|
Grumpster
|
 |
March 22, 2015, 07:13:51 AM |
|
Which site did you invest in?
I invested in coins double but forgot to look at the reviews. BTC0.6 gone.
For the most part, Multi Cryptos. Made about 100k doge from investments there, the rest of the profit has been from various different sites in small amounts, too many to name but most are mentioned in the first post. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 07:36:55 AM |
|
Which site did you invest in?
I invested in coins double but forgot to look at the reviews. BTC0.6 gone.
For the most part, Multi Cryptos. Made about 100k doge from investments there, the rest of the profit has been from various different sites in small amounts, too many to name but most are mentioned in the first post. , Should have definitely invested more. 12x profit is not bad, you know  |
|
|
|
Monnt
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 22, 2015, 07:47:48 AM |
|
Wow, Grumpster. Nice! 12x is indeed not bad  |
|
|
|
|
s1ng
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 22, 2015, 07:48:09 AM |
|
you're put to much effort for doing this because most ponzies will collapsed.
If not now maybe tomorrow but it still usefull for a new comer or newbie that interest to invest in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 07:49:15 AM |
|
you're put to much effort for doing this because most ponzies will collapsed.
If not now maybe tomorrow but it still usefull for a new comer or newbie that interest to invest in
Obviously all ponzis will collapse, although it's good to know which one are still paying and which one has stopped. It's like a HYIP monitor. |
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 07:57:25 AM |
|
you're put to much effort for doing this because most ponzies will collapsed.
If not now maybe tomorrow but it still usefull for a new comer or newbie that interest to invest in
Exactly what Fiiasco said. Of course, ponzi's collapse, but people don't know when they collapse and which ones are no longer paying. It's better to keep everyone alert than in the dark. Yup. Although you still need to be careful and be aware of the risks, even if it's listed as paying. |
|
|
|
|
wdnj
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:10:14 AM |
|
Very useful information
anyone who wants to find out what these sites are working
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:13:34 AM |
|
Very useful information
anyone who wants to find out what these sites are working
The list was updated just today, I am pretty sure all of the sites listed are working  |
|
|
|
pnzinet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:27:17 AM |
|
Thanks for adding pnzi.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enhancedfuel
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:44:24 AM |
|
If this site is completely for the people and non profit I want to know who the ref money is going to on the MAIN PAGE TRUST LIST hidden in mostly non ref links Pyramid| Bitcoin Pyramid**|http://bitcoinpyramid.com http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/18680Pyramid| CryptoPyramid* |http://cryptopyramid.com http://cryptopyramid.com/?ref=311tut tut I've put in two ref links, it isn't here for profit (I'm not biasing reviews, accepting BTC for higher listings, nor am I offering ads on the thread) but I am entitled to add ref links into the links. Doesn't make a difference to the user and their experience on the list. It is still promoting legitimate sites, and only one twentieth (if not less) of the sites have ref links. I'll try keep it to a minimum, but something needs to motivate me to keep on updating this list, I thought adding a few ref links to see if the list is being used or not would be a good idea. So far, it's enough to keep this list going for a few more weeks at the least. I'm sure you understand  But you did try and do it on the sly yes? if those ref links are yours you are making profit and you also hid it. You are very quick to catch people out when they try and be sneaky, just doing the same You don't need to try anything it's your thread. Had you had said some are ref links to keep me motivated no-one would mind I think with the effort you put in this I just just think you regret sneaking those two in And to say it doesn't make a difference to user is silly. You know why it is sneaky, it gets you btc when they put money in. We have all been told off for trying this at some point. This is yours. As always keep up the good work on this thread. I wont be commenting anymore on this issue |
|
|
|
|
|
enhancedfuel
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:45:08 AM |
|
