Signature Spam Overdose!

[coinfusion]

In a recent thread, 6 out of the first 7 posts (each from a different user) featured a bitmixer.io signature!  I just couldn't take it anymore, so after over 30 days of time logged in I finally had to activate the "Don't show users' signatures." setting.  How long did it take you to turn off signatures?

[hgerson]

In a recent thread, 6 out of the first 7 posts (each from a different user) featured a bitmixer.io signature!  I just couldn't take it anymore, so after over 30 days of time logged in I finally had to activate the "Don't show users' signatures." setting.  How long did it take you to turn off signatures?

It doesn't upset me at all.

[Decksperiment]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

[goosoodude]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

Wrong thread, bud.

Regarding signature, report the offending posts. The mods now are very active.

[Master Jedi]

I really don't care.

What annoys me is useless topics about petty stuff.

[kevindurant]

I don't use signatures. I believe their only purpose is get paid per posting. Otherwise any of them write this forum this much.

[hgerson]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

What is "abusing the trust system"?

[Decksperiment]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

Wrong thread, bud.

Regarding signature, report the offending posts. The mods now are very active.

Actually, this is not in the wrong thread, I was thanking the OP for his tip, as it occured to me this was a good thing, and I explained why?

[naypalm]

It used to be worse, with image signatures.

[bitcoin_bagholder]

In a recent thread, 6 out of the first 7 posts (each from a different user) featured a bitmixer.io signature!  I just couldn't take it anymore, so after over 30 days of time logged in I finally had to activate the "Don't show users' signatures." setting.  How long did it take you to turn off signatures?

I find the worst sig spamming offenders to be  on the payroll of BIT-X.com

[Grand_Voyageur]

In a recent thread, 6 out of the first 7 posts (each from a different user) featured a bitmixer.io signature!  I just couldn't take it anymore, so after over 30 days of time logged in I finally had to activate the "Don't show users' signatures." setting.  How long did it take you to turn off signatures?

I find the worst sig spamming offenders to be  on the payroll of BIT-X.com

Big payers attracts big spammers. IMO, a few signature campaigns are trying to curb the spam spree; but, a lot of them simply are happy with the exposure they receive from the huge amount of spam their users post.
I'm glad Staff now shows a Zero Tolerance policy against spammers and I'm supporting them by reporting spam posts myself.

[goosoodude]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

Wrong thread, bud.

Regarding signature, report the offending posts. The mods now are very active.

Actually, this is not in the wrong thread, I was thanking the OP for his tip, as it occured to me this was a good thing, and I explained why?

Did you read the post? You were talking about the trust system, while the OP was about disabling signatures.

How is disabling signatures make those abusing the trust system not get paid? How are those abusing the trust system in the first place getting paid?

[Decksperiment]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

Wrong thread, bud.

Regarding signature, report the offending posts. The mods now are very active.

Actually, this is not in the wrong thread, I was thanking the OP for his tip, as it occured to me this was a good thing, and I explained why?

Did you read the post? You were talking about the trust system, while the OP was about disabling signatures.

How is disabling signatures make those abusing the trust system not get paid? How are those abusing the trust system in the first place getting paid?

By disabling the signatures, they wont be paid for each 'view' or do you know anything about advertising? Since this is not your thread, take it from me, I was thanking the OP, butt out..

[goosoodude]

Thanks for that tip, now all those wankers abusing the trust system, wont get paid, yeehaaaa......

Sadley, neither will the genuine

See, abuser's of the trust system, it's coming for you..

Wrong thread, bud.

Regarding signature, report the offending posts. The mods now are very active.

Actually, this is not in the wrong thread, I was thanking the OP for his tip, as it occured to me this was a good thing, and I explained why?

Did you read the post? You were talking about the trust system, while the OP was about disabling signatures.

How is disabling signatures make those abusing the trust system not get paid? How are those abusing the trust system in the first place getting paid?

By disabling the signatures, they wont be paid for each 'view' or do you know anything about advertising? Since this is not your thread, take it from me, I was thanking the OP, butt out..

You still have not explained how disabling signature affects trust. Instead of telling otheres to butt out, maybe you should try reading, preferably your own posts.

[Decksperiment]

Oh, if you want me to explain it to a 5 year old, (I thought you were older and wiser) I'll quote this:

You still have not explained how disabling signature affects trust.

My explanation for a 5 year old:

B e c a u s e  u s e r ' s  a b u s i n g  t h e  t r u s t  s y s t e m  w h o  h a v e  t h e i r  o w n  S i g n a t u r e  c a m p a i g n  w i l l  N O T  b e  p a i d  p e r  v i e w  i f  w h a t  t h e  OP  s u g g e s t ' s  i s  p u t  i n t o  e f f e c t.. is this understandable to you?

Now kindley stop hijacking the OP's thread, should you wish to discuss this further, start your own thread?

Oh, and the reason I edit a lot of my post's is to correct spelling mistakes, or add mair shite, thankfully it's not as troublesome as yours.

Edit: I just ignored you, making that one less payment from YOUR signature campaign PER POST, your cheek just cost you.

[tex99]

I didn't know you could hide user's signatures until I read the OP. I clicked don't show users' signatures on the Look and Layout Preferences and they all disappeared. Thanks OP.

[1Referee]

I think the spam is a bit less than what it used to be. Especially compared to when primedice sig campaign was active.

Bitmixer added a new rule that every post must be at least 75 characters in order to be considered a payment worthy post.

Also, Bitmixer doesn't pay anymore for posting in off-topic section. I think that's a great method to reduce as much spam as possible.