Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 08:00:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Accuracy of GPU performance measures  (Read 1424 times)
Sjalq (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2011, 12:57:47 PM
 #1

Hi guys,

I'm new to all things mining and abandoned the idea back when we were below $2.00

What I don't understand is why according to the BitCoin wiki the hash rate is going down with new GPUs. ( https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_Hardware_Comparison )

Basically what is the most cost effective GPU to buy these days based only on cost of equipment?


Cheesy mine mine mine mine mine mine mine Cheesy
*Image Removed*
18WMxaHsxx6FuvbQbeA33UZud1bnmD7xY3
1715544012
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715544012

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715544012
Reply with quote  #2

1715544012
Report to moderator
1715544012
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715544012

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715544012
Reply with quote  #2

1715544012
Report to moderator
1715544012
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715544012

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715544012
Reply with quote  #2

1715544012
Report to moderator
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715544012
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715544012

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715544012
Reply with quote  #2

1715544012
Report to moderator
1715544012
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715544012

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715544012
Reply with quote  #2

1715544012
Report to moderator
1715544012
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715544012

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715544012
Reply with quote  #2

1715544012
Report to moderator
Basiley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 24, 2011, 01:03:34 PM
 #2

Ati: from 5850 to 6990. some was use even 5830 and 48xx, but thats not so reasonable.
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025



View Profile
May 24, 2011, 01:14:33 PM
 #3

Is it really that hard to make a spreadsheet to calculate hashing power per dollar?

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054



View Profile WWW
May 24, 2011, 01:23:47 PM
 #4

Chalk it up to ATI's confusing naming scheme. 6870 is a weaker card than 5870, also I think miners are not yet optimized for 6XXX.

A rig with two 5970 is very solid if you can find some. If you want to add to an existing machine, a 5870 is good.

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
Basiley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 24, 2011, 06:16:30 PM
 #5

Chalk it up to ATI's confusing naming scheme. 6870 is a weaker card than 5870, also I think miners are not yet optimized for 6XXX.

A rig with two 5970 is very solid if you can find some. If you want to add to an existing machine, a 5870 is good.
more likely not "miners not optimised", but 69xx less suitable for GPGPU usage and bit more suitable for gaming thanks to improved ROP's and memory size/speed.
google [questionably reasonable]difference between VLIW5 [58x0 GPU's]and VLIW4 [69xx GPU's].
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!