Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer

[GazetaBitcoin]

I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer, which is trying to fool people that he can offer money laundering check. I am not sure if he managed to scam anyone so far, but what is certain that he follows all patterns of a scammer.

What happened: the scammer alleges that he has thousands of BTC, ETH and TRX addresses addresses which are marked for being used in illegal activities / unusual behavior. He asks money for checking if client's (BTC / ETH / TRX) funds were used in illegal activities.

Scammer's Profile Link: saxydev

Reference Link: Anti money laundering service checks
Amount Scammed: unknown.
Payment Method: the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight.
Proof of Payment: N/A so far.
PM/Chat Logs: N/A.

Additional Notes: saxydev appeared recently inside Romanian board, starting to say various ridiculous things inside the translated topic of 1miau's Why people should be using SegWit addresses. OP declared himself against SegWit, signaling that it has all sort of problems, but without specifying anything. He tried to act smart, like talking in riddles but, in fact, it was clear that he is a mere illiterate underclassman, probably barely able to spell his name. Although I, NeuroticFish and also PrivacyG tried to reason with him, explaining that, if you have something to say, make sure you say it clearly, he did not act accordingly at all.

Later he joined another Romanian topic, defending the imbecility called Pi Network. He just writes idiotic stuff and, together with his level of very low education reminds me a lot of another Romanian imbecile, andulolika, which, among ban evasion and making death threats on the forum was also trying to scam forum users through various schemes (you can check the feedback I left him).

Make sure you read OP's Trust feedbacks -- saxydev sells "input analysis", which besides being fundamentally pointless, is against Bitcoin, as he treats the currency as non-fungible. I don't say he's a liar or a scammer; just a neutral warning of what kind of person you're about to be dealing with. (from BlackHatCoiner)

Excepting all of the above, I wrote this warning inside his thread, but my post was quickly deleted. Most likely, saxydev created his service topic with self-moderation to be able to delete any post incriminating him. My deleted post can be seen below.

Although I have no clear evidence that he is a scammer, all these hints suggest me that it's better to avoid OP. If you are interested in dealing with him, approach him with very high caution!. Be it andulolika's alt or not, saxydev seems to run enough shenanigans for being safe to avoid him.


Update (Jan 27th, 2023): the scammer exposed himself as being a scammer within this thread, after scamming user dkbit98 with 0.1 BTC representing a deal not honored by saxydev. As a consequence, I also updated topic title from "Be careful with saxydev; he is a possible scammer" to "Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer".

What happened: dkbit98 made him the offer to prove that saxydev is selling a service which is free for the Internet; the offer was to have dkbit98 post such a website and, in case he will do it, to have saxydev pay him 0.1 BTC; saxydev denied that such thing exists and accepted the deal, after trying twice to cancel it unilateral.

Scammer's Profile Link: saxydev

Reference Link: Be careful with saxydev; he is a scammer
Amount Scammed: 0.1 BTC
Payment Method: BTC
Proof of Payment: N/A so far.
PM/Chat Logs: the agreement was sealed at post #20 of this thread.

[1714207372]

1714207372

[1714207372]

1714207372

[1714207372]

1714207372

[1714207372]

1714207372

[saxydev]

First, you are an idiot seeking attention when someone disagrees with him.

I was not against segwit as technology, I am against the compromises arround implementing segwit.
I did not defend PI, I just stated facts, they are traded and they have a blockchain, even said in my post that they are ponzi/pyramidal system.
And you are the second after JollyJohnyBeGood who called me an alt of someone, from alt of eliale, now I am alt of andouluka. Well mr. NewsletterBitcoin fuck off.
Giving a feedback as opinion instead of actually doing a trade, means you have some mental frustration, probably momi issues

You are not incriminating me, you just don't know what you are talking about lol

Edit 1:

About pi:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5435710.msg61630339#msg61630339
Translation using google cause I am lazy:

It's not like that, they changed the story. The coins in the phone, the mined ones, were never "mined". In fact they went on a testnet to constantly test the wow stuff that pi has been implementing and changing the world for 6 years now.

