Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 11:24:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ...  (Read 1506 times)
ak111in (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 1003


View Profile
February 28, 2015, 04:40:55 PM
Last edit: December 16, 2018, 03:17:46 PM by ak111in
 #1

...
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
February 28, 2015, 05:14:05 PM
 #2

I think numbers like this happen because some block explorers take "change" sent back to the same address in to account as another "receive" whilst others don't?

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
cr1776
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4074
Merit: 1304


View Profile
February 28, 2015, 11:48:28 PM
 #3

I think numbers like this happen because some block explorers take "change" sent back to the same address in to account as another "receive" whilst others don't?


So any option to get correct value for blockexplorer.com ?

It depends on what is "correct". As Newar said, if you count everything, you get one answer; if you count everything except change, you get another.

Some people might think change shouldn't count since it really wasn't sent to an address, it just remained there; others might say it should count.

One could look at the code and alter it, and verify that this is even the issue.

:-)
liraz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 31, 2015, 10:49:58 PM
 #4

I thought this was a bug with the old code and assumed blockchain.info was in the right but strangely enough after migrating blockexplorer.com to Insight there is still a difference in the balance.

I can't speak for what blockchain.info is doing, but since the site is open source you can take a look yourself and figure out where the difference is coming from. This time I'm betting blockexplorer.com is right.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!