Raystonn (OP)
|
|
March 10, 2015, 08:58:22 PM |
|
Holly $#!+ Could it be... maybe...
What if they are looking at producing chips to conduct BTC transfers that could go into ANYTHING? <snip>
Yes, that is exactly what is meant by "internet of things". There is a cost to running every machine in the world, and there is a cost to allocating resources. Objects are managed by their owners. It can take a great deal of time to allocate your resources efficiently. With an internet of things, your objects compete to provide services within your guidelines, but without your explicit micromanagement. This frees humanity to focus on the bigger picture: their goals in life. This can also be extended to the relationships between managers and employees. A decentralized corporation will be owned by shareholders. They will provide the currency that ultimately goes to the only employees in the corporation: individual contributors. Management is eliminated completely, and replaced by a hierarchy of management software objects that work toward the goals defined by shareholders. Anything that cannot be done by a machine is offered to human employees by the management software objects, probably all on a contract basis. That includes design, implementation, verification, and support of new products. Elimination of human managers is Dilbert's dream come true. Shareholders set out goals and provide money. Their corporation's IoT manages those resources toward the goals.
|
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
|
March 11, 2015, 01:32:15 AM |
|
Perhaps they are going to develop a more consumer-friendly Trezor
|
insert coin here: Dash XfXZL8WL18zzNhaAqWqEziX2bUvyJbrC8s
1Ctd7Na8qE7btyueEshAJF5C7ZqFWH11Wc
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
March 11, 2015, 02:25:47 AM |
|
Source is WSJ so gave it a read 21’s lead investors include U.S. venture-capital heavyweights Andreessen Horowitz and RRE Ventures, along with Chinese private-equity firm Yuan Capital, with a strategic stake going to chipmaker Qualcomm Inc.QCOM -1.13% through its venture-capital unit. Additionally, Khosla Ventures and Data Collective have invested in 21, as well as chief executives and founders from various tech companies, including PayPal co-founders Peter Thiel and Max Levchin, eBay Inc. co-founder Jeff Skoll, Dropbox Inc. CEO Drew Houston, Expedia Inc. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi and Zynga Inc. co-founder Mark Pincus This is an interesting set of backer companies and will be something I will keep track of as well.
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
Bit_Happy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
|
|
March 11, 2015, 02:29:44 AM |
|
Holly $#!+ Could it be... maybe...
What if they are looking at producing chips to conduct BTC transfers that could go into ANYTHING? Want to rent that car? Send from your phone to start your 100 mile rental. You could meter about anything, you could put such chips in everything from soda machines to hotel room doors (these have to be replaced anyway since they are now 100% hackable). One could envision a world of devices ready to serve you as soon as payment is received. These devices could be anywhere. You could design a new shifter knob for your car then send your file along with payment to a 3D printer. There is no end to the ideas.
Imagination combined with new "toys" == A great time to be in the right place.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
March 11, 2015, 02:30:30 AM |
|
21’s lead investors include U.S. venture-capital heavyweights Andreessen Horowitz and RRE Ventures, along with Chinese private-equity firm Yuan Capital, with a strategic stake going to chipmaker Qualcomm Inc.QCOM -1.13% through its venture-capital unit. https://www.cbinsights.com/investor/qualcomm-ventures2015-03-10 21 Inc Series A - II $111M Andreessen Horowitz, Dara Khosrowshahi, Data Collective, Drew Houston, Jeff Skoll, Khosla Ventures, Mark Pincus, Max Levchin, Peter Thiel, RRE Ventures, and Yuan Capital They are funding it (21 Inc, whatever the will be doing), not taking an active part in it, so no (insert buzzword salad) inside qualcomm chips. Also that (insert buzzword salad) 21 inc would be doing looks to be probably mining: https://www.cbinsights.com/company/21e621 Inc, formerly 21e6, is a stealth company that aims to manufacture Bitcoin ASIC. Company (Alive / Active)
|
|
|
|
tarmi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
|
|
March 11, 2015, 02:50:52 AM |
|
100 mil for a new asic chip? with that kind of money they can own 50 % of the network right now.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
March 11, 2015, 02:54:11 AM |
|
100 mil for a new asic chip? Yeah pretty much this. Already checked it out? They're hiring.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
March 11, 2015, 03:05:37 AM |
|
with that kind of money they can own 50 % of the network right now.