If this site is completely for the people and non profit I want to know who the ref money is going to on the MAIN PAGE TRUST LIST hidden in mostly non ref links Pyramid| Bitcoin Pyramid**|http://bitcoinpyramid.com http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/18680Pyramid| CryptoPyramid* |http://cryptopyramid.com http://cryptopyramid.com/?ref=311tut tut I've put in two ref links, it isn't here for profit (I'm not biasing reviews, accepting BTC for higher listings, nor am I offering ads on the thread) but I am entitled to add ref links into the links. Doesn't make a difference to the user and their experience on the list. It is still promoting legitimate sites, and only one twentieth (if not less) of the sites have ref links. I'll try keep it to a minimum, but something needs to motivate me to keep on updating this list, I thought adding a few ref links to see if the list is being used or not would be a good idea. So far, it's enough to keep this list going for a few more weeks at the least. I'm sure you understand I think that's fair. You're doing a great job protecting the community of investors here (such as myself), at least you deserve some reward for it. 100% agreed. Just didn't like the sneak. NOW wont be commenting more on this issue |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:50:51 AM |
|
man you sure do have the answer for everything  |
|
|
|
|
enhancedfuel
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:51:29 AM |
|
If this site is completely for the people and non profit I want to know who the ref money is going to on the MAIN PAGE TRUST LIST hidden in mostly non ref links Pyramid| Bitcoin Pyramid**|http://bitcoinpyramid.com http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/18680Pyramid| CryptoPyramid* |http://cryptopyramid.com http://cryptopyramid.com/?ref=311tut tut I've put in two ref links, it isn't here for profit (I'm not biasing reviews, accepting BTC for higher listings, nor am I offering ads on the thread) but I am entitled to add ref links into the links. Doesn't make a difference to the user and their experience on the list. It is still promoting legitimate sites, and only one twentieth (if not less) of the sites have ref links. I'll try keep it to a minimum, but something needs to motivate me to keep on updating this list, I thought adding a few ref links to see if the list is being used or not would be a good idea. So far, it's enough to keep this list going for a few more weeks at the least. I'm sure you understand I think that's fair. You're doing a great job protecting the community of investors here (such as myself), at least you deserve some reward for it. 100% agreed. Just didn't like the sneak. NOW wont be commenting more on this issue You have a fair point, but he didn't really say anywhere that we wouldn't be placing in ref links  HA! He didn't say he would never put ref links! I'm owned |
|
|
|
|
|
enhancedfuel
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:53:16 AM |
|
If this site is completely for the people and non profit I want to know who the ref money is going to on the MAIN PAGE TRUST LIST hidden in mostly non ref links Pyramid| Bitcoin Pyramid**|http://bitcoinpyramid.com http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/18680Pyramid| CryptoPyramid* |http://cryptopyramid.com http://cryptopyramid.com/?ref=311tut tut I've put in two ref links, it isn't here for profit (I'm not biasing reviews, accepting BTC for higher listings, nor am I offering ads on the thread) but I am entitled to add ref links into the links. Doesn't make a difference to the user and their experience on the list. It is still promoting legitimate sites, and only one twentieth (if not less) of the sites have ref links. I'll try keep it to a minimum, but something needs to motivate me to keep on updating this list, I thought adding a few ref links to see if the list is being used or not would be a good idea. So far, it's enough to keep this list going for a few more weeks at the least. I'm sure you understand I think that's fair. You're doing a great job protecting the community of investors here (such as myself), at least you deserve some reward for it. 100% agreed. Just didn't like the sneak. NOW wont be commenting more on this issue You have a fair point, but he didn't really say anywhere that we wouldn't be placing in ref links HA! He didn't say he would never put ref links! I'm owned Quote from: dmugetsu on March 15, 2015, 01:50:37 PM Quote from: supermoney on March 15, 2015, 01:49:20 PM @dmugetsu you should add an address for donations, I will be glad to deposit some there Smiley No need, I'm only doing this to keep the community safe. Maybe if cryptoincrease add an affiliate option, i'll throw in a ref link just to earn a bit from my efforts while promoting a legit site, but if not, I don't think it would be fair to take donations for doing a deed that should really be done by forum mods in the first place... If they can't keep the community safe, I guess someone has to! anyway guys put a lot of hard work in so ima leave him alone |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 10:56:57 AM |
