have been bitcoiners who are members of those communities (e.g. Reddit, Stack Exchange, etc.) that have suggested incorporating bitcoin into the site itself, but then the fireworks begin.  Some hate the idea as Bitcoin is seen as a threat by some and they go ballistic at the thought of bitcoin encroaching upon their community.  Others hate it because a good reputation on these forums currently must be achieved through merit.  If money gets involved, the type of participation changes and the quality might suffer.  For instance, some think the introduction of Quora credits really hurt Quora, rating it as being not much better than a Yahoo! answers type of site now.  

Witcoin was the first community site to integrate bitcoin.  It was such as small community then and the site ended up closing.   Ogrr.com probably does the best job of this today.  But there are other examples -- Rugatu, and in many ways, the signatures here on the BitcoinTalk forum are frequently used for this since the forum software itself doesn't support associating a bitcoin address to a profile yet.  It does display the URI handler though.  So if I show a bitcoin address here, such as the Faucet's: bitcoin:15ArtCgi3wmpQAAfYx4riaFmo4prJA4VsK it gets formatted nicely for use by your URI-enabled client.

Unichange.me

            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █


joecascio
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100

Semi-retired software developer, tech consultant


View Profile WWW
July 28, 2012, 08:26:19 PM
 #13

To Death and Taxes,

1. A directory only affects people who register with it. It doesn't change bitcoin's anonymity level in the slightest. A directory of users, coupled with applications that tapped into it would be a help to getting acceptance with the general public.

2. Agree completely with the 3rd party aspect. It's the banks, paypals we're trying to be free of. A directory should only be a way of connecting people who want to be found, not an payment intermediary.


Joe Cascio
Python/Django & Android developer
Twitter: @joecascio
BCB
CTG
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


BCJ


View Profile
July 28, 2012, 09:01:07 PM
 #14

I have to agree that

1.  Not having to install local client
2.  Not having to download the blockchain
3.  Having an intermediate "label" or email address to abstract the big, scary, confusing bitcoin address

will be essential to engaging mass market general users

I've not used coin-a-pult but Coinbase (for general UI) and blockchain.info (for technology and security)  seem to be leaders in this movement.
Vernon715
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 31, 2012, 02:59:00 PM
 #15

Downside #1:  It compromises the anonymity concept of Bitcoin.  You provide a great nexus for tracking who sent coins to where.

Downside #2: It compromises the "no trusted third party" concept of Bitcoin.  You simply walk away with all the coins.


I agree with D&T completely. If you want to send someone bitcoin, just get them to generate an address and then send it to them.

It is anonymous, secure, and just as easy.

Please donate: 1FfJzfpGCXD6saKqmMs8W1qt9wouhA98Mj

http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1642

100101011010100100101010010111001010010101010100101001000100101010101010101010
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!