Bitcoin Forum

i just wonder why facebook and twitter are too low in terms of pool allocation, what i m seeing now is not longer encouraging about doing facebook and twitter anymore again. facebook and twitter are more stressful compared to other pools but it seems they have less reward.
watch out the stress in retwitting and tweetting also post and repost on facebook everyday and everytime writting report come to think the stress.. also emerging how your facebook profile will be filled with picture and text of any campaign which you are advertising. please i m using this moment to plead to bounty managers to add up facebook and twitter (increase the allocation), so wen participating we won't get tired of doing the work (advertising on social media).
also due to the stress some ends up on the way without the program being end while some manage to follow the program to the ends.


please if you agree with me, support me with your send-able merit.
i will appreciate with your merit.

This is not the case all the time, there are campaigns that are giving more budget in facebook and twitter because they know there's a lot of participant in that bounty campaign.

you are right, sometimes there is a social campaign of media the allocation of reward is greater than other campaigns. but the current average reward allocation for social media campaigns is smaller than other campaigns. in my opinion it is feasible and fair, its work is also not heavy and hassle, it's just bounty manager must make policy to give the limit amount of participants in social media campaign

Work and social networks brings less money because you can increase the number of subscribers and friends using bots and reciprocal subscriptions. Organizers see this and allocate little money to social networks

On the company in social networks allocate little money because the advertising companies there are not effective. There you can increase the number of subscribers and friends with the help of bots and reciprocal subscriptions. Organizers of advertising companies see this and do not allocate a large budget for social networks.

I believe that it will depend on onwers' strategy in terms of developing the community.
some may think that it will be good to spread out messages via social channels such as facebook or twitter
other may consider telegram as the most effective channel
particular focus only on signature on main-stream channel such as BCT forum
in short, it will vary and based on their own strategy

Because Facebook and Twitter are the easiest way to make competitive in the bounty companies. It takes less time and effort, and money. Look how many people involved in these companies ? With over 1,000 almost everywhere! And therefore the reward will be very small.

I see your point, as I have noticed the stakes getting smaller and smaller for FB and Twitter but there is valid reason for this. Too much non-organic traffic there, just a whole load of false accounts with no real intention of ever supporting the projects. I have seen some of these bounty accounts for social media. Nothing but advertisements and promotions, calling every project the next big thing. No surprise that bounty managers see their value as very low.

Prove that FB and Twitter can bring in quality members and supporters, and the stakes will improve.

Yeah you are right many people are creating facebook accounts with false or bought followers to join on bounties for higher stakes but they don't have anything to do with that project because they don't have any followers so it is just a waste to pay him.And some projects have more or equal allocation as signature campaign because that may related to that kind of media.

Actually, I'm a bit surprised that these Twitter/Facebook campaigns are so popular. And I don't see reasons why payments of that type bounties should be high.
People aren't using their real social media accounts for bounties. They have made profiles dedicated to bounties. Often their friends/followers are fake. It's also common that majority of their friends/followers are other bounty hunters. All content that their post using these accounts are related to bounties - shares, retweets and etc. And at once they are promoting several bounties. Tell me, what kind of audience these posts can reach? It's just a spam, you should enjoy that you are getting paid for it without complaining that earnings are too low. But I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook and Twitter will start to ban these bounty spamming accounts more active.

Already there are many answers to these question! Twitter and Facebook are the most effective way to get desired target users to get awareness about the project. There are many people who participated in the campaign for promotion but companies are allowing low % pools for the social media promotion, it is there are many other effective otherways and they are allowing higher % to them.

Stressful? Are you kidding? Facebook and twitter are the easiest task on bounties because there are softwares that you can use to schedule you posts for every week. They can also schedule it on one go from start to end of the bounty.

yes it is actually stressful to compose your own original tweets and post because you need to think of some unique original post related to the project that your promoting but most of them do only required two original/unique post per week and the remaining are just share or re tweets. so overall working on a bounty social media campaigns is somehow easy when compared to other task like signature campaigns and translation campaigns. we shoudnt be surprise at all if the allocated reward is way too small.