|
It seems dmugetsu is a lot smarter than we all originally thought props to him for not actually trying to sneak anything in lol, imo this is the best resource this board has. Really glad someone cares for this community. |
|
|
|
|
enhancedfuel
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:01:03 AM |
|
It seems dmugetsu is a lot smarter than we all originally thought props to him for not actually trying to sneak anything in lol, imo this is the best resource this board has. Really glad someone cares for this community. I still believe he snuck or he would have just posted the link with his ref at the end (like in my sig) not mask it over with just the site address. I'm a sneak and it takes one to know one, no matter how hard they may work. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:04:30 AM |
|
It seems dmugetsu is a lot smarter than we all originally thought props to him for not actually trying to sneak anything in lol, imo this is the best resource this board has. Really glad someone cares for this community. I still believe he snuck or he would have just posted the link with his ref at the end (like in my sig) not mask it over with just the site address. I'm a sneak and it takes one to know one, no matter how hard they may work. Fair enough, but did you ever think that the table URL would have been extremely un-appealing to the format? Here's a recreation of what I'm on about... Current Table: PAYING: Type | | | Site Name | | | Site URL | | | Auto/Manual | | | Trustability | | | Date Launched | | | Currencies Accepted | | | Plans Offerred | | | BCT Thread | | | Status | Pyramid | | | Bitcoin Pyramid** | | | | | | Auto | | | 95% | | | 16/17/2011 | | | Bitcoin | | | Variable | | | | | | PAYING |
Table with ref link: PAYING: Type | | | Site Name | | | Site URL | | | Auto/Manual | | | Trustability | | | Date Launched | | | Currencies Accepted | | | Plans Offerred | | | BCT Thread | | | Status | Pyramid | | | Bitcoin Pyramid** | | | | | | Auto | | | 95% | | | 16/17/2011 | | | Bitcoin | | | Variable | | | | | | PAYING | Pyramid | | | Bitcoin Pyramid** | | | | | | Auto | | | 95% | | | 16/17/2011 | | | Bitcoin | | | Variable | | | | | | PAYING |
It may not look like a big issue, but it makes a difference to formatting. If he REALLY wanted to sneak it, he could have used bit.ly for all links and then you would've had to check every single link for a ref link lol... Idk maybe he did try to make it subtle, but he could've done a better job if that was his intention |
|
|
|
|
enhancedfuel
|
|
March 22, 2015, 11:12:27 AM |
|
It seems dmugetsu is a lot smarter than we all originally thought props to him for not actually trying to sneak anything in lol, imo this is the best resource this board has. Really glad someone cares for this community. I still believe he snuck or he would have just posted the link with his ref at the end (like in my sig) not mask it over with just the site address. I'm a sneak and it takes one to know one, no matter how hard they may work. Fair enough, but did you ever think that the table URL would have been extremely un-appealing to the format? Here's a recreation of what I'm on about... Current Table: PAYING: Type | | | Site Name | | | Site URL | | | Auto/Manual | | | Trustability | | | Date Launched | | | Currencies Accepted | | | Plans Offerred | | | BCT Thread | | | Status | Pyramid | | | Bitcoin Pyramid** | | | | | | Auto | | | 95% | | | 16/17/2011 | | | Bitcoin | | | Variable | | | | | | PAYING |
Table with ref link: PAYING: Type | | | Site Name | | | Site URL | | | Auto/Manual | | | Trustability | | | Date Launched | | | Currencies Accepted | | | Plans Offerred | | | BCT Thread | | | Status | Pyramid | | | Bitcoin Pyramid** | | | | | | Auto | | | 95% | | | 16/17/2011 | | | Bitcoin | | | Variable | | | | | | PAYING | Pyramid | | | Bitcoin Pyramid** | | | | | | Auto | | | 95% | | | 16/17/2011 | | | Bitcoin | | | Variable | | | | | | PAYING |
It may not look like a big issue, but it makes a difference to formatting. If he REALLY wanted to sneak it, he could have used bit.ly for all links and then you would've had to check every single link for a ref link lol... Idk maybe he did try to make it subtle, but he could've done a better job if that was his intention If you really think he snuck just those two links in there like that so as not to ruin the lovely format of the page then fair enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiiasco
|
|
March 22, 2015, 12:45:08 PM |
|
so do you list offshore sites or only on bitcointalk as I have a lot you can review for us!!
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
