Bitcoin Forum

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

Many ICO always update fake news for getting many investor, how ever I check many ICO raised hard cap but always have lower price after listing on exchange market, maybe they make fake news and they do not raised hard cap for ICO.

What ICO is that? Please be detailed so we can help you out, easily.
Of course, that's normal but for some reason, I'm surprised that there's still ico that aiming that much, looks like they're confident of their product. How much had they already raise, btw?

I think every project has its own calculations. with that much hardcap, it certainly makes investors doubt to invest, because it will take a lot of time to reach it. on the other hand if the softcap target is within normal limits, it will certainly be a positive value in itself, because by achieving softcap, the project can still run

The sales progress of the ICO is still at 0% so for me the investors are very doubtful to make an investment you can look the bitagro, I am looking for some coin to invest with their platform seems good enough but the numbers makes me doubt.

Perhaps, you should trust your guts. I did search on google and found  this  (https://www.agrocoin.mt/en/) though seems it isn't the one you're talking to.

---

Otherwise, this isn't the proper board to discuss this. Please move your thread to altcoin board.

I think it's too high, seeing the work done does look like a lot of money, an agro-business that believes it will achieve such a large amount.
It's better to be reviewed and re-examined so as not to get trapped.

depending on the type and price of the coin, what project do you mean? what is the price of the token when making an ICO?
hardcap is just a target, which is a reasonable amount if indeed the price of the token whose total supply of tokens is balanced with the hardcap target they are targeting.

IMHO, they can set the hard cap wherever they want. It's not something standard and it does not reflect anything.

On this topic, I read a rather interesting post from Ian Balina. He wrote that many projects with which he had come across were artificially inflating the hard cap of their projects. Many developers could not explain the overestimated amount of hard cap. This was due to the fact that in 2017 - early 2018, the ICO market had a high level of HYIP and many of the developers made a profit of it. They could set themselves high salaries, form unreasonable reserve funds and so on. And even now, many projects continue to act in exactly the same way. Of course, this does not apply to all projects, and some projects rightly establish high hard caps as they are planning large-scale projects, but rather a minority of them.

In an ICO website they always have the full details about their project,
From the developer up to their advisors and their coin price and the whole supply ,
They would also put up their plans .
So maybe you just missed something  try reading their whitepaper.

Every ICO has different standards and they calculate the money they need differently.
However, in this market condition, I find it very dumb to set a hard cap at 72 million. You will never catch up this amount of money even if your ICO lasts too long.

There's a simple answer to inflated hard caps.

Most ICOs are scams.
Most people are greedy.

That's all there is to it. Just human nature, unfortunately.

ICO metrics is way too difficult to judge. A good project that I know only raised around 4 million and that's enough for them to onboard new clients, develop the code, buy an office, even have enough money for 18 months (assuming there's no profit for them, which is almost impossible considering the quality of the team).

I think you can ask the team directly about this, but if their hard cap is so high while they don't have any existing product, it's very likely their token price would drop a lot.

I have a project they raised more than 50M $, and the price on 2$. After the exchange the price already down more than 90% i have around 300-400 if we calculation that the price will be 600-800$ but right now the token worth only under 5$

hard cap didnt guarante it will success in market too,moreover they have big discount for seed  and private sale contributors.and also big allocation on bounty campaign could make its price down alot.

Hardcap is just an indication that it would be the maximum sales they need to whether stop the sale and continue to the next process on their project.

That is the beginning of fraud and scam having a hardcap only give the the chance to have an excuse at the end of the day to run away with investors money, and most of the ICO this day upload fake informations about their total supply and even the mile they have covered all in the quest to lior investors.

Nowadays majority of the scam projects are comes in the market. But we must properly analyse the right platform because new technology is the right direction for future journey so we can find the project goals and future implementation. I never Suggest to participate in bounty because it was our own risk.

I want to know which ICO project has that high hardcap? Honestly, I just found out that there are ICO that have such a high hardcap, which is a total of 72 million dollars. I think the developer is too high in making hardcap, because until now no ICO has sold up to 72 million dollars. The ICO has so few interested people that I don't think it will reach that hardcap. But actually it's the right of the ICO project developer because it doesn't matter to me if hardcap isn't fulfilled.

Hard caps vary differently for each ICO because they have set of goals to be achieved that corresponds to a certain amount of fund collected. So the correct question would be "is this kind of hard cap reasonable?" not "is it normal to have this hard cap?". Anyway, it seems to me that that project is unreasonable to set that high of a hard cap. For comparison, Electroneum has a very good concept and fairly popular but its hardcap is just around $30M.

Of course to make a quality comment will help you with the information that you can specify about the project.If you are not interested in a specific project and the situation in General with ICO which have a large hard cap then everything is not so clear.You need to analyze a lot of information to make a conclusion about the project. But if the amount of fees is indicated but the price of the coin is not indicated, then most likely this project is an absolute scammers.

I think they just wanted to send signals to investors that they're expecting something big on their project that's why they targeted a huge hard cap. But for crypto enthusiast, we all know that it's a difficult target specially in this current market conditions. Of course total supply is also need to be put in place, if there nothing you can find in their website then you have to think twice about this project, just saying.

This is very weird, why they seems to set a hard cap that is not reasonable at this market conditions right now? I'm sure majority of you will agree to me that the amount being set is exorbitant. I guess it will really hurt them more and investors will just shun away from this project because of those hard cap goal.


Then they're giving us a wrong signal. Even the most successful projects in 2018 hasn't reached $70 m market cap as far as I know.

72 million sounds like a lot but other projects have been able to raise billions of dollars.  I consider EOS to be a centralized piece of garbage but they were able to raise billions for their token which doesn't even serve a real need for crypto users.

Usually all the details are written in their whitepaper and in their official website so investors can be able to freely calculate but there are ICOs that claim to have a private sales and I don't like it because it is private it makes people feel they don't have the right to know the current sale status and indeed no one asks because they are keeping it private. I feel that there is anomaly happening behind this private issue. Suddenly they will post an update that it was a successful ICO or sold out ICO. They will promise the moon and the stars so they can get investors.  ;D

Price per coin, soft cap and hard cap together with their date and all the roadmaps and other details are usually written in their website and they are usually giving updates in social medias on how much they've sold already from time to time. The hard cap must be  proportioned to the project they are developing, if you see it unrealistic or too good to be true then they are just making a big claim with out any basis on it or nothing to show, maybe just to attract more investors.

It could be normal because it isca target but whether it is realistic is another thing totally. It is figure computed together with the supply. You can make more research to know the supply if you are suspecting unrealistic figure and goals before you buy.

it's just a kind of high target the team wants to achieve in order to get more funds from investors.

