bitbets
|
|
February 19, 2015, 04:51:50 PM |
|
Jesus is the king of kings, and lord of lords
Glad to see someone sharing the gospel
|
,╓▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄╓ ╓▄█████████████████▄╖ ╓▄█████▀▀'▒,,,,,╠'▀▀█████▄, ,▓███▀╜,▄▄███████████▄▄,╙▀████╖ ▄███▀ ▄█████▀▀"``╙"▀▀█████▄ ▀███▄ ▓███╜╓████▀ ,▄▄█████▄▄, ▀████,╙███▌ ▓███`╔███▀ ╓▓███▀▀▀▀▀████╖ ▀███@"███▌ ]███▌┌███▌ ▐███ ███▄ ▐███ ▐███, ▐███ ▐███ .███ ███ ███▌ ███▌ ▐███ ▐███ '███ ███ ███▌ ███▌ ]███@╙███@ ▀██▌ ,▄██▌ ▐███ ▐███` ▓███ ▐███▄ ╙██▀╩ 9███╜ ╔███▀,███▌ ████,╙███▌ ▓███╜,████ ▀███▄ ▀╜ ▀▀ ▄███▌ ╙████▄, ╓▄████╜ ╙█████▄▄╓, ,╓▄▄█████▀ ▀▀█████████████████▀▀ '▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀'
| CloakCoin | Trustless Anonymous Cryptocurrency | PoSA3 Forum | Bitcointalk | Twitter | Facebook | VK | Reddit | CloakTV | Instagram | IRC-Chat | Faucet
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 05:08:10 PM |
|
Jesus is the king of kings, and lord of lords
Glad to see someone sharing the gospel
Honestly I'm not really sharing the Christian Gospel I'm getting to first base, the simple truth that its highly likely there is a higher power and no atheists really has anything more than 1st year Philosopher arguments to make their faith in no God sound reasonable. I'm sorry but religious language makes us believers seems like crackpots. Many people today deep down know there is something of significance in their existence and funnily enough still have deep senses of right and wrong which is kind of hilarious considering they perceive themselves as advanced pond life. I think the onus is on atheists is to put into a few sentences why God doesn't exist. Like I said I can, matter exists, logic says it must come from somewhere, it naturally calls for a creator. Even a big bang calls for an instigator. Its kind of stupid being an Atheist honestly, its the retarded meme du jour that long coated geeks working in the service industry can feel better about how dipshit dumb they are. Come on atheists give me your best shot. Come on tell me God doesn't exist because Science has proven he doesn't hahahahahahaha. Every generation has sheep sucking up their views from their environment.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 19, 2015, 05:23:55 PM |
|
You can't state this fact or idea in a few sentences?
No. Then either you don't understand it or its not really proof.
Your logic looks flawed to me.
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 05:55:28 PM Last edit: February 19, 2015, 06:07:32 PM by nextgencoin |
|
You can't state this fact or idea in a few sentences?
No. Then either you don't understand it or its not really proof.
Your logic looks flawed to me. Least I've stated it. Who would say well I know this amazing fact about the Universe as a logical fact (and be sure I'm not stating a fact i'm stating my logic to think/believe/suspose in a God/Power/Creator) but I simply can't explain it in a simple way. If its that convoluted maybe its a little 'fragile'? Look matter, void, atoms, etc exist so to say they I guess your saying have always existed is a crazy position that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. And the most logic idea is there must be an eternal being, uncreated, outside of creation that instigated the Universe. If that being or power exists then I'm pretty sure we should be in awe and wonder and crumbling humbleness because to put it sarcastically, he's a bit better than us...
|
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 06:17:10 PM |
|
Who or what instigated the Big Bang?
