Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 12:07:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What Would You Have Bid For The USMS Seized BTCs?  (Read 1530 times)
Armis (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 04:34:43 PM
 #1

OK, the USMS auction of 50K BTC from Silk Road seizure is finished: http://www.forbes.com/sites/katevinton/2015/03/10/three-anonymous-bidders-take-home-50000-bitcoin-in-silk-road-auction/

The question is: What would you have bid for the 50,000 Bitcoins?


My bid would have been $111 per BTC for the whole lot, however, I really don’t like buying seized assets because it fosters more seizing and a culture of seizures. As evidence by police department, sheriff offices, and whole cities actually depending on seizures as a revenue resource for the running of their entity.

Think about it, when the police take “ill gotten gains” from the “bad guy” isn’t the system laundering the money back into the system?   If they want to do the right thing for everyone, simply put all of the money, property, etc into a furnace and burn it.  As for the btc they could simply send it all to an irretrievable address, effectively destroying the coins.


Anyway, what would you have bid for the coins?
1714824471
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714824471

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714824471
Reply with quote  #2

1714824471
Report to moderator
1714824471
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714824471

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714824471
Reply with quote  #2

1714824471
Report to moderator
1714824471
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714824471

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714824471
Reply with quote  #2

1714824471
Report to moderator
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
juju
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 06:33:41 PM
 #2

OK, the USMS auction of 50K BTC from Silk Road seizure is finished: http://www.forbes.com/sites/katevinton/2015/03/10/three-anonymous-bidders-take-home-50000-bitcoin-in-silk-road-auction/

The question is: What would you have bid for the 50,000 Bitcoins?


My bid would have been $111 per BTC for the whole lot, however, I really don’t like buying seized assets because it fosters more seizing and a culture of seizures. As evidence by police department, sheriff offices, and whole cities actually depending on seizures as a revenue resource for the running of their entity.

Think about it, when the police take “ill gotten gains” from the “bad guy” isn’t the system laundering the money back into the system?   If they want to do the right thing for everyone, simply put all of the money, property, etc into a furnace and burn it.  As for the btc they could simply send it all to an irretrievable address, effectively destroying the coins.


Anyway, what would you have bid for the coins?

I would have paid 217 or below, to diverge from the price discussion, If we decided to treat any coin differently than another it would destroy the Fungibility of Bitcoin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungibility), (1 Bitcoin is always equivalent to another Bitcoin). Think about this an Ounce of Gold is worth an Ounce of Gold, even if the gold was used to purchase drugs, or was taken directly from the dirt. If we treated "hacked", "dirty" or "Ill gotten coins" differently I think it would be bad.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3388
Merit: 4616



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 06:36:09 PM
 #3

If I had the cash available, I probably would have bid $300 per BTC.
Possum577
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Loose lips sink sigs!


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 06:42:09 PM
 #4

I don't recall when the seizure took place exactly, what's the USMS "cost basis" for when they acquired the coins?

AT101ET
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1348


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 10:42:05 PM
 #5

I'd have bid just under current market value. Say it was $250 beforehand, if have bid $240 or so per coin. Actually of I really wanted to buy 50k BTC ID have paid market price for it as had I put a buy order online for that I wouldn't be able to buy 50k worth of BTC for the same price without artificially raising the price.
Armis (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:17:10 PM
 #6

If I had the cash available, I probably would have bid $300 per BTC.



I'd have bid just under current market value. Say it was $250 beforehand, if have bid $240 or so per coin. Actually of I really wanted to buy 50k BTC ID have paid market price for it as had I put a buy order online for that I wouldn't be able to buy 50k worth of BTC for the same price without artificially raising the price.

This is very strange because you as well as other are willing to buy a wholesale item at retail value, to me that's crazy, then when you factor in that this is a deadline sale, must sell, motivated seller, etc ... it's even more insane to pay retail.  

