Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 06:11:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Coinapult Claims $40k Lost in Hot Wallet Compromise  (Read 1576 times)
inBitweTrust (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 01:22:21 AM
 #1

There are security risks when you centralize private key storage whether it is an encrypted database of credit cards or bitcoin private keys:

http://www.coindesk.com/coinapult-loses-40k-hot-wallet-compromise/

The message is clear that people need to use exchanges and payment processors as gateways and not a place of storing their assets.

Secure your bitcoins yourself:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=858604.0

1714932689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714932689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714932689
Reply with quote  #2

1714932689
Report to moderator
1714932689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714932689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714932689
Reply with quote  #2

1714932689
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714932689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714932689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714932689
Reply with quote  #2

1714932689
Report to moderator
1714932689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714932689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714932689
Reply with quote  #2

1714932689
Report to moderator
1714932689
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714932689

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714932689
Reply with quote  #2

1714932689
Report to moderator
Cthulhu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 01:49:04 AM
 #2

At least this time no costumer funds were lost and Coinapult is able to survive with the loss, others were not so luck.
Grumpster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 01:50:51 AM
 #3

Well hey, at least it's a relatively low (in comparison to other breaches) amount of bitcoins lost to the hackers this time and hopefully the company will learn from it and come back bigger, better & even more secure.
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 01:53:06 AM
Last edit: March 18, 2015, 02:11:11 AM by Bit_Happy
 #4

Blincoe told CoinDesk:

    “Our team is looking into all possible scenarios in regards to what happened.”


It is a very short read, and I hope they are able to fully recover soon.

inBitweTrust (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 01:59:41 AM
 #5

I have nothing against Coinapult and wish them best but one concern I have lately with these hacks that are either partially recovered or "don't effect customer funds" (bitstamp, coinapult, ect..)is that it could be setting future clients up under either a premeditated scam or the operation doesn't really back up all their clients assets and are running as a fractional reserve operation.

Coinapult seems to be pumping their "locks" feature which encourages users to trust them to store both their bitcoins and fiat in a centrally controlled company. This is not a safe or advisable thing we should be encouraging users to do.

By all means use them as an exchange or payment processor.... but secure your bitcoins yourself.

bitcoin_bagholder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 02:09:25 AM
 #6

At least this time no costumer funds were lost and Coinapult is able to survive with the loss, others were not so luck.

Some customer funds might have been in the hot wallet but they will be refunded if that's the case.

Bitmixer sucks

Bit-X sucks
Grumpster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 02:19:12 AM
 #7

My main concern is how these exchanges have $40k worth of their own funds in the first place that, operationally, they can "get by" without... how are these guys making so much money in the first place?  Roll Eyes
bitcoin_bagholder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 02:23:17 AM
 #8

My main concern is how these exchanges have $40k worth of their own funds in the first place that, operationally, they can "get by" without... how are these guys making so much money in the first place?  Roll Eyes

Look at the invest funding many of these bitcoin companies receive. Into the millions.

Bitmixer sucks

Bit-X sucks
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 04:47:11 AM
 #9

I guess Voorhees ran out of the FeedZBirds Bitcoins. Time for a fresh injection of cash. lol

http://upstart.bizjournals.com/money/loot/2013/09/04/erik-voorhees-of-satoshidice-coinapult.html?page=all

gadman2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 977
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 04:51:43 AM
 #10

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=956768.msg10468445

Ron~Popeil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 05:09:51 AM
 #11

If they are not passing the loss on to users I tend to think it was a genuine hack. Take some of those funds and invest them in a good security team. It will pay for itself over time.

Agestorzrxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 06:32:42 AM
 #12

The security of bitcoin is still the biggest problem to make it going to mainstream. Bitcoin itself is more security than any bank account, but it's very complex to keep it security.
inBitweTrust (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 07:19:24 AM
 #13

I guess Voorhees ran out of the FeedZBirds Bitcoins. Time for a fresh injection of cash. lol

http://upstart.bizjournals.com/money/loot/2013/09/04/erik-voorhees-of-satoshidice-coinapult.html?page=all

Little out of date.
From what I understand he left coinapult https://coinapult.com/about a while ago and is now running a very successful shapeshift - http://www.coindesk.com/shapeshift-raises-525k-reveals-erik-voorhees-as-creator/

I guess Voorhees ran out of the FeedZBirds Bitcoins.

Weird... is he still suggesting that FeedZBirds is still a yet to be completed project?

rememberme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 415
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 18, 2015, 08:17:17 AM
 #14

CoinApult already survived this... nothing to worry about, plus, they already updated their wallets and it seems even more secure now.

Bitcoin and Crypto Mining Rigs https://www.minerigs.shop
AtheistAKASaneBrain
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 01:04:08 PM
 #15

The security of bitcoin is still the biggest problem to make it going to mainstream. Bitcoin itself is more security than any bank account, but it's very complex to keep it security.

Bitcoin itself is god, the problem is the exchanges and services are run by humans, prone to corruption.
Ron~Popeil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 03:11:20 PM
 #16

The security of bitcoin is still the biggest problem to make it going to mainstream. Bitcoin itself is more security than any bank account, but it's very complex to keep it security.


I don't think securing a personal stash is complicated. People become accustomed to having banks babysit their fiat wealth and naturally that habit extends to their bitcoin holdings. Getting people to take responsibility for their own private keys is quite complicated. 

acquafredda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1481



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 03:19:28 PM
 #17

There are security risks when you centralize private key storage whether it is an encrypted database of credit cards or bitcoin private keys:

http://www.coindesk.com/coinapult-loses-40k-hot-wallet-compromise/

The message is clear that people need to use exchanges and payment processors as gateways and not a place of storing their assets.

Secure your bitcoins yourself:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=858604.0

It's an old excuse so far.
inBitweTrust (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 03:59:11 PM
 #18

I absolutely dread the day when btc-e gets "hacked" and we have to deal with another Mtgox level shitstorm. If we can keep repeating these warnings hopefully a small percentage of people will take our advice and protect their investments properly.

kepo07
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 04:02:09 PM
 #19

The security of bitcoin is still the biggest problem to make it going to mainstream. Bitcoin itself is more security than any bank account, but it's very complex to keep it security.

Most if not all Bitcoin exchanges do not have millions to pay security professionals each month code a nice backend that is bulletproof against hack attempts. Cold storage would definitely help with the storage though.
inBitweTrust (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 18, 2015, 04:07:52 PM
 #20

Most if not all Bitcoin exchanges do not have millions to pay security professionals each month code a nice backend that is bulletproof against hack attempts. Cold storage would definitely help with the storage though.

If an exchange cannot afford 80k a year to pay for one decent security expert than they don't deserve to exist.

If an exchange is insured, pays for top notch security, and highly regulated the best outcome you can hope for is guaranteed theft from the state between 15-40%, Otherwise you should expect to lose all your money within enough time.

Better secure bitcoins yourself and use bitcoin as intended.

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!