Plus, they added a rule that shows the beauty of a pyramid system, when you transfer them to your wallet, they block them compared to what you selected. And they recommend that you block them for 3 years. Many received on main-net but are blocked.

I get asked by pi at least once a day, I'm really aware of their changes lol.

The real currency exists, and they have been transferring coins since then. A friend/acquaintance who has nothing to do with crypto took out about 4000 euros from pi through me. He did kyc, they gave him the coins and I sold them to him. But they canceled 3 quarters of the "mined" balance. To withdraw the mined money, your friends must also do kyc. Ponzi/pyramidal, scam, they made money only from advertisements, the good part is that they have not directly asked for donations until now to update to premium plans like Sweatshit does for example.

Well.. : https://www.pi-blockexplorer.com/

https://www.huobi.com/support/en-us/detail/84926622541921

You don't need KYC to use the wallet, you need KYC for "mined" coins (bs).

However, it seems that the story of the pi people is becoming real, they made a lot of money with this shit

Edit2:
About segwit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5398988.msg61600878#msg61600878

Segwit seems to solve a problem, but as an update after 8 years, after 2 years of debate, it was just a signal that it is possible to move in the direction of change through compromise. The compromise showed that all pools, miners, etc. have priority.
Indeed, as a technology, it is an improvement to use compared to legacy, but not enough and not as significant as it is praised by topics like yours. That's what I wanted to say in my reply. The background of the change and the whole history is such a big story that I, a user of crypto for several years, cannot accept it and just go with the legacy. I'm not a fan of BCH, also on principle, although I enjoyed the airdrop quite a lot.
I suspect that in the years to come, at some point, when the reward per block will change, we will again have a soft fork, which again will not be in our interest, ordinary mortals, but will solve the problems that segwit has them, has them and is creating them now.

----

If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.

Same happened with the case of JollyJonnyBeGood: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg61200521#msg61200521

When you are against some popular opinions you are the mf'er. Well, dear NewsletterBitcoin fuck off

[shasan]

 Self-topic is usually created to remove spam posts. And another reason can be for any type of contradictory post. Based on the screenshot you have provided I could not see any type of spamming. So, the post is contradictory to his/her post. And contradictory posts should be deleted by those who are scammers or likely to be a scammer.

[saxydev]

Self-topic is usually created to remove spam posts. And another reason can be for any type of contradictory post. Based on the screenshot you have provided I could not see any type of spamming. So, the post is contradictory to his/her post. And contradictory posts should be deleted by those who are scammers or likely to be a scammer.

I had to unignore you to quote your post ;( ! A sad moment for me!

He's post is a spam. Accusing me in my thread of being the alt of someone else and saying that anti money laundering checks are scammy/illegal or dangerous is a SPAM.

He did not made a constructive post to my thread and more I can delete any post in a self-moderated thread.

Also he insulted me, so it's my right to delete his post.

Unfortunately NewsletterBitcoin dissapointed me ;(

[GazetaBitcoin]

So the scammer strikes back. I expected that.

First, you are an idiot seeking attention when someone disagrees with him.

Thank you. Your statement reflects your high level of education.

I was not against segwit as technology, I am against the compromises arround implementing segwit.

In multiple occasions I, NeuroticFish and PrivacyG asked you what specific issues you are talking about. You never replied. Reference: [1], [2], [3], [4].

you are the second after JollyJohnyBeGood who called me an alt of someone, from alt of eliale, now I am alt of andouluka.

I said that you may be but, most likely, your poor English skills prevent you from understanding the difference between "is" and "may be".

Well mr. NewsletterBitcoin fuck off.

Thanks again. Again, a high lever of education and moral standards.

Giving a feedback as opinion instead of actually doing a trade, means you have some mental frustration, probably momi issues

Probably you don't know how to properly use Trust feedback. If you look at the description of Neutral feedback you'll see: "Other comments".