They reduced due to news from the facebook banned crypto related ads and Twitter reduces the number of ads in the wall. This is reason to work in bounties with the manual intervention itself. We will be able to do it easily without big efforts.
I have not tried to use my personal facebook account promote the crypto related since I am looking to be anonymous in using cryptos. In the meanwhile ads banning everything goes wrong bro.

I think it low allocated budget because its the easiest type of campaign.

Read all the posts above and you actually see that no, these methods are NOT the most effective way any more. In fact I do not think they ever were!

1. Effective means, you get the results you want at a good cost. But since social media followers are there happy to post cat photos and their holiday locations, these people are not going to invest in cryptos and ICOs. You pay money to show ads to these people, who are not interested. That means ineffective cost.
2. Desired target is people who want to invest, interested in cryptos, as I mentioned above, the audience is not desired. So that is why bounties are getting lower for Twitter and FB posts.

Facebook and Twitter are the easiest things to do for the bounty. In addition, there can be a huge number of people involved. In some companies, there were more than 5000. The award is distributed to such a huge audience. Plus, the total reward for participating in social networking companies is half that of participation in a signature. Therefore, the payments are very small.

I agree with you, Limit the number of participants more appropriate in bounty campaign social media.
in this way the possibility of gifts in the can be more

Ive seen some projects which do give big allocation when it comes to twitter and facebook campaign but most of the time i do see big allocations on signature and translation bounty programs which i do see it as a right thing for them to make since traffic on this forum is much worth on to advertise compared on fb and twitter since we do all know that crypto traffic isnt really too great on there.

Bro, why are you triggered if the pool allocation for social media campaigns aren't that high? Simple, if you think that the rates are low then just don't join them.  This is not the first time that I'm seeing some complains about the opportunity that they got.
You are demanding that much and now you don't want to get tired of doing work? If you don't want to get tired of working then you have to be the boss with your own company and business.

You are very right, in the past I think like you, I have a question why the allocation for twitter campaign & facebook allocation is low? If I think the work done on facebook or twitter is more difficult, we have to like & share after that we also have to create a report in the thread, sometimes there are also campaigns that have to make a tweet related to the project and we Also notified the report, is not this more difficult than other campaigns.
But, I think every project has good reason to do like that, we can do that.

Maybe you know yourself why paying facebook and twitter is low,first the work is very easy just do like and share,While other bounty like signature campaign big payday karna require their ideas every day and must promote certain projects

It might stressful but providing good posts here on a regular basis to keep the discussion intact and clean while advertising a project seems a bit more hard to posting or tweeting and besides known accounts or respectable ones could give better outlook for the community of the project they are promoting.

Right! there are only a few people on Twitter and Facebook who might Ads on daily basis, but the majority of the people are daily watching their Ads in Bitcointalk forum. Signature Campaign will get more awareness when compared Facebook and Twitter that's why they are allocating higher % to the Signature campaign.

He's even looking for encouragement.

If it's stressful to join those facebook and twitter campaign then just quit them and don't complain.

Retweeting is even easy by just pressing the button not giving yourself a big effort for doing so.

How come that a simple sharing/liking/retweet are being stressful? But when you browse a non-sense posts/memes/quotes in your daily activity at social media it automatically triggered your brain cell to post it on your wall without any hesitation. Wow! First of all, you've decided to participate at your own will, and they stated all the task for the campaign that you must accomplish. So if you feel that your payment wasn't enough for the job that you've been done then quit no one will stop you.

If they share the advertisement on social networking but they does not give the enough views or investment like we can give the medium signature campaign bb code. All ann thread, social chat links, website of the project and etc are in the bb code itself.
that may helpful to get the investors. Moreover here the forum people well aware of crypto investment. No need to teach them big like we do like newbies.

I wonder too lol  :D
for me it's harder to give quality opinions here in the forum rather than sharing,liking, and retweeting especially the merit system made the ranking becomes a lot harder than before, lower ranks = small profit, and besides those social medias are not intended to crypto enthusiast alone.