Eh, but to each his own (12.5 mill)

electerium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:17:34 PM
 #7

between stamp/finex you can buy about 20k coins at any given moment, your avg cost will probably be 305ish (if 280 was the price at auction).


even if you bought all those coins, you'd set off a firestorm in the market upwards.

so if i was looking at it as an investment to acquire 50k coins at a fair price, i'd submit a bid at about 15% over market value.
Armis (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:19:24 PM
 #8

between stamp/finex you can buy about 20k coins at any given moment, your avg cost will probably be 305ish (if 280 was the price at auction).


even if you bought all those coins, you'd set off a firestorm in the market upwards.

so if i was looking at it as an investment to acquire 50k coins at a fair price, i'd submit a bid at about 15% over market value.


  Shocked [faints] Huh
electerium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:23:04 PM
 #9

between stamp/finex you can buy about 20k coins at any given moment, your avg cost will probably be 305ish (if 280 was the price at auction).


even if you bought all those coins, you'd set off a firestorm in the market upwards.

so if i was looking at it as an investment to acquire 50k coins at a fair price, i'd submit a bid at about 15% over market value.


  Shocked [faints] Huh

read what i wrote very carefully. If i was looking to acquire all 50k coins at a fair price.
Slaxt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250

Gone......


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:24:39 PM
 #10

When the news came out for the date of the auction the price was around 220-230 regardless of the pre pump auction i would have paid no more than 200 and that is easy money for them as we all know. It's the thing about stolen goods it is roughly 3rd of the price so your $111 is so much more realistic than what they got..

TC is the worse thing to happen to default, needs to open his eyes and not jump to conclusions, not everyone lies!!! Anyway as promised I have left, pass word changed to long random which I will forget like that plonker who ruined a perfectly fine account.
lucasjkr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:31:37 PM
 #11

between stamp/finex you can buy about 20k coins at any given moment, your avg cost will probably be 305ish (if 280 was the price at auction).


even if you bought all those coins, you'd set off a firestorm in the market upwards.

so if i was looking at it as an investment to acquire 50k coins at a fair price, i'd submit a bid at about 15% over market value.

You'd offer a premium for a large block of coins? Don't see the point, if you really wanted 50k coins, you could just buy them as they become available (not place a single order for 50k). Because once you have those coins, you're going to move the market in the opposite direction when you try to exit... 15% premium to buy, plus a push down when you sell, you're looking at needing to see those coins go up 20-25% just to break even....

Maybe I'm wrong, but I didn't think that bidders weren't limited to a single bid...
electerium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:37:54 PM
 #12

between stamp/finex you can buy about 20k coins at any given moment, your avg cost will probably be 305ish (if 280 was the price at auction).


even if you bought all those coins, you'd set off a firestorm in the market upwards.

so if i was looking at it as an investment to acquire 50k coins at a fair price, i'd submit a bid at about 15% over market value.

You'd offer a premium for a large block of coins? Don't see the point, if you really wanted 50k coins, you could just buy them as they become available (not place a single order for 50k). Because once you have those coins, you're going to move the market in the opposite direction when you try to exit... 15% premium to buy, plus a push down when you sell, you're looking at needing to see those coins go up 20-25% just to break even....

Maybe I'm wrong, but I didn't think that bidders weren't limited to a single bid...

if you injected 14m into finex/stamp even over the course of 1 week people would notice. that is how illiquid they are (especially stamp)
Armis (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:44:18 PM
 #13

between stamp/finex you can buy about 20k coins at any given moment, your avg cost will probably be 305ish (if 280 was the price at auction).


even if you bought all those coins, you'd set off a firestorm in the market upwards.

so if i was looking at it as an investment to acquire 50k coins at a fair price, i'd submit a bid at about 15% over market value.


  Shocked [faints] Huh

read what i wrote very carefully. If i was looking to acquire all 50k coins at a fair price.


Given that govt took (stole, confiscated, seized, appropriated, etc ...) the coins 'fair price' is probably a misnomer.  Nevertheless, as you can see here: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/#markets there are a ton of public markets for BTC so with a little work you could easily amass 50K coins
without a peep.

However, this is not a public sale, it is not subject to the norms of public sale as you indicated above.   This is not only a private sale, it's one where
only a few are invited, bidding is blind (bidding against one's self) and you have a highly motivated seller.  All of that screams fire sale, doesn't it?