This is exactly what my feedback is. For more information you can alsu use LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.

You are not incriminating me, you just don't know what you are talking about lol

I am not incriminating you yet. For the moment I am just raising alarm signals about you.

Translation using google cause I am lazy

No, you used Google because you don't know English. Sadly, you also don't know Romanian.

If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.

Be my guest.

Same happened with the case of JollyJonnyBeGood: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4975753.msg61200521#msg61200521

If JollyGood has more information about the way you are trying to scam people, I am kindly inviting him here. I feel though that saxydev will be walking on very thin ice if JollyGood will come here.

Self-topic is usually created to remove spam posts. And another reason can be for any type of contradictory post. Based on the screenshot you have provided I could not see any type of spamming. So, the post is contradictory to his/her post. And contradictory posts should be deleted by those who are scammers or likely to be a scammer.

Obviously. Needless to say, AML checks are allowed only to institutions authorized by authorities. Nobody would authorize an underclassman for performing AML check. My warning to other users is this in fact: as long as someone is illiterate enough to not be able even to spell his name, be very cautious. If the person is an imbecile then certainly a deal can go bad, as he does not understand what he's doing. If he knows what he's doing then his very low intellect may lead to other problems. If he's just an underclassman but agile in shenanigans, then most likely he'll try to scam you.

I had to unignore you to quote your post ;( ! A sad moment for me!

Oh no! Almost crying here. I'm sure shasan feels the same.

He's post is a spam.

Probably you wanted to type "his post" instead of "he's post". Then again: when you are an illiterate is difficult even to spell correctly "a-ha".

Accusing me in my thread of being the alt of someone else and saying that anti money laundering checks are scammy/illegal or dangerous is a SPAM.

AML checks are illegal, as long as they are not authorized by the govern. AML checks are not scammy but you are scammy. Last, but not least, AML checks are not dangerous; dealing with you is dangerous.

He did not made a constructive post to my thread and more I can delete any post in a self-moderated thread.

For other users the post was constructive. Same as this topic is.

Also he insulted me, so it's my right to delete his post.

What is the insult?

Unfortunately NewsletterBitcoin dissapointed me ;(

Now I'm really crying.

[saxydev]

Fuck off, you are just an idiot dear NewsletterBitcoin.

AML checks are illegal, as long as they are not authorized by the govern. AML checks are not scammy but you are scammy. Last, but not least, AML checks are not dangerous; dealing with you is dangerous.

AML checks are illegal? Ok. I'm out of this thread, ignoring your replies from now on.

Don't hide under may or not may be/semantics. That's bs. You may be the killer of the age of reason.

I have just read this statement. What an idiot. Do not like NewsletterBitcoin aka GazetaBitcoin
Where the fuck else to deal idiot if not through pm's or discord lol. relay chat?

Payment Method: the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight.

btw in my aml thread:

I am offering 3 free vouches for the first people who requires such service (except users with gambling signatures).

2 left.

[dkbit98]

I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer, which is trying to fool people that he can offer money laundering check. I am not sure if he managed to scam anyone so far, but what is certain that he follows all patterns of a scammer.

He doesn't have to be a scammer, because all this ''aml checks'' are already available for free with at least one website and one telegram bot.
This guy is probably using this free tools and he is charging people this ''service'' that can be done for free, and he is just trying to earn from this.
It's obvious that most of his posts are made in shitcoin boards, so no wonder he was supporting Pi Network crap, but I didn't saw anyone said he scammed someone.

[saxydev]

I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer, which is trying to fool people that he can offer money laundering check. I am not sure if he managed to scam anyone so far, but what is certain that he follows all patterns of a scammer.

He doesn't have to be a scammer, because all this ''aml checks'' are already available for free with at least one website and one telegram bot.
This guy is probably using this free tools and he is charging people this ''service'' that can be done for free, and he is just trying to earn from this.
It's obvious that most of his posts are made in shitcoin boards, so no wonder he was supporting Pi Network crap, but I didn't saw anyone said he scammed someone.