I think it depends in your ability to work for social media. I too are a social media promoter but I make sure I will be compensated with the right amount on my efforts. Choose a jog well and you will be fine. :)

Dude already perfect answer been shared mate. I do not know why you bumped the 1 week dead thread with the unwanted answer here. I personally sent also text also some people for bumping against dead thread.
Still people like comes once in a while and doing this on forum.
Next to this negative and fake news spreaders. This has been fight and banned there is no merit system also needed here.
Please do not spam more here guys. Hope you can find your thought on the different person's answer here.

it just happens to me, you often open a thread that you do not expect to get high allocation for social media. Or you have been fanatical to a certain manager without you realizing that he always pays low for social media campaigns.

It is low because there are many participants, it is also like a supply and demand, many are participating in Facebook and Twitter that's why the allocation is lower, unlike with signature bounty which is a demand is high, because you can only promote one bounty in signature unlike in facebook and twitter which you can promote multiple programs.

exactly i don't think there are really investors lurking in those social media sites like facebook and twitter. it might be a waste i they try more on linkedin where pros who are trying to earn and has knowledge about economics are registering. but then those dev team are probably just want their search terms indexed google wants sites that are shared in social media sites which still is part of their marketing.

This is the reason for participants to cheat, social media is easy to do just like and share. Participants do not hesitate to use some of their social media accounts to commit fraud.
unless the manager provides a large allocation for this campaign.

I strongly disagree with the argument you are saying. I often and follow the project facebook and twitter but the allocation is greater than the signature, translation or youtube. look into the korea auto / cube project project. see the allocation. where facebook and twitter is bigger than any campaign. maybe you just lazy to find and want an instant. if you want to relax and get a big advantage why you are not trying to invest or create your own ico project. and make facebook and twitter allocation is greater, because it is useless you make the argument but the allocation is the policy of the company/ wise of the company

Job using facebook and twitter is too easy compared with signature campaign, because all you need to do is to share and tweet, get the link and boom that's all. Then adding friends in facebook and twitter is so easy even you can't know the persons you can add it as your friend to full fill the needed viewer of your post in facebook. Not like signature campaign that you need to rank up, you also need to consume a lot of time to complete the needed posts also rules of signature campaign is too hard to do compare to facebook and twitter.

according to my experience I can add, some projects allocate the amount of presentation on signature and language transfer, but there are some projects that change it by giving more percentage of social media bounty project, all depends on the strategy policy that will be done by the developer team own, successful frien

I think that payment for social networks has become so small, because this is not an effective advertising, a lot of bots from which there is absolutely no benefit, the organizers of the bounty see it and pay less attention to social networks than the signature

when you take part in the bounty, you have to promote this company, and advertising in social networks has become completely ineffective because all people have a lot of bots in subscribers or in friends and the organizers of the bounty see that there is almost no use from social networks

no . Social medias are still effective when it comes to advertising purposes because a lot of the population thesedays are now using social media as a part of their everyday life , you may also notice that there were lots of ico and crypto related ads popping on them right after you access the homepage of your social media accounts. However  bots and organizer is still undetectable for some cases because managers are to busy to do a one by one scanning of social media post and links.

I see that they were just using some bots or dummy account to help them for their campaigns and i found it so unfair for those who are working too hard for those who joined at any social networks campaign. And maybe that's why facebook and twitter are too slow because of these spammers bot everywhere that tends to lurk on those social networking sites.

if in my opinion it depends on the project we are following there is giving high allocation in social media campaign there is also low so for facebook and twitter is not always low in its allocation

Facebook and twitter are the easiest to get gifts. There are no hard rules in getting rewards. Participants who follow it too much. So that's what makes the allocation small. Maybe by limiting the number of participants can make the bounty hunter get a bigger prize.

it is true if we look at it. but facebook and twitter it does not take much time to post or share. different from youtube, signature, media, article, and translation. when compared with all that? which one do you think is easier? the answer is definitely twitter and facebook. others need more time and thought.