Hard hats are too high, so this will make you work harder, and this challenge seems difficult with current market conditions. If you really have a real product it will not be as easy as you can definitely still go through a long process. Make a discussion with the team, whether to reach the soft hat if it's too high.

my mistake that I put agrocoin instead of Bitagro, I'd like to correct it.
Now there is still confusion for me, seems like there are two agrocoin  this  (https://www.agrocoin.mt/en/) one and the other one is here  (https://bitagro.io/), and this one is an exchange if Im not mistaken and their coin is also an agrocoin that is why it create a little confusion to me.

I can you suggest you about the potential ico for you, you can try to take a look at xaup which created by PPT developer. But you can follow this my best suggestion for you to join binance and prepare your amount for celer ico. these choices seem to be the best thing rather than put your money in agrocoin. that depends on your decision and this is only a suggestion

celer ico looks like will success in binance pad again like previous ico.investors now waiting this ico launched.by looking bittorent and fetch ai success they very interested joining in binance pad.they were very confidence will gain much profit from this.

Too high. I wouldn't buy that they really did collected $72M with their ICO. If they are telling the truth, expect that people will dump it quickly.

Wow that is huge amount of hard cap and I don't think they have ICO who really successs to reach that hard cap but if they have some incase I think the project is very potential so the investors invest a lot of money. Can you give the information what ICO who have 72 million dollats hard cap. Because mostly the ICO that I join their target hard cap is between $10-$20 million and even that they did not reach.

It is no news that most of the ICO are scam which make their news also to be scam,most of them are just looking for a way to attract more investors by giving fake news.

Why not? And I think all the information regarding coin should be available on the website. It would better if you mentioned about that ICO and we could add some information about that. Which one is this, by the way.

Most of them hardly talk about total supply anymore,even when you are asking them,the only thing you hear from community manager is that that information is not available now.They are all scammer.

It's not weird if they have a legit team, means they can hold responsible anything what will happens. The first thing seen by investor ICO when they decide to invest are teams. Whatever funds they need to make the project run well then every investor will choose their project to help them, but with one note the teams had a good credibility and they had succeeded many projects before. Investor will see it as a potential project which should they take a part in it.
   

I think it will be very hard to reach the hardcap in such amount, especially in this market which is still bearish.
$72 million is not a small amount, im afraid the project won't succeed raising the fund for their ICO.
I wonder if the project is real or not. If you can monitor the ETH raised in their address, then it will be good

Many ICO project purposely hide information about total supply and only after ICO ascertains, that a hidden part of tokens was sold on seed round or even early.

$72 Millions is possible, but not normal in current bearish market, may i know that which project? did you read the project whitepaper, I think all the information should list there, if not asking in their telegram channel, sometime project owner deceive investor their project total raised funds, try to verify what they said.

Of course, they should post full information on their website. A hardcap of 72 million is a very large number, and in this case, everything should be calculated and written down to the smallest detail. Otherwise, it's just a fraud.
Yes, and what about the bounty (you indicated in the title of the topic)?

we do not easily believe that. now there are a lot of fake news that might be contested in the public with a large amount of acquisition ico but cannot be open to the public. this is what we need to be aware of.

Same thought. It depends on what the project is trying to achieve. I know of an ICO that's into renewable energy and it has a soft cap of around 170 million Euros.

You have to check again. For current conditions, it is very difficult to reach large Hard cap. With many ICO failing and increasing fraud. In fact, many projects made false news that the project had reached Hard cap. We must be more careful in determining ICO choices.

yes it seems they are only spewing lies, because according to my thinking if ICO really has reached hardcap then there will be many people who are interested in their coins and that will be a reference to the price of coins that do not continue to decline when they are listed on the exchange.

If you are into any ICO that has no plain clean info please just stay away and move on ,many of these ICOs gives out only fake Info's just to lure innocent people, be very careful

Hardcap and soft cap values are just fixed by the project team so having high value of hard cap doesn't make it anything special.As you said if the project is worthless that even won't sell 1% of their tokens so for me it is not important only the technology behind it more important.

That's a huge amount of hardcap and I think if the project really requires that much money, they should have been doing a great project. But if you see that the project is not that good, then maybe they are fooling the community to lure investors to invest into their product more.

in my opinion it is normal if they are able to achieve it and may I know what ICO has that high Hard Cap? can you explain a little details about the ICO that you mentioned? if there is no information about ICO and its origin is unclear I suggest you be more careful if you want to invest in the ICO that you mentioned.

I think this is too difficult to achieve hardcap, many ico have reached $ 2 million said to be successful because they collect and promote it with hard work.

ICO Should have an open nature, if the number of available coins is not announced, as investors we may be suspicious. because after all we need to analyze all information available to avoid scam.

yes i agree because as the matter of fact  that is the most important when it come running a project. wherein total supply of the project so that it become interesting in my opinion .  So that they can convince more investors also to participate on their project.  For me without total supply is very difficult actually to put trust and money.

It is too high, at least for this bear market when BTC is struggling to get $4000, however, it's upto the ico issuer. I think you should get all the information at their ANN thread and website too.

It does matter to some because they think that ico can become more succesful if they already reach these so called caps  .  for me it does not matter at all because i see that all ico bounty are still risky because youl never what they end up  .


Number of coins is not an indication to tell of the ico is shady or not .  they can easily put fake numbers on thier info but whats the point of that if they will soon end up scam ?

Well, why not be able to collect ?
if the project will be released on laundgepade on binance I think he will be able to collect the same amount , but of course you need to track how much a project as if there is no information it is better not to participate in it

I think the best way to prevent from being victim?don't engaged in this stupid project as this is clearly a scam project.

The team must be transparent in every single details about what’s happening in the project but if this is something like what this team is doing then step aside and find another profiteering

I believe he missed to read the white paper, team details and project team's response so far he joined. If there is good move on these things we may trust the project but you need to take the own responsibility while you are enrolling yourself on any ICO investment.

Many people on this forum contributed their all efforts over cryptocurrency bounty program here but many of the ICO did not pay them still. Lets hope all things go good for you.

Bounty hard cap now is not easy to get or not too easy to raised because of bad condition of the market. And it is also depends on how good the bounty projects is. if the bounty project is good and has the potential to earn more money then it can reach hardcap.

It depends on the projects some are really need a huge amount of money for development, marketing etc if it needs some large manpower and target for international users it must be a enough for a big hard cap but if the project is not too huge this is too big.

Usually every project will have it's total amount of supply for the coins they will makes, and make some allocation of those coins for many things including ICO, Bounty or future development. But if the project doesn't give those information, i think we should be careful with the project. So it's better being cautious than being regret.

I think that is too much because at the moment it is difficult to convince investors to be able to support ICO so that currently many ICO projects that target hardcap far below the $ 72 million of their sales fail. especially with projects that have as many hardcap targets as that much, I think it will be even more difficult.