|
|
|
|
Indefinitely
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2015, 06:34:49 PM Last edit: February 19, 2015, 06:56:15 PM by Indefinitely |
|
It is quite peculiar, that religious persons in this thread are actually against the big bang theory. The big bang theory presents the option of there being a God, as it doesn't try to specify exactly how the big bang came around in the first place, though two popular assumptions was that colliding universes created the cosmic egg that turned into the big bang, or that God set the big bang in motion. The author of this thread and all those who argue against the big bang, are also arguing against your own religion and whatever god(s) you believe in. This new theory, http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html, explains that the Universe might be eternal, which means it never had a beginning and will never have an end. It also completely takes God(The Abrahamic) out of the picture, as it's stated in the bible, koran, and torah that God created the universe(Which means that the universe had a beginning) and that all things come to an end, both of which if this new theory is correct, would shown to be wrong.
|
|
|
|
nsimmons
|
|
February 19, 2015, 07:03:43 PM |
|
Who or what instigated the Big Bang? Obviously.... Ask where lighting came from 2500 years ago and you'll get an equally ridiculous answer. Ask the Babylonians and they'll tell you Mardok killing Tiamat was the big bang. That predates the Abrahamic god. Shouldn't it be more valid?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 19, 2015, 07:39:49 PM |
|
Who creates virtual particles?
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3934
Merit: 1378
|
|
February 19, 2015, 07:47:25 PM |
|
Who creates virtual particles?
Virtual creators.
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:02:51 PM |
|
It is quite peculiar, that religious persons in this thread are actually against the big bang theory. The big bang theory presents the option of there being a God, as it doesn't try to specify exactly how the big bang came around in the first place, though two popular assumptions was that colliding universes created the cosmic egg that turned into the big bang, or that God set the big bang in motion. The author of this thread and all those who argue against the big bang, are also arguing against your own religion and whatever god(s) you believe in. This new theory, http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html, explains that the Universe might be eternal, which means it never had a beginning and will never have an end. It also completely takes God(The Abrahamic) out of the picture, as it's stated in the bible, koran, and torah that God created the universe(Which means that the universe had a beginning) and that all things come to an end, both of which if this new theory is correct, would shown to be wrong. I guess you mean me even though i've made clear I don't believe in 'Religion' any more than you have a Religion. I simply think in all likelihood there is a God just like you don't think there is a God. I'm pretty sure I didn't suggest a BigBang meant there is no God I simply based on 99% of people I have met who don't believe in God use the BigBang theory as proof there doesn't need to be a God. I was simply based on that making the point any BigBang needed to be instigated. I mean and event witnessed needs a cause right? That's Science. I don't have a problem with Science I have a problem with amateur scientists who think Science has somehow ruled out God.
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:11:21 PM |
|
Who or what instigated the Big Bang? Obviously.... Ask where lighting came from 2500 years ago and you'll get an equally ridiculous answer. Ask the Babylonians and they'll tell you Mardok killing Tiamat was the big bang. That predates the Abrahamic god. Shouldn't it be more valid? Are you on crack? Seriously we are debating the origins of the Universe and you are comparing the originator or the BigBang as in the same realm as the source of Lightening. Seriously if you want a debate lay off the dumbjuice. The Babylonians predated the Abrahamic God? Seriously? More crack. You are saying the origins of something are dated from the time we have recorded sources. Shit. So I guess Oxygen which was only 'discovered' and recorded was when Oxygen was started. Before we all simply died within a few minutes. In the words of Homer Simpson Dohhh! Anymore embarrassing statements and you are dismissed from this adult debate.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:20:53 PM |
|
Who or what instigated the Big Bang? Obviously.... Ask where lighting came from 2500 years ago and you'll get an equally ridiculous answer. Ask the Babylonians and they'll tell you Mardok killing Tiamat was the big bang. That predates the Abrahamic god. Shouldn't it be more valid? Are you on crack? Seriously we are debating the origins of the Universe and you are comparing the originator or the BigBang as in the same realm as the source of Lightening. Seriously if you want a debate lay off the dumbjuice. The Babylonians predated the Abrahamic God? Seriously? More crack. You are saying the origins of something are dated from the time we have recorded sources. Shit. So I guess Oxygen which was only 'discovered' and recorded was when Oxygen was started. Before we all simply died within a few minutes. In the words of Homer Simpson Dohhh! Anymore embarrassing statements and you are dismissed from this adult debate. I think his point was (although I'm not completely sure) is 'how do you choose which creation myth to believe?'.
