Selling Signature Space (Hero - 644 Activity)

[ranlo]

Hey all! I just dropped my previous signature campaign and I'm looking for a new one! Previous system was 0.0012 BTC/post through an offering Marcotheminer is handling. I'd like to lock in at either:

1) 0.0013/post
or
2) 0.035 BTC/week flat-rate

(Will also accept various altcoins, so feel free to toss an offer over and I'll see what I can do)

This price is for exclusive signatures (and I can, of course, use all of the features like colors or whatever). I may consider a slightly lower payment in return for a non-exclusive agreement as well.

I'm not a spammer, and I don't inflate my post count. When doing a bump, for example, I remove the previous post before doing so. As a result, I don't go around looking for things to post on -- I post where I feel there's a reason/value to doing so. As a result of this, I also don't increase post counts based on whether or not there's a signature campaign going. I just follow the flow the same.

Feel free to toss me a PM if you're interested in working out a deal with me!

[ranlo]

Update! Lowered flat-rate to 0.035/week to normalize it with previous earnings.

[cazkooo]

Update! Lowered flat-rate to 0.035/week to normalize it with previous earnings.

there are a lot options for 0.035/week

either secondstrade, 777coin, or bitmixer give this options

coinroyale gives 0.04/week

here is link for secondstrade since i am promoting their service through my signature as well

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.0

[ranlo]

Update! Lowered flat-rate to 0.035/week to normalize it with previous earnings.

there are a lot options for 0.035/week

either secondstrade, 777coin, or bitmixer give this options

coinroyale gives 0.04/week

here is link for secondstrade since i am promoting their service through my signature as well

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.0

Would rather deal with people directly... it's easier than constantly trying to keep up with a sig campaign to see changes that may invalidate you if you don't notice them. Or getting messages telling you that your signature isn't set up right and you need to fix it, only to spend an hour looking into WHY it's not right, finding out that it WAS right, and contacting the person that runs it and them telling you that they weren't actually saying YOURS was wrong, just that if it wasn't right it would need to be fixed.

The whole micro-managing thing is annoying, to say the least. Dealing with people 1-on-1 I can skip all of that.

[Quickseller]

What about your account makes your signature space more valuable then other hero accounts?

[ranlo]

What about your account makes your signature space more valuable then other hero accounts?

Lack of spam, commenting when I have something that contributes to the conversation (rather than hunting for things to comment on -- I'm as active when I am paid as I am when I'm not), a member of multiple communities within the crypto space, etc.

With that said, that's where my value comes from. Am I more valuable? Maybe or maybe not. It depends on where you view "value" as stemming from. To each his own.

FWIW, my average monthly payments prior to dropping the last signature campaign were 0.14 BTC or so on average (and would be more if I were like a lot of people and hunted for things solely to boost my post count). Not in it to make significantly more. I'd rather break even to what I was getting before but skip the red tape associated with dealing with most campaigns. This all stemmed from a situation a couple days that really pushed me away from the normal campaigns:

Please fix your signature. Select the FULL code (from top left all the way to bottom right).

Make sure its correct!

I wrote back about how I thought it was correct and I don't have the time/patience to watch the thread every day and look for minor changes to the code so I can ensure I'm always eligible. Then I get this sent back:

There was no issue. You were fine, it was a reminder to have the signature space exactly as needed.

Bye.

This was the final push for me. Don't make people waste time finely combing over code to figure out why I'm targeted as having an issue and then tell me that there WAS no issue and everything was fine. That's annoying as shit and it's a waste of both of our time.

1-on-1 cuts out all of this. If there's a change that needs made, they can let me know and I can usually do it within a minute. There's no constant hounding of a thread to figure out what's going on, no constant need for analyzing the code to ensure nothing changed, etc.

It's just not worth the complications for $25-30 a month, and that's assuming they don't ban you from the sig. campaign for no reason.

[josef2000]

Bitmixer.io gives you 0.035btc a week.
Try them out

[marcotheminer]

Please fix your signature. Select the FULL code (from top left all the way to bottom right).

Make sure its correct!

I wrote back about how I thought it was correct and I don't have the time/patience to watch the thread every day and look for minor changes to the code so I can ensure I'm always eligible. Then I get this sent back:

There was no issue. You were fine, it was a reminder to have the signature space exactly as needed.

Bye.

This was the final push for me. Don't make people waste time finely combing over code to figure out why I'm targeted as having an issue and then tell me that there WAS no issue and everything was fine. That's annoying as shit and it's a waste of both of our time.

1-on-1 cuts out all of this. If there's a change that needs made, they can let me know and I can usually do it within a minute. There's no constant hounding of a thread to figure out what's going on, no constant need for analyzing the code to ensure nothing changed, etc.

It's just not worth the complications for $25-30 a month, and that's assuming they don't ban you from the sig. campaign for no reason.

You had other things in your signature which I could not allow. So in fact there was an issue.

No one's been ever dropped without a reason.

[ranlo]

Please fix your signature. Select the FULL code (from top left all the way to bottom right).

Make sure its correct!

I wrote back about how I thought it was correct and I don't have the time/patience to watch the thread every day and look for minor changes to the code so I can ensure I'm always eligible. Then I get this sent back:

There was no issue. You were fine, it was a reminder to have the signature space exactly as needed.

Bye.

This was the final push for me. Don't make people waste time finely combing over code to figure out why I'm targeted as having an issue and then tell me that there WAS no issue and everything was fine. That's annoying as shit and it's a waste of both of our time.

1-on-1 cuts out all of this. If there's a change that needs made, they can let me know and I can usually do it within a minute. There's no constant hounding of a thread to figure out what's going on, no constant need for analyzing the code to ensure nothing changed, etc.

It's just not worth the complications for $25-30 a month, and that's assuming they don't ban you from the sig. campaign for no reason.

You had other things in your signature which I could not allow. So in fact there was an issue.

No one's been ever dropped without a reason.

The message started by implying that the signature code itself was off. Were it to mention the additional links first OR to not include the beginning, it would be much more clear. The implied statement was "your signature code isn't right, so you need to make sure you're copying the whole thing. Also, remove the extra links." This is where the problem stems from.

What you said was on par with a car inspection station saying "get your exhaust system checked out, and replace the burned out light bulb in the rear." Then turning around and saying "... there was nothing wrong with your exhaust. I just wanted you to replace the light bulb."

[kwaasteniet]

Try bitmixer. It pays to 0.035 weekly (50 posts)

[MadZ]

Try bitmixer. It pays to 0.035 weekly (50 posts)

You should actually read the thread before posting.

[abacus]

Try bitmixer. It pays to 0.035 weekly (50 posts)

You should actually read the thread before posting.

Yes, duplicate replies are very annoying.
Anyway, it seems that bitmixer is not accepting new members anymore.

[WEBcreator]

Try bitmixer. It pays to 0.035 weekly (50 posts)

You should actually read the thread before posting.

Yes, duplicate replies are very annoying.
Anyway, it seems that bitmixer is not accepting new members anymore.

ah finally bitmixer closing new applicant, was wondering how many budget did bitmixer have for this sig campaign because it seems like there is a lot of people joining it 

[ranlo]

Update: Signature locked down for this week!

[funtotry]

I don't know why you are making your own thread just to find a signature campaign. Are you really that special?
Here is a thread that will point you in the right direction https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0
Why not use bit-x they are very good sig campaign.

[JessicaSe]

Why not use bit-x they are very good sig campaign.

as he already told that he left the bit-x campaign but he can find many choice at this thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0

CoinRoyale campaign is paying more then he asking here