I agree with you that they should put the total supply on their website for investors to know, a project with $ 72 million that is really unclear when it is too big a number.  will have a lot of doubts about this project if I intend to invest

that why you need to check every ICO bounty that you will joined
they should open information about their supply or ico that sell out or not
many fake news or even fake caps on funding just to get more investor

Its normal right now, and sometimes they just cheat on numbers to deceived more investors. Though in reality the hard card is too high and its hard to collect that kind of money for a new coins. Some ICO also don’t have softcap, they just work according to their timeline even without investors i guess, the number of supply coin usually indicated and the price will depend on the level they have set.

depends on project, recently i participate in some bounty then raise about 68M $,they give reward for bounty hunter before fund raise is 5M Token.
then after finish ico they cut it, and just give 100k token which price per token is 1$.

I don't believe any project can reach their hardcap in this moment, some scam project wants to attract the investors, and usually to said they have reached the softcap and more, if you can't find the contract address, it should be the fake news.

It is not normal if it is small project and something which can be done with less money.
Basically money is for development. It can be for other things too.
Maybe if it is for real estate.
I don't think exchange need that kind of money only to start exchange because they have their fees and they have to develop exchange which probably doesn't cost 72M. It can be for gambling site too.
It really depends on project and goals.

A project can raise $72 millions yes could be more. But since 2018 everything turned something unpleasant. There are scams and lies everywhere. Usually we had big lies about the ICO scores and the caps in 2018 and unfortunately most of them turned scam. No one believes in ICO's anymore.

ICOs or projects with shallow details should not be an option, else you might end up losing your money.
Sometimes, I just wonder why some projects would demand such huge amount of money.
Also, in this case, the details are not revealed, so I would advise you to be careful.

There's nothing bad if a project hard cap is up to 72 million dollars but the last time I check every which there hard is up to the amount mentioned those project are project that have to do with precious metals or stones and you'll find the total supply if you check their site but I will advise you to ask ICO Ethics  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2204241) for advise.

Usually all descriptions of projects are on the website! I think now is not the time when you can collect 72 kk $! Most likely this is deception, check the information before participating in this project!

We don't know if the ICO said the truth about reaching the Hard Cap because we don't know how much money they can collect from the investor. They can say that the cap was reached and now they are running a new phase for the project. Or maybe they hide something to the public, so we still guessing about the truth. But it is hard to reach that number since they need to have a big list of the investor.

You did not specify whether the project reached a hardcap, or that the hardcap target was 72m $. If that project gets $ 72m hardcap at this time, it's hard to believe. I don't think a project can be done at this time.

You must be careful with fraud because I see that the achievements are very large and may be very difficult to achieve. Many ICOs have stated that they have achieved Soft Cap, but the project is not running and the developer is leaving the ICO. It is very difficult to get a good and very promising project, it takes hard work to get it.

You can simply take part in a large number of bounty campaigns and some of these campaigns will bring very good money.

You might keep looking for that and won't see it dude. Many ico now come up with fake write ups and update just to lure investors.

what's the name of the project? so large is their hard stamp, now the ICO project is starting to do things that shouldn't be done. they can sometimes make fake news for everyone. we need to examine their project and it might be good if someone arranges an ICO project in circulation so if there is a bad project or commit scam we can report it. sounds good but this is difficult.

If a project has determine $ 72 million for the hard cap, then I think the project needs to be great. Because I think $ 72 million is quite a value for a new platform. So if you are going to join this ICO, I think you should do a good research. I would especially recommend that you investigate team members and, partners which it has of the project.

Good day! That's too high but some good ICOs really could sell successfully. I would rather choose joining a lower hardcap for sometimes projects aiming for a higher hardcap don't usually reach their goals and end up on refunds, some even abandon their projects and leave the investors hanging.

High hard cap on a project can be a sign of how much valuable the project is but in the recent days it doesn't follow any sign like that,the project owner just simply set the limits but at the end een failed to reach the soft cap values.

Recently, cases of fraudulent projects have become more frequent, everything happens in such a way that many projects provide fake information about collecting funds and cannot confirm it in the future and this is very sad.

There is  very wide range between most projects soft and hard caps. Some good projects do have a up-to-date progress bars showing collected funds on their token sale web page.

This day, people should be very careful of the project they are investing in, project with very high hard cap hardly reach the soft cap and that might leads to refunding or investors been scam. In other case, some project with very high hard cap do have lower soft cap and I believe a project can run better with soft cap. You just have to make proper research before investing in any project and make sure it's legit before you put your money in it

Many ICOs makes sure they reach hardcap or they won't continue with the project and only few that met softcap continues with the project ,my advice son scam projects lies about there hardcap just to fool investors and some won't even disclose it at all ,don't believe what you see every time it might be a lie

I don't know why some ICO campaign did not put the progress of their ICO in ther website and they didn't even update their community about it and at the end of the ICO tey will tell it is a fail. that's why i only join bounty campaign with progress bar on their website.

Don't be deceived by what you see on the website of many of these ICOs, most of them are fake. They can tell you they have reached softcap even when they are not even closer to a quarter of the softcap. Just be vigilant in your investment.

ICOs many times have too much big hard cap but also soft cap. Many people are asking why they need such high softcap. The answer is that they want get as much as possible from the token sale. No matter they really need it.

I do not understand why they put such a soft cap if they can not collect it and then give money back to investors.

I would advised you check thoroughly through their whitepaper to be sure you didn’t skip vital details of their projects because usually it is expected of an ICO site to be to be well detailed on every information regarding their project but if you have gone through this properly and sure you didn’t skip anything it can therefore be clear that such ICO is scam.

To have such hard cap might be a medium to give excuses at the end of the project, hereby not remitting monies belonging to investors and another reason some ICOs upload inflating details about their supply and miles they’ve covered is to lure new investors and it is wrong all the same.

If new projects hide information about current fees, this is not very good. This can only mean one thing: the amount collected is very small, and the developers do not want to show it.
Contact support and ask them to give a link to the wallet where the investment charges are conducted so that you can read them.

I think it's too much, but I can't say that they overstate their sales targets because each ICO has a different concept, so the capital they need will be different
if the concept is mining, usually the ICO will have a big target, but if the concept is like an exchanger, then I think the target will be only a little

True, most ICOs are now making fake Hardcap on their website, they want to attract Investors in their ICO, so we must be careful before buying at ICO.

Of course it could. It depends on the project itself. There are even more than 100 million hardcap, and mostly those belong to the banking sector. Information about the supply on the site should be, in my opinion you should look more carefully.

Almost all ICO at the moment can not assemble the hard cap. Investing in ICO makes no sense, at least I think so. There are normal projects, but they appear extremely rarely and at the same time the prices of their coins after the ICO are still less.

There are many ICO projects are live whos hardcap is 100 Million USD or more than it! But they can't reach even the softcap 8 Million USD since 2018  ;D ! Therefore most of the ICO projects are not raising a single buck but they are showing fake raised because it is very easy to change the ICO timeline bar in the website.