If the bounty manager gives the work like creating article about the project and ask that share along with the project's channel post means even facebook bounters will get little bit busy like Signatures and Youtubers.
To get the better amount in stack you have to go with the transalators, Youtubers and finally signature participants. Others in social network promotion work will not go better mate.

because social media like facebook and twitter have something to do with google, and google prohibits advertising bitcoin appears, for security reasons. because the bitcoin crime is getting rampant and it's not a small loss.

it is low allocated budget because its the easiest type of campaign. and most of all the members here are joining the campaigns, the more population the it less the budget earnings.

you earn less than a signature, because it is easier to work in social networks, you need to make reposts and retweets and get a reward for this, such as you are very much and the budget is divided into you all, so the final income is not great

in a social network involves a very large number of people because the working conditions are simple, and the budget that was allocated to social networks is shared between all participants, so at the end of the company each participant receives few tokens

work with social networks does not bring enough money because this is a very easy way to earn money, people do not want to develop an account on the forum, they want to start earning money immediately, but social networks do not give a good result for the bounty, so the payment is very low

Yes social media campaigns are easy but that doesnt mean they pay less than signature campaigns or any other bounties . Social media campaigns do sometimes pay higher and the same pay rate as what on a signature campaigns but overall itll still depends on the company if they have a huge allocated reward on that campaign.



wrong. Social medias do have a great impact for the bounty because there were now millions of users on social medias nowadays  and that simply means many people can see your post and retweets/shares and they may possibly invest on it if ever they like the idea of the project . Most social media campaign pay less because this type of campaign are much easier than any other campaign.

Influences in social networks are also high and you're right that the task is simple and easy so the reward isn't that high. And ICOs do believe that facebook and twitter allocation should be low as it has been started by the early projects. Signature campaign is the highest stake AFAIK because this is the main forum for bitcoin and also works for the Altcoins so that's what others should understand and curious with the allocation.

I think it depends on the target of the project and there are more investors in this forum than on social medias. And it is easier to do the job through social medias than making good quality post in this forum. You have to think of something that can be beneficial on this forum by your own words and understanding so I think it would be fair enough to have greater allocation on signature campaigns than on social media campaigns.

Thats also my question before but that allocation mistake is on the Bounty Manager side if the allocation is too low they must set a limit in terms of participation and not let everyone to join  Quality is better than Quantity in advertising the more clearer the message the more consumers attract well thats my own opinion and subject any mistakes  and Im not and expert.

The more I think about it, the more I believe social media followers are not true investors in crypto. I always believed they were low quality but after now reading all the complaints and whining, I see that is mostly coming from bounty hunters, and people looking for free coins and HYIP participants. The actual investors do not care because their sources have always been outside of social media. Like you said, even on this forum you find most of them rather than on FB and Twitter.

Wel it becoming more useless to the project nowadays, all those bots accounts with fake followers coming in and flooding all the program.

It all depends on the effectiveness of an outcome. Why do you think that social media campaigns has the lowest allocated fund? Mainly because participants doesnt really care about the project, most of them are a bunch of fake accounts, it was made intended for the campaign. Either if you have legit account, target market for the project would be less than 30% and the rest will be just annoyed by your posts.
Not to mention one can partcipate different project at a time and the campaign contains a lot of participants. More participants means low shares.

I cannot agree with you, as I still think that these campaigns are the easiest one, as there many people who just create a bot who does all retweets or reposts for them and the only thing they have to do is to write own tweet. which are not more 5 per week. And moreover tweeter and facebook cmpaigns doesn't prevent from participating in several campaigns at once, when for signature, a person can choose only one project and it will take at least one month for a project and you can loose all that time if the project is unsuccessful

Don't argue with the manager since he can't just decide to increase the bounty poll in one campaign category, the whole team can, it also your choice if you accept the poll award, if not you can just walk away and try to look for another.

