GannickusX
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:14:27 AM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
|
|
|
|
Minnlo
|
|
March 14, 2015, 03:18:32 PM |
|
moneypot.com primedice.com satoshidice.com luckyb.itJust-dice.com they're all provably fair, but their house edge varies from 0.5% to 1.9%. The house always wins anyway. which one the most little house edge? house edge take effect on our game? Primedice have 0.9% house edge And lucky.bit have about 1% house edge If you need dice site with low house edge, then try SafeDice They only have 0.5% House edge Correct me if im wrong but I think luckyb.ithas no house edge coz its not a dice site, its a plinko.. Primedice has a house edge of 1%. When PD3 was released, it came with a jackpot feature making the house edge 0.91%. But the feature has been removed now. LB has a house edge of roughly 1.66% - 1.76%, depending on which line you are playing.
|
|
|
|
Minnlo
|
|
March 14, 2015, 03:26:30 PM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
AFAIK there are at least 2 games with 0% house edge, the PvP on Primedice and the PvP raffle game on Peerbet. The downside is that there are not many players and it is hard for you to find a good match.
|
|
|
|
Bardman
|
|
March 14, 2015, 03:27:55 PM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
AFAIK there are at least 2 games with 0% house edge, the PvP on Primedice and the PvP raffle game on Peerbet. The downside is that there are not many players and it is hard for you to find a good match. A dice with 0% house edge would still make profit so i dont know why no one made it, it would atract a lot of players
|
|
|
|
Minnlo
|
|
March 14, 2015, 03:48:31 PM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
AFAIK there are at least 2 games with 0% house edge, the PvP on Primedice and the PvP raffle game on Peerbet. The downside is that there are not many players and it is hard for you to find a good match. A dice with 0% house edge would still make profit so i dont know why no one made it, it would atract a lot of players I don't quite get it. By definition, "0% house edge" means the game has a expected value of zero to both the players and the house. So how would a 0% house edge game bring profit to the house?
|
|
|
|
goose20
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1173
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:15:12 PM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
AFAIK there are at least 2 games with 0% house edge, the PvP on Primedice and the PvP raffle game on Peerbet. The downside is that there are not many players and it is hard for you to find a good match. A dice with 0% house edge would still make profit so i dont know why no one made it, it would atract a lot of players I don't quite get it. By definition, "0% house edge" means the game has a expected value of zero to both the players and the house. So how would a 0% house edge game bring profit to the house? It doesn't in itself. But the house hopes players will play other house games that do have a house edge. It's a marketing strategy.
|
|
|
|
Bardman
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:18:56 PM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
AFAIK there are at least 2 games with 0% house edge, the PvP on Primedice and the PvP raffle game on Peerbet. The downside is that there are not many players and it is hard for you to find a good match. A dice with 0% house edge would still make profit so i dont know why no one made it, it would atract a lot of players I don't quite get it. By definition, "0% house edge" means the game has a expected value of zero to both the players and the house. So how would a 0% house edge game bring profit to the house? It doesn't in itself. But the house hopes players will play other house games that do have a house edge. It's a marketing strategy. Not really?? With a 0% house edge casinos would still win, why? Easy at the moment you start using a strategy, it doesnt matter you name it, martingale you would still lose using martingale, yes the odds are a bit better per bet now but you will still see 20 lose streaks or more, the 0 house edge only affects players if you bet static, you bet 10k satoshis every bet, yes in the long term you would have a 0 profit but no one is gonna do that, right? So as i said before casinos would still win
|
|
|
|
Shogen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:26:08 PM |
|
I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
AFAIK there are at least 2 games with 0% house edge, the PvP on Primedice and the PvP raffle game on Peerbet. The downside is that there are not many players and it is hard for you to find a good match. A dice with 0% house edge would still make profit so i dont know why no one made it, it would atract a lot of players I don't quite get it. By definition, "0% house edge" means the game has a expected value of zero to both the players and the house. So how would a 0% house edge game bring profit to the house? It doesn't in itself. But the house hopes players will play other house games that do have a house edge. It's a marketing strategy. Not really?? With a 0% house edge casinos would still win, why? Easy at the moment you start using a strategy, it doesnt matter you name it, martingale you would still lose using martingale, yes the odds are a bit better per bet now but you will still see 20 lose streaks or more, the 0 house edge only affects players if you bet static, you bet 10k satoshis every bet, yes in the long term you would have a 0 profit but no one is gonna do that, right? So as i said before casinos would still win Well it looks like you are assuming people will keep on playing until they are broke. With that assumption, I guess you are right. A player need to have extremely good luck to wipe out the house bankroll before losing all his money, when the house has hundreds or thousands times more bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Slark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1004
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:41:18 PM |
|
Op, as you now probably know gambling is not that easy you will probably lose more than you win. You will lose no matter what, it does not matter if game is rigged or it is "provably fair" I got the impression that you are looking for a online bitcoin casino which is better than most because it will allow you to win more. There is no such place. So just pick your favourite casino and start playing.