I think it's normal for ICOs that really have new and real products. But for now it will be difficult to reach  hard cap. Yeah, for now many ICOs have hardcap targets too high and they can't reach the target.Because indeed market conditions are still deteriorating.

Yeah, there are some ICOs that don't attach the total supply of their tokens on the website and you can ask the team directly about this problem.

Of course the total pool of coins should be shown on the project website. It makes investors do not trust the developers. I think the coins will be created constantly thereby ensuring a high marketability. But soon I think they will burn their coins for good price maintenance on exchanges.

How you will calculate the bounty cap is getting the percentage allocated to the bounty from the sold tokens cap. Projects don't give from their total supply they give from their sold cap to bounties.

Most ICOs do not deserve their hardcap. I think the undeserving ones are just being greedy. Many of them are  decentralized applications with very simple concepts that do not deserve even their softcap

It depends on the project but many of them set unrealistic hard cap targets they cannot achieve in these market conditions.
It does not look good when a project changes the targets and reduce them like x10 when they realize they are not achievable.

You should name that ICO when you are posting information about that ICO, you should be aware that these ICO are faking their sales to entice people to invest and make it appear they are getting funded and trust from investors.

It is NOT necessary to invest in ICO because the use of them now is still there. It is better to buy tokens of interesting projects for you on the exchanges.

When the information is incomplete, there are many questions and doubts
As for the value of the hard hat, there are two possibilities
Either the team is confident of the product
Or it's a stupid scam
It was better to publish ICO websit so that we could know it clearly.

Several ICO this days are from scammers and unrealistic developer, Hardcap and soft cap should have a basis, and not what we see this days without a basis for figure quoted, for bounty hardcap most are always noted on the bounty thread, thous some developers tends to behave dubious after the ICO.

Try the project again and you have to name the project.
So that it will be easier for everyone to help you do a review.
Indeed, Hard Cap with that size is very difficult to achieve in a collapsed crypto condition.
Don't easily believe promising sites, it's better to do research.

Softcap will be some basis that a certain ICO will continue or even survive. It's commonly thing today that some ICO's where not achieving their target just because of the market situations and failure to show their capabilities into the public. That's is why many project have turn out into nothing cause they'll never get the amount that could help to sustain and continue to develop their project.

Yes it is normal, many projects do it to raise more money. Important is Softcap, that's the funding money needed to start operations and if softcap is not met the project won't start because collected funds are not enough. Total supply should be displayed on website, you're right.

$72 million is too big money for ICO and this goal of hard cap look too greedy.  And in this bearish  trend is very hard to collect that amount from investor. The normal hard cap for ICO is around $10 to $25 million.  The more important thing for project is they should be have working product.

Not only greedy but when you tried to create a comparison between that ico with another ico that needs a small amount to create a product and it doesn't make sense at all. That's why we called that as money grabber.

72M! Projects that need this massive amounts start better be ignored by investors, because most probably it's a scam.

at this time I already believe in funding that can reach the target at ico because we see that investors alone are not of great interest in the presence of ico which is very risky

The ICO project seems to have to be considered again because such events are usually a feature of an ICO project fraud. I hope you have not invested in the ICO.

Why the subject is bounty hard cap (which probably doesn´t exist) and you are writing here about ICO hard cap.

And my answer to your question is simple, leave if you think that the hard cap is too high. They can´t easily raise hundreds of millions of dollars before they show something 8)

Dont bother and skip it out and move to another project bounties because most likely with this hardcap they would still end up on failure which means
high tendency for bounties not to be paid out in the end of the day.Imagine that even projects do ask out $1M on their hardcap do still have the hard
time to attain it, how much more on $72M. Wake up man.

A hard cap of 72 million dollars is too high for a project to target especially in this current state of the crypto market. It may never be realized.

72 million is very much. what about the softcap? if the softcap can be achieved, maybe there is still hope that the project can continue. with a hardcap of that size it must take a long time because very few ICOs can fulfill the hardcap, but, with the right team and promotion, they have the possibility to reach that target. When participating in ICO, hardcap is an important factor to determine the value of coins in the future. Demand and supply are also important to determine the price of a coin, if the supply of coins is unknown then I think it's dangerous

You're dealing with a non transparent project they'll probably end up as a exit scam.. becareful on the kind of project you promote

Its rare to every project to reach a hard cap because even they reach it there's no assurance that it will boom in the market or having a great price. Some of are fake so they can attract some investor to invest in them. So always check it first before we invest to avoid loses.

The project is 100% Scam. May not be such a hard cap And when no such information on how much, how much is a coin, etc. then this project should get round

  I am Lahiru from Srilanka,           


          Bounty is very good.that is good Beninese as well as that people
                                                                 that lot of money buy us. that good investment. 




                                                                              Thank you!

Could you tell us the name of the coin?
Because this seems to be a scam 72 million dollar hard cap,
Without putting the whole information about their coin.
Have you tried to read their white paper?
Because it should be writen there.

The 72m dollar hard cap is completely nonsense. Some projects can only identify such nonsensical hardcaps as they only come out to collect money. Think that even the hard cap of the ico in Binance is around 7-8m dollars.

 

It is pretty ambitious on the falling market to target such great goals. During the raising market always every second ICO with a high level of hype are putting such goals, because they understand that on the raising market it is not a problem. But I doubt that any ICO will collect so much money right now.

Have you ever seen a project with 72 million hardcap? This is a number that is connected to the project itself and it can be even higher. As far as I remember, there was a big project called WBB(World Bit Bank), and the softcap was $ 150 million.

Sometimes I don't understand some projects, you set this hard cap at this moment that everybody is been careful of his investment and people losing interest in ICO's. No wonder most projects do not achieve their hard target but instead try to catch their soft cap.

And what surprises you so much? 72 million dollars hardcap is quite a normal amount. Do not confuse this with a soft cap, which is usually a couple of million dollars. If you can not find information about the total token supply or any other information , you can always ask about it in the official telegram channel of the project you are interested in.

I am not sure that they have raised more than $ 50 million from ICO sales, maybe just a strategy to attract many investors because after ICO the price is no more than the price of airdrop tokens

Seems the project is not worthy enough, how could a good project dont have full information about them, good project must include even a single world related. If you really did research and find it good, ask on their social media accounts to know them deeper. Ask the points you not know and make a nice decision afterwards

It could be.But I have not seen such projects for a long time.By and large,if the project is ambitious and it needs such a large amount money,then at least the project team should provide an open access smart contract.

We can't discuss their decision based on market conditions and bounty hunters are not patient enough for listing on the exchanges.

It's hard to make a computation because there is no name of the project like all the other with the same opinion, ICOs are faking their hardcap this is an old strategy to attract investors and make the projects look good in the eyes of everybody.

You should watch how many tokens or coins are for sale, usually it is around 50% of total supply. Also, I think that number in Soft Cap is more important to watch than Hard Cap number.
Hard Cap is just best scenario for project, but Soft Cap is money without which they can not continue their project.

