|
topcat363
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 05:34:20 PM |
|
a bit more dumping and a new exchange should be a recipe for launch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
March 04, 2015, 07:26:26 PM |
|
Volume at that second is 12.30 BTC
Bittrex will be next, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lore06
|
|
March 04, 2015, 07:30:35 PM |
|
I miss some activity in this threat
|
|
|
|
|
klopper
|
|
March 04, 2015, 07:45:18 PM |
|
Yeah... bittrex will probably add it soon now that there is a blockexplorer!  |
|
|
|
|
|
JSpike
|
|
March 04, 2015, 07:48:08 PM |
|
Yeah... bittrex will probably add it soon now that there is a blockexplorer! Looks great, bought some today. Bring it to the public, bring it to Bittrex! |
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
March 04, 2015, 07:53:11 PM |
|
Lol mod, it was sarcasm about dump.
{
"blocks" : 3757,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 493.17890529,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 14000000000,
"netmhashps" : 64187.49300843,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 1000000,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
|
Erkallys
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1004
|
|
March 04, 2015, 09:57:13 PM |
|
Interested by a French translation and moderation of the French community for some ITL ?
|
|
|
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 04, 2015, 10:43:05 PM |
|
https://ilt.suprnova.cc Down ? EDIT: It works on IE and Chrome but not on Firefox/Waterfox anymore 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
March 04, 2015, 10:46:27 PM |
|
Firefox 36 works but laggy. |
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 04, 2015, 11:14:49 PM |
|
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 04, 2015, 11:15:42 PM |
|
An error occurred during a connection to ilt.suprnova.cc. Cannot communicate securely with peer: no common encryption algorithm(s). (Error code: ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
March 05, 2015, 01:04:15 AM |
|
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves. |
|
|
|
|
kcal63
|
|
March 05, 2015, 01:49:15 AM |
|
Once again with these new coins I am playing it backwards.
Mined a boat load of ILT, now trying to figure out if coin is worth holding.
These short POW stage coins have forced me into this methodology that I would have yelled at myself for even thinking about even a few months ago.
Although, 2 of the last 3 have worked out well for me. BITB and ECASH.
However, still nervous when I have to operate this way after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptophile
|
|
March 05, 2015, 01:54:11 AM |
|
after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
tsk tsk, obvious scam coin was obvious from the start |
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
March 05, 2015, 01:58:21 AM |
|
You risking with every coin, no one knows what will be tomorrow and everything can happen this any dev. But, we hope it will be okay and this will goes to the moon. |
|
|
|
|
|
plast555
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:16:13 AM |
|
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves. point is spread the hash around, not centralized coin to just one pool, there is nothing bad in that  |
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:22:41 AM |
|
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves. but the point is spread the hash around, not centralized coin to just one pool, there is nothing bad in that nononono you are absolutely right on that. In a perfect crypto world, no one pool should have more than 10% ish of the nethash BUT also in said perfect cryptoworld, there would be not be a rampant plague of scammers and thieves itching to steal every fiat cent you have. With that in mind, given the choice of the two, I would whole heartedly go with ocminer just cause I've used him before countless times and wouldn't go with a pool merely saying 'spread the hash to us'. THAT is not a convincing reason to use said pool. A better arguement/advert needs to be made to convince folks to switch. |
|
|
|
|
plast555
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:30:03 AM |
|
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves. but the point is spread the hash around, not centralized coin to just one pool, there is nothing bad in that nononono you are absolutely right on that. In a perfect crypto world, no one pool should have more than 10% ish of the nethash BUT also in said perfect cryptoworld, there would be not be a rampant plague of scammers and thieves itching to steal every fiat cent you have. With that in mind, given the choice of the two, I would whole heartedly go with ocminer just cause I've used him before countless times and wouldn't go with a pool merely saying 'spread the hash to us'. THAT is not a convincing reason to use said pool. A better arguement/advert needs to be made to convince folks to switch. and this coin is too short to centralized it, I mean on just 4550 blocks or so and I agree, right now no one can measure with OCminer ! and the most after all this s*** what happened with "some" coin/s |
|
|
|
|
|
Gleason
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:40:15 AM |
|
Once again with these new coins I am playing it backwards.
Mined a boat load of ILT, now trying to figure out if coin is worth holding.
These short POW stage coins have forced me into this methodology that I would have yelled at myself for even thinking about even a few months ago.
Although, 2 of the last 3 have worked out well for me. BITB and ECASH.
However, still nervous when I have to operate this way after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
when all else fails, you can at least take profit on 50% now, and keep 50% of your holdings to gamble on hoping for a rise after the POW Stage. You can never really tell in the crypto world! |
|
|
|
|
Poll
