Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 02:46:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Corporate CEO Takes On Fictional Unemployment Rate - US  (Read 833 times)
Chef Ramsay (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 04, 2015, 03:19:41 AM
 #1

5.6%! Hallelujah! (not really)

Quote
There's no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie.

And it's a lie that has consequences, because the great American dream is to have a good job, and in recent years, America has failed to deliver that dream more than it has at any time in recent memory. A good job is an individual's primary identity, their very self-worth, their dignity -- it establishes the relationship they have with their friends, community and country. When we fail to deliver a good job that fits a citizen's talents, training and experience, we are failing the great American dream.

Gallup defines a good job as 30+ hours per week for an organization that provides a regular paycheck. Right now, the U.S. is delivering at a staggeringly low rate of 44%, which is the number of full-time jobs as a percent of the adult population, 18 years and older. We need that to be 50% and a bare minimum of 10 million new, good jobs to replenish America's middle class.

I hear all the time that "unemployment is greatly reduced, but the people aren't feeling it." When the media, talking heads, the White House and Wall Street start reporting the truth -- the percent of Americans in good jobs; jobs that are full time and real -- then we will quit wondering why Americans aren't "feeling" something that doesn't remotely reflect the reality in their lives. And we will also quit wondering what hollowed out the middle class

http://www.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx
1715568399
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715568399

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715568399
Reply with quote  #2

1715568399
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715568399
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715568399

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715568399
Reply with quote  #2

1715568399
Report to moderator
1715568399
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715568399

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715568399
Reply with quote  #2

1715568399
Report to moderator
Lethn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
February 04, 2015, 05:00:07 AM
 #2

Not surprised in the slightest, Peter Schiff has already gone into a lot of detail on this and so has Max Keiser, here in the UK they've pulled the same trick, now even if you're below the tax income threshold etc. you'll be 'employed' because it makes the numbers look better, the politicians are simply wanting everything to be perfect for the elections and then they'll let everything collapse.
Ingatqhvq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 04, 2015, 12:14:20 PM
 #3

Serious question - looking at the graph, it looks like the disparity between U3 and U6 jumped quite a bit in 2009 and is just starting to get back the historical difference today. Do you think it was valid to be concerned about the disparity increasing by so much in 2009? That part does strike me as a little worrying, though it is coming back in line now, which seems good.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!