|
|
|
|
micromen
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:48:42 PM |
|
personally I like safedice.com
|
▄▄▄████████▄▄▄ ▄██████████████████▄ ▄██████████████████████▄ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ▀██████████████████████▀ ▀██████████████████▀ ▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
| | | | ███████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ███████ | | | | ▄▄██████████████▄▄ ▄██████████████████████▄ █████ ▄██████████████████████████▄ █████ ████ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ████ ▄██▀ ████ █████ ██████ █████ ████ ▄██▀ ████ █████ ██████ █████ ████ ██▀ ████ █████ ██████ █████ ████ ██ ████ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ████ ▄██████▄ ████████████████████████████ ████████ ███████▀ ▀███████ ▀██████▀ █████▀ ▀█████ ▀██████████████████████████▀ ▀▀████████████████████▀▀ | ✔️DICE ✔️BLACKJACK ✔️PLINKO | ✔️VIDEO POKER ✔️ROULETTE ✔️LOTTO |
|
|
|
Bardman
|
|
March 14, 2015, 04:53:18 PM |
|
can anyone give me suggest about 5 gambling sites which really use "Provably fair"? because many people said, "house always win".
Provably fair simply means -- "if the casino cheats you, you can detect it". It doesn't mean you can stop them cheating you (you can't) and doesn't mean you expect to make money (you don't). It just means that if the casino is cheating you, it's detectable. ok, thank you all, but how about 999dice? its recommended for gambling?
No, definitely not. They lie about being provably fair, with a backdoor scheme. If they cheat you, you can't know for sure. Hence it being not provably fair. This place is scum anyway, you should avoid it. They also claim to operate on a 0.05% margin, while allowing 40 BTC wins. lolz I thought there were casinos with 0% house edge around here, correct me if im wrong
There are. Some PvP games allow no edge (since they're not exposed to any risk). Money Pot allows you to play with a 0% house edge (by instantly cashing out) at the expense of being bait to bonus snatchers. DirectDice spams every thread with claims of 0% for frequent betters. I haven't looked into it though, as it sounds like some tard/scammy scheme. Not really?? With a 0% house edge casinos would still win
That's incorrect, as is your reasoning. You can write a simulation if you don't believe it. But even if the vast-majority of people will bust with a 0% house edge, the ones that don't will bust the house. A casino couldn't safely offer a 0 house edge game for a single satoshi if it could be played an infinite amount of times. If i write a simulation using martingale i will eventually bust, and that would happen with any other strategy, why dont you try it yourself, your reasoning is incorrect not mine, the ones that dont will bust the house? People are greedy, for example the guy who won 7k btc on just-dice and ended up loosing, people its always greedy and thats why a 0% house edge casino would still win
|
|
|
|
Bardman
|
|
March 14, 2015, 05:55:16 PM |
|
If i write a simulation using martingale i will eventually bust, and that would happen with any other strategy, why dont you try it yourself, your reasoning is incorrect not mine, the ones that dont will bust the house? People are greedy, for example the guy who won 7k btc on just-dice and ended up loosing, people its always greedy and thats why a 0% house edge casino would still win