They just want to sell devices probably.
|
|
|
|
Kipsy89
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Relax!
|
|
March 11, 2015, 11:05:37 AM |
|
They really should embed a secret element in the phone that enables the device to store BTC safely, man. This could work without any risk of the keys/seeds being exposed, even if the phone is rooted.
|
|
|
|
Grafzep
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2015, 12:40:40 PM |
|
Also that (insert buzzword salad) 21 inc would be doing looks to be probably mining: https://www.cbinsights.com/company/21e621 Inc, formerly 21e6, is a stealth company that aims to manufacture Bitcoin ASIC. Company (Alive / Active)
A Bitcoin ASIC doesn't need to be a mining ASIC
|
|
|
|
L0uis
|
|
March 11, 2015, 12:45:46 PM |
|
I wonder if this 116M is counted as investment in the 'Bitcoin ecosystem', like the 75M for Coinbase was. That will make 2015 going with a sick start, on paper.
|
|
|
|
Kipsy89
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Relax!
|
|
March 11, 2015, 12:49:09 PM |
|
I wonder if this 116M is counted as investment in the 'Bitcoin ecosystem', like the 75M for Coinbase was. That will make 2015 going with a sick start, on paper.
Just imagine what's still to come! It's only March and we're up quite a bit. If this year goes well - also price-wise - we may be in for an even better 2016 (with reward halving, man!!!)
|
|
|
|
HarmonLi
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Honest 80s business!
|
|
March 11, 2015, 01:14:12 PM |
|
They really should embed a secret element in the phone that enables the device to store BTC safely, man. This could work without any risk of the keys/seeds being exposed, even if the phone is rooted.
That's actually not a bad idea. I also believe that the key (no pun intended) to security in the Bitcoin ecosystem lies in hardware-secured wallets. Trezors are the prototype, but it would be really interesting if this secret element (right now used to store fingerprints, etc.) is integrated into a phones' SoC or something.
|
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
|
March 12, 2015, 12:44:21 PM |
|
with that kind of money they can own 50 % of the network right now.
They just want to sell devices probably. I don't think this is about bitcoin miners...at least, I hope so. It would be pretty anti-climatic.
|
▂▃▅▇█▓▒░B**-Cultist░▒▓█▇▅▃▂
|
|
|
ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
|
March 12, 2015, 02:35:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
|
|
March 12, 2015, 02:41:40 PM |
|
Wired and monetized everything, blockchain identity for cell phones; my mind is blown also. There are so many directions this could go that I don't know which way to look.
|
|
|
|
ErisDiscordia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1163
Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos
|
|
March 12, 2015, 03:05:33 PM |
|
Exciting visions of the future right there!
|
It's all bullshit. But bullshit makes the flowers grow and that's beautiful.
|
|
|
Shiver
|
|
March 13, 2015, 06:17:30 PM |
|
Now some people imagine this as heaven for the rich, like if for example a rich driver could flip all the red lights green. How sucky would that be if you had to wait at extra-long reds? But no. You had already preset the amount you were willing to pay in bidding for the traffic light to change, and it was far less...but more importantly you get paid for your waiting time. If it's not worth your while to wait and get paid today, just set your asking price higher (a dial just for this purpose is on your dashboard). You only wait if the other driver is offering enough to make you interested in waiting.
...so long as the guy in front of you isn't blocking your paid for fast lane. Maybe in a generation or so, but it's going to take a while. Look at toll booths in London. It will take a lot of time to implement that around the world. Great concept though for wealth distribution (and being an intentional sunday driver).
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
March 15, 2015, 08:32:07 PM |
|
Now some people imagine this as heaven for the rich, like if for example a rich driver could flip all the red lights green. How sucky would that be if you had to wait at extra-long reds? But no. You had already preset the amount you were willing to pay in bidding for the traffic light to change, and it was far less...but more importantly you get paid for your waiting time. If it's not worth your while to wait and get paid today, just set your asking price higher (a dial just for this purpose is on your dashboard). You only wait if the other driver is offering enough to make you interested in waiting.
...so long as the guy in front of you isn't blocking your paid for fast lane. Maybe in a generation or so, but it's going to take a while. Look at toll booths in London. It will take a lot of time to implement that around the world. Great concept though for wealth distribution (and being an intentional sunday driver). Wow I almost missed that nugget. Hard to come up with a better argument against randian fantasy babble than simply displaying it.
|
|
|
|
|