Bill Gates is right on systemic designed population explosion, riskier than fiat

[BitMos]

Bill Gates trough his equation is right, I mean if a group of people start to produce children unleashed it will be confrontational on a round planet. I understand the strategy used by those aiming to maximize their income with the max number of children possible, including the loss of many to maximize it to the extreme. then you add the idiots in the west ready to welcome all the misery in the world and you get a very explosive in all aspect situation. And let me be frank, I don't really like ctrl+p, but those spreader are even worst, more dangerous, more insane, more egoistical than any other life form, unless they accept the unacceptable. Do you have an opinion?

[1715381254]

1715381254

[1715381254]

1715381254

[1715381254]

1715381254

[1715381254]

1715381254

[BADecker]

It's working. Bill gates is getting the population reduction he was looking for.


Miscarriages skyrocket 366% in six weeks due to Covid vaccines

Official data released by the British government shows that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections are killing unborn babies at an astounding rate.

The latest Medicines and Healthcare produce Regulatory Agency's (MHRA) Yellow Card Scheme report, dated Dec. 9, 2020, through March 7, 2021, reveals a whopping 366 percent increase in the rate of miscarriage thanks to Chinese virus jabs.

This is the seventh such report to be released by the MHRA and it clearly shows that Wuhan flu shots are extremely deadly, especially for pregnant women who, for whatever reason, decide to get jabbed.

It is important to note that there is no scientific data to suggest that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections are safe or effective for pregnant women, and yet doctors and health authorities are still administering the shots to expectant mothers, resulting in many of them losing their unborn children.

The British government already warned pregnant women that they might not want to take the jab due to "no or limited" data showing its safety or efficacy in pregnant women.

[franky1]

you quoted a link that quotes a link thats not a report.

when actually viewing the report of all yellow card records.. it does not mention miscarriage
heck its not even a report that uses percentages
heck the closest possible option is 'abortion spontaneous' 26

funny thing is out of ~30million people having a vaccine.. 12000 had tummy ache and diarrhoea
0.04%
so id rather have digestion issues for 2 days than have covid symptoms for a week+

yet does not show miscarriages soon after a vaccine.. meaning no one has had one to then report it(as per standard hospital records that report people have miscarriages when they go to hospital for a miscarriage)
...
so badecker.. you made this topic.. so its up to you to show the SOURCE data

please show on the government website where it shows 366% miscarriages.

no replies with distracting waffle.. just have the direct link to the report and the page number
for once show you can do research. and show the source report

please be aware that generally 1-5 pregnancies result in miscarriage normally each year
so if your think its 366% thats more then 3 in 5 pregnancies result in miscarriage..

so please do back up your claims you quote with source data

[BADecker]

you quoted a link that quotes a link thats not a report.

when actually viewing the report of all yellow card records.. it does not mention miscarriage
heck its not even a report that uses percentages
heck the closest possible option is 'abortion spontaneous' 26

funny thing is out of ~30million people having a vaccine.. 12000 had tummy ache and diarrhoea
0.04%
so id rather have digestion issues for 2 days than have covid symptoms for a week+

yet does not show miscarriages soon after a vaccine.. meaning no one has had one to then report it(as per standard hospital records that report people have miscarriages when they go to hospital for a miscarriage)
...
so badecker.. you made this topic.. so its up to you to show the SOURCE data

please show on the government website where it shows 366% miscarriages.

no replies with distracting waffle.. just have the direct link to the report and the page number
for once show you can do research. and show the source report

please be aware that generally 1-5 pregnancies result in miscarriage normally each year
so if your think its 366% thats more then 3 in 5 pregnancies result in miscarriage..

so please do back up your claims you quote with source data

Did you actually email them your message, so that they know they goofed, or that people know that they are trolls, so that they have a chance to change their ways if they happen to be honest?

[franky1]

typical..
you post something without researching if what you post is even credible. yet when you get your opinion debunked. you pretend its not your opinion

sorry.. but you posted it. so you must back up what is included in your post.

show why you think your post is worthy of others reading it.
show why you believe the post to be worthy of your time spent posting it
show us your research that lends it credibility.

[BADecker]

typical..
you post something without researching if what you post is even credible. yet when you get your opinion debunked. you pretend its not your opinion

sorry.. but you posted it. so you must back up what is included in your post.

show why you think your post is worthy of others reading it.
show why you believe the post to be worthy of your time spent posting it
show us your research that lends it credibility.