If you want the project token so much then perhaps you can use your ETH to buy some of them.

yes, as I said. but it depends on the project we follow too. sometimes the signature is greater than the translator. and indeed many of the projects are much larger in signatures than translators. but in my opinion, being a translator is more difficult than we imagine.

SMM campaigns are the easiest ones in their requirements. I'm not surprised the pay for participation in them is quite low.

Some campaigns to do , others increase the rate of Facebook campaign, Twitter, because they know well they're the strongest campaigns to advertise their project, and they are certainly looking for success.

Sharing, tweeting, retweeting, posting few words about the project and you are ready to share the link.

Some were surprised why they are not paid with higher rates for an easy task, they all want is quick bucks with less effort.

in my opinion not all social media campaigns have a low allocation, maybe in different bounty there are giving big allocation for social media campaign

For me it just supply and demand, many bounty hunters are participating Social Media Task and they participate multiple bounty programs. Unlike in Signature in which you can only promote one program on the entire period.

Thats why other bounty task are much higher than Social Media because of people participating.

In facebook and on Twitter, friends are bounty hunters mostly, about 90%. Such friends do not carry any useful mission for the project, they do not buy tokens. The only benefit for the project from social networks is that the ISO name is  being heard by many people. Also in many cases there are bots that tasks instead of people.

It all depends on the manager who conducts the bounty company. Some pay more, some less. You have a choice. Participate wherever you like. I think you will succeed.

Well easy jobs get easy pays, unlike some other campaign like translation and blog or this video making, they takes time to create to finished it, unlike FB and twitter you can just click 2-3 buttons then your task of the day is done, isn't it? IF you want higher awards then take harder tasks, that is if you want it.

really my master supports you
paid for facebook and twitter is too small from other campaigns
even I can ever pay maybe 0.01% (1eth = 1000 tokens) and I only get 33 tokens when already in sahre every day
hopefully rewards for social media campaigns increased

Why do they have to pay more? There are a lot of participants, work is easy. I can not tell that i like this, but it is true.

It is true that facebook and twitter campaigns are very low in rates
Though the coverage of your tweets or post are depending on how friends or followers you are and you can get more views with it.

See the comparison between the participants because in signature only few people will participate based on their rank but in social media campaign a newbie can participate even if he has 200 followers.

I agree with what you say, the many factors that make it all, I think most investors are not looking for a project for him to invest via facebook & twitter, but directly to a forum, and it all depends on how much the allocation is derived from a project, and there are some managers who make the greatest allocation for facebook and twitter, rather than the campaign that he

Yes, you are right I agree with you. The social network bounties are so easy therefore payments are very small and all members happy with that.

Disagree with your words on here yet those allocations would really be just fine. When it comes to stress level and difficulty of such task i would rather see that signature campaigns and translations would really be much harder thats why its normal for those companies to took consideration to have those programs to have a bigger allocation than on twitter and facebook.

I think the reason why they allocate very little reward for this social media group is because in these platform, you can get a whole load of followers in which most of them do no even exist because a person can decide to create an account here if he or she is unable to get the required amount of followers to complete the task. Another reason is that this platform do require much stress as and it is less expensive in order to complet a job. All you need to do is invite people to the group and you can get your desired amount of followers.

Mostly the crypto currency investors are not from social media platform so most bounties not concentrating much on them and some of the bounties don't even have facebook campaigns.But it alsondepends on what kimd of project is that and work on social media campaign is also easy so don't expect high rewards for easy task.

I don't expect a campaign manager or bounty manager to allocate huge portion to either Twitter or Facebook which way much more easier than signature campaign. On those platform, I don't see anything hard in retweeting or sharing or link. If you want to out your own content, all you need to do is see what has been tweeted and put in your words. You don't have to bother about someone checking for post quality, there is no wait time before you tweet, you don't have to make high minimum number of tweets to be eligible for payments and all those conditions embedded in SIG campaigns.

Agree with you. Because the rule is too easy, someone try to increase account Fb and Tw (spam) for more reward. I hope the manager bounty campaign limited quality participant.

