Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 11:59:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: BIP Draft - Standardized/Protected/Multi Private Keys  (Read 981 times)
casascius (OP)
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136


The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)


View Profile WWW
August 02, 2012, 07:36:12 PM
Last edit: August 03, 2012, 05:42:22 AM by casascius
 #1

I am drafting another potential BIP and wanted to solicit comments.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Casascius/Base58Check-encoded_objects_proposal

With the increasing popularity of the use of paper wallets as offline Bitcoin storage, there is a growing demand for ways to make that offline storage more secure, for various reasons of the user's choice.  Currently, there exists no straightforward way to encrypt a paper Bitcoin wallet.

There is also growing demand for paper wallets that can be split and saved in redundant geographical locations or with different trusted parties, or which are generated in individual parts by multiple machines so that no single machine ever has access to the entire private key prior to redemption.  This proposal introduces a standard based on elliptic curve multiplication where Base58Check-encoded strings and/or QR codes can be used to represent parts of a multi-part key.  This proposal also introduces a simple standard format for denoting a RAID-like recovery record, so that a multi-part key can be distributed and redeemed in a fashion that tolerates the loss of any one part of the key.

This proposal also seeks to define unique prefixes on Base58Check-encoded strings so that they convey useful visual information to a user, and requests that other developers maintain awareness of the string prefixes and maximize their usefulness to the user.

Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable.  I never believe them.  If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins.  I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion.  Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice.  Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
1715083194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715083194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715083194
Reply with quote  #2

1715083194
Report to moderator
1715083194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715083194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715083194
Reply with quote  #2

1715083194
Report to moderator
1715083194
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715083194

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715083194
Reply with quote  #2

1715083194
Report to moderator
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
August 03, 2012, 05:28:32 AM
 #2

Watching

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
techwtf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 03, 2012, 09:22:24 AM
Last edit: August 03, 2012, 09:49:26 AM by techwtf
 #3

should use erasure coding or ssss (Shamir's Secret Sharing Scheme, http://point-at-infinity.org/ssss/), not home-made recovery records Smiley

Edited: erasure coding reduces the security expectations, so only ssss is usable.
apetersson
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668
Merit: 501



View Profile
August 03, 2012, 09:28:25 AM
 #4

who not use standard BIP11 addresses?
casascius (OP)
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136


The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)


View Profile WWW
August 03, 2012, 02:11:51 PM
 #5

who not use standard BIP11 addresses?

These are a different transaction type altogether.  Not much supports these transactions yet.

I propose different ways to encode a normal private key. They can all be turned back in to a normal private key for a normal address with a utility and imported anywhere.

Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable.  I never believe them.  If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins.  I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion.  Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice.  Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!