Baghead
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:55:11 PM
 #14

I agree with the op stolen goods should not be sold, if a common man sells stolen goods he will be arrested for handling and selling stolen goods and may go to prison, but it is ok for them to do it of course because it was from 'the bad guy' makes it ok.

That being said i would buy them if i had the chance but it would be nowhere near market value i would pay close to the op about 100 -150 them greedy fks wanting more than market lol
Hfleer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


Changing avatars is currently not possible.


View Profile
March 12, 2015, 12:07:05 AM
 #15

About 10-15% below market so I could flip them in a reasonable time with a nice buffer for swings.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▓▓▓▓▓  BIT-X.comvvvvvvvvvvvvvvi
→ CREATE ACCOUNT 
▓▓▓▓▓
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
deluxeCITY
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 12, 2015, 12:37:31 AM
 #16

The fact i do not like nor care about the government would make me not want to set any bids on the auctioned coins to put anymore of my money in their pocket.

Having said that i would put a low ball bid into the mix of around the same as the op about $100 maybe a little more but nowhere near what they got over the market price is crazy lol

My reasons for such a low bid would be because i dislike them and the way they received not the bitcoin itself.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 3214



View Profile
March 12, 2015, 12:39:20 AM
 #17

I believe that anybody that would have bid below-market or at-market rates would not have won the auction.The alternative of buying 50,000 coins on the exchanges would drive the price way up, so bidders were already willing to pay at least market rate. In fact, it is possible that the recent rise is the result of auction losers buying on exchanges.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
Hfleer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


Changing avatars is currently not possible.


View Profile
March 12, 2015, 12:40:56 AM
 #18

I believe that anybody that would have bid below-market or at-market rates would not have won the auction.The alternative of buying 50,000 coins on the exchanges would drive the price way up, so bidders were already willing to pay at least market rate. In fact, it is possible that the recent rise is the result of auction losers buying on exchanges.

That assumes that there are people who want to buy 50000 coins and would have to otherwise buy on exchanges.

I am pretty sure that this is a rare case.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▓▓▓▓▓  BIT-X.comvvvvvvvvvvvvvvi
→ CREATE ACCOUNT 
▓▓▓▓▓
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
Bralex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 12, 2015, 12:46:36 AM
 #19

I believe that anybody that would have bid below-market or at-market rates would not have won the auction.The alternative of buying 50,000 coins on the exchanges would drive the price way up, so bidders were already willing to pay at least market rate. In fact, it is possible that the recent rise is the result of auction losers buying on exchanges.

The same goes for them selling if they 50,000 they would have got a lot less than market price would they not?

Also if i wanted 50k bitcoins then i could get them at market you would set the buy walls across multiple exchanges and they would get filled in a couple of weeks max without affecting the price.

Who ever brought them at or above market the govt would have seen them coming lol Stolen property brought at a premium  Grin


cloudthink.io   



 



 



 



 



 



Truly Profitable Investment Packages
Custom-Built ASIC Miners ● #1 Self-Sustainable Bitcoin Mining Service in the World ●
Armis (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 12, 2015, 01:08:58 AM
 #20

I believe that anybody that would have bid below-market or at-market rates would not have won the auction.The alternative of buying 50,000 coins on the exchanges would drive the price way up, so bidders were already willing to pay at least market rate. In fact, it is possible that the recent rise is the result of auction losers buying on exchanges.

That assumes that there are people who want to buy 50000 coins and would have to otherwise buy on exchanges.

I am pretty sure that this is a rare case.


you are being very, very kind.

I'm guessing the USMS chose the avenue they traveled expecting to get about 50% to 70% LESS than the face value of the merchandise. If they wanted face value they would have sold it on the open market little by little like anyone else seeking face value.  The also could have advertised a minimum bid of $200 so that everyone knows they want face value plus.  But none of that happened because they knew they would not get it.  Not just because all of 2014 was a buyer's market, and not because if they sold everything at the same time in the public market they would OBVIOUSLY get less in the aggregate, but because no one in with that kind of money is buying wholesale quantity at retail prices -- it's a fire sale auction NO ONE in their right mind expects to pay anywhere close to "market" value for anything at a "must sell" auction.

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!