Ok, let's do it -- a simple simulation of a greedy player who never stops gambling (unless he busts): var startingBankroll = 100; var bet = 1;
while(true) { var bankroll = startingBankroll;
for (var i = 1; bankroll > 0; ++i) {
bankroll += Math.random() < 0.5 ? bet : -bet; if (i % 100000000 === 0) console.log('Player has made', i , 'bets at a profit of:', bankroll-startingBankroll, ' BTC'); } console.log('PLAYER BUST!'); }
Now run that, and watch as the vast majority of players will bust. But occasionally you'll get to a real gem like this guy: Player has made 2300000000 bets at a profit of: 161962 BTC Player has made 2400000000 bets at a profit of: 175434 BTC Player has made 2500000000 bets at a profit of: 195960 BTC Player has made 2600000000 bets at a profit of: 207738 BTC Player has made 2700000000 bets at a profit of: 205418 BTC Player has made 2800000000 bets at a profit of: 209382 BTC Player has made 2900000000 bets at a profit of: 206398 BTC Player has made 3000000000 bets at a profit of: 217148 BTC Player has made 3100000000 bets at a profit of: 237032 BTC Player has made 3200000000 bets at a profit of: 251848 BTC Player has made 3300000000 bets at a profit of: 248634 BTC Player has made 3400000000 bets at a profit of: 252256 BTC Player has made 3500000000 bets at a profit of: 251060 BTC Player has made 3600000000 bets at a profit of: 260898 BTC Player has made 3700000000 bets at a profit of: 281134 BTC Player has made 3800000000 bets at a profit of: 294792 BTC Player has made 3900000000 bets at a profit of: 291088 BTC Player has made 4000000000 bets at a profit of: 295030 BTC Player has made 4100000000 bets at a profit of: 295540 BTC Player has made 4200000000 bets at a profit of: 304886 BTC Player has made 4300000000 bets at a profit of: 323828 BTC Player has made 4400000000 bets at a profit of: 337964 BTC Player has made 4500000000 bets at a profit of: 334380 BTC Player has made 4600000000 bets at a profit of: 338690 BTC
You really think the casino can handle billions of more bets, hoping it can make its hundreds of thousands of bitcoins back? And do you honestly think a casino would be willing to expose itself to unbounded liability for 0 expected profit?! It doesn't work, never has, never will. But perhaps, what we'll see is bet-match-making where 0% house edge is actually feasible. That way players can play with 0-edge, and casinos aren't the counter-party I dont understand that at all, what is that player using? Martingale? And how is he making 4 bilion bets?
|
|
|
|
|
Bardman
|
|
March 14, 2015, 06:15:49 PM |
|
I dont understand that at all, what is that player using? Martingale? And how is he making 4 bilion bets?
He is able to make that many bets -- because he hasn't yet busted. In my simulation, the player never quits until he's busted (just like you said, about a player being greedy). So even though he's up hundreds of thousands of bitcoins, he caries on. Which just shows how ridiculous using the "greed" nonsense is. With no house edge, a player being greedy doesn't help the casino -- just increases its chance of the casino busting (all for making 0 expected return. a silly value proposition) What strategy is he using
|
|
|
|
superSTAR777
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
|
March 14, 2015, 06:57:06 PM |
|
can anyone give me suggest about 5 gambling sites which really use "Provably fair"? because many people said, "house always win".