I myself am still confused about that but it seems like a natural thing, because there are so many projects like that

72 million dollars are just too much for an ICO to create a great platform, we seldom have seen a project or ICO getting funded that huge amount right now, I think it's fake its part of the strategy I seldom see  ICO that will show you how many funds they've got, developers  hate to be ignored so they will try to manipulate.

right now you can't trust almost anyone. Once, most of the ico have a counter on their official site... but now? Only few of them..

It has become so common how ICOs  give this kind of misleading news just in a bid to mislead incoming or new investors but sometimes this idea of inflating hard cap does not even work for investors because there is possibility of investors having doubts except otherwise the ICOs have been known with a good reputation.

If this data is not specified, the project may be fraudulent. You can not blindly believe all the information provided to us.  I think every project should immediately announce the number of coins of the issue.

Well hard cap are crazy target initial coin offering developers set for them selves most times investors and bounty hunters are more interested in project surpassing at least there soft cap. Only few projects hit hard cap

for me it's natural that they target high hard cap, at this point investor has no confidence in ico because there are many scam project and the difficult reality for the ico project can penetrate sofcap

Often, negotiations with large, individual investors are lengthening and until developers end up, not wanting to disclose the right numbers. I am sure that after closing all negotiations and signing contracts, the project will reveal all figures regarding the number of tokens sold and the amount of bonuses.

I also often can not find information about the collected funds on the site. I don't understand why the project team is hiding this. I think this is not a good sign for the project. I believe that all should be openly.

Really good projects are gaining more. Take only the development of Pavla Durov. He collected several billion in a very short amount of time. If people are really interested, then big fees are inevitable)

If hardcap, of course token sales reach 100%. You can see how much the total supply of tokens that are posted during ICO. If you are a prize participant, you are promised a fee based on the percentage of supply. Then you can calculate the total supply with the total percent for the bounty.

Projects should adjust their hard cap targets with the market situation.
Many of the projects are overestimating their hard cap and it has nothing to do with the reality.
It also tells a lot about that project.

I think that at the moment no ICO is impossible to raise so much money, so this is not a normal hard cap. I would not participate in the bounty of the company of such a project and especially invest in such an ICO.

I think that it is possible to collect 72 million dollars in a bear market only by sweeping the project on Binans and specifically pouring a lot of money into the pamp of the future token price.
For the implementation of most projects, no more than $ 10 million is enough, all that is more - will not benefit the project.

If hard cap is, say, 72 million USD and bounties are 1%, they say they are paying $720,000 in bounties, but in reality they will sell like a tenth of the hard cap and the bounty will also be a tenth of the promised value. Be careful with this math.

in my opinion, it is normal if the project they are developing has good potential for the prospect of going forward in the future according to the vision and mission that has been planned and there are great benefits for its users. but on the other side of the coin, it will be difficult to be able to raise the price to a higher rate, because it has a very large supply amount.

Such information should be indicated in white paper, if it is not there, it is very strange. You can try asking for information in the telegram channel.

I think that is not normal because usually a project will not need that much funding but because each project has a different concept to be the target and the money they need is also different so that hardcap makes sense
not normal but reasonable

high hardcup at ICO is not something that must be considered because hardcup is not the main reference for me personally to invest in ICO, there are many ICOs that can reach hardcup but when in exchange the price falls very much and there is also the opposite even though it can only attract few investors can only reach softcup when ICO but increases when on the exchange, it is clear that everything depends on how the TEAM works.

and that is happen to several projects.they dumped in market and investor ask to developers team about their work.i think better to buy in market, its more secure and safe for us.usually people dumped after listing on exchanges.

In fact, it is very difficult to carry out a financial evaluation of the project in our conditions, and many companies paint for themselves the desired level of funding at a high level.

Most ICO needs to start engaging themselves in viable projects now that are less expensive to operate because you are right, at this period, 72 million dollars as hard cap will be difficult although they have a softcap too and also I think any transparent ICO should give full details of their token supply on a place where public can generally see it, which the project website should be the first rather than making intending investors go through the stress of chatting with them before making necessary decision.

I don't think any project can raise 72m dollars right now. So if they saying they did, it is probably fake.

Also 72m $ is a great example of greed.

No, so far, ICO hardcap value ​​have average under $ 40 million. can be said to be normal under $ 40 million. So, I think $ 72 million is not normal.

All of that can happen in the ICO project sales process. But with the large sales value, the price in the market is not necessarily high after the listing. Because there are a number of ICO projects that have succeeded in reaching hardcap instead of paying to bounty hunters and there are also those who have not yet been listed on the exchange. So whether the achievement is correct or just engineering from the developer. And for now there are rarely ICO projects that can achieve hardcap in sales.

I was interested to read the white paper of the project, which would have decided to collect 72 million dollars in the current economic conditions. What would he justify such amounts. For example, the project BitTorrent was enough to collect only 7.2 million dollars.

$72 million is huge amount indeed, but as long as they have clear purposes of the raised funds, it will be ok.
The most important thing what we need to know first is, whether the ICO company is really exist, or only scam.
Such hardcap will be useless if it is not used to develop the project in the company.

Many project i see that they are published wrong information , so now difficult to clear what are they saying. I think 72$m hard cap reached its not easy way .most of the ico project are failed to rise hard cap & their ico price also droped if they comes to the exchange.

It is a regular situation, because there are some ICO structures that are calculating the token price after the token sale. Depending on the collected funds, they are distributing tokens to investors based on the current supply divided by collected funds.

they hid the supply so that many enthusiastic investors would invest in their projects with a high target hard cap. of course the target at the end of the period is also high and there are many expectations for that.

Maybe you are about to experience another scam project. You need to be careful with  those guys Lol, that's how acorn collective played their own prank on us and today they exit scam. Sending us emails telling us how they successfully exit scam.

For me a project or an ICO that is not transparent or do not show honesty on how they do their crowdfunding are potential scams, these are people who steal people's profile. photoshopped it and make them appear as part of their team, don't go for this kind of ICO.

What kind of project is this? At least provide us the project name or linked to it so we can learn the whitepaper and find out why the team set the hardcap so high. $72M is a large amount of money. I wonder what are they going to spend with.

whats the name of that ico ? 72 million dollar is a huge funds.
if that ico not scam, it will list on the popular exchange.

I think OP should post that ico here so that everyone can look into it. Scammers are really getting better at what they do and it’s very difficult to spot fake ICOs these days. I don’t know if any of you heard about Benefit, the high profile ICO scam in 2018. Nobody was able to tell it was a scam, even icobench gave them 4.1 out of 5, lol. All the things you will look for in legit ICOs was there on Benebit and everyone believed it was fake until they got busted. Long story.

It can be possible depending on what kind of ICO is that. But these days there are lots of ICOs that fakes everything just for them to be able to attract investors. At the end of it, when it gets listed on an exchanges you will get to find out that everything was just fake. Just be very careful and hold a proper research before you take any move making investment.