I do not agree it seems, for a social media campaign facebook and twitter small because the campaign through facebook and twitter is very easy, didnt makes stress not like youtube, and translation. so naturally for the distribution of prizes can be said small. because the job is easy. and in my opinion not stressful. stress it if you follow a lot of bounty and dizziness or sometimes confused.

not only that if you read news or articles related to bitcoin with sossial media you will know the reason why it happened facebook has banned advertising about crypto circulating. Due to facebook users not only adults but small children from 12 years of age and above.

I think why from so much work done and faced every day to post and report, but the rewards are smaller than the others and the number of participants is the most than the others, it is actually from the team has been analyzed in pembagianya. I do not think because of so stressful in his daily duties but the benefits in doing share and post will be directly utilized by many people but the selling value is high or not.

Too many participants sharing limited amount of tokens.
I have seen bounty with 5000 twitter participants, if we take $200K as funds for twitter bounty at the end of campaign everyone will receive 40$.

Indeed Facebook and Twitter are very low compared to other programs, because it is very easy in how it works like and share it. Different from other programs that have a lot of work and time.

to my understanding twitter and facebook are not too low but what i found out is that, some people are using multiple account so that what makes them to limit it that way, but content creation or vblog you can only submit one which you won't earn highly. so that is what i think could be the problem.

i wonder why they always intimidiate twitter and facebook campaign to much, some times the stress over doing facebook and twitter is much complare to any other bounty campaign. but what i only see is that low allocation for them.
so what i do now to keep earning higher token is to participate in all the project like telegram, content, vblog and translations at least by doing all this project will give you some quality tokens after being listed on exchange you can trade to any convinient currencies which you want to sell to.

Because the number of participants is usually very high. Last year, a bounty project usually only had 500 to 600 people joining the facebook and twitter campaign. Now the number is usually up to 2000 thousand people. The bonuses are fixed, and divided for many, so the reward for each person is small.

But even as that we have more participants in twitter and facebook campaign so the payment will be too low after the campaign ends so to e I suggest that it should be increased since we have more participants over it.
Looking at translation and vblog there reward are huge.

The process of completing facebook and twitter is very simple. I think even beginners can complete a task in just 10 minutes, and because of the large number of people who participate in facebook and twitter, this makes the reward even lower!

I think may be there two causes why bounty facebok and twitter have low value
first : maybe BM assume the task facebook and twitter is too easy when compared bounty signature, blog, youtube and creator content ,,
second : bounty facebook and twitter have very many participants so the division of stake it also affects the number of participants

Twitter and Facebook are also not strict in terms of rules and regulations , so i think reward is slow.

In the recent campaign, they are allocating a very good amount to the social media activity because many people are participating in twitter and facebook promotions. Compared with the signature campaign, managers are allocating some higher percentages to the social media activity.

The difficulty of completing the task is different, because facebook and twitter are the simplest bounty tasks. The signature is set for the bitcointalk forum. Since there are people who know about coins in the forum, there are more investors here! The task of translating and producing videos is very difficult, not everyone can do it!

You have a point and besides the tasks been given in every bounty camps for Facebook and Twitter is actually effortless, because you will only do shares and likes or tweets and retweets once a week only in order to received stakes or what payment they probably provide in their bounty.

if I myself now participate in social media bounty program but must see the allocation and the number of participants. why now the social media allocation is lower because now the newbie account can participate in different social media campaigns with the restricted signature rank account.

I think there are too many people involved in these two campaigns and the amount of allocation of these two campaigns is also low 5-10%.

yes you i agree with you why bounty sosmed program very few get the prize in compare with others when the work of bounty program is very difficult and make a little dizzy. I think if the first time that his job just post and like every that you share it's normal if bounty get a little prize. but now it's different how it works bouty sosmed. we have to make a post every week after that we have to give a weekly report so we get a reward. it's pretty hard and makes a little dizzy if it's a natural thing to get a little gift. please reconsider the ico makers and change the bounty sosmed prizes for more.