house edge wins , doesnt means site is not provably fair , just its that site maintain a edge to make profit and there ar tons of honest sites like primedice, prcdice , etc
|
a a a a a a a a a
|
|
|
GannickusX
|
|
March 14, 2015, 08:00:51 PM |
|
If i write a simulation using martingale i will eventually bust, and that would happen with any other strategy, why dont you try it yourself, your reasoning is incorrect not mine, the ones that dont will bust the house? People are greedy, for example the guy who won 7k btc on just-dice and ended up loosing, people its always greedy and thats why a 0% house edge casino would still win
Ok, let's do it -- a simple simulation of a greedy player who never stops gambling (unless he busts): var startingBankroll = 100; var bet = 1;
while(true) { var bankroll = startingBankroll;
for (var i = 1; bankroll > 0; ++i) {
bankroll += Math.random() < 0.5 ? bet : -bet; if (i % 100000000 === 0) console.log('Player has made', i , 'bets at a profit of:', bankroll-startingBankroll, ' BTC'); } console.log('PLAYER BUST!'); }
Now run that, and watch as the vast majority of players will bust. But occasionally you'll get to a real gem like this guy: Player has made 2300000000 bets at a profit of: 161962 BTC Player has made 2400000000 bets at a profit of: 175434 BTC Player has made 2500000000 bets at a profit of: 195960 BTC Player has made 2600000000 bets at a profit of: 207738 BTC Player has made 2700000000 bets at a profit of: 205418 BTC Player has made 2800000000 bets at a profit of: 209382 BTC Player has made 2900000000 bets at a profit of: 206398 BTC Player has made 3000000000 bets at a profit of: 217148 BTC Player has made 3100000000 bets at a profit of: 237032 BTC Player has made 3200000000 bets at a profit of: 251848 BTC Player has made 3300000000 bets at a profit of: 248634 BTC Player has made 3400000000 bets at a profit of: 252256 BTC Player has made 3500000000 bets at a profit of: 251060 BTC Player has made 3600000000 bets at a profit of: 260898 BTC Player has made 3700000000 bets at a profit of: 281134 BTC Player has made 3800000000 bets at a profit of: 294792 BTC Player has made 3900000000 bets at a profit of: 291088 BTC Player has made 4000000000 bets at a profit of: 295030 BTC Player has made 4100000000 bets at a profit of: 295540 BTC Player has made 4200000000 bets at a profit of: 304886 BTC Player has made 4300000000 bets at a profit of: 323828 BTC Player has made 4400000000 bets at a profit of: 337964 BTC Player has made 4500000000 bets at a profit of: 334380 BTC Player has made 4600000000 bets at a profit of: 338690 BTC
You really think the casino can handle billions of more bets, hoping it can make its hundreds of thousands of bitcoins back? And do you honestly think a casino would be willing to expose itself to unbounded liability for 0 expected profit?! It doesn't work, never has, never will. But perhaps, what we'll see is bet-match-making where 0% house edge is actually feasible. That way players can play with 0-edge, and casinos aren't the counter-party Im sorry to tell you but your simulation is wrong or i just didnt understand how was the player betting
|
|
|
|
activebiz
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:18:52 PM |
|
I don't think there are such casinos around. the best suggestions would be primedice, coinroyale.
|
|
|
|
deluxeCITY
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:24:38 PM |
|
I don't think there are such casinos around. the best suggestions would be primedice, coinroyale.
There are fair casino's just look at any that have been out the longest and i am sure if there was a problem then there would be multiple complaints in any amount of time before i started my sig campaign i played bitdice and never had a problem in well over 5 months the site has been going over a year so i recommend them for that plus a decent owner who will not do a runnerr.
|
|
|
|
asuryan180
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:57:20 PM |
|
I would give Dadice a go they are spending a good amount on their campaign and that is a good sign to me that they mean business and they are not about to release a unfair dice site that will not last a week before complaints ya know, has graphics and is a fun experience highly recommended and not just because i am wearing their sig lol
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3864
Merit: 1732
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:33:00 PM |
|
Most sites these days use provably fair.
However you need to keep in mind that since the client seed doesn't usually change, they can still cheat you assuming you never change your seed.
|
|
|
|
|