There is 0 service that asks for in depth analyse for free. If you can point me to a service which is up to date, that offers it for free, I will offer you as well for free a lifetime of BTC/ETH analyse which costs arround 200$ each.

Also just for aml score, very few do it for free, and from those, very few gather their own information. I know lots of people from this domain and those for free or that offer a trial, 95% are scams or inacurate.

Read again, I was not supporting Pi network, I was just stating facts. They have an exchange where to buy and sell crypto (huobi), they have main-net etc.

And about their request of KYC, I know what means privacy and I am against useless kyc in crypto world, but they are not the first to require it. And I saw most of the old members when other coins requested it, people to recommend it.

And again the shit pi network is one of the most used crypto out there, there are more pi in personal wallets as worldwide than btc's at the moment, even if it's shit and it is testnet. Pi has 50 mil downloads only on google play and Mycelium only 1 million, Metamask 10 mil only. Versus other scams, they did not ask yet for money from people. I do not praise Pi, but these are facts.

[NeuroticFish]

I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer, which is trying to fool people that he can offer money laundering check. I am not sure if he managed to scam anyone so far, but what is certain that he follows all patterns of a scammer.

He doesn't have to be a scammer, because all this ''aml checks'' are already available for free with at least one website and one telegram bot.
This guy is probably using this free tools and he is charging people this ''service'' that can be done for free, and he is just trying to earn from this.
It's obvious that most of his posts are made in shitcoin boards, so no wonder he was supporting Pi Network crap, but I didn't saw anyone said he scammed someone.

That's correct, hence no red tag yet from DT, although many have got red tag much easier, also without scamming anybody, but with more obvious attempts to scam.
Still, a bit of awareness is imho okay; his actions are (at least somewhat) shady (from the self moderated topic and removing that post to the laughable retaliatory trust feedbacks, also not forgetting about asking money for probably free service).

[GazetaBitcoin]

Fuck off, you are just an idiot dear NewsletterBitcoin.

Congrats for confirming again your high moral standards and your good level of education!

Just a side note here, if I am allowed: "Gazeta" means "Newspaper", not "Newsletter". It's just a small difference, like the one between "duke" and "douche". But again, don't worry too much about it. Your main problem is not the poor knowledge of English. What's really embarrassing is the fact that you don't know even your own language.

AML checks are illegal?

Yes, they are. If you are not sure, feel free to go to ANAF headquarters (ANAF is the Romanian IRS) and let those inspectors know that you are doing their job. I believe they'll be happy to hear it.

Ok. I'm out of this thread, ignoring your replies from now on.

Oh, no!

Don't hide under may or not may be/semantics. That's bs. You may be the killer of the age of reason.

I may be; yet I am not.

Do not like NewsletterBitcoin aka GazetaBitcoin

Nobody forces you to like GazetaBitcoin.

Where the fuck else to deal idiot if not through pm's or discord lol. relay chat?

Payment Method: the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight.

Skipping the poor usage of English for arranging the words inside the sentence, to answer to your question I'd say to be transparent and make the deals inside your topic.

btw in my aml thread:

I am offering 3 free vouches for the first people who requires such service (except users with gambling signatures).

2 left.

I am not sure you know the difference between "vouch" and "voucher". According to WikiDiff,

As verbs the difference between vouch and voucher is that vouch is to take responsibility for; to express confidence in; to witness; to obtest while voucher is to establish the authenticity of; to vouch for.
As nouns the difference between vouch and voucher is that vouch is warrant; attestation while voucher is a piece of paper that entitles the holder to a discount, or that can be exchanged for goods and services.

(I highlighted for you the part which is for your interest, as I am sure that otherwise you would have missed it.)

He doesn't have to be a scammer, because all this ''aml checks'' are already available for free with at least one website and one telegram bot.