HARD CAP cant be determine into the total supply as many project or most of them has only percentage of total supply to be sell or sold in an ICO.
ICO hard cap is very important as it shows the impact in the community of how the people reacts and cope on the project.
This gives a better demand and a good sign of not just being a successful now but even in the future!

That’s a lot of money for a hardcap
But what project are referencing ?
You should find the contract on etherscan to vet the total supply of the coin

Well, I don't believe that attaining the hard cap of a project will create chance for the ICO to be successful since so many if them has no good intention about the project and that of the investors interest. This is why so many of loses value significantly after being listed on exchange.

It is up to them to set the amount of hardcap, the more important thing is how they set the soft cap.
The softcap will be the one that deciding the project success or fail raising funds.
i think the value per coin not depends on ICO price only, but it depend on the demands.

The important number is how much the company has collected and not the hard cap.

it okay, when they decide how much hard cap for their ico mean they know how strong and how competent the team it self
we as bounty just can help them to promote their ico so they can reach at least softcaps

72 million dollars hard cap  is really so high. But it is normal  if the project is strong. You said you can not find the total supply of that coin. If so then the project is not strong. And they doesn't collect the hard cap  even can not be reach to the soft cap . Since I don't know the Ico name so I can not see the project details. Try more to find the total supply hope will be found because All ico keep remains on their website/ white paper .    Thanks

It depends on the ideas and innovations that are offered to investors, and how the potency and prospects about the project for us. That's normal because to develop the project with extraordinary ideas and innovations will definitely require a large amount of money.
Regarding the supply that is not listed on the website, we can look for it in the whitepaper.

Now on days of cryptocurrency i dont see any bounty and ico projects that reach hardcap, and i think the reason why is lack of investment so ico cant raised funds.so its possible to reach 72 billion dollars of hardcap now even the project is too good and reliable its mot easy to reach that high hardcap.

Yes bounty team should show total supply of tokens that hunters can calculate their tokens but in maximum campaigns i saw total tokens are shown and unfortunately 2/1 may missed to published their total tokens. It may also their campaign policy for hunters. On the other hand some team doing cheating with hunters. For that reason it may also not shown in thread.

in the current situation, I am not very sure about the funding that reached that value because now there are so many manipulations that dev and team can do to lure investors

And that strategy already used by a lot of Developer i think, when they want to attract investors, they put their own money in there so the project look like get a lot of investors and then can attract others to invest in there. Sometime, even reach hardcap project not success in market if developer not serious with their project.

I don’t know why now we set such a high limit in fundraising in ICO projects. With the current poor investor activity, this amount is unrealistic even for very good projects. Can, to show that their project is huge and worthy of such a sum? Or to end up with bounty hunters that they have not reached the upper limit in fundraising and therefore the payments will be small?

They should be flexible, and if they understand the market condition now, they would not set a high cap for an ICO.
Reaching a soft cap would already mean that they secure the minimum funding to continue the project, and it's also important that investors will understand that results are not instant, they should change their mindset into long term.

There is another possibility that could happen. We could not see the speculation against the value of the coins are expensive. If they already have the support of other companies, and has collaborated with many other companies may project could run. but by funding it will be very difficult to gather investors with market conditions right now.

yes you are right now there is a lot of manipulation that has been done by team but with these circumstances you have to think twice about investing or maybe we should leave project because it's not transparent makes us doubt

You don't need to invest on an ICO that do not show transparency, investors deserve to know, the supply and the allocation of the supply I have not yet seen an ICO that hide their supply and allocation, can you please name the project.

if we want to take part in an ICO project we have to be really careful and careful in choosing sometimes we are careful just not necessarily the project that we are following can reach hardcap, it is true we have to convince the team that manages whether the team has the usual team managing a project well or not so that later will not be disappointed in the future.

I don't know how they make the decision to their hard cap 72 Million Dollars, for me its to much for hard cap. Sound Like fake or fraud ICO. I never see company make hard cap target like that, its weird just to see how big their hard cap.

Faking collected amount is the new method deployed by many ico these days in order to attract investors, they will just upload a figure on their website which can't be traced on blockchain in 2017 contributors can see amount of sold tokens but now reverse is the case.

Every project has is own aim and objective that is why there is soft cap and hard cap, and when project have this two mention below they need to also indicate their total supply and their should also indicate price per token.

I have noticed that some  ico projects do not usually put their total supply on the websites.
Do I will suggest you check out their Whitepaper as it is always there .
Again, there is something going on with some projects, the level of secrecy as regards the amount raised and all that seems to be  the trend now.

I don't believe if there really is someone who is able to reach the hardcap with total funding reaching that value, because ico himself is currently also a lot of doubts due to the many frauds that occur, so in my opinion people become cautious

 
Well, it is not the sold tokens only that matter it is the execution of plan and how the project will attract more demand in the near future. This is why others are delaying especially in the process of papers for legalities where it is considered as crucial. In your case since you did not mention the project's name and its detail so probably replies here will not be going to concede your expectations.

If you ask questions about such hard hats, I think they have prepared the answers for you if the project is a scam, I think we should participate in reliable projects and have teams famous team to join

each project has its own soft cap and hardcap target 72 m hard stamp is very large,and if you don't find a stock of coins, immediately leave the project because the project does not have clarity You can choose projects that can be trusted.

do not immediately trust the project that gets $ 72 million  Lots of projects now cheat the results of sales to attract investors and at the end disappeared or the tokens are not worth the price ICO

Of the many projects it does have different hardcaps. Because that depends on the aspect of the project. If Hardcap is $ 72 m. Of course it's a very big achievement, but in every project there is even more. Tapai must be remembered, sometimes it is a fake project that manipulates their income.

I think it is not normal, for any ico with such a huge hardcap
There has to be a corresponding token number in the total supply

If the tokens for sale does not correlate with the ico price and value indicated for hardcap
Then, the project is a joke

Becareful what you seek for ,any ICO projects that can't give out full information on there website about total MX supply ,softcap meter and hardcap meter ,pls stay away from such projects ,they will only feed investors fake ,unrealistic news and fake volumes too just stay away from them

we very often see manipulation carried out by projects that are intended to deceive other investors. because of the great achievements, there will certainly be many investors looking at the project please be careful about choosing a project even though the achievements are already numerous.

You must also post here the fully details about the ico project you are talking about. If they are confident to achieve it, well I don't see wrong with it dude. But like what I said you should tell us here what coin is that? does the project is still running in progress or not?

an ico Han have a hard cap of any amount. The token total supply sometimes might not be announced immediately because it is not minted yet. But many projects show all this information.  Maybe you should ask the team on this issue

A few months ago, I saw WPP Energy's bounty and achieved a very strong hardcap. Almost close to 100% of tokens sold. Maybe that was a very great achievement in this long-running bear season. All are possible and certainly targeted by their team. Hopefully according to the purpose.