This is also I observe when the hype of cryptocurrency last year 2017 that boosts all numbers of participants. Now with the merit and strict monitoring of our great forum leader and moderators, I have seen changes and more accounts been negged for farming and spamming. Let’s hope for a best payday the rest of the year now and help them by reporting those abusing accounts.

becouse to many of them join bounty campaign and facebook that's why too low he can give to them. and also if you want high stakes or tokens join to newsilike campign their give token directly not stakes. sometime he can give stakes

Hello friends! I do not think the project allocates less% of the social media campaign. It is worth mentioning that the number of people involved in such campaigns is overwhelming. That makes the reward get less

Because Facebook and Twitter is easy to advertising. You can post and shares only..

You can think like this
When you are looking for a collaborator, are you more willing to find someone with the same interests as you, so that you have a higher chance of success?
Most of Facebook and Twitter customers don't know about coins, their chances of participating in coins are actually very small, and signatures and translations are more targeted! (Because these ads are designed for people who understand cryptocurrencies) Do you understand?

facebook and twitter campaigns are not like the previous year, even this second campaign is the most complicated and time-consuming campaign of the other gifts for the current year while the allocation of payments is lower than other prizes.
and if the previous year we just need to retweet and share, like a campaign managed by SYLON and this is very appropriate if we get a very low cost. but since the beginning of 2018 twitter and facebook campaign turned into the most complicated campaigns, among others, because we have to retweet, tweet, share, post and do weekly reports until the project is completed

Why Facebook and Twitter bounty are too low, this is the reason :

1. there is a very easy and simple task, your job just do some like, share, create some own post, and do weekly reports on forum or forms.
2. everyone can join this bounty no matter what your forum rank in this forum. as you have facebook and twitter account with much friends/followers, you are eligible to join.
3. Payments depend on how much participants join. More people join the bounty, less payment you got because the allocation of the bounty divided to all participants.

If you want to earn more reward on a bounty, try another bounty programs like signature or blog/article bounty...

In Bitcointalk.org, Facebook and Twitter campaign has small award since application is uimited and award will be distributed to all participant sometime if the project is good almost 3K participants are there... But if you want a bigger you can check Bountyhive.io...

i dont get the point why Telegram Is too high even for nothing!
Just join and submit your username!
its hard to keep track of user activity in Channel!
How that helps for promotion!

There is far too much spam on Facebook therefore a mighty amount of profiles get blocked

I see many projects still have equal allocation to social media pool and signature pool . Also there is reason that why budget is not highest in social media , because people can join many projects under social media campaign so they can earn from multiple projects but in signature campaign they cant do the same .

Yes, social campaigns like facebook and twitter are now too many participants so the reward is quite small. Therefore, it is best to engage in various projects to achieve the best possible return. Or else you should join other campaigns like Reddit, youtube and article as it still has few participants, the reward is quite high when the requirements.

I agree with your opinion but it seems that FB and TW are too simple to join. Other campaigns seem more difficult with the majority of bounty hunters

There are too many bounty hunters involved in Facebook and Twitter campaigns so the rewards for it are less and more stringent, so maybe now it's better to make a video.

I don't see anything surprising in the fact that the work in social networks pay very little. I think that social networks do not need to spend the budget bounty because social networks are useless and do not bring benefits to the ICO

The rewards for each bounty mission are different, and many bounty missions are also assigned to Twitter and Facebook for many rewards!

Statistics show that social networks bring very little benefit for ICO and bounties. Social networks do not attract investors and advertising social networks no one takes seriously. Besides, anyone can create a new account and a few days to cheat yourself a few thousand followers or friends

for me there is nothing easy, social media campaigns like like n share are as difficult as other campaigns. Social media campaigns have to make reports on threads every week and there are even rules that require making posts. and in my opinion the job is not easy and requires discipline and patience.

