If the second post ended with something "extra" that added to the conversation, then it would be much better.
I agree. It's ok to repeat or reassure something but only if you can add something extra really. Answering a question that has already been answered is unnecessary in my opinion and it does make me roll my eyes when I see it like I did with the post quoted in the op but it's not currently against 'the rules'.
This is common nowadays. People read only the first post, ignore the answers below and write their own to raise their post count.
There's a lot of dumb and ignorant answers in almost every thread, but what can you do?
Whilst I don't doubt most people are doing it to raise their post count and a signature does contribute to this behaviour it's not just limited to this forum. Look at any forum or even yahoo answers etc and you'll find the same behaviour but a paid signature sure will encourage it but I'm not sure whether the posts should be deleted or not. It can be difficult to decide what constitutes a unnecessary post and will differ from mod to mod, though in the quoted case in the op clearly it adds nothing and is unnecessary so it could be seen as spam (and if that is the case, removed).
It would actually be reay helpful to know what is really considered as spam, lately i have seen senior members and hero members get banned for spamming or low quality posts wich is kind of scary
What Hero Member was banned? Just contribute relevantly and put some effort in but lots of short posts in quick succession in large volume is asking for trouble.
Thanks for posting but still I haven't got an accurate answer to my question and please don't concetrate on the posters. I just gave an example.
-MZ
It has been discussed before briefly in the staff forum but with no concrete answer so I think they should stay for now but it's up to you whether you want to report them or not (just like with poor quality posts - mods opinion of what is spam or useless differs). I think these posts should be discouraged but taken on a case by case basis but when they're spotted (or reported) their other posts should be investigated - which I usually do - and if the rest of their posts are poor they should be dealt with.