Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2018, 03:20:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: If governments and insurers intervene by offering security on bitcoins do you think users will increase?
yes - 6 (60%)
no - 4 (40%)
Total Voters: 10

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Quick poll  (Read 1260 times)
jessicahammond
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2015, 03:33:19 PM
 #1

Hi please could you quickly give your views on this topic Smiley
1544412046
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1544412046

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1544412046
Reply with quote  #2

1544412046
Report to moderator
1544412046
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1544412046

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1544412046
Reply with quote  #2

1544412046
Report to moderator
1544412046
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1544412046

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1544412046
Reply with quote  #2

1544412046
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Bad Uncle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2015, 03:38:29 PM
 #2

Since when would governments offer insurance. That would be up to insurances companies wouldn't it? Regardless, bitcoin users will increase over time and so will services and products to help you  secure or insure your coins.
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1278


No I dont escrow anymore.


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2015, 03:49:02 PM
 #3

Hi please could you quickly give your views on this topic Smiley

You would probably get more and better answers if you did more than just post a question every few days and disappear.

Q7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2015, 05:03:49 PM
 #4

Oh definitely. Having a backing sure helps. Maybe some form of regulation whereby if there is a claim of bankruptcy due to hacks, a proper investigation can be conducted. Also if there is a requirement to have accounting audit to maintain credibility that would certainly give that level of confidence to the users.

ebliever
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
February 20, 2015, 05:35:03 PM
 #5

Ironically, this ties in with the post I just made about a Bitcoin security paradox - coincidence??

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962306.0

Luke 12:15-21

Ephesians 2:8-9
Madness
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


My goal is becaming a billionaire.


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2015, 05:46:16 PM
 #6

Hi please could you quickly give your views on this topic Smiley

Mmm nah , not really.
If Media starts speaking about Bitcoin goods instead of speaking about drugs and weapons (Silk road) and simillar bullshits that would increase the number of Bitcoiners . Most of people see it as a danger and scam .

~ Madness

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 1289



View Profile
February 20, 2015, 05:54:33 PM
 #7

government no
insurers yes

reason: government stop activity/freedoms, whilst insurance protect against loss.

im all for consumer protection, just not government limitations

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
koelen3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1006


Sooner or later, a man who wears two faces forgets


View Profile
February 20, 2015, 06:08:36 PM
 #8

Though an insurance is good but being given by government means no anonymity , and am not trading bitcoin with their help
Not in ever 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!