This is even a greater signal for being a scammer: selling something that's free?! Oo

It's obvious that most of his posts are made in shitcoin boards, so no wonder he was supporting Pi Network crap, but I didn't saw anyone said he scammed someone.

Similar, I also did not say that he is a scammer. I said that he may be and, by outlining some of his actions, I wanted to make people aware of who they may be dealing with.

If you can point me to a service which is up to date, that offers it for free, I will offer you as well for free a lifetime of BTC/ETH analyse which costs arround 200$ each.

Is that the analysis pointed by BlackHatCoiner at your Trust page?

saxydev sells "input analysis", which besides being fundamentally pointless, is against Bitcoin, as he treats the currency as non-fungible. I don't say he's a liar or a scammer; just a neutral warning of what kind of person you're about to be dealing with.

BlackHatCoiner's last sentence is close to what I said. However, about your precious analysis (although I have my doubts about the outcome of an analysis made by an imbecile), I am sure that dkbit98 will feel very flattered.

Also just for aml score, very few do it for free, and from those, very few gather their own information. I know lots of people from this domain and those for free or that offer a trial, 95% are scams or inacurate.

And you are among those 95%, right?

Read again, I was not supporting Pi network, I was just stating facts. They have an exchange where to buy and sell crypto (huobi)

They do?

they have main-net etc.

Really?

And about their request of KYC, I know what means privacy and I am against useless kyc in crypto world, but they are not the first to require it. And I saw most of the old members when other coins requested it, people to recommend it.

Can you name some?

And again the shit pi network is one of the most used crypto out there

I beg your pardon?

there are more pi in personal wallets as worldwide than btc's at the moment, even if it's shit and it is testnet

It is testnet or mainnet? Now I'm confused. You say here they use testnet, but a few lines up you said they have mainnet. Make your decision, will you?

I do not praise Pi, but these are facts.

You are an imbecile and this is another fact.

his actions are (at least somewhat) shady (from the self moderated topic and removing that post to the laughable retaliatory trust feedbacks

And the retaliatory feedback brought him another feedback from me. Still, a neutral one. But he's getting close to get a negative one. Each post he makes he's one step closer

[dkbit98]

There is 0 service that asks for in debt analyse for free. If you can point me to a service which is up to date, that offers it for free, I will offer you as well for free a lifetime of BTC/ETH analyse which costs arround 200$ each.

I don't care about your lifetime BTC/ETH analyse, whatever that is, fact is that you are 100% using some third party tool, and I could prove it easily but I don't want to waste time on that.
Another fact is that you know nothing about Bitcoin and any other cryptocurrency, and if you love pi network crap so much than use your ''analyse'' for pi newtork not for bitcoin.
I doubt even a single person from forum ever paid a cent for your magical ''analyse'' of anything.

[saxydev]

There is 0 service that asks for in debt analyse for free. If you can point me to a service which is up to date, that offers it for free, I will offer you as well for free a lifetime of BTC/ETH analyse which costs arround 200$ each.

I don't care about your lifetime BTC/ETH analyse, whatever that is, fact is that you are 100% using some third party tool, and I could prove it easily but I don't want to waste time on that.
Another fact is that you know nothing about Bitcoin and any other cryptocurrency, and if you love pi network crap so much than use your ''analyse'' for pi newtork not for bitcoin.
I doubt even a single person from forum ever paid a cent for your magical ''analyse'' of anything.

Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Another fact is that you know nothing about Bitcoin and any other cryptocurrency, and if you love pi network crap so much than use your ''analyse'' for pi newtork not for bitcoin.
I doubt even a single person from forum ever paid a cent for your magical ''analyse'' of anything.

