[BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion

[marcotheminer]

What are you thoughts?

[1714998205]

1714998205

[1714998205]

1714998205

[1714998205]

1714998205

[1714998205]

1714998205

[1714998205]

1714998205

[abyrnes81]

What are you thoughts?

Good!  Can I ask you if there will be an 'avatar campaign'?

[hilariousandco]

Looks good but you might want to mention that bit-x is an exchange as peeps might just think it's solely the debit card.

Good!  Can I ask you if there will be an 'avatar campaign'?

I'm interested in knowing that as well.

[joksim299]

What are you thoughts?

Nice design it looks attractive
Follow https://bit-x.com/cards if you want more info

[unamis76]

What are you thoughts?

Looks good! be sure to tell us when to change our sig

[dznuts85]

What are you thoughts?

definitely looks better for the best sig campaign yet.. i like that one

[marcotheminer]

So theymos has allowed the selling of avatars. I will have a serious think about it.

[pawel7777]

What are you thoughts?

Looks much better imo

[irfan_pak10]

So theymos has allowed the selling of avatars. I will have a serious think about it.

Where it is posted link please?

[abyrnes81]

So theymos has allowed the selling of avatars. I will have a serious think about it.

Where it is posted link please?

This is his post:

1) Is nudity allowed? If so, to what extreme? To a non nsfw tag?

No.

2) Is NSFL allowed? [NSFL = Not Safe For Life]

No.

3) Is other adult content allowed?

Maybe.

If I receive (or anticipate receiving) several complaints about something, it's probably too much.

4) Are paid avatar campaigns allowed?

Yes.

5) Is copyright content allowed? How should copyright holders request deletion of infringing content?

You are not allowed to infringe copyright, of course. I have no way of knowing whether you have a license to use particular images, and it's additionally sometimes difficult to determine whether fair use applies, so I will not be proactively removing possibly-infringing images. The DMCA process is used.

6) Is racial / sexist content allowed?

Probably.

7) Is there a limit on 'annoyingness'?

Animation is not allowed, so I feel like it'd be difficult to create an avatar that is sufficiently annoying that I'd want to remove it.

8 ) Are 'imitation' avatars allowed? Ie wearing avatars of specific companies to give the false impression of representation.

Copying someone's avatar in order to impersonate them or cause confusion is not allowed. But if you both use some generic picture of some famous person or something, that's probably not going to count, and using elements of someone's avatar for purposes other than impersonation will probably be allowed. Same for companies.

9) How should users report those with infringing avatars?

DMCA takedown notices or any other legal thing must be emailed to me. For other issues, post about it in Meta.

[nioc]

I vote no for avatars.

I like mine.

[gkv9]

I vote no for avatars.

I like mine.

Seems you don't have one currently...
So, adding Bit-X's avatar (when campaign will start) to earn some more BTC meanwhile ain't a bad deal I guess...
In the end, choice is yours obviously...

[Amph]

I vote no for avatars.

I like mine.

it depend on the payment really, if they say to you that with the avatar you would get 0.03 a day, i'm sure you will accept it

[nioc]

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

[marcotheminer]

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

Made me smile, thanks for that.

What does everyone think of my current signature?

[dznuts85]

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

Made me smile, thanks for that.

What does everyone think of my current signature?

i dont like your current signature marco.. the last one you showed us is better because it is more colorful

[waterpile]

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

Made me smile, thanks for that.

What does everyone think of my current signature?

I think of it like when i printed something and came out short of ink.. I think some of the words are hard to read.

[crazyivan]

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

Made me smile, thanks for that.

What does everyone think of my current signature?

Yap, I also think this old one s better cause it s more colorful, I guess it draws more attention which should translate into more clicks. Regarding text, if you would like to underline the credit card offer, that s fine.

[umairsaleem]

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

Made me smile, thanks for that.

What does everyone think of my current signature?

I suggest signature have to be regularly redesigned to catch new attention, once a month, maybe two.

What are you thoughts?

This is better I think.

[dothebeats]

What are you thoughts?

This signature is cool, IMO. The colors look vibrant and more attractive to the eye. Can we please see this signature soon?

A flat rate of 0.03per day, cool.  I would consider giving up my avatar even though its the same one Satoshi used.

Made me smile, thanks for that.

What does everyone think of my current signature?

I think of it like when i printed something and came out short of ink.. I think some of the words are hard to read.

Those instances made me realize that I somehow need to check the ink level before printing colored documents. Needs color, actually.