AnaLCoin | SHA256 | POW/POS | 300k coins | IN-WLT TRDNG ! | LAUNCHED !!!

[jc12345]

away from my wallet, whats the problem?

The block chain is not moving along on autopilot to produce POS blocks every 40s or so as per the design. Only when coins are sent to another address does it trigger a POS block. If nothing is sent, the chain stands still. If Anal hodlers want to move their coins, it is currently a manual process whereby someone must send 20 coins or so to and fro from one address to another all the time so that the movement triggers POS blocks to be solved. Something is not right and the dev (or someone with coding knowledge) must fix this.

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[Vlizzjeffrey]

we must advertise this on datingsites so all the girls can see it, all the girls who like anal will buy this for sure then it will be madness, imagine millions of women buying analcoin because they just cant resist it.

[Peter80]

ANALICIOUS GIVEAWAY!



Please contribute Analcoin to the following address for a FAUCET/GIVEAWAY to encourage people to use Analcoin. Probably 0.05 per person. I will donate 500 coins to this.
NEW FAUCET/GIVEAWAY DONATION ADDRESS: AG6wWbkuVu2aeRruEo3Tc7hg5eL6evFY2g
Giveaway to start around 4/4/2015

as promised send 1000 Anal for the Giveaway. --> 59efb49d182c86fda87cc9de49ed5a7ad7cfc91b37242f0f4bdc20d98d33dfff

@DEV --> If you have no time for edit ann etc., pls talk with Vanity - he did great community work! Come on

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[bombardo]

I would suggest that the wallet issue is fix first as it is not functioning as it should.

Is there anybody in the community with the knowledge to have a look and fix this wallet.

[Arie22]

I would suggest that the wallet issue is fix first as it is not functioning as it should.

Is there anybody in the community with the knowledge to have a look and fix this wallet.

I agree wallet need to fix..

It's say 2 sec but never stake 

[jc12345]

I would suggest that the wallet issue is fix first as it is not functioning as it should.

Is there anybody in the community with the knowledge to have a look and fix this wallet.

I agree wallet need to fix..

It's say 2 sec but never stake 

Its manual at the moment. Send coins to trigger the next block. It should recognise the POS reward and kick of the next block but doesnt.

[VanityWallets2015]

I would suggest that the wallet issue is fix first as it is not functioning as it should.

Is there anybody in the community with the knowledge to have a look and fix this wallet.

I agree wallet need to fix..

It's say 2 sec but never stake 

Its manual at the moment. Send coins to trigger the next block. It should recognise the POS reward and kick of the next block but doesnt.

I've asked someone to take a look at the wallet, see if we can organise a small bounty if its fixed and recompiled.

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[presstab]

My friend Billotronic asked me to look at this coin for him to see whats up with it.

The staking code grabs the stake reward, and if the result is zero it returns false and no stake is found:

Code:

int64_t nReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
        if (nReward <= 0)
            return false;

I was able to verify that this is what was causing an otherwise good stake to fail.

The proof of stake reward code is very ugly and it is what is causing the chain to fail without transactions. I will show you a real example from the blockchain and the how the reward changes throughout this code. See my comments in red. This is a stake that happened with coin age = 1034

Code:

int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * COIN_YEAR_REWARD * 25 / (365 * 25 + 8); //2.5% per year interest compounded everytime we stake

    At this point nSubsidy = 8491185 (analtoshis)

Code:

    //first divide what we get by 100000000 so we don't have to write COIN all the time after it.
    //we multiply it by 100000000 later. 
    nSubsidy /= 100000000;

Now nSubsidy is 0 because we can't make an integer smaller than 1.

Code:

    // 3 coins extra stake reward to give staking incentive 
    nSubsidy += 3; 

now nSubsidy is 3

Code:

        //need more coins in the input to get the bigger rewards 
        if (nSubsidy < 10.010) nSubsidy = 0.010; 

now nSubsidy is 0 again

Code:

       nSubsidy *= COIN;

       return nSubsidy + nFees;

It remains 0 until the fees are added to the subsidy at the very end. So if no one is paying transaction fees, then no stakes will happen.
   
This requires a hard fork to fix.