Says the joker^ with thousands of posts, and maybe hundreds of thousands of claims in those posts, and almost zero reference to back any of it up.

And then he wants to lay down rules for other people. Like telling them to back up what they posted when the backup is right in the post they posted.

Amazing! I wonder who wipes his nose for him, and wipes ...

[BADecker]

It's kinda funny, folks. The topic was started, belongs to BitMos, who was last active almost 6 years ago according to his stats. So, it seems that the topic was started, not by me, but by BitMos.

I suppose I should apologize a little to franky1. After all, he wasn't even talking to me, even though the things I said probably would have fit him with regard to BitMos. Yet I acted like he was talking to me, somewhat.

It's kinda standard activity for him... to clutter and mix everything up, using treachery in all he says. While it is kinda fun playing with franky1, tvbcof was probably right when he said to simply put f-1 on ignore.

[BADecker]

Looks like average, common people - even lowly reindeer herders - are picking up their authority in life, and defying their governments and the mad scientific schemes the science community is promoting.


Bill Gates’ mad science TERRAFORMING scheme blocked by reindeer herders

Bill Gates is an anti-human depopulation zealot who wants to exterminate humankind by blocking the sun and collapsing the global food supply. His mad science experiment to launch this global death initiative is called the “SCoPEx” project, which I first reported back in 2019. At that time, the fake news media claimed all reports about the project were a “conspiracy theory.”

Through further research, I was able to establish that this geoengineering / terraforming experiment was also funded by the Nazi-linked Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, which is linked to eugenics and depopulation agendas. I since launched Terraforming.news to provide focused coverage of this critical topic.

Now, Reuters admits the project is real, and they have just reported that Sweden’s space agency has cancelled the experiment due to pushback from, “Sweden’s indigenous Saami reindeer herders.”

The Reuters deception about the project continues, of course, as they dishonestly call the experiment “solar geoengineering.” That’s a deliberate misnomer. It’s actually terraforming of planet Earth as part of an effort to exterminate humankind and prepare Earth for a post-human era (which I’ve also been reporting since at least 2019).



The global extermination experiment is funded in part by Bill Gates and run by Harvard University researchers, all of whom pursue anti-human agendas that are deliberately designed to sharply decrease human populations across the planet. (This is their stated goal.)

Obviously, blocking the sun would shut down photosynthesis across the entire planet, resulting in a catastrophic collapse of every ecosystem on the planet (and in the oceans). Human civilization would cease to exist, and the global biosphere would plunge into a mass extinction that would, in effect, sterilize the planet of nearly all current life.

This is the goal of Bill Gates, who has also been spearheading infertility technologies and covid vaccines that are right now killing people all over the planet (with many millions more to die in the coming months from vaccine side effects).

For a full, detailed, scientific explanation of how this Bill Gates terraforming experiment would utterly destroy all live on Earth as we know it, watch my detailed “Oblivion Agenda” video here:

...

[franky1]

badecker does not realise how big the sun is and how it would require something bigger than the moon to dim the sun enough to create a shadow dark enough to be true nighttime (even a full eclipse doesnt make it full night time to kill all plants)

maybe you dont know how shadows work
but to block out something the size of sweden. the object needs to be way bigger then sweden

for instance something the size of a 747plane at 32000 feet wont even block out a square inch at sea level

..
moon diameter:384,400 km
distance: 3473km
umbra(shadow) diameter 160km

as you can see.. the moon is over 2400x bigger then the shadow it casts on earth

[wendygon]

I suppose I should apologize a little to franky1. After all, he wasn't even talking to me, even though the things I said probably would have fit him with regard to BitMos. Yet I acted like he was talking to me, somewhat.

[franky1]

I suppose I should apologize a little to franky1. After all, he wasn't even talking to me, even though the things I said probably would have fit him with regard to BitMos. Yet I acted like he was talking to me, somewhat.

you did not even make a post in this topic..
heck i was talking to badecker, which is clear by me mentioning his name..

seems your saying sorry for no reason. .. unless you are badeckers alt account

[BADecker]

I suppose I should apologize a little to franky1. After all, he wasn't even talking to me, even though the things I said probably would have fit him with regard to BitMos. Yet I acted like he was talking to me, somewhat.

you did not even make a post in this topic..
heck i was talking to badecker, which is clear by me mentioning his name..

seems your saying sorry for no reason. .. unless you are badeckers alt account

Poor little franky1. Go fishing from your boat, since you can't even take a little of your own 'is it silliness?' from somebody else, lol.