Bitcoin Forum

There is an interesting article from defense.com (hopefully not Putin's agent)

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/warfare/2015/08/02/us-army-ukraine-russia-electronic-warfare/30913397/ (http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/warfare/2015/08/02/us-army-ukraine-russia-electronic-warfare/30913397/)

1.

Which actually means that US troops can only finish the already disorganised troops who were bombed from above and have never been in a confrontation with an organised rival, who is willing to fight and possesses artillery, which made the most impact in the WW2. If we imagine that american soldiers are put against russian army or even ISIS or any other army which has at least old soviet artillery systems - it is not trained for the war and exposed for defeat.
This is why the americans are not sending the troops against ISIS I think. Not because they don't want to. But because they would fail without the air support.

2.

This is not about WW2, but about the future war. If an american squad is left without the communication with the commander it loses efficiency and those ugly russians have all the chances to take the communications off, which is a surprise for US Army for now.
Also, it is necessary to say that if the Donbass miners and teachers could cope and use this type of equipment - it is easy to use for anyone. In the world. Which pretty much shrinks the ability of US army to control the just conquered area and exposes their bases for planned attacks.

3.

This actually means that starting from Maidan US government used the ukrainian fascists in order to investigate what Russia would do and how it fights. Understanding that there is no chance of winning a war now US army needs to find weak spots for a fast and devastating strike which has more than 100% possibility to make a success.

The aim of US government for this and next century has been made. And it is war. Having entertained in Iraq and Afghanistan and leaving a wonderful ISIS as a result of long peacekeeping there US leadership is thinking of turning Eurasia in the same status as it has been done with arabian east. If US citizens agree with it - they should understand WHAT they do agree with and think of possible counteractions from the side of those who are being the aim of the aggressive plans.

What a load of total BS and evidence that the OP knows absolutely Nothing about American Soldiers. That said anyone notice that the Russians are the ones that keep talking of war while claim it is the evil West that is the cause of their own aggression. Clue: Russia would last about a month before Russian soldiers would be surrendering in mass, Putin does not have the loyalty that would drive their soldiers to die for him.

That is the opinion of a military instructor who teaches the cannon fodder how to fight. He doesn't share the view of the Internet warriors like you who would say that Russia wouldn't stand a month or three weeks (like Hitler thought) against the true warriors of western civilization. The actual problem is not that the guys of your level have such a viewpoint. The problem is that the US leadership's level is exactly like yours.

Yea, those Russian male shortcomings keep showing here. The OP should ask the Iraq Republican Guard how U. S. troops handle Russia built junk.

I believe it was over in under 100hrs. The U.S. military was so overwhelming it became a PR issue. I remember...because I watched the entire war on TV. The Russian built equipment became coffins and was referred to as target practice.

It's the same then asking russian army specialists themselves.

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150319/1019724723.html (http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150319/1019724723.html)

There is a propaganda belief in US that only the US is fighting against the Islamic State. There are videos and other issues proving it. But the reality is slightly different ISIS has troubles against Syria, Iraq and kurdish militia. This is why recently Turkey dropped some bombs at kurds and US promised to bomb Syria... ISIS needs your help, guys. They won't make without you!

Nope, the problem is people such as yourself believing what nonsense is fed you, or that you pass on from your handlers. I was also an instructor and combat soldier in the US Army, and I can assure you that your boys will be hard pressed to do anything other than surrender. Rattle your swords of war all you want, but step over the line and Russia will pay the price of Putin's aggression.

This is an information from an american web-site a purely american owner and the words belong to an american instructor. So your personal attack just qualifies you as an unable to read.

It's not russian instructor teaching fascists and murderers how to kill people. It's yours. (*)(*)(*)(*) of our borders and stay in peace. Americans don't have any interests in dying fighting russians in this stupid war. It's only a few guys from amrican leadership who would like to become multibillionares out of the today's status of regular billionares.

Invade more European Nations and learn more lessons.

If you think Russia would bow to any country, you don't know Russian history and the Russian people. They burned their homes in Moscow so Napoleons army wouldn't take them, and lost twenty seven million people rather than allow the Nazis to take over their lands. As of yet, their population hasn't recovered from it.

As for being loyal to Putin, this video by Stratfor Global Intelligence will prove otherwise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjdJLtS5ps8&feature=youtu.be

A Kiev Hijacker army officer who drunkenly ran an armored vehicle over pedestrians, killing an 8-year-old girl earlier this year has been awarded a state medal. The military claims that President Petro Poroshenko honored the soldier for his outstanding leadership prior to the tragic event.
http://www.rt.com/news/311596-soldier-medal-drunk-killing/ (http://www.rt.com/news/311596-soldier-medal-drunk-killing/)

I don't remember any cases that Russia in its history did anything like bombing Serbian schools, hospitals and bridges in order to play tough. There was only one case of russian agression against a european nation, which was the Winter war against future nazi sattelite. All the other cases can hardly compare to what the US did to the world.

Is this message board overly-populated with Russian Internet propagandists?

I mean, these guys and their painfully embarrassing lies and self-delusion and amateur-hour propagandizing are funny, and entertaining, but there seems to be a lot of it on this particular system.