Hard cap of 72 million USD on such a market is a very ambitious goal. Even IEOs that are being launched on Binance and Huobi have only less than a million USD for sale, so I have huge doubts that there will be any project that will achieve such a high goal.

value of 72m$ are to much for hardcap point on this bad market situation, but like you said, no info about the token itself neither price per token or their total supply, for me its smell like scam one.

Maybe the OP intended is "Bit Agro" https://bitagro.io/ with a large hardcap and this project is still running for the sale of IEO in LATOKEN.

right, such a hardcap will certainly be difficult to achieve logically, but if the team has its own views by offering good products, I don't think there is anything that is impossible to achieve.

I don't even see the product that created by bitagro as a good product. Basically, the result of the product will depend on the skill of the developers itself. Raised a huge money is not the solution and we can try to take EOS as the best example how 4 billions worth of money already wasted for EOS blockchain but it's not having a good performance compared with tron.

Previously I also joined the WPP project and in my opinion the project was quite potential because it reached a hardcap, but it really cannot guarantee if the project will be successful because all depends on how the team develops the project.

so hardcap only helps project success but does not guarantee that it will be truly realized.

try to find them through etherscan. use their ticker or better use their smart-contract. it will help if they sent tokens to buyers.

I think it's great ico and it's a great success and maybe this time-list will come in the binance very nice of this project and lots of investors and buy their tokens not to be calculated by other bounty hunters and investors so big and many of their ico sales and its advantages are to reach the hardpcap and have a great deal of help to make it more and more new projects that they can build with ico also to reach the hard cap in their ico but their project is still low so the price is not rising but when it is listed on the top exchanger it looks like its price is high but the dumpers are not avoiding the exchangers.

In my opinion. outside if an ICO has a 72 million dollar hard stamp. most ICOs have only 50 million dollars in hard drives or below. therefore if there are ICOs who have such a capability, their team will work hard and extraordinary.

72 million dollar is a huge amount of money for ICO in the current market conditions, so the project must provide detailed tokenometrics to tell the community how they are going to spend money.

Now it is a rarity that the project took and collected HARDCAP,PRM is very large,as many people have already turned away from ISO and do not believe in it now,so it is clear why not collect money,now for the openings to collect SOFTCAP is already cool and cool,well, we hope that times will change,and everything will be great))

Probably the project wants to launch a rocket into space.
This is a very large Hard Cap, no project in this market can not collect it. Pay more attention to the size of the Soft Cap, if it is as big, then do not even try to participate in such a project, because it will never collect the required amount of investment.

Lol,

Ico's are greedy. They probably would be happy with couple of million dollars but don't lock their chances if something huge happens. 72m $ is crazy big amount.

Can you name that project? During this bear market, almost 1 out of 20 ICo projects can reach the hard cap or even soft cap. Mostly they magic their progress bar in their website just to hype their project. However, did you ask them in their official group like telegram about their supply? If they really reach the hardcap then they should use it wisely to projects development.

Hmm, if the coin is an ERC20 coin, check the contract address to verify the token purchases. ICO owners love to tell lies you should do a research against what they telling.

Listen, let's clear up once and for all. If a project has a bad idea and documentation, it will not achieve anything. The fact that most of the projects do not achieve anything all because they are trying hard. What would be invested in you need an idea and not a stolen idea and copied 10 times for a carbon copy.

There are so many scams going on that you can't figure out which one is right and which one is not. The scammers put fake data on their website claiming to achieve softcap that attracts more and more investment and these guys just run away with the money.

There are many scams projects out there with the only aim to stylishly scam many in the industry and the responsibility lies in the hand of everyone of us to be highly vigilant and do thorough background checks on project before putting our hard earned money into it.

Raising such a huge hardcap is still possible even in this current market. I want to believe that the ICO must have had big investors, institutions and organisations onboard to gather such amount. However, to earn more trust from other stakeholders, they need to be transparent with the total supply and other details.

Many projects were setting abnormal targets for soft cap and hard cap. The problem with that is that theydid not take into consideration the bearish market situation this is the reason for failing for  many ICOs.

With the current condition of the market i doubt they will make it. I think they need to set a hard cap in realistic way. Also some investor wary because there are a lot of scam icos in this space. They need to see the people behind the ico that set high hard cap so investor will trust with them.

Why would such ICO will going to implement a hard cap that big? I see many successful ICO that their hardcap is below 50 million dollar and they have showed us their project developing and doing good in the market. Then there is 72 million? and even not displaying the total supply? Be alert cautious guys, that is not normal.

for me that's a normal thing, if indeed the target team of the project is big,
it's just that it will be a problem if the project has so many hardcaps but there are no developments in it.
being small and large a hardcap can be unnatural if it doesn't meet your initial expectations or expectations.

I think hard cap is a target of most high value that the coin or tokens would possibly reached. And this value would be very high that its hard to cope up and reached but possible to have. Several ico would not reached their target soft cap and its normal even soft cap some of the ico wouldn't get.

Well ICO being clear in all the aspect to attract investors etc by right is something they should be doing however sometimes we also must think from their shoes whether is it that some information must be keep private for certain reasons which only they will know.

Everything is normal,  every project have its own weaknesses and strenght. Having high supply of coins not mean to be no value. Its deoend on how the token be progressive and usefull in ways. If the coin was manage by biggest team and company. Demand will naturally increase without  seeing how big was its supply

Hard cap or not for ICO right now is not have higher potential, almost many ICO success raised hard cap but always have lower price after listing on exchange market, many coin listed with lower price than ICO.

Most ICOs can't reach the hard cap, few did for soft cap.
But mostly they can't hit it because people stopped investing.
There's still money for the market but people are skeptic about it.

I think that thing like that is very reasonable, because I see that most of the projects that I have noticed have achieved hard cap do not list the total supply, whatever they think.

It just would not be normal if it was the softcap. But the team must make available all the token information in the whitepaper, including the full supply of the currency.

Are you sure you look very well? You might want to check there whitepaper for more info and yes there are ICOs that has huge hardcap and few met there hardcap so this is not a problem ,just make sure the project is real and try to understand why the project was created

usually many ICOs manipulate data, to attract investors to be interested in their projects. But if there is indeed an ICO developer that transfers ICO information in real time I think you are lucky to join the project

If that's a medium project and that's a usual thing when it can't reach the hardcap because it gets less demand but for big ico with a lot of demand and the hardcap can be achieved just in some minutes.  Their intention in ico depends on the trend of the crypto itself.

Most ICO set a high hard cap to the project and at the same time always make they information public so for a project to state $72 million  as they hard cap and not make the total supply public will only lead to misinformation of the whole process because that hard cap is too high and that is what some time lead to failure of project not being able to reach it hard cap.