Excepting saxydev's precious piece of shit analysis analyse, another argument for the possibility of him being a scammer can be found by browsing his topics. His topics, not his posts! And, by looking at the topics he started, we can see names as:

Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...
Looking for information about ransom attacks
Looking for a paper -- here he was looking for a paper (?!) -- "I am looking for this paper: Discerning payment patterns in Bitcoin from ransomware attacks"
Interested in finding the real owner of a btc address - 40$ XMR -- "Please don't make it public, sensitive matter (not personal)."
Looking for hacks on the TRX network, stolen funds on TRON

And the list goes on. Furthermore, inside each topic he offered a shitty amount of money (5$ - 10$) for those giving him good information. For me, it seems like saxydevs tries to learn as much as he can from previous scams and then try to repeat them.

Maybe the topic which shows the most his scammy character is this: Maybe some hacks should not be illegal.

Why stealing btc from someone's private key is seen as malicious?

Seriously? What honest person would ask this?

Besides, one reply says things bluntly:

Why stealing btc from someone's private key is seen as malicious?

In this question, you question stealing right?

What else can be thought about someone asking such questions?

Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.

dkbit98, for the sake of the argument, if you manage to find some free time, give this moron some examples, to prove him that he is both a liar and an imbecile.

[saxydev]

When you do research about a subject you need information, aml on blockchain is all about information. The information must be updated daily and most of the topics.

Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...
Looking for information about ransom attacks
Looking for a paper -- here he was looking for a paper (?!) -- "I am looking for this paper: Discerning payment patterns in Bitcoin from ransomware attacks"
Interested in finding the real owner of a btc address - 40$ XMR -- "Please don't make it public, sensitive matter (not personal)."
Looking for hacks on the TRX network, stolen funds on TRON

- banks - thanks thanks, it was an ok ammount from my perspective

-ransom attacks - from conti to lazarus, most of the lately ransomware do not come with a public key posted in the ransomware note.
You need this information in order to find ransomware attacks or when ransom money are being laundered, who is laundering, from where is the source of funds or if the ransomware was paid. Most of the organisations always pay but they deny paying it.
I recommend bleepingcomputer as forum for this or https://www.vx-underground.org/ or my favourite https://id-ransomware.blogspot.com/ .

-the paper - if you will try to read from time to time, you will see why it is important to learn more about certain topics. Read the paper, great read!.

-real owner - when there is a hack or a scam, people are looking for details about who own's the address. NewsletterBitcoin is not the owner (I found out who he was).

-stolen funds on trx - there is not much information about trx just available online, even tho 42% of usdt blackmail attacks are paid through trc20. But of course, NewsletterBitcoin is new to this, he needs to find out about usdt first.

The discussion about keys is fun, not your keys, not your coins. If I have your key, are these my coins? That's interesting enough to debate, happened recently on this forum with yogg. Were those his coins if he had the keys? People will decide, not me.

For me NewsletterBitcoin is bored and he wants reach his weekly post requirment for the signature campaign.

[GazetaBitcoin]

I thought you were going to leave the forum...

If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.

Be my guest.

And I also thought you were ignoring me...

Ok. I'm out of this thread, ignoring your replies from now on.

Now I'm confused. Have you lied, perhaps? Same as you do inside your topics, in order to cheat people?

When you do research about a subject you need information, aml on blockchain is all about information When you are working hard on scamming people you need information.

There, I corrected the sentence for you. Thank me later.

Information about cyprus banks [...] blah blah blah

But of course, NewsletterBitcoin is new to this

Obviously, I never tried to scam anyone. Of course I am new to this. However, I have experience in finding scammers. Besides, I think I told you once, "Gazeta" is translated in English as "Newspaper", not "Newsletter". Perhaps you'll learn now.

The discussion about keys is fun, not your keys, not your coins.

Oooooo-ho-ho-ho! I laughed. It's sooo funny to steal someone's money, isn't it? Veeery, very funny!

If I have your key, are these my coins?

No, they are not yours.

That's interesting enough to debate, happened recently on this forum with yogg. Were those his coins if he had the keys? People will decide, not me.

I believe that Police will decide, not people. Same as it'll happen with you too, sooner or later.