Any insights?

I sure do enjoy their threats and saber-rattling and bully-boy posturing - classic Russian paranoia and inferiority-complex stuff - enough to keep an entire conference of psychiatrists busy for months.

Just curious.

Interesting that your forget Afghanistan (oh yeah You Lost), Vietnam, The Ukraine, ALL of Eastern Europe enslaved under your thumb for over 50 years. Yes, Russia has clean hands..

The answer is Yes, the site allows KGB agents to post their propaganda here, read it for entertainment value it provides if you wish, some of their nonsense is down right hilarious.

As for myself I am not a propagandist. And I don't preoccupy myself with lots of posts. I post just the things which are interesting to me. My rhetorics really changed, because the times changed here. It might not be felt inside the internal political election show in the US, but there is a lot of blood spilt already and the more it is spilling the more is the mutual hatred and risks of a big nuclear war. And the less is the maneuver in understanding each other. If I tell lies about you today there is a chance that we will still make friends over a piece of meat and bottle of beer, but if I rape your girlfriend and kill your mother there is almost a zero chance that you would give a second for a thought before shooting me at sight. Americans for the moment are as hated in Russia as russians are in the US. Even more. Because we seetons of blood from Donbass every day. And it comes not only with propaganda news. A lot of us have relatives in Ukraine and basically we are the one people with the citizens of Ukraine. There hasn't been much time after collapse of the USSR. This is why it is not the ukrainians which russians would go to war with as it might be planned by the White House. It is the US. And the war will not be an easy entertaining like hunting Iraqi armymen from board a plane. This is going to be a last war for the civilization which we know. If it can be cured by psychiatrists I would suggest calling for them to cure all of those who don't understand it.

With all my respect to Afghanistan people they are not a "european nation" which was mentioned in your post. I was commenting on what I have read and nothing else.
As for Ukraine Russia hasn't invaded it. If we invaded it as it might have been planned we would hav just the troubles of partisan war and eternal economic sanctions for taking a debtor with a potential of being ten times heavier than Greece for EU. There are no russian troops in ukrainian territory. There are the will-fighters and I think there also are some military instructors who train the anti-fascists of Donbass just like US military does it with the fascists.

PS As for eastern europe it was not enslaved. It had it politics which was dependant from USSR the way the politics of western europe was defined by US. Once the economical and political system of the commonwealth became inefficient (in fact it was made inefficient) USSR hasn't bombed anyone who was willing to leave the way the kievan puppets of US do it in Donbass. Even the Ukraine itself was left uncharged and 'unpunished'. This change of borders was welcomed by EU and US without any regards to international law and other litter, which they wave now in case of Ukraine.

Do you believe the nonsense you post or simply pass on the prepared answers?

No, not Serbia ... but they bombed Grozny back to stone age and most parts of Chechnya with it, killing thousands with this and all in matter of war against these evil Muslim terrorists who are so impudent and won't be further part of Russia!

Ehm ... well ... but if Russian won't be part of Ukraine with all this silly jabbering of Nazis in Kiev etc. (when being itself Russian fascists as same as Ukrainian are Nazis ... what an irony in itself, isn't it?), then it is of course something total else and is not a spark full comparable with Chechnya!
But if these 2 minorities in Georgia won't be part of Georgia but part of Russia and start to make rebellion, then they are again poor people and need support of Russia and this has of course nothing to do with Chechnyia too and isn't comparable etc. ... bla bla bla!

No, I don't defend USA here, they did evil without any doubts ... but it is totally ridiculous to claim that Russia is so peaceful and to blame the USA to be so evil, when Russia is same way evil! Only difference between both is that USA did more often as Russia, but if they do, both do the same way brutal and careless!

The stone age of Grozny:

https://twitter.com/mathieurault5/status/572839882575491072 (https://twitter.com/mathieurault5/status/572839882575491072)

I wonder if Iraq or Afghanistan has the same result or better.

The thing is that if a muslim is given a chance to live with his own values - then the results of his life are about the same as european's. The problem is not muslims. The problem is terrorists. The guys who kill real people for the sake of an abstract better world. BTW once Russia tried to fight the same (in most cases it is literally the same) people in Chechnya the West had a different position defending the terrorists and not the territorial integrity of Russia. Even when they understood that under Russia it would be much better for the people than it would have been under the terrorists... The position of the western rights of people changes depending of the current political situation. So I don't accept any argument based on people's right from a westerner. As a person you might believe in it yourself. But as a tool in a policy these rights are used to create wars and bloody mess of my country like it is already done in Libya. This country under Gaddafi was not providing EU with that much quantity of immigrants... Having destroyed it then your politicians today refuse little girls of any chance for survival showing how "strong" they are. Pfffff. You want to talk - talk the business.

Let us compare. I call chechen terrorists (some of them were not even chechen by nation) terroritsts not because I want to mark them with a bad word. They performed terrorist attacks on civilians in order to pressurize russian government and force them to make political decisions to their favour. There were numerous attacks on Moscow, Volgograd, Budennovsk. But the rebels of Donbass... Did they blow any civilians in Kiev in order to pressurize ukrainian puppets of the US? So?
When I call ukrainian fascists as fascists I don't mean the whole nation... as I don't mean germans of being fascists if I would speak of Hitler times.