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:21:54 PM |
|
It is quite peculiar, that religious persons in this thread are actually against the big bang theory. The big bang theory presents the option of there being a God, as it doesn't try to specify exactly how the big bang came around in the first place, though two popular assumptions was that colliding universes created the cosmic egg that turned into the big bang, or that God set the big bang in motion. The author of this thread and all those who argue against the big bang, are also arguing against your own religion and whatever god(s) you believe in. This new theory, http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html, explains that the Universe might be eternal, which means it never had a beginning and will never have an end. It also completely takes God(The Abrahamic) out of the picture, as it's stated in the bible, koran, and torah that God created the universe(Which means that the universe had a beginning) and that all things come to an end, both of which if this new theory is correct, would shown to be wrong. Just to throw this out there. Are you really completely confident in the fact there is no God and the Abrahamic/Christian faith that includes Judgement from the creator is wrong when the Scientists are constantly coming up with new theories and are debating constantly about what is right. Its like putting the potential of an eternal soul in the hands of a a bunch of geeks who wack off to Gillian Anderson on the XFiles. Shit I thought I needed to have faith. You guys are walking on millimeter thick ice. If I'm wrong I have Oblivion, If your wrong you have possibly eternal Judgement. I hope your a betting man that all I can say. You guys rock you're so brave!!!!
|
|
|
|
nextgencoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:23:43 PM |
|
Who or what instigated the Big Bang? Obviously.... Ask where lighting came from 2500 years ago and you'll get an equally ridiculous answer. Ask the Babylonians and they'll tell you Mardok killing Tiamat was the big bang. That predates the Abrahamic god. Shouldn't it be more valid? Are you on crack? Seriously we are debating the origins of the Universe and you are comparing the originator or the BigBang as in the same realm as the source of Lightening. Seriously if you want a debate lay off the dumbjuice. The Babylonians predated the Abrahamic God? Seriously? More crack. You are saying the origins of something are dated from the time we have recorded sources. Shit. So I guess Oxygen which was only 'discovered' and recorded was when Oxygen was started. Before we all simply died within a few minutes. In the words of Homer Simpson Dohhh! Anymore embarrassing statements and you are dismissed from this adult debate. I think his point was (although I'm not completely sure) is 'how do you choose which creation myth to believe?'. We aren't even talking religions....yet. Though I did in my first post explain my personal reasons for which one I believe is right and my rational. But no he clearly was suggesting that deciding a BigBang origins is the same as man at one time thinking Lightening was from a God/Gods rather than a natural process (which involves a creator) which is very different. But of course if he wants to go down the whole we were dumb then but now we arent he actually destroys any argument he now has cause I can simply say in 3 centuries people will think your understanding of the world is caveman like and foolish. I've not got the heart to tell him though..
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:26:09 PM |
|
If I'm wrong I have Oblivion, If your wrong you have possibly eternal Judgement.
If clerics say the truth then we shouldn't worry about Judgement day. We'll all go to Heaven because God loves us.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:31:16 PM |
|
If I'm wrong I have Oblivion, If your wrong you have possibly eternal Judgement.
If clerics say the truth then we shouldn't worry about Judgement day. We'll all go to Heaven because God loves us. I don't think they all say that, otherwise what would be the point of hell?
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:34:27 PM |
|
I don't think they all say that, otherwise what would be the point of hell?
Hell and Heaven are defining points. It's impossible to have a scale with one point only. Also, there is such thing as apocatastasis. It's another proof that we will all be in Heaven, even Satan.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:35:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|