For me NewsletterBitcoin is bored and he wants reach his weekly post requirment for the signature campaign.

Precisely! This must be also why I exposed the other two Romanian illiterate scammers -- andulolika and bekli23.

[saxydev]

Well, dear NewsletterBitcoin, I wanted to avoid you. But when you have someone that looks through your posts and find the most ridiculous accusations to bring against you, just can't ignore/giving you this privilege.

Perhaps Gazeta means Newspaper in romanian, but you are acting like a stressing newsletter on which you click unsubscribe, but you still get those emails.

I can't follow your story telling exposing nor understand why is there a need to quote every part of a reply and just reply out of context to parts of a message.

There, I corrected the sentence for you. Thank me later.

The moment when you quote someone and you modify the message shows what kind of person you are. No matter what's the topic. You can't quote and edit the quote. You just can't.

So far you have offended me, blamed me, accused me and even modified the quotes of my messages. Get a life lol

By calling you an idiot, I am offending the idiots. I am sorry for that

[GazetaBitcoin]

Well, dear NewsletterBitcoin, I wanted to avoid you. But when you have someone that looks through your posts and find the most ridiculous accusations to bring against you, just can't ignore/giving you this privilege.

This is how scammers are exposed here. Or, in part, this is how it's done -- by checking post history. And by checking any online activity which may lead to evidence. Simply, this is how it's done.

I can't follow your story telling exposing nor understand why is there a need to quote every part of a reply and just reply out of context to parts of a message.

This is because you have no education, you are an underclassman and you did not even learn some ethics about posting. In order for a post to be clearly understood it's recommended to quote relevant parts from the earlier post(s).

The moment when you quote someone and you modify the message shows what kind of person you are.

I was being sarcastic. This is why I also left your original words, but with strikethrough font. To be clear that I am not trying to change your words, but to ridicule you. Sadly for you, your very low intellect does not help you understand such subtle things, nor a subtle sarcasm. But it's okay, nature needs both wise and idiots.

You can't quote and edit the quote. You just can't.

Guess what? I just did it

So far you have offended me

I asked you above, but you never replied:

What is the insult?

So far you have [...] blamed me

What was I supposed to do? Congratulate you for trying to scam people?

So far you have [...] accused me

I did not accuse you yet. I'm just collecting evidence at the moment.

Get a life lol

I do have a life. And I have a happy life. Also, a honest life. Can you sleep well during the night, thinking at the people you scammed or you tried to scam?

By calling you an idiot, I am offending the idiots. I am sorry for that

If imbecility would hurt, you'd probably be in pain and yell day and night. Fortunately for you, it doesn't hurt.

[saxydev]

Ya sure good luck with that NewsletterBitcoin lol

enjoy your happy life lol

[dkbit98]

Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.

Just because you can't find something that doesn't mean this thing doesn't exist, except maybe in your mind.
I said that I can prove such services exist already, I know two who are totally free and others who are paid, unlike your imaginary service that nobody ever saw, because you don't have website or anything else.
Let me make you an offer, if I post a proof for a free service like I said you will pay me 0.1 BTC, I think this is fair offer for a guy who is so active businessman like you.

[saxydev]

Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.

Just because you can't find something that doesn't mean this thing doesn't exist, except maybe in your mind.
I said that I can prove such services exist already, I know two who are totally free and others who are paid, unlike your imaginary service that nobody ever saw, because you don't have website or anything else.
Let me make you an offer, if I post a proof for a free service like I said you will pay me 0.1 BTC, I think this is fair offer for a guy who is so active businessman like you.

Edit:
Deal. Let's see

Neah, you know what. You are a legendary member and it will very easy to proof your own words/statements.

There is none and there will never be a free service, it will make no sense to let it be free. Only mainting it daily as cost is that high, that 1 week for free ruins the business and the checks are useless.

I keep my word, lifetime free in debt analysis of any input of your choosing.