Georgia was free to perform any miracle of economy and motivate abkhazians and ossetians to join them inside their nice state. But they chose a different way. The choice was a choice of a land as for ossetians and abkhazians they didn't care. This is why Russia had to intervene. Now these minorities live in the land which belongs to them by nature and history and not by a piece of paper (as it really blongs to Georgia).

I have zero problems with eastern europeans having joined the EU. It was their national choice which I have to respect. But it seems that the way we respect their choice is far more than they respect the choice of people living east off Poland.

I was given a blame - I provided an answer. I have no reason for sophisticated constructions like "A has killed a kid every day" "B has ran across a guy once in a car". "A and B are the same killers and B can actually be considered even worse, because he wants to look better than A"... I love Russia and I am not giving up to anti-russian propaganda.

I never speak anything which I haven't thought of MYSELF.

Blatantly untrue.

I am also curious why Russians keep talking about war with he west. No one else does, just Russians sitting here talking about static war, nuclear war, economic war, whatever.

You guys are hilarious warmongers

Because the war is closer to Russia then it is to the westerners. Before the start of WW2 while western politician talked about 'peace for generation' and played interesting cultural games of nazis

http://hronika.info/uploads/posts/2015-07/1437224932_zig.jpg

Hitler had already annexed Czechoslovakia and started the war preparation fueling the system with the blood of racially weak jews and others. Few civilians in 1937 did understand that the war is already and the hottest phase is really close.

For the moment I myself think that the big war is imminent and I see no other way for the world to continue. If there is no dramatic change to the good, which I hope for, but don't have any reasons to believe.

Yes, that is all correct.

Now for extra fun, which country has taken territory by military mean in the last couple years.

So again I ask, why do you guys want to go to war so badly? Is that how you guys feel you will be powerful in the world again?

ISIS.


I don't want. I desperately want that one of my readers would at least pray about me in our last hours and once we met in the afterlife we would have at least some possibility for the communal future. I don't hope for anything more than that.

Go ahead and throw on a jammer against US troops. That's a great way to get an up lose demonstration of the effectiveness of an MLRS or ATACMS warhead.

Exactly. And this means nuclear war.

How? Both of those are conventional weapons.

So you are the head of the KGB, pleased to met ya.

Who told you that nuclear response is allowed only for nuclear strike? During the carribean crisis US wanted to destroy soviet nuclear rockets with conventional weapons. And if the plan started these rockets wouldn't wait until the americans hit with their nuclear bombs somewhere near.

The jamming of signal allows to paralyse and disorganise the troops. In conditions when the troops don't have the orders to open fire they are exposed to propaganda and civil pressure. Multi-launch rocket system can only strike to kill, which is an act of war and brings the strike back. Then follows the strike back with something heavier, and heavier strike back and? And nuclear war as it was said.


Did anyone speak of the psychiatrists in the thread? It's hightime!

Jamming is already an act of war. If Russia jammed US troops, they would be the ones striking first.

They say something different.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/ (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/)

Not all jamming is created equal. What the Fencers were doing was spoofing, that is jamming active acquisition radar. That is defensive passive jamming.

Jamming enemy communications or systems like GPS are offensive active jamming. That is an act of war.

If it fails. If it succeeds then the war doesn't start and no victims appear. If a wquad of superultraspecial marines is blocked and forced to surrender under the circumstances of absence of the communication, then acr of war doesn't happen from their side and it turns into act of propaganda. If Russia destroys GPS sattelites then it is a possibility of the war.
But these are details which we can neglect. The balancing of modern political situation at a knife blade between cold war and nuclear war is more then obvious even from the discussion of these details itself.

You can't jam cabled communications and you can't jam runners. Any commander worth his salt is going to get word out about active jamming and have the jammers destroyed.

Afghanistan. Before Americans created Taliban there, Soviet Union was constructing infrastructure, building roads and power plants there. Some of it is still functioning there today. US just had to get and destroy it.

Ukraine. An artificial state. Actually Russia, prior to the West-funded coup d'etat of 1917 and the subsequent illegal and illegitimate split of of Russia.

Vietnam. If I remember correctly, USA got a royal beating there.

Eastern Europe. If "Enslaved"="rebuilt and financed by", then yes.

Good commentary to the US stance.

Also, US-funded and trained Nazis are fighting Russians in Donbass, just not those Russian who live in the Russian Federations. Rather, they are exterminating the 5+ million Russian population of Novorossia, which, quite understandably, puts up a fight.

We can easily imagine a similar exchange between a critical Ukrainian and a European Union financial administrator. The Ukrainian complains: "There are two reasons we are in a panic here in Ukraine. First, we are afraid that the EU will simply abandon us to the Russian pressure and let our economy collapse…" The EU administrator interrupts him: "But you can trust us, we will not abandon you, we will tightly control you and advise you what to do!" "Well," responds the Ukrainian calmly, "that’s my second reason."  ;D ;D ;D