[VanityWallets2015]

PressTab, thank you, Billotronic, thanks again. PM sent.
Looks fairly straight forward to modify, but imagine there is a better POS solution.
I recommend a 2.25% POS/annum then a 0.01 POS post 300K blocks to keep the chain moving.
Bounty could be made available, or payment in leui of upgrade at some point when the coin becomes majorly profitable.
Thoughts anyone?

[bombardo]

PressTab, thank you, Billotronic, thanks again. PM sent.
Looks fairly straight forward to modify, but imagine there is a better POS solution.
I recommend a 2.25% POS/annum then a 0.01 POS post 300K blocks to keep the chain moving.
Bounty could be made available, or payment in leui of upgrade at some point when the coin becomes majorly profitable.
Thoughts anyone?

Yes i agree with the 2.25% after 300k.

Lets make the wallet upgrade a priority.

[billotronic]

My friend Billotronic asked me to look at this coin for him to see whats up with it.

The staking code grabs the stake reward, and if the result is zero it returns false and no stake is found:

Code:

int64_t nReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
        if (nReward <= 0)
            return false;

I was able to verify that this is what was causing an otherwise good stake to fail.

The proof of stake reward code is very ugly and it is what is causing the chain to fail without transactions. I will show you a real example from the blockchain and the how the reward changes throughout this code. See my comments in red. This is a stake that happened with coin age = 1034

Code:

int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * COIN_YEAR_REWARD * 25 / (365 * 25 + 8); //2.5% per year interest compounded everytime we stake

    At this point nSubsidy = 8491185 (analtoshis)

Code:

    //first divide what we get by 100000000 so we don't have to write COIN all the time after it.
    //we multiply it by 100000000 later. 
    nSubsidy /= 100000000;

Now nSubsidy is 0 because we can't make an integer smaller than 1.

Code:

    // 3 coins extra stake reward to give staking incentive 
    nSubsidy += 3; 

now nSubsidy is 3

Code:

        //need more coins in the input to get the bigger rewards 
        if (nSubsidy < 10.010) nSubsidy = 0.010; 

now nSubsidy is 0 again

Code:

       nSubsidy *= COIN;

       return nSubsidy + nFees;

It remains 0 until the fees are added to the subsidy at the very end. So if no one is paying transaction fees, then no stakes will happen.
   
This requires a hard fork to fix.

ah press, you are my hero!

[notsofast]

Thanks for delving into the code to find the problem, and again in advance for working to fix it!

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[VanityWallets2015]

This post was inappropriate and posted during a time of personal and mental health issues, sorry.

[AnaLCoin]

My friend Billotronic asked me to look at this coin for him to see whats up with it.

The staking code grabs the stake reward, and if the result is zero it returns false and no stake is found:

Code:

int64_t nReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
        if (nReward <= 0)
            return false;

I was able to verify that this is what was causing an otherwise good stake to fail.

The proof of stake reward code is very ugly and it is what is causing the chain to fail without transactions. I will show you a real example from the blockchain and the how the reward changes throughout this code. See my comments in red. This is a stake that happened with coin age = 1034

Code:

int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * COIN_YEAR_REWARD * 25 / (365 * 25 + 8); //2.5% per year interest compounded everytime we stake

    At this point nSubsidy = 8491185 (analtoshis)

Code:

    //first divide what we get by 100000000 so we don't have to write COIN all the time after it.
    //we multiply it by 100000000 later. 
    nSubsidy /= 100000000;

Now nSubsidy is 0 because we can't make an integer smaller than 1.

Code:

    // 3 coins extra stake reward to give staking incentive 
    nSubsidy += 3; 

now nSubsidy is 3

Code:

        //need more coins in the input to get the bigger rewards 
        if (nSubsidy < 10.010) nSubsidy = 0.010; 

now nSubsidy is 0 again

Code:

       nSubsidy *= COIN;

       return nSubsidy + nFees;

It remains 0 until the fees are added to the subsidy at the very end. So if no one is paying transaction fees, then no stakes will happen.
   
This requires a hard fork to fix.

Thanks for digging into the code, can you just create a pull request so we can merge that into the code and update the daemon/wallets ?