Too simple. FA and TW are common to many people, so it is natural to assume that the reward is less

I'm newcomers to the bonuses, Fb and Tw are the first things I think but the bonus for it is too little while the other campaign is less participant but the bonus is too high, need to adjust

yes you are right my friend likes your question here I also wonder social media bounty why the prize given is very little even though judging from the way it works is very complicated and makes a little stress on the report in their rules. But I have seen that some of the IOI's increased prizes for social media bounties gave them a higher reward than the signature for me fair. but only a few ico gave it. and not much.

Facebook and Twitter have the low pool allocation because the action in Facebook an Twitter requirement when doing bounty is very easy. You only make some posts and shares within the living week to receive the stake. If you want to get more reewards, please try with content or signature action, the requirement is hard but you can get the high rewards

The first is because Facebook and Twitter have a large number of participants, and secondly because Twitter and Facebook are done in a very simple way!

Not important to the number of participants. The important thing is that on facebook and twitter there are not many known crypto. They usually ignore the sharing, and only in bitcointalk and youtube are easy access to those who know about crypto. So Facebook and twitter are always low in pool

I think it might take less time. You can perform the desired task very quickly.

Yes, participation in social companies is thankless job. And most often the reward doesn't justify expense of time for posts, retweets, writing of reports. Tasks in social companies are rather simple therefore there are a lot of participants. On Twitter the excessive number of participants are bots, and because of that strongly reduced reward size. The situation on Facebook is a little better, but not much. Also there's no limits of participants and quite easy rules.

Yes Facebook campaign is not easy to do but the allocations are always low. That is why I find It not interesting anymore.

well in social media campaign it's a easy task, just sharing and tweeting the post of the project. And not all of your friend are intersted in crypto currency so no one cares about the shares and tweets that you do.

First is they can join in many campaigns as long as they can handle it and I've seen many newbie accounts that are only owned by 1 people. If you check the reputation section, you can see that at least 6-7 newbie accounts are proven connect because the user transferred all the tokens that he had received in a single address.

I think the gift for Facebook and Twitter can't be a little, maybe because the participants who follow it are so much compared to the signature and also the others who have only a few participants because not all ranks can follow it, maybe that's the reason.

As a rule, the pool for facebook and twitter is almost the same in most campaigns, 10-15%. There are campaigns that well encourage 20-25%, but such are few. There are a lot of participants on facebook and twitter, of course, I would like the pool to be bigger, but it's not up to us to decide.

even if the pool will be more and the number of participants will increase, so this is not an option. you need to complicate the rules of bounty, then the payments will be higher

I think those social networks are time waisting, because there are too many participants in those social networks and bigger participants means smaller stakes, I used to work on them before but I found out it doesn't worth it, I'd rather translation campaigns, YouTube bounty and signature campaigns instead.

Because the task is too easy, and the number of participants is too large, even though its pool is quite large. So it is not easy to both earn a lot of money.

I was surprised yesterday that I was blocked for a day in facebook. I could not send a message on the bounty. Now it's normal

Social media campaigns like facebook and twitter are not at all stressful ! One can even complete them in the last minute by just pressing the like/share button on all the posts of  the social media account of the project.
The click to post of these campaigns is very low mainly due to garbage accounts with no real followers. Bounty hunters follow each other and never ever use their accounts apart from spammingly sharing the posts.

Maybe because joining facebook and twitter campaign is easy compared to other campaigns. That is why they get a lot of joiners and if there are too many participants, you will get less tokens via stakes computation. Best thing to do is to maximize your number of friends or followers to get higher stakes.

in my opinion, bro, because now there are a lot of participants and a little allocation, the list of participants is not limited, which I often experience and finally we get very small prizes.

This may be because Facebook and Twitter do not bring more practical effects to the project, because the role of Facebook and Twitter is not very obvious compared to signatures and videos!

If you checked other bounties social media has greater reward than signature and in some categories,meaning that social media campaign is giving such a good impact on the project.

yes really, bro, why is the prize for Facebook and Twitter campaign so small when we have to try to think every time we make a post or twet, and our results are in prizes with very little coin