Surprise: Government has been wrong about cholesterol for 40 years

[rosh]

"Wrong" doesn't have anything to do with it. "Lying."

Quite tough for them to admit that. 

[1715444142]

1715444142

[1715444142]

1715444142

[BADecker]

"Wrong" doesn't have anything to do with it. "Lying."

Quite tough for them to admit that. 

The interesting thing about it is that, before a person becomes a government official, he is a person. He might be a liar. But, more than likely he is simply trying to get along in life.

Then, when he gets into government, he is forced into a lying type of culture. He may have good ideals. He may have good laws that he wants to get passed. But he has to accept all kinds of bad things, or the crooks in government won't allow him to do any of the good he is trying to do. So, just to do the good, he is forced to do some of the bad.

Take Ron Paul for example. He is a great guy, working for the people as hard as he can. Now that he is formally out of government, he is still working for the people.

Ron Paul is a government guy. Make no mistake about it. Sure, he suggests that we audit the FED. There are probably times that he has suggested that we shut it down. Maybe he even supports Bitcoin. But here is where he is still a government guy.

In all of Ron Paul's studying and books he has read and written, and with all his experience in office, the things he is doing don't hold a candle to the things that Karl Lentz is freely doing for and giving to the people.

Ron Paul is government focused. Karl Lentz is showing the people how to keep government from having any control over them.

Karl Lentz is promoting the things of Bill Thornton and Richard Cornforth in a practical way. If the people forgot about the politicians, including Ron Paul, and put into practice the things of Richard Cornforth in Karl's manner, the prisons would become virtually empty of all the people who did no crime, but were bamboozled into prison by government. As Richard says on his website at http://voidjudgments.com/detailsvoid.htm,

IF EVERY VOID JUDGMENT WAS VACATED WITH DAMAGES, IT WOULD REPRESENT THE GREATEST SHIFT IN MATERIAL WEALTH IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD!

Ron Paul, government guy isn't doing this. Karl Lentz, working with his own and Bill Thornton's and Richard Cornforth's law, is.

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html

[picolo]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/02/10/feds-poised-to-withdraw-longstanding-warnings-about-dietary-cholesterol/


The nation’s top nutrition advisory panel has decided to drop its caution about eating cholesterol-laden food, a move that could undo almost 40 years of government warnings about its consumption.

The group’s finding that cholesterol in the diet need no longer be considered a “nutrient of concern” stands in contrast to the committee’s findings five years ago, the last time it convened. During those proceedings, as in previous years, the panel deemed the issue of excess cholesterol in the American diet a public health concern.

The finding follows an evolution of thinking among many nutritionists who now believe that, for healthy adults, eating foods high in cholesterol may not significantly affect the level of cholesterol in the blood or increase the risk of heart disease.




Cholesterol Is Not a ‘Nutrient of Concern,’ Report Says


Experts say this would mean that recommendations are finally catching up with the evidence, which suggests that dietary cholesterol bears little impact on a person’s risk of heart disease.

“There have been multiple analyses and meta-analyses now looking at intake of dietary cholesterol and the risk of heart disease,” says Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. “In the general population, there’s really not any strong evidence for a link.” However, a few studies have shown that there may be increased risk in people with type-2 diabetes, he says.



http://time.com/3705734/cholesterol-dietary-guidelines/


The shameful history of government, health industry, and media vilification of the egg:
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/28/breaking-eggs-not-bad-for-you-and-the-nyt-is-on-it/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a week for science! First, no big bang, the universe was always there. Now eating eggs is good for you. What's next?

 

It is science bitch

[Wilikon]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/02/10/feds-poised-to-withdraw-longstanding-warnings-about-dietary-cholesterol/


The nation’s top nutrition advisory panel has decided to drop its caution about eating cholesterol-laden food, a move that could undo almost 40 years of government warnings about its consumption.

The group’s finding that cholesterol in the diet need no longer be considered a “nutrient of concern” stands in contrast to the committee’s findings five years ago, the last time it convened. During those proceedings, as in previous years, the panel deemed the issue of excess cholesterol in the American diet a public health concern.

The finding follows an evolution of thinking among many nutritionists who now believe that, for healthy adults, eating foods high in cholesterol may not significantly affect the level of cholesterol in the blood or increase the risk of heart disease.




Cholesterol Is Not a ‘Nutrient of Concern,’ Report Says


Experts say this would mean that recommendations are finally catching up with the evidence, which suggests that dietary cholesterol bears little impact on a person’s risk of heart disease.

“There have been multiple analyses and meta-analyses now looking at intake of dietary cholesterol and the risk of heart disease,” says Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. “In the general population, there’s really not any strong evidence for a link.” However, a few studies have shown that there may be increased risk in people with type-2 diabetes, he says.



http://time.com/3705734/cholesterol-dietary-guidelines/


The shameful history of government, health industry, and media vilification of the egg:
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/28/breaking-eggs-not-bad-for-you-and-the-nyt-is-on-it/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a week for science! First, no big bang, the universe was always there. Now eating eggs is good for you. What's next?

 

It is science bitch

[BADecker]

It seems that 90% of the medical stuff on Wikipedia is wrong. It also seems that as many as 50% of physicians and medical students trust it. Because of this, who in the world should believe much of anything that the medical says?

http://www.jaoa.osteopathic.org/content/114/5/334.full