I believe every ico must reach softcap and hardcap to show how solid the project is.some bounty hunters always check this before writing any blog about project. I believe you will all agree with me that bounty ico that do not reach do not have solid foundation that's why some of then do pack off within a short period of time and return money back to investors.

Like others i myself had a experience of failure to reach the hard cap of bounty which i joined. But besides all of this i do never stop joining bounty program, i used to make it as a part of a business which is a nature trend.

That is quite unrealistic most especially at this time of bear market. I have seen several other projects like that. Some of them had to reduce either their soft cap or hard cap and a typical example was KeplerTek. Most times, it is advisable to be careful with such project. Although, there are so many other things that ought to be considered.

Some ICOs who were able to reach its hard cap was because of the hype. As you can see, most of its token price after the ICO is below the ICO tokensale price.
SO hitting the soft cap is enough as long as the project is solid.

Though it's hard to find that and from how the market behaves we do need to double check every projects that we will going to support or if we are planning to invest just like if you are also interested doing bounty you have to check the performance and not only for reaching caps that the team was reporting.

Softcap is enough to reach this days, many ICO fails even there has a good team behind it, it is about investors if they put their investment with it then you can see the true success of the project. You can see the success in terms of the the funds they have been collected.

Wow that is a huge amount of Hard cap for an ICO. For an ICO that is hiding some important information in their project and has a very huge hard cap, I don't think this is the perfect ICO where we can invest our money into it.

72 Million is too high for it and now that investors are afraid to invest in ICO because of the numerous ICO scams happened past years. I don't think they will reach their hard cap unless they will spread fake information to the people.

It is very difficult for ICOS projects to mobilize 72 million USD Hardcap as you mentioned. Because the time you mentioned Bitcoin price is very low and the market is very bad. I think if the ICOS project has financial potential is better than fake and fool all investors. We should be careful with the project.

For me , it is not normal for an ICO to have that much quota in terms in their hardcap. That amount is too much to collect or raise, if an ICO will run for short time only or just a few months. It is important for the ICO team to consider the market's situation, range of time for their ICO period, and even the total supply of their tokens before assigning as much amount as they can for their hardcap.

there are projects like this ico reach their hard cap because their project is good but there are ico that do not reach the hard cap but that reach the soft cap and listen to these ico which is a success but in today's time there is so much ico the ones coming out and the others are scams so it's hard to join because the risky size is too big if you just want to invest in the ico make sure you first legit and review their ico first so that your ico funds will not invest in ico about the market is pretty much a rising market price now so the prices of altcoins today are increasing, especially the btc and eth they have raised so investors are happy now because of the btc height and the altcoins have also increased as expected their price.

now ICO is very difficult to penetrate Hardcap even if an ICO can penetrate the softcap it is better. this has resulted in a lack of investor interest in investing in the ICO because there have been many cases of fraud. but I still hope the ICO will be trusted again, so the bounty participants will feel the positive impact.

hardcap with such a large amount of money is an extraordinary achievement that can be obtained by the Iico project if it is true that it can be achieved. but I think for the current situation there are no projects that can get that much funds for project development. Investors will think several times to invest.

for now it is very difficult to see the hard cap project because of reduced investor confidence in the ICO project. in my opinion, do not be too high in determining the target hard cap because the project can achieve soft cap alone is very difficult. I hope the ICO project team can re-grow investor confidence in the ICO project so that in the future the development of crypto can be more rapid.

A big ICO can't be determine that it can have a big demand.
A big ICO can come from a big business.
But it isn't the very basis that these project can have big demand just because they are like that.

the achievement of hardcap is a very desirable and highly anticipated thing, but the current situation of the ICO is so lackluster that many projects do not reach hardcap. sometimes it doesn't even reach the softcap. therefore if the project has achieved hardcap it has become a very good achievement.

hardcap is indeed one of the characteristics of the ico program success, but after being on the market it does not mean that the price of coins is expensive, so do not be affected only on hardcap, but also focus on what projects are being implemented, whether the project is good for everyone or only for some groups obviously this world business so the project must also be broad to reach all circles

You should not believe such an overestimated performance hardcap. In my opinion, only a few of the vast number of ICO projects have collected amounts in excess of $ 10 million. If even the crypto exchanges admit that they artificially inflate the BTC trading volumes, then ICO projects with their anonymity can easily hide the real amount of invested funds.

The collected sum is going to be divided by the total supply for sale. At the end you will get a price for one token, but 72 million USD on such a market? I cannot believe that any project can collect so much money right now.

72 million dollars is ridiculous and unrealistic in this current market. I don't know what the project aim to achieve with such a hard cap. Look more into the project for an idea of the token but I will definitely pass.

I understand your frustration, buddy. It is such a common practice to have difficulties finding key token metrics, that I have an urge to vomit sometimes. Such data should be written with letters bigger than the NYSE sign.

Is high time we should refuse not to be  blindfolded with all these face ico projects with fake information on their website trying to get attention of the new investors to their fake project.

This is a very difficult achievement and you have to check it again. I do not believe that the project can achieve Hard Cap. If you haven't found total inventory, it's better to check with the team, they must be active. But after you check and you doubt, it's better not to join.

Before we give an opinion about whether the project can get so many ICO sales of 72 million dollars, we have to look at what products they are planning and whether they really need so much money to run the company because with so much money if they just building the platform is questionable.

Not all ICOs display the total supply on their site, because there are also those who have displayed it. And many ICOs also display fake total raised, this is their strategy to attract investors

If that's always the scenario of every new project ICO, it's so dangerous for all who planned to invest in a certain project. There should be a strict regulations for an ICO, most importantly it should be should be scrutinize by every possible investors whose interested to join in a certain project. Hopefully there's a website whose handling those ico confirmation, that won't passed unless found out legit and promising.

Okay, but can you please explain me why the title of this subject is 'Bounty hard cap'? Do you want to start discussion about possible peg to bounty supply in terms of hardcap ?

i think its normal if the project has a great plan and great product with excellent member of team also advisor, and the value of over 70M$ was a big value, its surely a big project of ICO.

each project also wants good results so they develop a strategy that they think is a good thing. but actually the ICO project is currently in unfavorable conditions because there are so many negative news that people leave the ICO.
Although not all ICOs are bad, if we can examine in detail, we can still get a chance from it.

Yes, this changes according to the project itself. There are even projects with over $100 million hard cap. But there is a possibility of scam. Because, in the current situation, starting sale with the 72 million hard cap is not something that every project can do.

It was a pretty strange model that I have seen by some ICOs back in 2018. But it was no so efficient, because nobody really knew how much coins they are going to get. Thats why it is a rarity today to find such a project.

An ICO project is usually hardcaped because it is a symbol of the success of an ico but is currently under way in the face of the ico amg hard cap due to lack of investment in the ICOs. Normally limits the amount of ico projects of hardcap and if it reaches it is definitely a successful project.its normal to have an high value of hardcap.